Trial Outcomes & Findings for Injectable Filler for Cheek Flattening (NCT NCT01225354)
NCT ID: NCT01225354
Last Updated: 2020-12-16
Results Overview
Upon completion of the study, 300 blinded evaluators will evaluate one of three binders comprised of a random visit photographs from baseline, optimal cosmetic result, and 1 month post optimal cosmetic result of 20 subjects. The 10-point (1=Not at all to 10=Extremely well) First Impression Scales consisting of 8 criteria. A score of 10 means favorable results and a score of 1 means unfavorable results.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
20 participants
After the 1-month post optimal correction visit for 20 subjects (averaged)
2020-12-16
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Calcium Hydroxylapatite
Subject will be treated at baseline and, if needed, at 2 weeks.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
20
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
19
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
1
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Injectable Filler for Cheek Flattening
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Calcium Hydroxylapatite
n=20 Participants
Subject will be treated at baseline and, if needed, at 2 weeks.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
20 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
48.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.71 • n=93 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
20 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
20 participants
n=93 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: After the 1-month post optimal correction visit for 20 subjects (averaged)Upon completion of the study, 300 blinded evaluators will evaluate one of three binders comprised of a random visit photographs from baseline, optimal cosmetic result, and 1 month post optimal cosmetic result of 20 subjects. The 10-point (1=Not at all to 10=Extremely well) First Impression Scales consisting of 8 criteria. A score of 10 means favorable results and a score of 1 means unfavorable results.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Calcium Hydroxylapatite
n=19 Participants
Subject will be treated at baseline and, if needed, at 2 weeks.
Calcium hydroxylapatite: Subjects will be treated to full correction at visit 1 and, if needed, a touch-up injection at 2 weeks.
|
|---|---|
|
Blinded Evaluations of First Impression
|
7.35 score on a scale
Interval 6.15 to 8.5
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 monthPopulation: All subjects completing indicated visit
Self-esteem change will be determined by patient self-evaluation using the Heatherton \& Polivy State Self-Esteem (HPSS). The primary variable will be measured as improvement in self-esteem from baseline self-evaluations. A 20-item scale that measures a participant's self-esteem at a given point in time. The 20 items are subdivided into 3 components of self-esteem: (1) performance self-esteem, social self-esteem, and appearance self-esteem. All items are answered using a 5-point scale (1= not at all, 2= a little bit, 3= somewhat, 4= very much, 5= extremely). Scores range from 20-100. Scores closer to 100 indicate a more favorable outcome.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Calcium Hydroxylapatite
n=19 Participants
Subject will be treated at baseline and, if needed, at 2 weeks.
Calcium hydroxylapatite: Subjects will be treated to full correction at visit 1 and, if needed, a touch-up injection at 2 weeks.
|
|---|---|
|
Self-esteem
|
8.105 units on a scale
Interval 7.0 to 9.0
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 weeksSelf-esteem change will be determined by patient self-evaluation using the Heatherton \& Polivy State Self-Esteem (HPSS). The primary variable will be measured as improvement in self-esteem from baseline self-evaluations. Self-esteem change will be determined by patient self-evaluation using the Heatherton \& Polivy State Self-Esteem (HPSS). The primary variable will be measured as improvement in self-esteem from baseline self-evaluations. A 20-item scale that measures a participant's self-esteem at a given point in time. The 20 items are subdivided into 3 components of self-esteem: (1) performance self-esteem, social self-esteem, and appearance self-esteem. All items are answered using a 5-point scale (1= not at all, 2= a little bit, 3= somewhat, 4= very much, 5= extremely). Scores range from 20-100. Scores closer to 100 indicate a more favorable outcome.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Calcium Hydroxylapatite
n=19 Participants
Subject will be treated at baseline and, if needed, at 2 weeks.
Calcium hydroxylapatite: Subjects will be treated to full correction at visit 1 and, if needed, a touch-up injection at 2 weeks.
|
|---|---|
|
Self-esteem
|
8.35 score on a scale
Interval 7.55 to 9.35
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline and 1 month post-OCR (averaged)Each subject will complete a 10-point (1-Not at all to 10-Very Much) scale evaluating their own first impression at Baseline and 1-month post-OCR. First impression scores were recorded at baseline and 1-month post-OCR, and an average of the two scores were reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Calcium Hydroxylapatite
n=19 Participants
Subject will be treated at baseline and, if needed, at 2 weeks.
Calcium hydroxylapatite: Subjects will be treated to full correction at visit 1 and, if needed, a touch-up injection at 2 weeks.
|
|---|---|
|
Subject First Impression
|
7.35 score on a scale
Interval 6.15 to 8.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 monthLive subject malar deficiency severity will be rated by PI at Visits 1-4 according to the SOBER scale (Weeks 1-4 correspond to Visits 1-4). SOBER Scale (Solish Beer Remington Scale): is used to grade facial rhytids in the malar region. Grade 1: Mild Grade 2: Moderate Grade 3: Severe Grade 4: Extreme Grade 5: Extreme Scores closer to 1 is a more favorable outcome, while scores closer to 5 is a less favorable outcome
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Calcium Hydroxylapatite
n=19 Participants
Subject will be treated at baseline and, if needed, at 2 weeks.
Calcium hydroxylapatite: Subjects will be treated to full correction at visit 1 and, if needed, a touch-up injection at 2 weeks.
|
|---|---|
|
Assessment of Malar Deficiency
Visit 1
|
4.8 score on a scale
Interval 4.1 to 5.0
|
|
Assessment of Malar Deficiency
Visit 2
|
4.2 score on a scale
Interval 3.8 to 4.5
|
|
Assessment of Malar Deficiency
Visit 3
|
2.7 score on a scale
Interval 2.3 to 3.1
|
|
Assessment of Malar Deficiency
Visit 4
|
1.6 score on a scale
Interval 1.2 to 1.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 monthInvestigator will complete GAIS (Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale) at Visits 2-4 comparing overall appearance of current visit's photo to baseline photo. Worse: -1 No Change: 0 Improved: 1 Much Improved: 2 Very Much Improved: 3
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Calcium Hydroxylapatite
n=19 Participants
Subject will be treated at baseline and, if needed, at 2 weeks.
Calcium hydroxylapatite: Subjects will be treated to full correction at visit 1 and, if needed, a touch-up injection at 2 weeks.
|
|---|---|
|
Aesthetic Improvement
Visit 4
|
2.5 score on a scale
Interval 1.0 to 3.0
|
|
Aesthetic Improvement
Visit 2
|
1.7 score on a scale
Interval 1.0 to 3.0
|
|
Aesthetic Improvement
Visit 3
|
1.9 score on a scale
Interval 1.0 to 3.0
|
Adverse Events
Calcium Hydroxylapatite
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place