Trial Outcomes & Findings for Dysport® Pediatric Lower Limb Spasticity Study (NCT NCT01249417)
NCT ID: NCT01249417
Last Updated: 2022-09-28
Results Overview
The MAS is a 6-point scale which measures the intensity of muscle tone by measuring the resistance of the muscle to passive lengthening or stretching. Investigator will grade muscle tone in the GSC from 0 (no increase in tone) to 4 (affected parts rigid in flexion or extension).
COMPLETED
PHASE3
241 participants
Change from baseline to Week 4
2022-09-28
Participant Flow
Each centre that participated in the study was expected to randomise between five and 25 subjects. It was planned to have at least two participating centres per country.
Screening details: A total of 241 subjects were randomised to the study. The safety population included 239 subjects who were treated. Out of the 239 treated subjects, 4 subjects were excluded from the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population because no MAS score was obtained at the baseline visit and/or at Week 4.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Dysport 10 U/Kg
10 U/Kg per lower limb. Either one or both lower limbs can be treated. Total volume injected, 2ml per leg.
Botulinum type A toxin (Dysport®): I.M. (in the muscle) injection on day 1 of a single treatment cycle.
|
Dysport 15 U/Kg
15 U/Kg per lower limb. Either one or both lower limbs can be treated. Total volume injected, 2ml per leg.
Botulinum type A toxin (Dysport®): I.M. (in the muscle) injection on day 1 of a single treatment cycle.
|
Placebo
Total volume to be injected per lower limb - 2ml. Either one or both lower limbs can be treated.
Placebo: I.M. injection on day 1 of a single treatment cycle.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Randomised Population
STARTED
|
80
|
80
|
81
|
|
Randomised Population
Treated
|
80
|
80
|
79
|
|
Randomised Population
COMPLETED
|
79
|
79
|
77
|
|
Randomised Population
NOT COMPLETED
|
1
|
1
|
4
|
|
Treatment Phase - ITT Population
STARTED
|
79
|
79
|
77
|
|
Treatment Phase - ITT Population
COMPLETED
|
78
|
75
|
73
|
|
Treatment Phase - ITT Population
NOT COMPLETED
|
1
|
4
|
4
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Dysport 10 U/Kg
10 U/Kg per lower limb. Either one or both lower limbs can be treated. Total volume injected, 2ml per leg.
Botulinum type A toxin (Dysport®): I.M. (in the muscle) injection on day 1 of a single treatment cycle.
|
Dysport 15 U/Kg
15 U/Kg per lower limb. Either one or both lower limbs can be treated. Total volume injected, 2ml per leg.
Botulinum type A toxin (Dysport®): I.M. (in the muscle) injection on day 1 of a single treatment cycle.
|
Placebo
Total volume to be injected per lower limb - 2ml. Either one or both lower limbs can be treated.
Placebo: I.M. injection on day 1 of a single treatment cycle.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Randomised Population
Study treatment not received
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
|
Randomised Population
No MAS score at baseline and/or Week 4
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
|
Treatment Phase - ITT Population
Other
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
|
Treatment Phase - ITT Population
Adverse Event
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
|
Treatment Phase - ITT Population
Withdrawal by Subject
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
|
Treatment Phase - ITT Population
Lost to Follow-up
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Dysport® Pediatric Lower Limb Spasticity Study
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Dysport 10 U/Kg
n=79 Participants
Dysport 10 U/Kg intramuscular injection on either one or both lower limbs (2 ml per leg), single treatment.
|
Dysport 15 U/Kg
n=79 Participants
Dysport 15 U/Kg intramuscular injection on either one or both lower limbs (2 ml per leg), single treatment.
|
Placebo
n=77 Participants
Placebo intramuscular injection on either one or both lower limbs (2 ml per leg), single treatment.
