Trial Outcomes & Findings for Understanding Quality and Equity in Wheelchairs for Veterans (NCT NCT01236170)
NCT ID: NCT01236170
Last Updated: 2019-06-27
Results Overview
The investigators will assess QOL with the Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey (VR-12) and two additional physical function items designed for patients with SCI. Eight QOL domains are assessed, including physical functioning, vitality, role limitations due to physical problems, role limitations due to emotional problems, bodily pain, general health, social functioning, and mental health. The VR-12 has been used extensively with Veterans in a variety of health domains and has shown to be reliable and valid in ambulatory care populations (Cronbach's alpha= .83-.85). The additional two items were added because previous research demonstrated that existing measures of physical function in the VR12 are not appropriate to patients with SCI and are not able to reveal differences in physical function among SCI patients. The investigators assessed physical QOL and mental QOL, both scales range from 0 (worst possible outcome) to 100 (best possible outcome).
COMPLETED
497 participants
Measured at baseline
2019-06-27
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Group 1
Veterans with spinal cord injury or amputated limbs who use a wheelchair as their primary source of mobility
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
497
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
482
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
15
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Understanding Quality and Equity in Wheelchairs for Veterans
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Group 1
n=482 Participants
Veterans with spinal cord injury or amputated limbs who use a wheelchair as their primary source of mobility
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Customized
<=18 years
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
Between 18 and 65 years
|
327 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
>=65 years
|
151 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female
|
19 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Male
|
462 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
482 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Measured at baselinePopulation: Only 468/482 participants were included in this analysis due to 14 participants having missing data.
The investigators will assess QOL with the Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey (VR-12) and two additional physical function items designed for patients with SCI. Eight QOL domains are assessed, including physical functioning, vitality, role limitations due to physical problems, role limitations due to emotional problems, bodily pain, general health, social functioning, and mental health. The VR-12 has been used extensively with Veterans in a variety of health domains and has shown to be reliable and valid in ambulatory care populations (Cronbach's alpha= .83-.85). The additional two items were added because previous research demonstrated that existing measures of physical function in the VR12 are not appropriate to patients with SCI and are not able to reveal differences in physical function among SCI patients. The investigators assessed physical QOL and mental QOL, both scales range from 0 (worst possible outcome) to 100 (best possible outcome).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 1
n=468 Participants
Veterans with spinal cord injury or amputated limbs who use a wheelchair as their primary source of mobility
|
|---|---|
|
Quality of Life Assessed With the Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey (VR-12)
Physical Quality of Life Summary Score
|
44.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.7
|
|
Quality of Life Assessed With the Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey (VR-12)
Mental Quality of Life Summary Score
|
43.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.4
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: one time use, at baselineThe investigators assessed Satisfaction with Wheelchair Service Delivery using the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8). The CSQ-8 is an 8-item, easily administered and scored measure of client satisfaction with services (e.g., "How would you rate the quality of service you have received?"). For the purpose of this study, the investigators asked patients to focus specifically on satisfaction with service at their SCI or AL wheelchair clinic. The scale is unidimensional, yielding a homogenous estimate of general satisfaction with services. It is scored by summing the individual items and produces a score ranging from 8-32, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction. The CSQ-8 has been extensively used in a variety of healthcare settings, operates similarly across ethnic groups, and demonstrates excellent psychometric properties (Cronbach's alpha = .83-.93).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 1
n=482 Participants
Veterans with spinal cord injury or amputated limbs who use a wheelchair as their primary source of mobility
|
|---|---|
|
Satisfaction With Wheelchair Service Delivery
|
26.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: one time use, at baselineWe assessed Satisfaction with patients' prescribe wheelchair using the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology ( (QUEST). We used an 8-item subset of the QUEST to assess patients' satisfaction with their wheelchair. QUEST is the first and only standardized satisfaction assessment tool that was designed specifically for assistive technology devices. Its' development was based on major theoretical models of assistive technology. The QUEST has been widely cited and used in clinical and research settings, and demonstrates strong psychometric properties (Cronbach's alpha = .82). The 8 item subset focuses specifically on patients' satisfaction with different aspects of their wheelchair (e.g., "How satisfied are you with the dimensions (size, height, length, width) of your assistive device?"). Responses range from 1(not satisfied at all) to 5(very satisfied). Cronbach's alpha = .80 for the 8-item wheelchair subset. We chose to eliminate the other four items.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 1
n=482 Participants
Veterans with spinal cord injury or amputated limbs who use a wheelchair as their primary source of mobility
|
|---|---|
|
Satisfaction With Prescribed Wheelchair
|
4.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Measured at baselinePopulation: 452/482 participants were included in this analysis because 30 participants had missing data.
We assessed participation in society with a modified version of the Craig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Technique Short Form (CHART-SF). The CHART was designed to provide a simple measure of involvement in life situations ("In a typical week, how many days do you get out of your house and go somewhere?") with sub-scales measuring physical independence, cognitive independence, mobility, occupation, social integration and economic self-sufficiency. The CHART-SF produces scores ranging from 0 (severe handicap) to 100 (no handicap) for each of the sub-scales and a total score ranging from 0-600. The CHART-SF is the most widely used participation measure in rehabilitation research. It has been used in various ethnic groups, and has well-established psychometric properties (test-retest reliability = .93; inter-rater reliability = .83). We dichotomized into "Disabled" and "Not Disabled" where disabled are those with a CHART score \<100, and not disabled are those with a CHART score \>=100
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 1
n=452 Participants
Veterans with spinal cord injury or amputated limbs who use a wheelchair as their primary source of mobility
|
|---|---|
|
Participation in Society
Disabled (<100)
|
208 participants
|
|
Participation in Society
Not Disabled (>=100)
|
244 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: over a two week period following baselinePopulation: Access to data is no longer available.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
Adverse Events
Group 1
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place