Trial Outcomes & Findings for Dysport® Pediatric Lower Limb Spasticity Study (NCT NCT01249417)

NCT ID: NCT01249417

Last Updated: 2022-09-28

Results Overview

The MAS is a 6-point scale which measures the intensity of muscle tone by measuring the resistance of the muscle to passive lengthening or stretching. Investigator will grade muscle tone in the GSC from 0 (no increase in tone) to 4 (affected parts rigid in flexion or extension).

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE3

Target enrollment

241 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Change from baseline to Week 4

Results posted on

2022-09-28

Participant Flow

Each centre that participated in the study was expected to randomise between five and 25 subjects. It was planned to have at least two participating centres per country.

Screening details: A total of 241 subjects were randomised to the study. The safety population included 239 subjects who were treated. Out of the 239 treated subjects, 4 subjects were excluded from the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population because no MAS score was obtained at the baseline visit and/or at Week 4.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Dysport 10 U/Kg
10 U/Kg per lower limb. Either one or both lower limbs can be treated. Total volume injected, 2ml per leg. Botulinum type A toxin (Dysport®): I.M. (in the muscle) injection on day 1 of a single treatment cycle.
Dysport 15 U/Kg
15 U/Kg per lower limb. Either one or both lower limbs can be treated. Total volume injected, 2ml per leg. Botulinum type A toxin (Dysport®): I.M. (in the muscle) injection on day 1 of a single treatment cycle.
Placebo
Total volume to be injected per lower limb - 2ml. Either one or both lower limbs can be treated. Placebo: I.M. injection on day 1 of a single treatment cycle.
Randomised Population
STARTED
80
80
81
Randomised Population
Treated
80
80
79
Randomised Population
COMPLETED
79
79
77
Randomised Population
NOT COMPLETED
1
1
4
Treatment Phase - ITT Population
STARTED
79
79
77
Treatment Phase - ITT Population
COMPLETED
78
75
73
Treatment Phase - ITT Population
NOT COMPLETED
1
4
4

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Dysport 10 U/Kg
10 U/Kg per lower limb. Either one or both lower limbs can be treated. Total volume injected, 2ml per leg. Botulinum type A toxin (Dysport®): I.M. (in the muscle) injection on day 1 of a single treatment cycle.
Dysport 15 U/Kg
15 U/Kg per lower limb. Either one or both lower limbs can be treated. Total volume injected, 2ml per leg. Botulinum type A toxin (Dysport®): I.M. (in the muscle) injection on day 1 of a single treatment cycle.
Placebo
Total volume to be injected per lower limb - 2ml. Either one or both lower limbs can be treated. Placebo: I.M. injection on day 1 of a single treatment cycle.
Randomised Population
Study treatment not received
0
0
2
Randomised Population
No MAS score at baseline and/or Week 4
1
1
2
Treatment Phase - ITT Population
Other
0
0
1
Treatment Phase - ITT Population
Adverse Event
0
0
1
Treatment Phase - ITT Population
Withdrawal by Subject
1
3
1
Treatment Phase - ITT Population
Lost to Follow-up
0
1
1