|
Total
n=235 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.3 • n=5 Participants
|
5.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.2 • n=7 Participants
|
5.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.5 • n=5 Participants
|
5.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.3 • n=4 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
Children (2-9 years)
|
67 participants
n=5 Participants
|
67 participants
n=7 Participants
|
65 participants
n=5 Participants
|
199 participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
Children (10-17 years)
|
12 participants
n=5 Participants
|
12 participants
n=7 Participants
|
12 participants
n=5 Participants
|
36 participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
45 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
48 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
48 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
141 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
34 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
31 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
29 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
94 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
21 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
21 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
62 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
58 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
58 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
57 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
173 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black/African American
|
2 participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 participants
n=7 Participants
|
5 participants
n=5 Participants
|
7 participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian/White
|
57 participants
n=5 Participants
|
60 participants
n=7 Participants
|
55 participants
n=5 Participants
|
172 participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian/Alaskan Native
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Multiple
|
19 participants
n=5 Participants
|
19 participants
n=7 Participants
|
17 participants
n=5 Participants
|
55 participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Botulinum toxin Status
Naive
|
40 participants
n=5 Participants
|
41 participants
n=7 Participants
|
41 participants
n=5 Participants
|
122 participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Botulinum toxin Status
Non-naive
|
39 participants
n=5 Participants
|
38 participants
n=7 Participants
|
36 participants
n=5 Participants
|
113 participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Number of legs being treated
1 Leg injected
|
42 participants
n=5 Participants
|
50 participants
n=7 Participants
|
47 participants
n=5 Participants
|
139 participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Number of legs being treated
2 Legs injected
|
37 participants
n=5 Participants
|
29 participants
n=7 Participants
|
30 participants
n=5 Participants
|
96 participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS)
GMFCS level 1
|
46 participants
n=5 Participants
|
45 participants
n=7 Participants
|
40 participants
n=5 Participants
|
131 participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS)
GMFCS level 2
|
24 participants
n=5 Participants
|
24 participants
n=7 Participants
|
30 participants
n=5 Participants
|
78 participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS)
GMFCS level 3
|
9 participants
n=5 Participants
|
10 participants
n=7 Participants
|
7 participants
n=5 Participants
|
26 participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Height
|
117.1 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.7 • n=5 Participants
|
111.6 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.5 • n=7 Participants
|
114.6 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.7 • n=5 Participants
|
114.4 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.7 • n=4 Participants
|
|
Weight
|
23.1 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.4 • n=5 Participants
|
21.1 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.7 • n=7 Participants
|
22.6 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.9 • n=5 Participants
|
22.3 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.0 • n=4 Participants
|
|
Body Mass Index (BMI)
|
15.8 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.9 • n=5 Participants
|
16.1 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.7 • n=7 Participants
|
16.2 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.7 • n=5 Participants
|
16.0 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.8 • n=4 Participants
|
|
Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) score
|
3.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.3 • n=5 Participants
|
3.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.3 • n=7 Participants
|
3.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.4 • n=5 Participants
|
3.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.4 • n=4 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Change from baseline to Week 4Population: ITT population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment and who had a MAS score in the GSC assessed both at baseline and at Week 4.
The MAS is a 6-point scale which measures the intensity of muscle tone by measuring the resistance of the muscle to passive lengthening or stretching. Investigator will grade muscle tone in the GSC from 0 (no increase in tone) to 4 (affected parts rigid in flexion or extension).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Dysport 10 U/Kg
n=79 Participants
Dysport 10 U/Kg intramuscular injection on either one or both lower limbs (2 ml per leg), single treatment.
|
Dysport 15 U/Kg
n=79 Participants
Dysport 15 U/Kg intramuscular injection on either one or both lower limbs (2 ml per leg), single treatment.
|
Placebo
n=77 Participants
Placebo intramuscular injection on either one or both lower limbs (2 ml per leg), single treatment.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in MAS Score in the Gastrocnemius-soleus Complex (GSC) at the Ankle Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower Limb
|
-0.86 units on a scale
Interval -1.07 to -0.65
|
-0.97 units on a scale
Interval -1.18 to -0.76
|
-0.48 units on a scale
Interval -0.69 to -0.27
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 4Population: ITT population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment and who had a MAS score in the GSC assessed both at baseline and at Week 4.
