Trial Outcomes & Findings for FLT PET/CT for Staging, Target Definition and Assessment of Response to Therapy in Patients With Esophageal Cancer (NCT NCT01243619)
NCT ID: NCT01243619
Last Updated: 2017-05-17
Results Overview
Determine the possibility of aquiring three sets of serial Positron emission tomography (PET) scans from 5 patients at designated time points and to develop a mechanism to import and analyze images from F-fluoro-3'-deoxy-3'-L-fluorothymidine (FLT)-PET, Fluorodeoxyglucose(FDG)-PET and Computed Tomography (CT) on a single advanced software platform with deformable image registration capability. We will report patient acceptance of and compliance with this regimen, as well as the utility of the software platform for conducting the proposed analysis.
COMPLETED
NA
5 participants
1 year
2017-05-17
Participant Flow
Single arm open label pilot study. Study was expected to enroll five patients at Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital. The study was initiated in August 2010 and the primary completion date was March 2013.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
All Participants
All participants in the trial received an FDG PET scan before and after chemoradiation for esophageal cancer. In addition, as experimental staging studies, patients on this protocol received a third FDG PET scan during chemoradiation, and received three FLT PET scans before, during and after chemoradiation. All patients received standard of care chemotherapy and radiation and went on to esphagectomy.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
5
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
5
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
FLT PET/CT for Staging, Target Definition and Assessment of Response to Therapy in Patients With Esophageal Cancer
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
All Participants
n=5 Participants
All participants in the trial received an FDG PET scan before and after chemoradiation for esophageal cancer. In addition, as experimental staging studies, patients on this protocol received a third FDG PET scan during chemoradiation, and received three FLT PET scans before, during and after chemoradiation. All patients received standard of care chemotherapy and radiation and went on to esphagectomy.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
63.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.6 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 yearDetermine the possibility of aquiring three sets of serial Positron emission tomography (PET) scans from 5 patients at designated time points and to develop a mechanism to import and analyze images from F-fluoro-3'-deoxy-3'-L-fluorothymidine (FLT)-PET, Fluorodeoxyglucose(FDG)-PET and Computed Tomography (CT) on a single advanced software platform with deformable image registration capability. We will report patient acceptance of and compliance with this regimen, as well as the utility of the software platform for conducting the proposed analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=5 Participants
All participants in the trial received an FDG PET scan before and after chemoradiation for esophageal cancer. In addition, as experimental staging studies, patients on this protocol received a third FDG PET scan during chemoradiation, and received three FLT PET scans before, during and after chemoradiation. All patients received standard of care chemotherapy and radiation and went on to esphagectomy.
All patients accepted and complied with having three sets of PET scans performed (six total PET scans).
The software used in this protocol has allowed quantitative comparison among the PET scans.
|
|---|---|
|
Feasibility: Determined by the Number of Participants Who Had All Three Sets of Completed Serial PET Scans That Were Imported for Analysis
|
5 participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 1 yearWe will compare the findings of FDG and FLT PET scans at pre-treatment, mid-treatment and post-treatment time points to determine how closely they correlate with each other, and if there is a specific time point at which any observed differences between FDG and FLT PET scans are most pronounced. We will also determine which of the six PET scans may correlate most closely with the response to treatment as determined by pathologic findings at esophagectomy.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
Adverse Events
All Participants
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Harvey Mamon MD, PhD
Brigham and Women's Hospital / Dana Farber Cancer Institute
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place