Trial Outcomes & Findings for FLUENCY® PLUS Endovascular Stent Graft for In-stent Restenosis (NCT NCT01257438)
NCT ID: NCT01257438
Last Updated: 2017-01-09
Results Overview
Access Circuit Primary Patency (ACPP) is defined as the interval following the index intervention until the next access thrombosis or repeated intervention. ACPP ends with a reintervention anywhere within the access circuit, from the arterial inflow to the superior vena cava-right atrial junction. Venous rupture caused by PTA is not an ACPP failure unless achieving hemostasis also causes thrombosis. Freedom from access thrombosis or repeated intervention is the criteria for success.
COMPLETED
NA
275 participants
6 months
2017-01-09
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Fluency
Fluency Plus Endovascular Stent Graft
Fluency Plus Endovascular Stent Graft: Treatment of in-stent restenosis
|
PTA Only
PTA only: Treatment of in-stent restenosis
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
132
|
143
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
102
|
97
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
30
|
46
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
FLUENCY® PLUS Endovascular Stent Graft for In-stent Restenosis
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Fluency
n=132 Participants
Fluency Plus Endovascular Stent Graft
Fluency Plus Endovascular Stent Graft: Treatment of in-stent restenosis
|
PTA Only
n=143 Participants
PTA only: Treatment of in-stent restenosis
|
Total
n=275 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
62.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.57 • n=5 Participants
|
61.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.47 • n=7 Participants
|
61.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.52 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Gender
Female
|
64 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
70 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
134 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Gender
Male
|
68 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
73 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
141 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
21 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
39 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
111 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
125 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
236 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
72 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
84 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
156 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
57 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
50 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
107 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
132 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
143 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
275 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthsPopulation: Subjects at risk (at 6 months) is a calculation in Kaplan-Meier time-to-event analyses that refers to subjects who have not had ACPP failure through the 6 months (i.e., are event-free through 6 months).
Access Circuit Primary Patency (ACPP) is defined as the interval following the index intervention until the next access thrombosis or repeated intervention. ACPP ends with a reintervention anywhere within the access circuit, from the arterial inflow to the superior vena cava-right atrial junction. Venous rupture caused by PTA is not an ACPP failure unless achieving hemostasis also causes thrombosis. Freedom from access thrombosis or repeated intervention is the criteria for success.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Fluency
n=109 Participants
Fluency Plus Endovascular Stent Graft
Fluency Plus Endovascular Stent Graft: Treatment of in-stent restenosis
|
PTA Only
n=111 Participants
PTA only: Treatment of in-stent restenosis
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Access Circuit Primary Patency (ACPP) That is Superior for FLUENCY® PLUS Endovascular Stent Graft (Following Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty (PTA)) Over PTA Alone Through Six Months.
|
16.7 % of subjects with successful ACPP
Interval 9.24 to 24.16
|
3.0 % of subjects with successful ACPP
Interval 0.0 to 6.27
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 30 daysPopulation: Safety rates measured for the randomized subjects population (both AV Graft and Fistula subjects combined), the percentage of subjects free from safety events through 30 days.
Safety rates measured for the randomized subjects population (both Arteriovenous (AV) Graft and Fistula subjects combined), the percentage of subjects free from safety events through 30 days.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Fluency
n=132 Participants
Fluency Plus Endovascular Stent Graft
Fluency Plus Endovascular Stent Graft: Treatment of in-stent restenosis
|
PTA Only
n=143 Participants
PTA only: Treatment of in-stent restenosis
|
|---|---|---|
|
Non-inferiority of FLUENCY® PLUS Endovascular Stent Graft (Following PTA) Over PTA Alone Through 30 Days in the Treatment of In-stent Restenotic Lesions.
|
96.9 % of subjects free from safety events
Interval 92.31 to 99.16
|
96.4 % of subjects free from safety events
Interval 91.81 to 98.82
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthsPrimary Lesion Patency (PLP) is defined as the interval after the index intervention until the next re-intervention at the original treatment site or until the extremity is abandoned for permanent access. Freedom from re-intervention is the criteria for success.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Fluency
n=109 Participants
Fluency Plus Endovascular Stent Graft
Fluency Plus Endovascular Stent Graft: Treatment of in-stent restenosis
|
PTA Only
n=111 Participants
PTA only: Treatment of in-stent restenosis
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Primary Lesion Patency (PLP) That is Superior for FLUENCY® PLUS Endovascular Stent Graft (Following PTA) Over PTA Alone Through Six Months in the Treatment of In-stent Restenotic Lesions.
