Trial Outcomes & Findings for Dose-finding Study of Hexaminolevulinate (HAL) Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) to Treat Cervical Neoplasia (NCT NCT01256424)
NCT ID: NCT01256424
Last Updated: 2016-05-16
Results Overview
Lesion response was defined by three variables: Histology, cytology and HPV. Patient response at three months required histology regression to CIN1 or normal, cytology of LSIL or less severe, and HPV negative.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
262 participants
3 months after last treatment
2016-05-16
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
HAL 5% With Illumination
Cervical PDT using Hexaminolevulinate: Treatment with a singe dose of 2g HAL 5% ointment followed by photoactivation
|
HAL 1% With Illumination
Cervical PDT using Hexaminolevulinate: Treatment with a singe dose of 2g HAL 1% ointment followed by photoactivation
|
HAL 0.2% With Illumination
Cervical PDT using Hexaminolevulinate: Treatment with a singe dose of 2g HAL 0.2% ointment followed by photoactivation
|
Placebo Ointment Without Illumination
Treatment with a singe dose of 2g placebo ointment, no photoactivation
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
65
|
67
|
62
|
68
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
56
|
59
|
55
|
61
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
9
|
8
|
7
|
7
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Dose-finding Study of Hexaminolevulinate (HAL) Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) to Treat Cervical Neoplasia
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
HAL 5% With Illumination
n=65 Participants
Cervical PDT using Hexaminolevulinate: Treatment with a singe dose of 2g HAL 5% ointment followed by photoactivation
|
HAL 1% With Illumination
n=67 Participants
Cervical PDT using Hexaminolevulinate: Treatment with a singe dose of 2g HAL 1% ointment followed by photoactivation
|
HAL 0.2% With Illumination
n=62 Participants
Cervical PDT using Hexaminolevulinate: Treatment with a singe dose of 2g HAL 0.2% ointment followed by photoactivation
|
Placebo Ointment Without Illumination
n=68 Participants
Cervical PDT using Hexaminolevulinate: Treatment with a singe dose of 2g placebo ointment, no photoactivation
|
Total
n=262 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
65 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
67 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
62 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
68 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
262 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
65 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
67 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
62 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
68 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
262 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
64 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
65 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
61 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
68 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
258 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 months after last treatmentPopulation: Patients with CIN2 at baseline, based on central histology review
Lesion response was defined by three variables: Histology, cytology and HPV. Patient response at three months required histology regression to CIN1 or normal, cytology of LSIL or less severe, and HPV negative.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
HAL 5% With Illumination
n=19 Participants
Cervical PDT using Hexaminolevulinate: Treatment with a singe dose of 2g HAL 5% ointment followed by photoactivation
|
HAL 1% With Illumination
n=29 Participants
Cervical PDT using Hexaminolevulinate: Treatment with a singe dose of 2g HAL 1% ointment followed by photoactivation
|
HAL 0.2% With Illumination
n=19 Participants
Cervical PDT using Hexaminolevulinate: Treatment with a singe dose of 2g HAL 0.2% ointment followed by photoactivation
|
Placebo Ointment Without Illumination
n=21 Participants
Cervical PDT using Hexaminolevulinate: Treatment with a singe dose of 2g placebo ointment, no photoactivation
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Comparison of Lesion Response Rates of Three Different Doses of HAL PDT and Placebo at 3 Months After Treatment.
|
95 percentage of patients
|
69 percentage of patients
|
63 percentage of patients
|
57 percentage of patients
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 months after treatmentPopulation: Patients with CIN2 at baseline, based on central histology read, and HPV positive at baseline
HPV response was defined as clearance of baseline HPV infection, asssessed by genotype
Outcome measures
| Measure |
HAL 5% With Illumination
n=13 Participants
Cervical PDT using Hexaminolevulinate: Treatment with a singe dose of 2g HAL 5% ointment followed by photoactivation
|
HAL 1% With Illumination
n=24 Participants
Cervical PDT using Hexaminolevulinate: Treatment with a singe dose of 2g HAL 1% ointment followed by photoactivation
|
HAL 0.2% With Illumination
n=17 Participants
Cervical PDT using Hexaminolevulinate: Treatment with a singe dose of 2g HAL 0.2% ointment followed by photoactivation
|
Placebo Ointment Without Illumination
n=18 Participants
Cervical PDT using Hexaminolevulinate: Treatment with a singe dose of 2g placebo ointment, no photoactivation
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Comparison of HPV Response of Three Different Doses of HAL PDT and Placebo at 3 Months After Treatment.
|
62 percentage of patients
|
38 percentage of patients
|
41 percentage of patients
|
28 percentage of patients
|
POST_HOC outcome
Timeframe: 6 months after first treatmentPopulation: Patients diagnosed with HSIL histology by a panel of pathologists were included in the analysis.
Response was defined as absence of HSIL, and absence of oncogenic HPV if LSIL.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
HAL 5% With Illumination
n=21 Participants
Cervical PDT using Hexaminolevulinate: Treatment with a singe dose of 2g HAL 5% ointment followed by photoactivation
|
HAL 1% With Illumination
n=22 Participants
Cervical PDT using Hexaminolevulinate: Treatment with a singe dose of 2g HAL 1% ointment followed by photoactivation
|
HAL 0.2% With Illumination
n=23 Participants
Cervical PDT using Hexaminolevulinate: Treatment with a singe dose of 2g HAL 0.2% ointment followed by photoactivation
|
Placebo Ointment Without Illumination
n=18 Participants
Cervical PDT using Hexaminolevulinate: Treatment with a singe dose of 2g placebo ointment, no photoactivation
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Comparison of Response Rates of Three Different Doses of HAL PDT and Placebo at 6 Months After First Treatment.
|
76 percentage of participants
|
45 percentage of participants
|
43 percentage of participants
|
28 percentage of participants
|
POST_HOC outcome
Timeframe: 9 months after first treatmentPopulation: Patients diagnosed with HSIL histology by a panel of pathologists were included in the analysis.
