Chemotherapy or Observation in Stage I-II Intermediate or High Risk Endometrial Cancer

NCT ID: NCT01244789

Last Updated: 2025-07-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

244 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-12-31

Study Completion Date

2028-07-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Patients with stage 1 \& 2 endometrial cancer are treated with surgery. Despite the fact that disease is confound to uterus, unfortunately some of these patients may relapse and die of their disease. Postoperative radiotherapy cannot improve survival. Chemotherapy has shown survival benefit in more advanced stage disease (stage 3 \& 4).

This study evaluates if one can improve survival in intermediate and high risk early-stage patients by offering them postoperative chemotherapy. This is a randomized phase 3 trial where effect of postoperative chemotherapy is compared with postoperative observation alone (standard strategy).

Substudy: Translational research

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Patients with medium and high risk stage I and II endometrial cancers have, despite radical surgery, a rather high risk for progression.

Adjuvant radiotherapy was the traditional therapy for many decades. Four randomized phase III studies and a meta-analysis have revealed that adjuvant radiotherapy improves local control at the cost of excessive short and long term toxicity, though has absolutely no impact on survival.

Two phase III studies have randomized between adjuvant radiotherapy versus adjuvant chemotherapy, both failed to show any difference in survival between radiotherapy and chemotherapy, though both studies are criticized for inferior chemotherapy regimens or inclusion of good prognosis patients. The GOG-122 study on more advanced cases (stage 3 \& 4) randomized between combination chemotherapy versus whole abdominal irradiation and found significant improvement in survival in the chemotherapy arm.

NSGO-EC-9501 and MaNGO studies have indicated that adjuvant chemotherapy added to adjuvant radiotherapy may improve survival compared to adjuvant radiotherapy alone in early stage medium and high risk patients. One may conclude that impact on survival comes only from chemotherapy. Many investigators have therefore adapted adjuvant chemotherapy as standard treatment in various countries including Denmark. However, such conclusion has low level of evidence, as there are no randomized phase III studies comparing postoperative observation alone versus adjuvant chemotherapy.

It is of utmost importance to demonstrate efficacy of adjuvant combination chemotherapy in a randomized phase III trial comparing to no further treatment in the medium and high risk node negative stage 1 \& 2 patients.

Combination chemotherapy regimen of paclitaxel-carboplatin is proposed in this study, as this combination is effective and well tolerated.

The eligible patients for such a study are a fraction of patients with endometrial cancer therefore this study will be performed within the ENGOT collaboration.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Endometrial Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Observation

postoperative observation only

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

observation

Intervention Type OTHER

active observation

Combination chemotherapy

postoperative 6 courses of 3 weekly iv carboplatin-paclitaxel combination chemotherapy

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

carboplatin and paclitaxel

Intervention Type DRUG

6 courses of iv 3-weekly chemotherapy Carboplatin AUC5 Paclitaxel 175mg/m2

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

carboplatin and paclitaxel

6 courses of iv 3-weekly chemotherapy Carboplatin AUC5 Paclitaxel 175mg/m2

Intervention Type DRUG

observation

active observation

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Target Population

1. Only node-negative patients are eligible: Histological confirmed endometrial carcinoma with no macroscopic remaining tumour after primary surgery and lymph-node negative disease, with one of the following postoperative FIGO 2009 stage and grade:

1. Stage I grade 3 endometrioid adenocarcinoma
2. Stage II endometrioid adenocarcinoma
3. Stage I and II type 2 histology (clear cell, serous, squamous cell carcinoma, or undifferentiated carcinoma) Prior therapy
2. Patients have undergone hysterectomy (total abdominal hysterectomy, radical hysterectomy, laparoscopic or robotic hysterectomy) and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) and pelvic lymphadenectomy (LNE).
3. LNE: minimum 12 pelvic nodes (6 from each side) should be removed. Para-aortic LNE is optional
4. Omentectomy strongly recommended in clear cell, serous or undifferentiated carcinoma.
5. Surgery performed within 10 weeks of randomization. If the dates for hysterectomy and lymph node dissection are different, 10 weeks are counted from the last surgery, and in that case the gap between two surgeries should not exceed 8 weeks.

6. Patients must give informed consent according to the rules and regulations of the individual participating centres
7. Patients have not received any other anticancer therapy other than surgery.
8. Adjuvant vaginal brachytherapy is permitted in both arms. In chemotherapy arm, timing of VBT should not cause delay in chemotherapy delivery.
9. Patients must have a WHO performance status of 0-2
10. Patients must have an adequate bone-marrow, renal and hepatic function (WBC ≥3.0x109/L, neutrophils ≥1.5x109/L, platelets ≥100x109/L, total S-bilirubin \<2 x upper normal value, ALAT \<2.5 x upper normal value, estimated GFR \>50 ml/min (measured or calculated according to Cockroft-Gault or Jeliffe). Up to 5% deviation for hematological values and 10% deviation for s-bilirubin and ALAT are tolerated.
11. Life expectancy of at least 12 weeks
12. Patients must be fit to receive combination chemotherapy
13. Patient's age \>18 years

Exclusion Criteria

Target Disease Exceptions

1. Carcinosarcoma, Sarcomas or small cell carcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation.

Prohibited Treatments and/or Therapies
2. External Beam Radiotherapy
3. Concurrent cancer therapy
5. Previous or concurrent malignant disease except for curatively treated carcinoma in situ of the cervix or basal cell carcinoma of the skin
6. Active infection or other serious underlying medical condition, which might prevent the patient from receiving treatment or to be followed
7. Whatever reasons which interferes with an adequate follow-up
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - EORTC

NETWORK

Sponsor Role collaborator

Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie Austria

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

North Eastern German Society of Gynaecological Oncology

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Nordic Society of Gynaecological Oncology - Clinical Trials Unit

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Belgian Gynaecological Oncology Group

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Mario Negri Gynecologic Oncology group (MaNGO)

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Israeli Society of Gynecologic Oncology

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Multicenter Italian Trials in Ovarian cancer and gynecologic malignancies (MITO)

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Central and Eastern European Oncology Group

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Danish Gynecological Cancer Group

NETWORK

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mansoor R Mirza, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Danish Gynecological Cancer Group

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Danish Gynecological Cancer Group (DGCG)

Copenhagen, , Denmark

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2010-023081-52

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

ENGOT-EN2-DGCG

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.