Baseline Characteristics

Dysport® Pediatric Lower Limb Spasticity Study

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Dysport 10 U/Kg
n=79 Participants
Dysport 10 U/Kg intramuscular injection on either one or both lower limbs (2 ml per leg), single treatment.
Dysport 15 U/Kg
n=79 Participants
Dysport 15 U/Kg intramuscular injection on either one or both lower limbs (2 ml per leg), single treatment.
Placebo
n=77 Participants
Placebo intramuscular injection on either one or both lower limbs (2 ml per leg), single treatment.
Total
n=235 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.3 • n=5 Participants
5.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.2 • n=7 Participants
5.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.5 • n=5 Participants
5.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.3 • n=4 Participants
Age, Customized
Children (2-9 years)
67 participants
n=5 Participants
67 participants
n=7 Participants
65 participants
n=5 Participants
199 participants
n=4 Participants
Age, Customized
Children (10-17 years)
12 participants
n=5 Participants
12 participants
n=7 Participants
12 participants
n=5 Participants
36 participants
n=4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
45 Participants
n=5 Participants
48 Participants
n=7 Participants
48 Participants
n=5 Participants
141 Participants
n=4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
34 Participants
n=5 Participants
31 Participants
n=7 Participants
29 Participants
n=5 Participants
94 Participants
n=4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
21 Participants
n=5 Participants
21 Participants
n=7 Participants
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
62 Participants
n=4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
58 Participants
n=5 Participants
58 Participants
n=7 Participants
57 Participants
n=5 Participants
173 Participants
n=4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black/African American
2 participants
n=5 Participants
0 participants
n=7 Participants
5 participants
n=5 Participants
7 participants
n=4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian/White
57 participants
n=5 Participants
60 participants
n=7 Participants
55 participants
n=5 Participants
172 participants
n=4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian/Alaskan Native
1 participants
n=5 Participants
0 participants
n=7 Participants
0 participants
n=5 Participants
1 participants
n=4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Multiple
19 participants
n=5 Participants
19 participants
n=7 Participants
17 participants
n=5 Participants
55 participants
n=4 Participants
Botulinum toxin Status
Naive
40 participants
n=5 Participants
41 participants
n=7 Participants
41 participants
n=5 Participants
122 participants
n=4 Participants
Botulinum toxin Status
Non-naive
39 participants
n=5 Participants
38 participants
n=7 Participants
36 participants
n=5 Participants
113 participants
n=4 Participants
Number of legs being treated
1 Leg injected
42 participants
n=5 Participants
50 participants
n=7 Participants
47 participants
n=5 Participants
139 participants
n=4 Participants
Number of legs being treated
2 Legs injected
37 participants
n=5 Participants
29 participants
n=7 Participants
30 participants
n=5 Participants
96 participants
n=4 Participants
Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS)
GMFCS level 1
46 participants
n=5 Participants
45 participants
n=7 Participants
40 participants
n=5 Participants
131 participants
n=4 Participants
Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS)
GMFCS level 2
24 participants
n=5 Participants
24 participants
n=7 Participants
30 participants
n=5 Participants
78 participants
n=4 Participants
Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS)
GMFCS level 3
9 participants
n=5 Participants
10 participants
n=7 Participants
7 participants
n=5 Participants
26 participants
n=4 Participants
Height
117.1 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.7 • n=5 Participants
111.6 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.5 • n=7 Participants
114.6 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.7 • n=5 Participants
114.4 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.7 • n=4 Participants
Weight
23.1 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.4 • n=5 Participants
21.1 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.7 • n=7 Participants
22.6 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.9 • n=5 Participants
22.3 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.0 • n=4 Participants
Body Mass Index (BMI)
15.8 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.9 • n=5 Participants
16.1 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.7 • n=7 Participants
16.2 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.7 • n=5 Participants
16.0 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.8 • n=4 Participants
Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) score
3.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.3 • n=5 Participants
3.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.3 • n=7 Participants
3.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.4 • n=5 Participants
3.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.4 • n=4 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Change from baseline to Week 4

Population: ITT population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment and who had a MAS score in the GSC assessed both at baseline and at Week 4.

The MAS is a 6-point scale which measures the intensity of muscle tone by measuring the resistance of the muscle to passive lengthening or stretching. Investigator will grade muscle tone in the GSC from 0 (no increase in tone) to 4 (affected parts rigid in flexion or extension).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Dysport 10 U/Kg
n=79 Participants
Dysport 10 U/Kg intramuscular injection on either one or both lower limbs (2 ml per leg), single treatment.
Dysport 15 U/Kg
n=79 Participants
Dysport 15 U/Kg intramuscular injection on either one or both lower limbs (2 ml per leg), single treatment.
Placebo
n=77 Participants
Placebo intramuscular injection on either one or both lower limbs (2 ml per leg), single treatment.
Change in MAS Score in the Gastrocnemius-soleus Complex (GSC) at the Ankle Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower Limb
-0.86 units on a scale
Interval -1.07 to -0.65
-0.97 units on a scale
Interval -1.18 to -0.76
-0.48 units on a scale
Interval -0.69 to -0.27

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 4

Population: ITT population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment and who had a MAS score in the GSC assessed both at baseline and at Week 4.