Response was defined as absence of HSIL, and absence of oncogenic HPF if LSIL
Outcome measures
| Measure |
HAL 5% With Illumination
n=21 Participants
Cervical PDT using Hexaminolevulinate: Treatment with a singe dose of 2g HAL 5% ointment followed by photoactivation
|
HAL 1% With Illumination
n=22 Participants
Cervical PDT using Hexaminolevulinate: Treatment with a singe dose of 2g HAL 1% ointment followed by photoactivation
|
HAL 0.2% With Illumination
n=23 Participants
Cervical PDT using Hexaminolevulinate: Treatment with a singe dose of 2g HAL 0.2% ointment followed by photoactivation
|
Placebo Ointment Without Illumination
n=18 Participants
Cervical PDT using Hexaminolevulinate: Treatment with a singe dose of 2g placebo ointment, no photoactivation
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Comparison of Response Rates of Three Different Doses of HAL PDT and Placebo at 9 Months After First Treatment
|
76 percentage of participants
|
50 percentage of participants
|
43 percentage of participants
|
33 percentage of participants
|
Adverse Events
HAL 5% With Illumination
HAL 1% With Illumination
HAL 0.2% With Illumination
Placebo Ointment Without Illumination
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
HAL 5% With Illumination
n=65 participants at risk
Cervical PDT using Hexaminolevulinate: Treatment with a singe dose of 2g HAL 5% ointment followed by photoactivation
|
HAL 1% With Illumination
n=67 participants at risk
Cervical PDT using Hexaminolevulinate: Treatment with a singe dose of 2g HAL 1% ointment followed by photoactivation
|
HAL 0.2% With Illumination
n=62 participants at risk
Cervical PDT using Hexaminolevulinate: Treatment with a singe dose of 2g HAL 0.2% ointment followed by photoactivation
|
Placebo Ointment Without Illumination
n=68 participants at risk
Cervical PDT using Hexaminolevulinate: Treatment with a singe dose of 2g placebo ointment, no photoactivation
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
Salpingo-oophoritis
|
1.5%
1/65 • Number of events 1
|
0.00%
0/67
|
0.00%
0/62
|
0.00%
0/68
|
|
Infections and infestations
Tubo-ovarian abscess
|
1.5%
1/65 • Number of events 1
|
0.00%
0/67
|
0.00%
0/62
|
0.00%
0/68
|
|
Infections and infestations
Periorbital cellulitis
|
0.00%
0/65
|
1.5%
1/67 • Number of events 1
|
0.00%
0/62
|
0.00%
0/68
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
HAL 5% With Illumination
n=65 participants at risk
Cervical PDT using Hexaminolevulinate: Treatment with a singe dose of 2g HAL 5% ointment followed by photoactivation
|
HAL 1% With Illumination
n=67 participants at risk
Cervical PDT using Hexaminolevulinate: Treatment with a singe dose of 2g HAL 1% ointment followed by photoactivation
|
HAL 0.2% With Illumination
n=62 participants at risk
Cervical PDT using Hexaminolevulinate: Treatment with a singe dose of 2g HAL 0.2% ointment followed by photoactivation
|
Placebo Ointment Without Illumination
n=68 participants at risk
Cervical PDT using Hexaminolevulinate: Treatment with a singe dose of 2g placebo ointment, no photoactivation
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Local discomfort
|
36.9%
24/65 • Number of events 33
|
17.9%
12/67 • Number of events 15
|
14.5%
9/62 • Number of events 9
|
14.7%
10/68 • Number of events 13
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Discharge
|
33.8%
22/65 • Number of events 27
|
17.9%
12/67 • Number of events 17
|
14.5%
9/62 • Number of events 10
|
11.8%
8/68 • Number of events 9
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Spotting
|
9.2%
6/65 • Number of events 6
|
11.9%
8/67 • Number of events 8
|
11.3%
7/62 • Number of events 7
|
5.9%
4/68 • Number of events 6
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Local infection
|
9.2%
6/65 • Number of events 9
|
3.0%
2/67 • Number of events 2
|
4.8%
3/62 • Number of events 3
|
13.2%
9/68 • Number of events 10
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
3.1%
2/65 • Number of events 2
|
3.0%
2/67 • Number of events 2
|
1.6%
1/62 • Number of events 1
|
2.9%
2/68 • Number of events 2
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
3.1%
2/65 • Number of events 2
|
0.00%
0/67
|
0.00%
0/62
|
0.00%
0/68
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
3.1%
2/65 • Number of events 2
|
1.5%
1/67 • Number of events 1
|
0.00%
0/62
|
0.00%
0/68
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cystitis
|
1.5%
1/65 • Number of events 1
|
4.5%
3/67 • Number of events 3
|
0.00%
0/62
|
1.5%
1/68 • Number of events 1
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Menorrhagia
|
0.00%
0/65
|
3.0%
2/67 • Number of events 3
|
1.6%
1/62 • Number of events 1
|
1.5%
1/68 • Number of events 1
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
0.00%
0/65
|
0.00%
0/67
|
1.6%
1/62 • Number of events 1
|
5.9%
4/68 • Number of events 4
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: LTE60