Chemotherapy or Observation in Stage I-II Intermediate or High Risk Endometrial Cancer
NCT ID: NCT01244789
Last Updated: 2025-07-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
PHASE2
244 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-12-31
2028-07-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This study evaluates if one can improve survival in intermediate and high risk early-stage patients by offering them postoperative chemotherapy. This is a randomized phase 3 trial where effect of postoperative chemotherapy is compared with postoperative observation alone (standard strategy).
Substudy: Translational research
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Vaginal Cuff Brachytherapy Followed by Chemotherapy in Endometrial Cancer
NCT03189446
Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Stage II, Stage III, or Stage IV Ovarian Cancer
NCT00003732
Vaginal Cuff Brachytherapy Followed by Chemotherapy in Patients With Endometrioid Cancer
NCT00542490
Efficacy Study of Chemotherapy Followed by Radiation Therapy to Treat Endometrial Cancer
NCT01461746
Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Ovarian Epithelial, Fallopian Tube, or Peritoneal Cancer
NCT00031954
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Adjuvant radiotherapy was the traditional therapy for many decades. Four randomized phase III studies and a meta-analysis have revealed that adjuvant radiotherapy improves local control at the cost of excessive short and long term toxicity, though has absolutely no impact on survival.
Two phase III studies have randomized between adjuvant radiotherapy versus adjuvant chemotherapy, both failed to show any difference in survival between radiotherapy and chemotherapy, though both studies are criticized for inferior chemotherapy regimens or inclusion of good prognosis patients. The GOG-122 study on more advanced cases (stage 3 \& 4) randomized between combination chemotherapy versus whole abdominal irradiation and found significant improvement in survival in the chemotherapy arm.
NSGO-EC-9501 and MaNGO studies have indicated that adjuvant chemotherapy added to adjuvant radiotherapy may improve survival compared to adjuvant radiotherapy alone in early stage medium and high risk patients. One may conclude that impact on survival comes only from chemotherapy. Many investigators have therefore adapted adjuvant chemotherapy as standard treatment in various countries including Denmark. However, such conclusion has low level of evidence, as there are no randomized phase III studies comparing postoperative observation alone versus adjuvant chemotherapy.
It is of utmost importance to demonstrate efficacy of adjuvant combination chemotherapy in a randomized phase III trial comparing to no further treatment in the medium and high risk node negative stage 1 \& 2 patients.
Combination chemotherapy regimen of paclitaxel-carboplatin is proposed in this study, as this combination is effective and well tolerated.
The eligible patients for such a study are a fraction of patients with endometrial cancer therefore this study will be performed within the ENGOT collaboration.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Observation
postoperative observation only
observation
active observation
Combination chemotherapy
postoperative 6 courses of 3 weekly iv carboplatin-paclitaxel combination chemotherapy
carboplatin and paclitaxel
6 courses of iv 3-weekly chemotherapy Carboplatin AUC5 Paclitaxel 175mg/m2
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
carboplatin and paclitaxel
6 courses of iv 3-weekly chemotherapy Carboplatin AUC5 Paclitaxel 175mg/m2
observation
active observation
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
1. Only node-negative patients are eligible: Histological confirmed endometrial carcinoma with no macroscopic remaining tumour after primary surgery and lymph-node negative disease, with one of the following postoperative FIGO 2009 stage and grade:
1. Stage I grade 3 endometrioid adenocarcinoma
2. Stage II endometrioid adenocarcinoma
3. Stage I and II type 2 histology (clear cell, serous, squamous cell carcinoma, or undifferentiated carcinoma) Prior therapy
2. Patients have undergone hysterectomy (total abdominal hysterectomy, radical hysterectomy, laparoscopic or robotic hysterectomy) and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) and pelvic lymphadenectomy (LNE).
3. LNE: minimum 12 pelvic nodes (6 from each side) should be removed. Para-aortic LNE is optional
4. Omentectomy strongly recommended in clear cell, serous or undifferentiated carcinoma.
5. Surgery performed within 10 weeks of randomization. If the dates for hysterectomy and lymph node dissection are different, 10 weeks are counted from the last surgery, and in that case the gap between two surgeries should not exceed 8 weeks.
6. Patients must give informed consent according to the rules and regulations of the individual participating centres
7. Patients have not received any other anticancer therapy other than surgery.
8. Adjuvant vaginal brachytherapy is permitted in both arms. In chemotherapy arm, timing of VBT should not cause delay in chemotherapy delivery.
9. Patients must have a WHO performance status of 0-2
10. Patients must have an adequate bone-marrow, renal and hepatic function (WBC ≥3.0x109/L, neutrophils ≥1.5x109/L, platelets ≥100x109/L, total S-bilirubin \<2 x upper normal value, ALAT \<2.5 x upper normal value, estimated GFR \>50 ml/min (measured or calculated according to Cockroft-Gault or Jeliffe). Up to 5% deviation for hematological values and 10% deviation for s-bilirubin and ALAT are tolerated.
11. Life expectancy of at least 12 weeks
12. Patients must be fit to receive combination chemotherapy
13. Patient's age \>18 years
Exclusion Criteria
1. Carcinosarcoma, Sarcomas or small cell carcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation.
Prohibited Treatments and/or Therapies
2. External Beam Radiotherapy
3. Concurrent cancer therapy
5. Previous or concurrent malignant disease except for curatively treated carcinoma in situ of the cervix or basal cell carcinoma of the skin
6. Active infection or other serious underlying medical condition, which might prevent the patient from receiving treatment or to be followed
7. Whatever reasons which interferes with an adequate follow-up
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - EORTC
NETWORK
Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie Austria
OTHER
North Eastern German Society of Gynaecological Oncology
OTHER
Nordic Society of Gynaecological Oncology - Clinical Trials Unit
OTHER
Belgian Gynaecological Oncology Group
OTHER
Mario Negri Gynecologic Oncology group (MaNGO)
OTHER
Israeli Society of Gynecologic Oncology
OTHER
Multicenter Italian Trials in Ovarian cancer and gynecologic malignancies (MITO)
UNKNOWN
Central and Eastern European Oncology Group
OTHER
Danish Gynecological Cancer Group
NETWORK
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mansoor R Mirza, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Danish Gynecological Cancer Group
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Danish Gynecological Cancer Group (DGCG)
Copenhagen, , Denmark
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2010-023081-52
Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
ENGOT-EN2-DGCG
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.