Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Randomized, Comparative, Open-label Study of IV Monofer® Administered as Maintenance Therapy by Single or Repeated Bolus Injections in Comparison With IV Iron Sucrose in Subjects With CKD-5D (NCT NCT01222884)
NCT ID: NCT01222884
Last Updated: 2015-12-02
Results Overview
The primary outcome measure was the proportion of subjects who were able to maintain haemoglobin between 9.5 and 12.5 g/dL (both values included) at week 6. Haemoglobin was measured by a blood sample at the different visits. All blood samples were taken before the dialysis from the dialysis catheter. Intravenous iron was administered during dialysis, at least 30 min after the start and at least 1 h before the end of dialysis.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
351 participants
Baseline to 6 weeks
2015-12-02
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Iron Isomaltoside 1000
Iron isomaltoside 1000 (Monofer)administered as 500 mg intravenous single bolus injections OR administered as 500 mg fractionated (100mg+200mg+200mg) intravenous bolus injection
Monofer: Iron isomaltoside 1000 (Monofer®) administered as 500 mg intravenous single bolus injection over approximately 2 minutes
|
Iron Sucrose
Iron sucrose administered as 500 mg fractionated (100mg+200mg+200mg) intravenous bolus injection
Iron sucrose: Iron sucrose is administered undiluted in doses of 100mg at baseline, 200mg at week 2 and 200 mg at week 4 as fractionated IV bolus injections according to local Summary of Product Characteristics
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
234
|
117
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
210
|
113
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
24
|
4
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
A Randomized, Comparative, Open-label Study of IV Monofer® Administered as Maintenance Therapy by Single or Repeated Bolus Injections in Comparison With IV Iron Sucrose in Subjects With CKD-5D
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Iron Isomaltoside 1000
n=234 Participants
Iron isomaltoside 1000 (Monofer)administered as 500 mg intravenous single bolus injections OR administered as 500 mg fractionated (100mg+200mg+200mg) intravenous bolus injection
Monofer: Iron isomaltoside 1000 (Monofer®) administered as 500 mg intravenous single bolus injection over approximately 2 minutes
|
Iron Sucrose
n=117 Participants
Iron sucrose administered as 500 mg fractionated (100mg+200mg+200mg) intravenous bolus injection
Iron sucrose: Iron sucrose is administered undiluted in doses of 100mg at baseline, 200mg at week 2 and 200 mg at week 4 as fractionated IV bolus injections according to local Summary of Product Characteristics
|
Total
n=351 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
129 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
66 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
195 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
105 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
51 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
156 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
60.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.2 • n=5 Participants
|
59.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.4 • n=7 Participants
|
60.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.9 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
76 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
43 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
119 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
158 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
74 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
232 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
India
|
44 participants
n=5 Participants
|
28 participants
n=7 Participants
|
72 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
|
131 participants
n=5 Participants
|
56 participants
n=7 Participants
|
187 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Russian Federation
|
6 participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 participants
n=7 Participants
|
9 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Poland
|
10 participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 participants
n=7 Participants
|
13 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Sweden
|
6 participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 participants
n=7 Participants
|
10 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Switzerland
|
13 participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 participants
n=7 Participants
|
19 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Romania
|
14 participants
n=5 Participants
|
12 participants
n=7 Participants
|
26 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Denmark
|
6 participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 participants
n=7 Participants
|
11 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
4 participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 6 weeksPopulation: The FAS population included all subjects who were randomised into the study, received at least one dose of the study drug, and had a Hb assessment. Subjects were included as randomised, regardless of which treatment they actually received.