PGA Scale of the Treatment Response: Global assessment of treatment response assessed by asking the Investigator the following question: "how would you rate the response to treatment in the subject's lower limb(s) since the last injection?" Answers will be made on a 9 point rating scale (-4: markedly worse, -3: much worse, -2: worse, -1: slightly worse, 0: no change, +1: slightly improved, +2: improved, +3: much improved, +4: markedly improved).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Dysport 10 U/Kg
n=79 Participants
Dysport 10 U/Kg intramuscular injection on either one or both lower limbs (2 ml per leg), single treatment.
|
Dysport 15 U/Kg
n=79 Participants
Dysport 15 U/Kg intramuscular injection on either one or both lower limbs (2 ml per leg), single treatment.
|
Placebo
n=77 Participants
Placebo intramuscular injection on either one or both lower limbs (2 ml per leg), single treatment.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) of the Treatment Response.
|
1.54 units on a scale
Interval 1.28 to 1.81
|
1.5 units on a scale
Interval 1.23 to 1.77
|
0.73 units on a scale
Interval 0.46 to 0.99
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 4Population: ITT population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment and who had a MAS score in the GSC assessed both at baseline and at Week 4.
GAS is a functional scale used to measure progress towards individual therapy goals. Individual goals defined for each subject by the physician, and the child's parents (caregiver) where applicable, prior to treatment. Post-baseline, the GAS for each goal rated using a defined scale (-2: Much less than expected outcome, -1: somewhat less than expected outcome, 0: expected outcome, 1: somewhat more than expected outcome, and 2: Much more than expected outcome).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Dysport 10 U/Kg
n=79 Participants
Dysport 10 U/Kg intramuscular injection on either one or both lower limbs (2 ml per leg), single treatment.
|
Dysport 15 U/Kg
n=79 Participants
Dysport 15 U/Kg intramuscular injection on either one or both lower limbs (2 ml per leg), single treatment.
|
Placebo
n=77 Participants
Placebo intramuscular injection on either one or both lower limbs (2 ml per leg), single treatment.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Goal Attainment Scale (GAS) Score
|
51.53 units on a scale
Interval 49.05 to 54.01
|
50.86 units on a scale
Interval 48.36 to 53.36
|
46.21 units on a scale
Interval 43.7 to 48.72
|
Adverse Events
Dysport 10 U/Kg
Dysport 15 U/Kg
Placebo
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Dysport 10 U/Kg
n=80 participants at risk
Dysport 10 U/Kg intramuscular injection on either one or both lower limbs (2 ml per leg), single treatment.
|
Dysport 15 U/Kg
n=80 participants at risk
Dysport 15 U/Kg intramuscular injection on either one or both lower limbs (2 ml per leg), single treatment.
|
Placebo
n=79 participants at risk
Placebo intramuscular injection on either one or both lower limbs (2 ml per leg), single treatment.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Head injury
|
0.00%
0/80 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
0.00%
0/80 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
1.3%
1/79 • Number of events 1 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Upper limb fracture
|
0.00%
0/80 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
0.00%
0/80 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
1.3%
1/79 • Number of events 1 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Adenoidal hypertrophy
|
1.2%
1/80 • Number of events 1 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
0.00%
0/80 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
0.00%
0/79 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Gastroenteritis
|
0.00%
0/80 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
0.00%
0/80 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
1.3%
1/79 • Number of events 1 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
0.00%
0/80 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
0.00%
0/80 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
1.3%
1/79 • Number of events 1 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Rotavirus infection
|
0.00%
0/80 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
0.00%
0/80 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
1.3%
1/79 • Number of events 1 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Dysport 10 U/Kg
n=80 participants at risk
Dysport 10 U/Kg intramuscular injection on either one or both lower limbs (2 ml per leg), single treatment.
|
Dysport 15 U/Kg
n=80 participants at risk
Dysport 15 U/Kg intramuscular injection on either one or both lower limbs (2 ml per leg), single treatment.
|
Placebo
n=79 participants at risk
Placebo intramuscular injection on either one or both lower limbs (2 ml per leg), single treatment.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
10.0%
8/80 • Number of events 10 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
7.5%
6/80 • Number of events 6 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
6.3%
5/79 • Number of events 5 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal pain
|
1.2%
1/80 • Number of events 1 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
2.5%
2/80 • Number of events 2 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
0.00%
0/79 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Excoriation
|
2.5%
2/80 • Number of events 2 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
0.00%
0/80 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
0.00%
0/79 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fall
|
1.2%
1/80 • Number of events 1 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
0.00%
0/80 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
2.5%
2/79 • Number of events 2 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Epilepsy
|
2.5%
2/80 • Number of events 3 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
3.8%
3/80 • Number of events 4 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
0.00%
0/79 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
0.00%
0/80 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
2.5%
2/80 • Number of events 3 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
1.3%
1/79 • Number of events 1 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
7.5%
6/80 • Number of events 7 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
10.0%
8/80 • Number of events 8 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
5.1%
4/79 • Number of events 4 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
3.8%
3/80 • Number of events 3 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
5.0%
4/80 • Number of events 5 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
5.1%
4/79 • Number of events 4 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
2.5%
2/80 • Number of events 2 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
2.5%
2/80 • Number of events 2 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
1.3%
1/79 • Number of events 1 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
2.5%
2/80 • Number of events 3 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
1.2%
1/80 • Number of events 3 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
1.3%
1/79 • Number of events 2 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
|
1.2%
1/80 • Number of events 1 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
0.00%
0/80 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
2.5%
2/79 • Number of events 2 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
0.00%
0/80 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
0.00%
0/80 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
2.5%
2/79 • Number of events 2 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
2.5%
2/80 • Number of events 2 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
3.8%
3/80 • Number of events 3 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
5.1%
4/79 • Number of events 4 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscular weakness
|
2.5%
2/80 • Number of events 2 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
0.00%
0/80 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
1.3%
1/79 • Number of events 1 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
7.5%
6/80 • Number of events 8 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
16.2%
13/80 • Number of events 15 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
12.7%
10/79 • Number of events 11 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
12.5%
10/80 • Number of events 13 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
11.2%
9/80 • Number of events 10 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
5.1%
4/79 • Number of events 8 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
6.2%
5/80 • Number of events 6 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
7.5%
6/80 • Number of events 9 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
7.6%
6/79 • Number of events 7 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
3.8%
3/80 • Number of events 4 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
2.5%
2/80 • Number of events 2 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
2.5%
2/79 • Number of events 2 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis viral
|
1.2%
1/80 • Number of events 1 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
2.5%
2/80 • Number of events 2 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
0.00%
0/79 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Ear infection
|
0.00%
0/80 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
2.5%
2/80 • Number of events 4 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
2.5%
2/79 • Number of events 2 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection bacterial
|
0.00%
0/80 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
2.5%
2/80 • Number of events 2 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
0.00%
0/79 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pharyngitis
|
7.5%
6/80 • Number of events 7 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
1.2%
1/80 • Number of events 1 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
3.8%
3/79 • Number of events 3 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Rhinitis
|
3.8%
3/80 • Number of events 3 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
1.2%
1/80 • Number of events 1 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
3.8%
3/79 • Number of events 3 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
2.5%
2/80 • Number of events 2 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
1.2%
1/80 • Number of events 1 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
3.8%
3/79 • Number of events 3 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Respiratory tract infection viral
|
2.5%
2/80 • Number of events 2 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
1.2%
1/80 • Number of events 1 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
0.00%
0/79 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Viral infection
|
1.2%
1/80 • Number of events 1 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
1.2%
1/80 • Number of events 2 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
5.1%
4/79 • Number of events 5 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Varicella
|
5.0%
4/80 • Number of events 4 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
0.00%
0/80 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
1.3%
1/79 • Number of events 1 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Rhinorrhea
|
1.2%
1/80 • Number of events 1 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
0.00%
0/80 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
2.5%
2/79 • Number of events 2 • Up to Week 28 of follow-up
The safety population, defined as all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment, was used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs).
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place