Trial Outcomes & Findings for "Hub and Satellite" Heart Failure Provider's Network Study (NCT NCT01246050)
NCT ID: NCT01246050
Last Updated: 2019-10-30
Results Overview
This was a pilot, qualitative study to assess the feasibility and preliminary outcomes of a program to train primary care providers in specialty care. 9 Heart Failure Performance Outcome Quality Measures were studied: Patient weight measured at clinic visit; level of activity assessed; volume status assessed; Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitor/Angiotensin Receptor Blocker (ACEI/ARB) prescribed; ACEI/ARB at target dose; beta-blocker prescribed; beta-blocker at target dose; evidence-based beta-blocker used; coumadin prescribed in atrial fibrillation. Healthcare provider performance with each of the Performance Outcome Quality Measures was assessed at each study visit. Superior performance was defined as a higher score for each Measure on the follow-up visit compared to the baseline visit. The primary outcome of the study was considered to have been reached if 6 of the 9 outcome measures were superior to the baseline visit.
COMPLETED
NA
6 participants
12 months
2019-10-30
Participant Flow
Primary care providers practicing were recruited from Primary Care Clinics in the local VA healthcare system. Providers volunteered to be trained as Heart Failure providers and underwent specialized training in May 2010.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Arm 1: Received HF Training
CBOC Providers who have received HF Training
3 days of training in HF management: HF training includes didactic lectures, case discussions and interactive symposia, course materials including teaching material, textbooks, copies of HF clinical guidelines and patient education material for distribution, participation in HF Clinics and Inpatient Heart Failure Rounds.
Access to clinical pharmacist services: Including medication and disease teaching, adjustment and uptitration
Quarterly analysis of physician compliance: Individualized confidential, non-punitive feedback to providers from a set of prespecified core HF performance measures.
|
Arm 2: No HF Training
CBOC Providers in the same CBOC who have not received HF Training
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
6
|
6
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
6
|
6
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
"Hub and Satellite" Heart Failure Provider's Network Study
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Arm 1: Received HF Training
n=129 Participants
CBOC Providers who have received HF Training
3 days of training in HF management: HF training includes didactic lectures, case discussions and interactive symposia, course materials including teaching material, textbooks, copies of HF clinical guidelines and patient education material for distribution, participation in HF Clinics and Inpatient Heart Failure Rounds.
Access to clinical pharmacist services: Including medication and disease teaching, adjustment and uptitration
Quarterly analysis of physician compliance: Individualized confidential, non-punitive feedback to providers from a set of prespecified core HF performance measures.
|
Arm 2: No HF Training
n=129 Participants
CBOC Providers in the same CBOC who have not received HF Training
|
Total
n=258 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
65 years
n=5 Participants
|
65 years
n=7 Participants
|
65 years
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
125 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
128 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
253 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Coronary Artery Disease
Coronary Artery Disease present
|
101 participants
n=5 Participants
|
97 participants
n=7 Participants
|
198 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Coronary Artery Disease
Coronary artery disease not present
|
28 participants
n=5 Participants
|
32 participants
n=7 Participants
|
60 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Hypertension
Hypertension present
|
119 participants
n=5 Participants
|
119 participants
n=7 Participants
|
238 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Hypertension
Hypertension not present
|
10 participants
n=5 Participants
|
10 participants
n=7 Participants
|
20 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Diabetes
Diabetes present
|
72 participants
n=5 Participants
|
65 participants
n=7 Participants
|
137 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Diabetes
Diabetes not present
|
57 participants
n=5 Participants
|
64 participants
n=7 Participants
|
121 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Median ejection fraction
|
30 % left ventricular end-diastolic volume
n=5 Participants
|
30 % left ventricular end-diastolic volume
n=7 Participants
|
30 % left ventricular end-diastolic volume
n=5 Participants
|
|
Followed by Cardiology
Number followed by Cardiology
|
116 participants
n=5 Participants
|
108 participants
n=7 Participants
|
224 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Followed by Cardiology
Number not followed by Cardiology
|
13 participants
n=5 Participants
|
21 participants
n=7 Participants
|
34 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Followed by Advanced Heart Failure Clinic
Followed by Heart failure Clinic
|
26 participants
n=5 Participants
|
37 participants
n=7 Participants
|
63 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Followed by Advanced Heart Failure Clinic
Not followed by Heart Failure Clinic
|
103 participants
n=5 Participants
|
92 participants
n=7 Participants
|
195 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
HF Hospitalization past year
No. with a HF hospitalization in the past year
|
26 participants
n=5 Participants
|
15 participants
n=7 Participants
|
41 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
HF Hospitalization past year
No. without a HF hospitalization in the past year
|
103 participants
n=5 Participants
|
114 participants
n=7 Participants
|
217 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsPopulation: 129 patients cared for by HF trained primary care providers in Intervention Arm. 129 patients in the Control group, cared for by non-HF trained primary care providers.
This was a pilot, qualitative study to assess the feasibility and preliminary outcomes of a program to train primary care providers in specialty care. 9 Heart Failure Performance Outcome Quality Measures were studied: Patient weight measured at clinic visit; level of activity assessed; volume status assessed; Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitor/Angiotensin Receptor Blocker (ACEI/ARB) prescribed; ACEI/ARB at target dose; beta-blocker prescribed; beta-blocker at target dose; evidence-based beta-blocker used; coumadin prescribed in atrial fibrillation. Healthcare provider performance with each of the Performance Outcome Quality Measures was assessed at each study visit. Superior performance was defined as a higher score for each Measure on the follow-up visit compared to the baseline visit. The primary outcome of the study was considered to have been reached if 6 of the 9 outcome measures were superior to the baseline visit.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: Received HF Training
n=129 Participants
Patients followed by CBOC Providers who have received HF Training.
|
Arm 2: No HF Training
n=129 Participants
Patients followed by CBOC Providers in the same CBOC who have not received HF Training
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Superior Heart Failure Performance Outcome Quality Measures
|
5 number of outcome measures superior
|
4 number of outcome measures superior
|
Adverse Events
Arm 1: Received HF Training
Arm 2: No HF Training
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place