The primary outcome measure was the proportion of subjects who were able to maintain haemoglobin between 9.5 and 12.5 g/dL (both values included) at week 6. Haemoglobin was measured by a blood sample at the different visits. All blood samples were taken before the dialysis from the dialysis catheter. Intravenous iron was administered during dialysis, at least 30 min after the start and at least 1 h before the end of dialysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Iron Isomaltoside 1000
n=226 Participants
Iron isomaltoside 1000 (Monofer)administered as 500 mg intravenous single bolus injections OR administered as 500 mg fractionated (100mg+200mg+200mg) intravenous bolus injection
Monofer: Iron isomaltoside 1000 (Monofer®) administered as 500 mg intravenous single bolus injection over approximately 2 minutes
|
Iron Sucrose
n=115 Participants
Iron sucrose administered as 500 mg fractionated (100mg+200mg+200mg) intravenous bolus injection
Iron sucrose: Iron sucrose is administered undiluted in doses of 100mg at baseline, 200mg at week 2 and 200 mg at week 4 as fractionated IV bolus injections according to local Summary of Product Characteristics
|
|---|---|---|
|
Ability to Maintain Hemoglobin Level
|
82.7 percentage of participants
|
82.6 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 weeksPopulation: The FAS population included all subjects who were randomised into the study, received at least one dose of the study drug, and had a Hb assessment. Subjects were included as randomised, regardless of which treatment they actually received.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Iron Isomaltoside 1000
n=216 Participants
Iron isomaltoside 1000 (Monofer)administered as 500 mg intravenous single bolus injections OR administered as 500 mg fractionated (100mg+200mg+200mg) intravenous bolus injection
Monofer: Iron isomaltoside 1000 (Monofer®) administered as 500 mg intravenous single bolus injection over approximately 2 minutes
|
Iron Sucrose
n=113 Participants
Iron sucrose administered as 500 mg fractionated (100mg+200mg+200mg) intravenous bolus injection
Iron sucrose: Iron sucrose is administered undiluted in doses of 100mg at baseline, 200mg at week 2 and 200 mg at week 4 as fractionated IV bolus injections according to local Summary of Product Characteristics
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Hemoglobin Concentration
|
-0.07 g/dL
Interval -5.5 to 2.9
|
-0.06 g/dL
Interval -4.9 to 2.8
|
Adverse Events
Iron Isomaltoside 1000
Iron Sucrose
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Iron Isomaltoside 1000
n=230 participants at risk
Iron isomaltoside 1000 (Monofer)administered as 500 mg intravenous single bolus injections OR administered as 500 mg fractionated (100mg+200mg+200mg) intravenous bolus injection
Monofer: Iron isomaltoside 1000 (Monofer®) administered as 500 mg intravenous single bolus injection over approximately 2 minutes
|
Iron Sucrose
n=114 participants at risk
Iron sucrose administered as 500 mg fractionated (100mg+200mg+200mg) intravenous bolus injection
Iron sucrose: Iron sucrose is administered undiluted in doses of 100mg at baseline, 200mg at week 2 and 200 mg at week 4 as fractionated IV bolus injections according to local Summary of Product Characteristics
|
|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
acute coronary syndrome
|
0.43%
1/230 • Number of events 1
The safety population included all subjects who were randomised and received at least one dose of iron isomaltoside 1000 or iron sulphate. The safety analyses was performed on the safety population
|
0.00%
0/114
The safety population included all subjects who were randomised and received at least one dose of iron isomaltoside 1000 or iron sulphate. The safety analyses was performed on the safety population
|
|
Cardiac disorders
acute myocardial infarction
|
0.43%
1/230 • Number of events 1
The safety population included all subjects who were randomised and received at least one dose of iron isomaltoside 1000 or iron sulphate. The safety analyses was performed on the safety population
|
0.00%
0/114
The safety population included all subjects who were randomised and received at least one dose of iron isomaltoside 1000 or iron sulphate. The safety analyses was performed on the safety population
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
duodenal ulcer haemorrhage
|
0.43%
1/230 • Number of events 1
The safety population included all subjects who were randomised and received at least one dose of iron isomaltoside 1000 or iron sulphate. The safety analyses was performed on the safety population
|
0.00%
0/114
The safety population included all subjects who were randomised and received at least one dose of iron isomaltoside 1000 or iron sulphate. The safety analyses was performed on the safety population
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
gingivalbleeding
|
0.43%
1/230 • Number of events 1
The safety population included all subjects who were randomised and received at least one dose of iron isomaltoside 1000 or iron sulphate. The safety analyses was performed on the safety population
|
0.00%
0/114
The safety population included all subjects who were randomised and received at least one dose of iron isomaltoside 1000 or iron sulphate. The safety analyses was performed on the safety population
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
lower gastrointestinal haemorrhage
|
0.43%
1/230 • Number of events 1
The safety population included all subjects who were randomised and received at least one dose of iron isomaltoside 1000 or iron sulphate. The safety analyses was performed on the safety population
|
0.00%
0/114
The safety population included all subjects who were randomised and received at least one dose of iron isomaltoside 1000 or iron sulphate. The safety analyses was performed on the safety population
|
|
General disorders
puncture site haemorrhage
|
0.43%
1/230 • Number of events 1
The safety population included all subjects who were randomised and received at least one dose of iron isomaltoside 1000 or iron sulphate. The safety analyses was performed on the safety population
|
0.00%
0/114
The safety population included all subjects who were randomised and received at least one dose of iron isomaltoside 1000 or iron sulphate. The safety analyses was performed on the safety population
|
|
General disorders
sudden death
|
0.43%
1/230 • Number of events 1
The safety population included all subjects who were randomised and received at least one dose of iron isomaltoside 1000 or iron sulphate. The safety analyses was performed on the safety population
|
0.00%
0/114