|
65.2 % of subjects with successful PLP
Interval 55.59 to 74.86
|
10.4 % of subjects with successful PLP
Interval 4.3 to 16.57
|
Adverse Events
Fluency
PTA Only
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Fluency
n=128 participants at risk
Fluency Plus Endovascular Stent Graft
Fluency Plus Endovascular Stent Graft: Treatment of in-stent restenosis
|
PTA Only
n=137 participants at risk
PTA only: Treatment of in-stent restenosis
|
|---|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
Infection in the AVF venous cannulation site
|
0.78%
1/128 • Number of events 1 • all adverse events involving the AV access circuit that were reported by the Investigators from index procedure onward through 6 months, regardless of whether or not the events were classified by the Clinical Events Committee (CEC) as safety events.
|
0.73%
1/137 • Number of events 1 • all adverse events involving the AV access circuit that were reported by the Investigators from index procedure onward through 6 months, regardless of whether or not the events were classified by the Clinical Events Committee (CEC) as safety events.
|
|
Infections and infestations
infection of the old stent in the fistula
|
0.78%
1/128 • Number of events 1 • all adverse events involving the AV access circuit that were reported by the Investigators from index procedure onward through 6 months, regardless of whether or not the events were classified by the Clinical Events Committee (CEC) as safety events.
|
0.00%
0/137 • all adverse events involving the AV access circuit that were reported by the Investigators from index procedure onward through 6 months, regardless of whether or not the events were classified by the Clinical Events Committee (CEC) as safety events.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
vessel rupture
|
0.00%
0/128 • all adverse events involving the AV access circuit that were reported by the Investigators from index procedure onward through 6 months, regardless of whether or not the events were classified by the Clinical Events Committee (CEC) as safety events.
|
0.73%
1/137 • Number of events 1 • all adverse events involving the AV access circuit that were reported by the Investigators from index procedure onward through 6 months, regardless of whether or not the events were classified by the Clinical Events Committee (CEC) as safety events.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
ventricular fibrillation
|
0.00%
0/128 • all adverse events involving the AV access circuit that were reported by the Investigators from index procedure onward through 6 months, regardless of whether or not the events were classified by the Clinical Events Committee (CEC) as safety events.
|
0.73%
1/137 • Number of events 1 • all adverse events involving the AV access circuit that were reported by the Investigators from index procedure onward through 6 months, regardless of whether or not the events were classified by the Clinical Events Committee (CEC) as safety events.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
arm or hand edema
|
1.6%
2/128 • Number of events 2 • all adverse events involving the AV access circuit that were reported by the Investigators from index procedure onward through 6 months, regardless of whether or not the events were classified by the Clinical Events Committee (CEC) as safety events.
|
0.00%
0/137 • all adverse events involving the AV access circuit that were reported by the Investigators from index procedure onward through 6 months, regardless of whether or not the events were classified by the Clinical Events Committee (CEC) as safety events.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
rash on arm due to allergic reaction to unknown source
|
0.78%
1/128 • Number of events 1 • all adverse events involving the AV access circuit that were reported by the Investigators from index procedure onward through 6 months, regardless of whether or not the events were classified by the Clinical Events Committee (CEC) as safety events.
|
0.73%
1/137 • Number of events 1 • all adverse events involving the AV access circuit that were reported by the Investigators from index procedure onward through 6 months, regardless of whether or not the events were classified by the Clinical Events Committee (CEC) as safety events.
|
|
Infections and infestations
fever/cellulitis of both legs/sepsis
|
0.78%
1/128 • Number of events 1 • all adverse events involving the AV access circuit that were reported by the Investigators from index procedure onward through 6 months, regardless of whether or not the events were classified by the Clinical Events Committee (CEC) as safety events.
|
0.00%
0/137 • all adverse events involving the AV access circuit that were reported by the Investigators from index procedure onward through 6 months, regardless of whether or not the events were classified by the Clinical Events Committee (CEC) as safety events.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Fluency
n=128 participants at risk
Fluency Plus Endovascular Stent Graft
Fluency Plus Endovascular Stent Graft: Treatment of in-stent restenosis
|
PTA Only
n=137 participants at risk
PTA only: Treatment of in-stent restenosis
|
|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Hemorrhage
|
1.6%
2/128 • Number of events 2 • all adverse events involving the AV access circuit that were reported by the Investigators from index procedure onward through 6 months, regardless of whether or not the events were classified by the Clinical Events Committee (CEC) as safety events.
|
0.00%
0/137 • all adverse events involving the AV access circuit that were reported by the Investigators from index procedure onward through 6 months, regardless of whether or not the events were classified by the Clinical Events Committee (CEC) as safety events.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Infection
|
1.6%
2/128 • Number of events 2 • all adverse events involving the AV access circuit that were reported by the Investigators from index procedure onward through 6 months, regardless of whether or not the events were classified by the Clinical Events Committee (CEC) as safety events.
