Comparison of Endothelial Dysfunction (BMS vs SES) in the Same Patient With Multiple Coronary Artery Lesions

NCT ID: NCT01242306

Last Updated: 2010-11-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE1/PHASE2

Total Enrollment

25 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-03-31

Study Completion Date

2009-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a prospective, randomised study to compare the endothelial dysfunction of BMS vs SES, both implanted in the same patient with multiple de novo coronary artery lesions undergoing elective PCI. The primary end point will be the evaluation of endothelial dysfunction at 6 months follow-up by measuring the change in vessel diameter in 5 points of the stent and peri-stent site after infusion of acetylcholine.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This prospective, randomised study compares the endothelial dysfunction of BMS vs SES, both implanted in the same patient with multiple de novo coronary artery lesions undergoing elective PCI. From february 2009 to may 2009 we aim to enroll 20 patients with at least two de novo significant angiographic stenoses in different coronary segments who will have similar diameter and length. The primary end point will be the evaluation of endothelial dysfunction at 6 months follow-up by measuring the change in vessel diameter in 5 points of the stent and peri-stent site after infusion of acetylcholine.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Endothelial Dysfunction

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

endothelial dysfunction acetylcholine bms ses

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

BMS arm

bare metal stent arm

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

intracoronary infusion of acetylcholine

Intervention Type DRUG

Acetylcholine will be infused at a concentration of 140 microg/minute, over a period of 2 minutes, yielding estimated intracoronary concentrations of 10(-5)mol/L, with the assumption of a flow rate of 80mL/min). All infusions will be delivered at a constant rate using an infusion pump. Subsequently, in order to evaluate the endothelium-independent vasomotor response, 2mg of isosorbide dinitrate or bolus 250microg of nitroglycerine will be infused by intracoronary bolus in all subjects. The response to nitrate will be recorded 1 minute after the bolus. A 3-min period will be allowed to elapse between each drug infusion.

SES arm

sirolimus eluting stent arm

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

intracoronary infusion of acetylcholine

Intervention Type DRUG

Acetylcholine will be infused at a concentration of 140 microg/minute, over a period of 2 minutes, yielding estimated intracoronary concentrations of 10(-5)mol/L, with the assumption of a flow rate of 80mL/min). All infusions will be delivered at a constant rate using an infusion pump. Subsequently, in order to evaluate the endothelium-independent vasomotor response, 2mg of isosorbide dinitrate or bolus 250microg of nitroglycerine will be infused by intracoronary bolus in all subjects. The response to nitrate will be recorded 1 minute after the bolus. A 3-min period will be allowed to elapse between each drug infusion.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

intracoronary infusion of acetylcholine

Acetylcholine will be infused at a concentration of 140 microg/minute, over a period of 2 minutes, yielding estimated intracoronary concentrations of 10(-5)mol/L, with the assumption of a flow rate of 80mL/min). All infusions will be delivered at a constant rate using an infusion pump. Subsequently, in order to evaluate the endothelium-independent vasomotor response, 2mg of isosorbide dinitrate or bolus 250microg of nitroglycerine will be infused by intracoronary bolus in all subjects. The response to nitrate will be recorded 1 minute after the bolus. A 3-min period will be allowed to elapse between each drug infusion.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

cypher coroflex

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* stable angina pectoris
* at least two significant angiographic stenoses in different native coronary vessels or in the same vessel but two different ramifications with similar diameter
* non-surgical patients

Exclusion Criteria

* acute coronary syndromes
* myocardial infarction within 3 months from event
* clinical or angiographic coronary vasospasm
* coronary angiographic findings of a fresh thrombus in the initial angiography (filling defect proximal to or involving the stenosis)
* coronary anatomy unsuitable for for intracoronary acetylcholine testing (left main coronary artery disease \>30%, surgical three vessel disease or other anatomical considerations that make it unsafe to perform intracoronary studies)
* progression of lesions or development of de novo lesions in nontarget lesions or vessels on follow-up angiography
* patients with a vessel diameter \< 2,50 mm and length lesions \<10 and \>30 mm.
* patients with vessel diameter difference (SES vs BMS) \>0,5mm and length difference of the stenosis \>50%
* lesions treated with balloon injury \<10 mm or \>50 mm in length
* severe left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction
* bifurcation/ostial
* presence of an unhealed dissection identified by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) performed at the end of the study.
* angiographic restenosis in follow-up angiography
* patients with severe risk factors for endothelial dysfunction: severe renal failure, life expectancy less than 1 year, uncontrolled diabetes, uncontrolled hypertension (systolic blood pressure \>180mmHg), currently smoking, uncontrolled hypercholesterolemia (total cholesterol \>240mg/dl)
* any contraindication/nontolerance to the use of aspirin, heparin and/or clopidogrel
* lack of consent to participate
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo Forlanini

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

European Society of Cardiology

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Violini Roberto, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo Forlanini

Mischie Nicolae Alexandru, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

European Society of Cardiology

Nazzaro Marco, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo Forlanini

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo Forlanini

Roma, Roma, Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Mischie AN, Nazzaro MS, Fiorilli R, De Felice F, Musto C, Confessore P, Parma A, Boschetti C, Violini R. Head-to-head comparison of sirolimus-eluting stent versus bare metal stent evaluation of the coronary endothelial dysfunction in the same patient presenting with multiple coronary artery lesions: the CREDENTIAL study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Sep 1;82(3):E184-91. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24844. Epub 2013 Mar 5.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23359371 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CREDENTIAL

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id