PGA Scale of the Treatment Response: Global assessment of treatment response assessed by asking the Investigator the following question: "how would you rate the response to treatment in the subject's lower limb(s) since the last injection?" Answers will be made on a 9 point rating scale (-4: markedly worse, -3: much worse, -2: worse, -1: slightly worse, 0: no change, +1: slightly improved, +2: improved, +3: much improved, +4: markedly improved).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Dysport 10 U/Kg
n=79 Participants
Dysport 10 U/Kg intramuscular injection on either one or both lower limbs (2 ml per leg), single treatment.
Dysport 15 U/Kg
n=79 Participants
Dysport 15 U/Kg intramuscular injection on either one or both lower limbs (2 ml per leg), single treatment.
Placebo
n=77 Participants
Placebo intramuscular injection on either one or both lower limbs (2 ml per leg), single treatment.
Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) of the Treatment Response.
1.54 units on a scale
Interval 1.28 to 1.81
1.5 units on a scale
Interval 1.23 to 1.77
0.73 units on a scale
Interval 0.46 to 0.99

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 4

Population: ITT population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment and who had a MAS score in the GSC assessed both at baseline and at Week 4.

GAS is a functional scale used to measure progress towards individual therapy goals. Individual goals defined for each subject by the physician, and the child's parents (caregiver) where applicable, prior to treatment. Post-baseline, the GAS for each goal rated using a defined scale (-2: Much less than expected outcome, -1: somewhat less than expected outcome, 0: expected outcome, 1: somewhat more than expected outcome, and 2: Much more than expected outcome).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Dysport 10 U/Kg
n=79 Participants
Dysport 10 U/Kg intramuscular injection on either one or both lower limbs (2 ml per leg), single treatment.
Dysport 15 U/Kg
n=79 Participants
Dysport 15 U/Kg intramuscular injection on either one or both lower limbs (2 ml per leg), single treatment.
Placebo
n=77 Participants
Placebo intramuscular injection on either one or both lower limbs (2 ml per leg), single treatment.
Goal Attainment Scale (GAS) Score
51.53 units on a scale
Interval 49.05 to 54.01
50.86 units on a scale
Interval 48.36 to 53.36
46.21 units on a scale
Interval 43.7 to 48.72

Adverse Events

Dysport 10 U/Kg

Serious events: 1 serious events
Other events: 51 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Dysport 15 U/Kg

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 51 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Placebo

