Bendamustine + Rituximab in Older Patients With Previously Untreated Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma

NCT ID: NCT01234467

Last Updated: 2017-05-24

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

23 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-03-31

Study Completion Date

2016-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this research study is to learn about the safety of the treatment with a combination of bendamustine and rituximab and to find out what effects, both good and bad this treatment has on DLBCL. In addition to learning about the combination of bendamustine and rituximab, the researchers are interested in learning about how this cancer treatment affects daily activities. Subjects will be asked to complete a Geriatric Assessment (GA). GAs are designed to gather information on memory, nutritional status, mental health, and level of social support. GAs are also designed to help the health care team understand how well subjects can carry out their day to day activities and to briefly describe what other medical conditions subjects may have. This assessment will help the health care team understand a subject's "functional age" (the age a subject functions at) as compared to a subject's actual age.

The researchers also want to learn how chemotherapy affects the aging process in our bodies. This is done by measuring the amount of p16 in blood. Researchers want to understand if chemotherapy changes the levels of p16 in blood.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This multicenter Phase II clinical study will investigate the complete response (CR) rate after therapy with bendamustine combined with rituximab in older (≥65 years old) patients with previously untreated stage II-IV DLBCL deemed poor candidates for cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin hydrochloride, vincristine (Oncovin®), prednisone, rituximab (CHOP-R); n=37. The hypothesis being tested is that this regimen will be safe and effective as frontline therapy in older DLBCL patients deemed poor candidates for CHOP-R. After 3 cycles of therapy, patients with less than a partial response (PR) will come off study, and be managed at the discretion of their treating physician. Patients who achieve a PR after 3 cycles will continue for a total of 8 cycles of therapy, while patients who achieve a CR will continue for a total of 6 cycles of therapy. Secondary objectives include overall response rates (ORR), disease-free, progression-free and overall survival, and an evaluation of the toxicity and tolerability of the regimen.

This trial also includes an exploratory analysis designed to evaluate a potential correlation between expression of the senescence marker p16INK4a and the toxicity associated with this regimen.

In addition, patients will be asked to participate in a Geriatric Assessment (GA) tool during the trial.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Lymphoma, Diffuse Large-Cell Diffuse Large-Cell Lymphoma Lymphoma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Bendamustine, Rituximab

This is a single arm intervention where patients will receive bendamustine at a dose of 120 mg/m\^2 infused over 60 minutes in days 1 and 2 of each 21 day cycle along with rituximab 375 mg/m\^2 after bendamustine on day 1 of each cycle. Patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) of 3 at baseline were allowed to receive bendamustine at a dose of 90 mg/m\^2 daily with a dose increase to 120 mg/m\^2 daily if their ECOG improved.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Bendamustine

Intervention Type DRUG

Dosage Form: Intravenous (60 minute infusion) Dosage: 120mg/m2 (ECOG = 0-2) or 90mg/m2 (ECOG = 3) Frequency: Day 1 and Day 2; Every 3 weeks of a 21 day cycle. Duration: 3-6 Cycles

Rituximab

Intervention Type DRUG

Dosage form: Intravenous Dosage: 375 mg/m2 Frequency: Day 1 of every 3 weeks of a 21 day Cycle Duration: 3-6 Cycles

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Bendamustine

Dosage Form: Intravenous (60 minute infusion) Dosage: 120mg/m2 (ECOG = 0-2) or 90mg/m2 (ECOG = 3) Frequency: Day 1 and Day 2; Every 3 weeks of a 21 day cycle. Duration: 3-6 Cycles

Intervention Type DRUG

Rituximab

Dosage form: Intravenous Dosage: 375 mg/m2 Frequency: Day 1 of every 3 weeks of a 21 day Cycle Duration: 3-6 Cycles

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

TREANDA BENDAMUSTINE HYDROCHLORIDE (NDA) 022249 Rituxan (BLA) 103705

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with previously untreated , histologically confirmed, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), immunophenotyped for CD20
* Age greater than or equal to 65 years
* Stage II-IV
* Measurable disease including lesions that can be accurately measured in 2 dimensions by CT and have a greatest transverse diameter of 1cm or greater, and/or by bone marrow histopathology.
* ECOG performance status of 0-3
* Deemed poor candidate for CHOP-R due to ejection fraction less than or equal to 45%, ECOG performance status of 2, or in the opinion of the treating physician, patient would not tolerate administration of CHOP-R chemotherapy for other reasons,
* Life expectancy of at least 3 months;
* Documented negative serologic testing for HIV, Hepatitis B (unless positive due to prior vaccination), and hepatitis C within the year prior to enrollment
* Adequate bone marrow function (without transfusion support within one week of screening) function:
* Hemoglobin \> 8 g/dL
* Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) \>1000 cells/mm3
* Platelet count \> 75,000/mm3
* Adequate hepatic and renal function as demonstrated by:
* Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) \< 2.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN)
* Total serum bilirubin \< 2.5 x ULN
* Serum creatinine \< 1.5 x ULN
* If sexually active male of reproductive capability, has agreed to use a medically accepted form of contraception from time of enrollment to completion of all follow-up study visits
* Signed an institutional review board (IRB) approved informed consent document

Exclusion Criteria

* Central nervous system involvement by lymphoma
* History of previous allergic reactions to compounds of similar biological or chemical composition as rituximab or bendamustine
* Medical or other condition that would represent an inappropriate risk to the patient or would likely compromise achievement of the primary study objective.
* Other active malignancies (except: non-melanoma skin cancer, cervical carcinoma in situ without evidence of disease, prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia without evidence of prostate cancer)
* Patients on strong inhibitors of CYP1A2.
Minimum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cephalon

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Steven Park, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Seby B. Jones Cancer Center

Boone, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Northeast Medical Center

Concord, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Moses Cone Regional Cancer Center

Greensboro, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Leo Jenkins Cancer Center, East Carolina University Medical Center

Greenville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Rex Healthcare

Raleigh, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Marion L. Shepard Cancer Center

Washington, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://unclineberger.org/

Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center website

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

10-1405

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

LCCC 1011

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.