Trial Outcomes & Findings for Mobilizing Evidence Into Action to Improve Outcomes of Vulnerable Seniors (NCT NCT01254942)
NCT ID: NCT01254942
Last Updated: 2023-09-25
Results Overview
The primary outcome for this trial is the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB). The SPPB is composed of three separate tests that are timed and categorized depending on performance. The three domains evaluated in the SPPB are standing balance, gait speed, and sit to stand performance. The SPPB scores can range from 0-12, a higher score indicates better performance. The subscales are combined.
COMPLETED
NA
53 participants
12 months post-fracture
2023-09-25
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Usual Care
Usual care following hip fracture provided by the public health care system. this may include publicly funded home care services, rehab, and follow-up visits with doctors.
Usual Care
|
Intervention
Follow-up Fracture Clinic
B4 Clinic: Fracture Follow-Up Clinic plus Exercise Program This is an interdisciplinary outpatient clinic within the public health care system. Participants were assessed by a geriatrician, physiotherapist, occupational therapist, and other health providers as needed. Management and sessions were determined by health providers and participants.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
27
|
26
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
25
|
24
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
2
|
2
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Mobilizing Evidence Into Action to Improve Outcomes of Vulnerable Seniors
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Usual Care
n=27 Participants
Usual care following hip fracture
Usual Care
|
Intervention
n=26 Participants
Follow-up Fracture Clinic
B4 Clinic: Fracture Follow-Up Clinic plus Exercise Program
|
Total
n=53 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
27 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
26 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
53 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
34 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Canada
|
27 participants
n=5 Participants
|
26 participants
n=7 Participants
|
53 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 months post-fractureThe primary outcome for this trial is the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB). The SPPB is composed of three separate tests that are timed and categorized depending on performance. The three domains evaluated in the SPPB are standing balance, gait speed, and sit to stand performance. The SPPB scores can range from 0-12, a higher score indicates better performance. The subscales are combined.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Usual Care
n=25 Participants
Usual care following hip fracture
Usual Care
|
Intervention
n=24 Participants
Follow-up Fracture Clinic
B4 Clinic: Fracture Follow-Up Clinic plus Exercise Program
|
|---|---|---|
|
Short Physical Performance Battery
|
8.24 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.44
|
9.08 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.03
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsdifference between groups in minutes of sedentary behavior as captured by accelerometry
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Usual Care
n=26 Participants
Usual care following hip fracture
Usual Care
|
Intervention
n=26 Participants
Follow-up Fracture Clinic
B4 Clinic: Fracture Follow-Up Clinic plus Exercise Program
|
|---|---|---|
|
Difference in Sedentary Behavior Minutes/Day
|
607 adjusted minutes sedentary behavior/day
|
603 adjusted minutes sedentary behavior/day
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsnumber of self-reported falls over 12 months/group
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Usual Care
n=27 Participants
Usual care following hip fracture
Usual Care
|
Intervention
n=26 Participants
Follow-up Fracture Clinic
B4 Clinic: Fracture Follow-Up Clinic plus Exercise Program
|
|---|---|---|
|
Falls
|
31 number of falls over 12 months/group
|
28 number of falls over 12 months/group
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsself-reported quality of life measure, scores range from 0 to 1 (0 = no capability, 1 = full capability); the higher the score the better.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Usual Care
n=27 Participants
Usual care following hip fracture
Usual Care
|
Intervention
n=26 Participants
Follow-up Fracture Clinic
B4 Clinic: Fracture Follow-Up Clinic plus Exercise Program
|
|---|---|---|
|
Quality of Life (ICECAP-O)
|
0.81 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.11
|
0.78 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.13
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsself-reported health related quality of life (Visual Analogue Scale, 0 to 100). The higher the score means a better outcome.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Usual Care
n=27 Participants
Usual care following hip fracture
Usual Care
|
Intervention
n=26 Participants
Follow-up Fracture Clinic
B4 Clinic: Fracture Follow-Up Clinic plus Exercise Program
|
|---|---|---|
|
Health Related Quality of Life (EQ5D-5L)
|
78.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.5
|
77.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsSelf reported measure of lower extremity function. Scored 0 to 100. The higher the score the better.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Usual Care
n=25 Participants
Usual care following hip fracture
Usual Care
|
Intervention
n=24 Participants
Follow-up Fracture Clinic
B4 Clinic: Fracture Follow-Up Clinic plus Exercise Program
|
|---|---|---|
|
Lower Extremity Measure
|
82.27 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.55
|
88.72 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.40
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsmeasurement of walking speed over 3 or 4 meters
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Usual Care
n=27 Participants
Usual care following hip fracture
Usual Care
|
Intervention
n=26 Participants
Follow-up Fracture Clinic
B4 Clinic: Fracture Follow-Up Clinic plus Exercise Program
|
|---|---|---|
|
Gait Speed (m/s)
|
0.91 m/s
Standard Deviation 0.47
|
0.90 m/s
Standard Deviation 0.31
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsmeasurement of grip strength using a dynamometer
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Usual Care
n=25 Participants
Usual care following hip fracture
Usual Care
|
Intervention
n=23 Participants
Follow-up Fracture Clinic
B4 Clinic: Fracture Follow-Up Clinic plus Exercise Program
|
|---|---|---|
|
Grip Strength (Bilateral)
|
25.64 kg
Standard Deviation 11.92
|
26.13 kg
Standard Deviation 10.25
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsmeasurement of leg strength using a hand-held dynamometer
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Usual Care
n=25 Participants
Usual care following hip fracture
Usual Care
|
Intervention
n=23 Participants
Follow-up Fracture Clinic
B4 Clinic: Fracture Follow-Up Clinic plus Exercise Program
|
|---|---|---|
|
Leg Strength (Fractured Leg)
|
19.63 kg
Standard Deviation 7.55
|
18.87 kg
Standard Deviation 8.13
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baselineMeasure of global mobility, reported in s. Participant is asked to rise from a chair, walk 3 meters, turn and walk back to chair and sit down.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Usual Care
n=27 Participants
Usual care following hip fracture
Usual Care
|
Intervention
n=26 Participants
Follow-up Fracture Clinic
B4 Clinic: Fracture Follow-Up Clinic plus Exercise Program
|
|---|---|---|
|
Timed up and Go (TUG)
|
16.1 seconds
Standard Deviation 10.4
|
16.1 seconds
Standard Deviation 9.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline16 items, the lower the score the better, e.g., more falls efficacy (range from 7-28)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Usual Care
n=27 Participants
Usual care following hip fracture
Usual Care
|
Intervention
n=26 Participants
Follow-up Fracture Clinic
B4 Clinic: Fracture Follow-Up Clinic plus Exercise Program
|
|---|---|---|
|
Falls Self-efficacy International (FES-I)
|
12.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.7
|
9.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.1
|
Adverse Events
Usual Care
Intervention
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Usual Care
n=27 participants at risk
Usual care following hip fracture
Usual Care
|
Intervention
n=26 participants at risk
Follow-up Fracture Clinic
B4 Clinic: Fracture Follow-Up Clinic plus Exercise Program
|
|---|---|---|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Possible adverse event
|
0.00%
0/27
|
3.8%
1/26 • Number of events 1
|
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Associate Professor MC Ashe
The University Of British Columbia
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place