Serious events: 4 serious events
Other events: 42 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Dysport 10 U/Kg
n=80 participants at risk
Dysport 10 U/Kg intramuscular injection on either one or both lower limbs (2 ml per leg), single treatment.
Dysport 15 U/Kg
n=80 participants at risk
Dysport 15 U/Kg intramuscular injection on either one or both lower limbs (2 ml per leg), single treatment.
Placebo
n=79 participants at risk
Placebo intramuscular injection on either one or both lower limbs (2 ml per leg), single treatment.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Head injury
0.00%
0/80 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
0.00%
0/80 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
1.3%
1/79 • Number of events 1 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Upper limb fracture
0.00%
0/80 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
0.00%
0/80 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
1.3%
1/79 • Number of events 1 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Adenoidal hypertrophy
1.2%
1/80 • Number of events 1 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
0.00%
0/80 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
0.00%
0/79 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Gastroenteritis
0.00%
0/80 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
0.00%
0/80 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
1.3%
1/79 • Number of events 1 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
0.00%
0/80 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
0.00%
0/80 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
1.3%
1/79 • Number of events 1 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
Infections and infestations
Rotavirus infection
0.00%
0/80 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
0.00%
0/80 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
1.3%
1/79 • Number of events 1 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Dysport 10 U/Kg
n=80 participants at risk
Dysport 10 U/Kg intramuscular injection on either one or both lower limbs (2 ml per leg), single treatment.
Dysport 15 U/Kg
n=80 participants at risk
Dysport 15 U/Kg intramuscular injection on either one or both lower limbs (2 ml per leg), single treatment.
Placebo
n=79 participants at risk
Placebo intramuscular injection on either one or both lower limbs (2 ml per leg), single treatment.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
10.0%
8/80 • Number of events 10 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
7.5%
6/80 • Number of events 6 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
6.3%
5/79 • Number of events 5 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal pain
1.2%
1/80 • Number of events 1 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
2.5%
2/80 • Number of events 2 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
0.00%
0/79 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Excoriation
2.5%
2/80 • Number of events 2 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
0.00%
0/80 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
0.00%
0/79 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fall
1.2%
1/80 • Number of events 1 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
0.00%
0/80 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
2.5%
2/79 • Number of events 2 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
Nervous system disorders
Epilepsy
2.5%
2/80 • Number of events 3 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
3.8%
3/80 • Number of events 4 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
0.00%
0/79 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
Nervous system disorders
Headache
0.00%
0/80 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
2.5%
2/80 • Number of events 3 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
1.3%
1/79 • Number of events 1 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
General disorders
Pyrexia
7.5%
6/80 • Number of events 7 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
10.0%
8/80 • Number of events 8 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
5.1%
4/79 • Number of events 4 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
3.8%
3/80 • Number of events 3 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
5.0%
4/80 • Number of events 5 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
5.1%
4/79 • Number of events 4 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
2.5%
2/80 • Number of events 2 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
2.5%
2/80 • Number of events 2 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
1.3%
1/79 • Number of events 1 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
2.5%
2/80 • Number of events 3 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
1.2%
1/80 • Number of events 3 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
1.3%
1/79 • Number of events 2 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
1.2%
1/80 • Number of events 1 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
0.00%
0/80 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
2.5%
2/79 • Number of events 2 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
0.00%
0/80 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
0.00%
0/80 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
2.5%
2/79 • Number of events 2 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
2.5%
2/80 • Number of events 2 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
3.8%
3/80 • Number of events 3 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
5.1%
4/79 • Number of events 4 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscular weakness
2.5%
2/80 • Number of events 2 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
0.00%
0/80 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
1.3%
1/79 • Number of events 1 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
7.5%
6/80 • Number of events 8 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
16.2%
13/80 • Number of events 15 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
12.7%
10/79 • Number of events 11 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
12.5%
10/80 • Number of events 13 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
11.2%
9/80 • Number of events 10 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
5.1%
4/79 • Number of events 8 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
Infections and infestations
Influenza
6.2%
5/80 • Number of events 6 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
7.5%
6/80 • Number of events 9 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
7.6%
6/79 • Number of events 7 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
3.8%
3/80 • Number of events 4 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
2.5%
2/80 • Number of events 2 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
2.5%
2/79 • Number of events 2 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis viral
1.2%
1/80 • Number of events 1 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
2.5%
2/80 • Number of events 2 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
0.00%
0/79 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
Infections and infestations
Ear infection
0.00%
0/80 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
2.5%
2/80 • Number of events 4 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
2.5%
2/79 • Number of events 2 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection bacterial
0.00%
0/80 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
2.5%
2/80 • Number of events 2 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
0.00%
0/79 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
Infections and infestations
Pharyngitis
7.5%
6/80 • Number of events 7 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
1.2%
1/80 • Number of events 1 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
3.8%
3/79 • Number of events 3 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
Infections and infestations
Rhinitis
3.8%
3/80 • Number of events 3 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
1.2%
1/80 • Number of events 1 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
3.8%
3/79 • Number of events 3 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
2.5%
2/80 • Number of events 2 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
1.2%
1/80 • Number of events 1 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
3.8%
3/79 • Number of events 3 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
Infections and infestations
Respiratory tract infection viral
2.5%
2/80 • Number of events 2 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
1.2%
1/80 • Number of events 1 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
0.00%
0/79 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
Infections and infestations
Viral infection
1.2%
1/80 • Number of events 1 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
1.2%
1/80 • Number of events 2 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
5.1%
4/79 • Number of events 5 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
Infections and infestations
Varicella
5.0%
4/80 • Number of events 4 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
0.00%
0/80 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
1.3%
1/79 • Number of events 1 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Rhinorrhea
1.2%
1/80 • Number of events 1 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
0.00%
0/80 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
2.5%
2/79 • Number of events 2 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).

Additional Information

Medical Director, Neurology

Ipsen

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place