|
1.5%
2/137 • Number of events 2 • all adverse events involving the AV access circuit that were reported by the Investigators from index procedure onward through 6 months, regardless of whether or not the events were classified by the Clinical Events Committee (CEC) as safety events.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Pain
|
0.00%
0/128 • all adverse events involving the AV access circuit that were reported by the Investigators from index procedure onward through 6 months, regardless of whether or not the events were classified by the Clinical Events Committee (CEC) as safety events.
|
0.73%
1/137 • Number of events 1 • all adverse events involving the AV access circuit that were reported by the Investigators from index procedure onward through 6 months, regardless of whether or not the events were classified by the Clinical Events Committee (CEC) as safety events.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arm or Hand Edema
|
1.6%
2/128 • Number of events 2 • all adverse events involving the AV access circuit that were reported by the Investigators from index procedure onward through 6 months, regardless of whether or not the events were classified by the Clinical Events Committee (CEC) as safety events.
|
0.00%
0/137 • all adverse events involving the AV access circuit that were reported by the Investigators from index procedure onward through 6 months, regardless of whether or not the events were classified by the Clinical Events Committee (CEC) as safety events.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Pseudoaneurysm
|
1.6%
2/128 • Number of events 2 • all adverse events involving the AV access circuit that were reported by the Investigators from index procedure onward through 6 months, regardless of whether or not the events were classified by the Clinical Events Committee (CEC) as safety events.
|
0.00%
0/137 • all adverse events involving the AV access circuit that were reported by the Investigators from index procedure onward through 6 months, regardless of whether or not the events were classified by the Clinical Events Committee (CEC) as safety events.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Vessel Rupture
|
0.00%
0/128 • all adverse events involving the AV access circuit that were reported by the Investigators from index procedure onward through 6 months, regardless of whether or not the events were classified by the Clinical Events Committee (CEC) as safety events.
|
1.5%
2/137 • Number of events 2 • all adverse events involving the AV access circuit that were reported by the Investigators from index procedure onward through 6 months, regardless of whether or not the events were classified by the Clinical Events Committee (CEC) as safety events.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Allergic reaction. to uncertain source; rash on right arm
|
0.78%
1/128 • Number of events 1 • all adverse events involving the AV access circuit that were reported by the Investigators from index procedure onward through 6 months, regardless of whether or not the events were classified by the Clinical Events Committee (CEC) as safety events.
|
0.00%
0/137 • all adverse events involving the AV access circuit that were reported by the Investigators from index procedure onward through 6 months, regardless of whether or not the events were classified by the Clinical Events Committee (CEC) as safety events.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Fever/cellulitis of both legs/sepsis
|
0.78%
1/128 • Number of events 1 • all adverse events involving the AV access circuit that were reported by the Investigators from index procedure onward through 6 months, regardless of whether or not the events were classified by the Clinical Events Committee (CEC) as safety events.
|
0.00%
0/137 • all adverse events involving the AV access circuit that were reported by the Investigators from index procedure onward through 6 months, regardless of whether or not the events were classified by the Clinical Events Committee (CEC) as safety events.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Infolded covered stent
|
0.00%
0/128 • all adverse events involving the AV access circuit that were reported by the Investigators from index procedure onward through 6 months, regardless of whether or not the events were classified by the Clinical Events Committee (CEC) as safety events.
|
0.73%
1/137 • Number of events 1 • all adverse events involving the AV access circuit that were reported by the Investigators from index procedure onward through 6 months, regardless of whether or not the events were classified by the Clinical Events Committee (CEC) as safety events.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Prolonged Bleeding
|
0.00%
0/128 • all adverse events involving the AV access circuit that were reported by the Investigators from index procedure onward through 6 months, regardless of whether or not the events were classified by the Clinical Events Committee (CEC) as safety events.
|
0.73%
1/137 • Number of events 1 • all adverse events involving the AV access circuit that were reported by the Investigators from index procedure onward through 6 months, regardless of whether or not the events were classified by the Clinical Events Committee (CEC) as safety events.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Ventricular Fibrillation
|
0.00%
0/128 • all adverse events involving the AV access circuit that were reported by the Investigators from index procedure onward through 6 months, regardless of whether or not the events were classified by the Clinical Events Committee (CEC) as safety events.
|
0.73%
1/137 • Number of events 1 • all adverse events involving the AV access circuit that were reported by the Investigators from index procedure onward through 6 months, regardless of whether or not the events were classified by the Clinical Events Committee (CEC) as safety events.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
hemoptysis
|
0.78%
1/128 • Number of events 1 • all adverse events involving the AV access circuit that were reported by the Investigators from index procedure onward through 6 months, regardless of whether or not the events were classified by the Clinical Events Committee (CEC) as safety events.
|
0.00%
0/137 • all adverse events involving the AV access circuit that were reported by the Investigators from index procedure onward through 6 months, regardless of whether or not the events were classified by the Clinical Events Committee (CEC) as safety events.
|
Additional Information
Josh Smale, Associate Director Clinical Affairs
Bard Peripheral Vascular
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER