Motivational Interviewing for Weight Loss

NCT ID: NCT01246349

Last Updated: 2017-11-17

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-09-30

Study Completion Date

2012-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The investigators studied the effect of motivational interviewing (MI) on self-efficacy, health behaviors, and health outcomes in overweight children and adolescents (ages ranging from 10 to 18 years).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

One empirically supported intervention with a large evidence base for improving adult outcomes in behavioral health-related disorders is Motivational Interviewing (MI). MI is strongly rooted in the client-centered therapy of Rogers (1951). Its relational stance emphasizes the importance of understanding the client's internal frame of reference and displaying unconditional positive regard for the client. Motivational interviewing can thus be defined as a client-centered, directive method of therapy for enhancing intrinsic motivation to change by exploring and resolving ambivalence. MI manifests through specific strategies, such as reflective listening, summarization, shared decision making, and agenda setting.

Adolescent participants exposed to motivational interviewing in conjunction with usual care (diet and exercise program) are expected to endorse greater self-efficacy, report increased engagement in healthy behaviors, demonstrate a decrease in body weight and report improved psychological outcomes. While motivational interviewing has been shown to increase adults' motivation to make healthy behavior changes, few adolescent studies have demonstrated this effect.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Childhood Obesity

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Motivational Interviewing Child and Adolescent Self-Efficacy Health Behaviours

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Motivational Interviewing Group

For the Motivational Interviewing (MI) treatment group, a clinical psychology doctoral student trained in Motivational Interviewing administered six individual motivational interviewing treatment sessions, each 30 minutes in length.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Motivational Interviewing (Treatment Group)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Motivational interviewing (MI) can be defined as a client-centered, directive method of therapy for enhancing intrinsic motivation to change by exploring and resolving ambivalence (Miller and Rollnick, 2002). MI manifests through specific strategies, such as reflective listening, summarization, shared decision making, and agenda setting.

Control Group

The comparison group received six social skills training sessions instead of Motivational Interviewing (MI).

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Social Skills Training (Control Group)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Within the social skills training framework, advice is given to clients and sessions are focused on assigning goals for clients to work towards without specific regard for their readiness to change. The intervention is aimed at finding appropriate ways to navigate typical social situations (e.g., how to negotiate with parents).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Motivational Interviewing (Treatment Group)

Motivational interviewing (MI) can be defined as a client-centered, directive method of therapy for enhancing intrinsic motivation to change by exploring and resolving ambivalence (Miller and Rollnick, 2002). MI manifests through specific strategies, such as reflective listening, summarization, shared decision making, and agenda setting.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Social Skills Training (Control Group)

Within the social skills training framework, advice is given to clients and sessions are focused on assigning goals for clients to work towards without specific regard for their readiness to change. The intervention is aimed at finding appropriate ways to navigate typical social situations (e.g., how to negotiate with parents).

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Obese youth (with Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥ to 85th percentile for age and gender (as classified by the Center for Disease Control))
* ages 10-18 years
* attending a local obesity clinic ("Healthy Weights" clinic)

Time of entry into the weight-loss program was controlled for; however, both new and current participants had the option to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria

* taking medication whose side effects may influence weight gain or weight loss
* did not speak English
* demonstrated a developmental delay
* reported being pregnant and/or reported having an eating disorder
Minimum Eligible Age

10 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

The Hospital for Sick Children

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jill Hamilton

Staff Endocrinologist

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jill Hamilton, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

The Hospital for Sick Children

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The Hospital for Sick Children

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1000017625

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id