Trial Outcomes & Findings for "Hub and Satellite" Heart Failure Provider's Network Study (NCT NCT01246050)

NCT ID: NCT01246050

Last Updated: 2019-10-30

Results Overview

This was a pilot, qualitative study to assess the feasibility and preliminary outcomes of a program to train primary care providers in specialty care. 9 Heart Failure Performance Outcome Quality Measures were studied: Patient weight measured at clinic visit; level of activity assessed; volume status assessed; Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitor/Angiotensin Receptor Blocker (ACEI/ARB) prescribed; ACEI/ARB at target dose; beta-blocker prescribed; beta-blocker at target dose; evidence-based beta-blocker used; coumadin prescribed in atrial fibrillation. Healthcare provider performance with each of the Performance Outcome Quality Measures was assessed at each study visit. Superior performance was defined as a higher score for each Measure on the follow-up visit compared to the baseline visit. The primary outcome of the study was considered to have been reached if 6 of the 9 outcome measures were superior to the baseline visit.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

6 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

12 months

Results posted on

2019-10-30

Participant Flow

Primary care providers practicing were recruited from Primary Care Clinics in the local VA healthcare system. Providers volunteered to be trained as Heart Failure providers and underwent specialized training in May 2010.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Arm 1: Received HF Training
CBOC Providers who have received HF Training 3 days of training in HF management: HF training includes didactic lectures, case discussions and interactive symposia, course materials including teaching material, textbooks, copies of HF clinical guidelines and patient education material for distribution, participation in HF Clinics and Inpatient Heart Failure Rounds. Access to clinical pharmacist services: Including medication and disease teaching, adjustment and uptitration Quarterly analysis of physician compliance: Individualized confidential, non-punitive feedback to providers from a set of prespecified core HF performance measures.
Arm 2: No HF Training
CBOC Providers in the same CBOC who have not received HF Training
Overall Study
STARTED
6
6
Overall Study
COMPLETED
6
6
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
0
0

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

"Hub and Satellite" Heart Failure Provider's Network Study

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Arm 1: Received HF Training
n=129 Participants
CBOC Providers who have received HF Training 3 days of training in HF management: HF training includes didactic lectures, case discussions and interactive symposia, course materials including teaching material, textbooks, copies of HF clinical guidelines and patient education material for distribution, participation in HF Clinics and Inpatient Heart Failure Rounds. Access to clinical pharmacist services: Including medication and disease teaching, adjustment and uptitration Quarterly analysis of physician compliance: Individualized confidential, non-punitive feedback to providers from a set of prespecified core HF performance measures.
Arm 2: No HF Training
n=129 Participants
CBOC Providers in the same CBOC who have not received HF Training
Total
n=258 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
65 years
n=5 Participants
65 years
n=7 Participants
65 years
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
125 Participants
n=5 Participants
128 Participants
n=7 Participants
253 Participants
n=5 Participants
Coronary Artery Disease
Coronary Artery Disease present
101 participants
n=5 Participants
97 participants
n=7 Participants
198 participants
n=5 Participants
Coronary Artery Disease
Coronary artery disease not present
28 participants
n=5 Participants
32 participants
n=7 Participants
60 participants
n=5 Participants
Hypertension
Hypertension present
119 participants
n=5 Participants
119 participants
n=7 Participants
238 participants
n=5 Participants
Hypertension
Hypertension not present
10 participants
n=5 Participants
10 participants
n=7 Participants
20 participants
n=5 Participants
Diabetes
Diabetes present
72 participants
n=5 Participants
65 participants
n=7 Participants
137 participants
n=5 Participants
Diabetes
Diabetes not present
57 participants
n=5 Participants
64 participants
n=7 Participants
121 participants
n=5 Participants
Median ejection fraction
30 % left ventricular end-diastolic volume
n=5 Participants
30 % left ventricular end-diastolic volume
n=7 Participants
30 % left ventricular end-diastolic volume
n=5 Participants
Followed by Cardiology
Number followed by Cardiology
116 participants
n=5 Participants
108 participants
n=7 Participants
224 participants
n=5 Participants
Followed by Cardiology
Number not followed by Cardiology
13 participants
n=5 Participants
21 participants
n=7 Participants
34 participants
n=5 Participants
Followed by Advanced Heart Failure Clinic
Followed by Heart failure Clinic
26 participants
n=5 Participants
37 participants
n=7 Participants
63 participants
n=5 Participants
Followed by Advanced Heart Failure Clinic
Not followed by Heart Failure Clinic
103 participants
n=5 Participants
92 participants
n=7 Participants
195 participants
n=5 Participants
HF Hospitalization past year
No. with a HF hospitalization in the past year
26 participants
n=5 Participants
15 participants
n=7 Participants
41 participants
n=5 Participants
HF Hospitalization past year
No. without a HF hospitalization in the past year
103 participants
n=5 Participants
114 participants
n=7 Participants
217 participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 12 months

Population: 129 patients cared for by HF trained primary care providers in Intervention Arm. 129 patients in the Control group, cared for by non-HF trained primary care providers.

This was a pilot, qualitative study to assess the feasibility and preliminary outcomes of a program to train primary care providers in specialty care. 9 Heart Failure Performance Outcome Quality Measures were studied: Patient weight measured at clinic visit; level of activity assessed; volume status assessed; Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitor/Angiotensin Receptor Blocker (ACEI/ARB) prescribed; ACEI/ARB at target dose; beta-blocker prescribed; beta-blocker at target dose; evidence-based beta-blocker used; coumadin prescribed in atrial fibrillation. Healthcare provider performance with each of the Performance Outcome Quality Measures was assessed at each study visit. Superior performance was defined as a higher score for each Measure on the follow-up visit compared to the baseline visit. The primary outcome of the study was considered to have been reached if 6 of the 9 outcome measures were superior to the baseline visit.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Arm 1: Received HF Training
n=129 Participants
Patients followed by CBOC Providers who have received HF Training.
Arm 2: No HF Training
n=129 Participants
Patients followed by CBOC Providers in the same CBOC who have not received HF Training
Number of Superior Heart Failure Performance Outcome Quality Measures
5 number of outcome measures superior
4 number of outcome measures superior

Adverse Events

Arm 1: Received HF Training

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Arm 2: No HF Training

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Henry Ooi

VA Medical Center Nashville

Phone: 615-8736373

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place