Two Pneumatic Compression Devices in the Treatment of Lower Extremity Lymphedema

NCT ID: NCT01239160

Last Updated: 2020-11-06

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

238 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-11-02

Study Completion Date

2012-06-27

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The treatment of lymphedema has been a major focus of attention for physicians and scientists for several decades. At this time, no successful techniques have been developed to prevent lymphedema, and therefore, a great deal of emphasis is placed on treatment modalities that can lessen the severity and impede the progression of this debilitating condition.

The treatment on offer usually consists of a maintenance phase using compression garments and an intensive treatment phase, which includes the use of skin care, compression bandaging, exercise and manual lymphatic drainage (MLD). The intensive phase is usually described as complex decongestive therapy (CDT). This is time consuming and requires high resource usage. Pneumatic compression devices (PCD) offer and alternative to MLD and can be used by the patient. There are a number of devices on the market that are categorized into 1. without calibrated gradient compression 2. With calibrated gradient compression.

This trial will compare two PCDs, a simple device without calibrated compression, and an advanced device with calibrated compression, in the reduction of swelling and maintenance of reduced limb volume in 262 patients with lower limb lymphoedema. The primary end point will be limb volume reduction over 12 weeks of treatment, with secondary outcome after 24 weeks.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a Multicentre, prospective, single (assessor) blind randomised study. The primary objective of the study is to assess volume reduction in the treatment of lymphoedematous legs with an advanced PCD compared to a simple PCD in patients with lower limb lymphoedema. The main outcome is the percentage volume reduction of the affected limb at end of treatment compared to baseline.

Secondary objectives of the study are Assessment of safety Quality of life Health economic parameters

In total 262 patients with leg lymphoedema will be enrolled into the study. Patients eligible for the study are those who suffer from late stage II and stage III according to the International Society of Lymphology lymphoedema staging. Lymphoedematous legs can be of primary or secondary origin and uni or bilaterally affected. Medical history will be taken at baseline.

Patients will be taught how to use the device they have been randomised to. Visits will then take place at weeks 1,4,8,12 and 24 weeks. The device will be used for up to 60 minutes each day on the trial limb. At each visit sequential circumferences of the affected and unaffected limbs will be measured with a tape measure.

All adverse events will be documented. At beginning and end of study quality of life questionnaires and health economic information will be completed by the patients.

At the Derby site assessment of tissue quality will be made using ultrasound and moisture meter to assess tissue fluid.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lymphedema

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

lymphedema pneumatic compression device randomised clinical trial volume reduction

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Advanced PCD

The use of an advanced PCD device to reduce and maintain limb volume

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Flexitouch System

Intervention Type DEVICE

A segmental, programmable, gradient pneumatic compression device. It consists of a controller and garment set. The garments are constructed of nylon and have 27-32 chambers, depending upon garment size. The pressure setting is variable between "normal" and "increased." The device is intended to be used for 60 minutes per day

Simple PCD

The use of the Simple PCD is to reduce and maintain limb volume

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Hydroven FPR

Intervention Type DEVICE

The FH is an intermittent sequential external pneumatic compression system. The garment contains 3 compression chambers. The pressure range of the compressor device is 30-100 mmHg. It is intended to be used for 60 minutes per day.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Flexitouch System

A segmental, programmable, gradient pneumatic compression device. It consists of a controller and garment set. The garments are constructed of nylon and have 27-32 chambers, depending upon garment size. The pressure setting is variable between "normal" and "increased." The device is intended to be used for 60 minutes per day

Intervention Type DEVICE

Hydroven FPR

The FH is an intermittent sequential external pneumatic compression system. The garment contains 3 compression chambers. The pressure range of the compressor device is 30-100 mmHg. It is intended to be used for 60 minutes per day.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Subjects must be ≥ 18 years old or legal age in host country.
* Subjects must have a diagnosis of primary or secondary late Stage 2 or 3 unilateral or bilateral lower extremity lymphoedema.
* At time of initial evaluation, individuals must be at least 3 months post-surgery, chemotherapy and/or radiation treatment for cancer if applicable.
* If subjects were treated in a clinic setting for lymphoedema (Phase 1 treatment) they must be at least 3 months post completion of their acute care.

Exclusion Criteria

* Diagnosis of active or recurrent cancer, or less than 3 months at the time of initial evaluation from the completion of chemotherapy, radiation therapy or primary surgery for the treatment of cancer.
* Diagnosis of acute infection. The source of the infection must be treated for 2 weeks prior to admittance into the study.
* Diagnosis of acute thrombophlebitis (in last 2 months)
* Diagnosis of peripheral arterial disease (PAD): PAD is defined as an Ankle Brachial Index (ABI), of 0.7 or lower.
* Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis within the previous 6 months
* Diagnosis of pulmonary edema
* Diagnosis of congestive heart failure (uncontrolled)
* Diagnosis of chronic kidney disease with a Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) of less than 30 mls per minute.
* Patients with poorly controlled asthma (i.e. those with severe persistent symptoms throughout the day, night time awakenings several times per week, use of a beta2 agonist inhaler several times per day and those whose normal activity is extremely limited).
* Pregnancy
* Any condition where increased venous and lymphatic return is undesirable
* Inability or unwillingness to participate in all aspects of study protocol and/or inability to provide informed consent
* Currently participating in another clinical trial
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Tactile Medical

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Christine J Moffatt, RN PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Nottingham Trent University

Vaughan Keeley, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Derby Hospitals NHS Trust

Margaret Sneddon, RGN

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Glasgow

Peter J Franks, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Tactile Medical

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hope Research Institute

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Northwestern University

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Prairie Education & Research Cooperative

Springfield, Illinois, United States

Site Status

University of Missouri-Columbia,Ellis Fischel Cancer Center, Lymphedema Therapy Clinic

Columbia, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Stony Brook University Medical Center

Stony Brook, New York, United States

Site Status

Carolinas Rehabilitation

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Ohio State University Medical Center

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

University of Pittsburgh Medical Center

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Greenville Hospital Systems

Greenville, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Fletcher Allen Health Care, Inc., University of Vermont

Colchester, Vermont, United States

Site Status

Flinders Medical Center

Adelaide, , Australia

Site Status

LOROS Hospice

Leicester, Leics, United Kingdom

Site Status

King's Mill Hospital

Mansfield, Nottinghamshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

University of Glasgow

Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom

Site Status

Abertawe Bro Morgannwg University

Swansea, West Glamorgan, United Kingdom

Site Status

Royal Derby Hospital

Derby, , United Kingdom

Site Status

St Oswalds Hospice

Gosforth, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Kendal Lymphology Centre

Kendal, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Norfolk and Norwich University

Norwich, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Queens Medical Center

Nottingham, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Lymphoedema Clinic, Singleton Hospital

Swansea, , United Kingdom

Site Status

St Giles Hospice

Whittington, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Australia United Kingdom

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Flexitouch 1010

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id