The safety population included all subjects who were randomised and received at least one dose of iron isomaltoside 1000 or iron sulphate. The safety analyses was performed on the safety population
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
biliary colic
|
0.43%
1/230 • Number of events 1
The safety population included all subjects who were randomised and received at least one dose of iron isomaltoside 1000 or iron sulphate. The safety analyses was performed on the safety population
|
0.00%
0/114
The safety population included all subjects who were randomised and received at least one dose of iron isomaltoside 1000 or iron sulphate. The safety analyses was performed on the safety population
|
|
Immune system disorders
hypersensitivity
|
0.43%
1/230 • Number of events 1
The safety population included all subjects who were randomised and received at least one dose of iron isomaltoside 1000 or iron sulphate. The safety analyses was performed on the safety population
|
0.00%
0/114
The safety population included all subjects who were randomised and received at least one dose of iron isomaltoside 1000 or iron sulphate. The safety analyses was performed on the safety population
|
|
Infections and infestations
arteriovenous fistula site infection
|
0.43%
1/230 • Number of events 1
The safety population included all subjects who were randomised and received at least one dose of iron isomaltoside 1000 or iron sulphate. The safety analyses was performed on the safety population
|
0.00%
0/114
The safety population included all subjects who were randomised and received at least one dose of iron isomaltoside 1000 or iron sulphate. The safety analyses was performed on the safety population
|
|
Infections and infestations
device related infection
|
0.43%
1/230 • Number of events 1
The safety population included all subjects who were randomised and received at least one dose of iron isomaltoside 1000 or iron sulphate. The safety analyses was performed on the safety population
|
0.00%
0/114
The safety population included all subjects who were randomised and received at least one dose of iron isomaltoside 1000 or iron sulphate. The safety analyses was performed on the safety population
|
|
Infections and infestations
infected fistula
|
0.43%
1/230 • Number of events 1
The safety population included all subjects who were randomised and received at least one dose of iron isomaltoside 1000 or iron sulphate. The safety analyses was performed on the safety population
|
0.00%
0/114
The safety population included all subjects who were randomised and received at least one dose of iron isomaltoside 1000 or iron sulphate. The safety analyses was performed on the safety population
|
|
Infections and infestations
lower respiratory tract infection
|
0.43%
1/230 • Number of events 1
The safety population included all subjects who were randomised and received at least one dose of iron isomaltoside 1000 or iron sulphate. The safety analyses was performed on the safety population
|
0.88%
1/114 • Number of events 1
The safety population included all subjects who were randomised and received at least one dose of iron isomaltoside 1000 or iron sulphate. The safety analyses was performed on the safety population
|
|
Infections and infestations
respiratory tract infection
|
0.43%
1/230 • Number of events 1
The safety population included all subjects who were randomised and received at least one dose of iron isomaltoside 1000 or iron sulphate. The safety analyses was performed on the safety population
|
0.00%
0/114
The safety population included all subjects who were randomised and received at least one dose of iron isomaltoside 1000 or iron sulphate. The safety analyses was performed on the safety population
|
|
Infections and infestations
staphylococcol bacteraimia
|
0.00%
0/230
The safety population included all subjects who were randomised and received at least one dose of iron isomaltoside 1000 or iron sulphate. The safety analyses was performed on the safety population
|
0.88%
1/114 • Number of events 1
The safety population included all subjects who were randomised and received at least one dose of iron isomaltoside 1000 or iron sulphate. The safety analyses was performed on the safety population
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
fall
|
1.3%
3/230 • Number of events 3
The safety population included all subjects who were randomised and received at least one dose of iron isomaltoside 1000 or iron sulphate. The safety analyses was performed on the safety population
|
0.00%
0/114
The safety population included all subjects who were randomised and received at least one dose of iron isomaltoside 1000 or iron sulphate. The safety analyses was performed on the safety population
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
arteriovenous fistula site haemorrhage
|
0.87%
2/230 • Number of events 2
The safety population included all subjects who were randomised and received at least one dose of iron isomaltoside 1000 or iron sulphate. The safety analyses was performed on the safety population
|
0.00%
0/114
The safety population included all subjects who were randomised and received at least one dose of iron isomaltoside 1000 or iron sulphate. The safety analyses was performed on the safety population
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
femoral neck fracture
|
0.43%
1/230 • Number of events 1
The safety population included all subjects who were randomised and received at least one dose of iron isomaltoside 1000 or iron sulphate. The safety analyses was performed on the safety population
|
0.00%
0/114
The safety population included all subjects who were randomised and received at least one dose of iron isomaltoside 1000 or iron sulphate. The safety analyses was performed on the safety population
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
vascular graft occlusion
|
0.43%
1/230 • Number of events 1
The safety population included all subjects who were randomised and received at least one dose of iron isomaltoside 1000 or iron sulphate. The safety analyses was performed on the safety population
|
0.00%
0/114
The safety population included all subjects who were randomised and received at least one dose of iron isomaltoside 1000 or iron sulphate. The safety analyses was performed on the safety population
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
anaesthetic complication
|
0.00%
0/230
The safety population included all subjects who were randomised and received at least one dose of iron isomaltoside 1000 or iron sulphate. The safety analyses was performed on the safety population
|
0.88%
1/114 • Number of events 1
The safety population included all subjects who were randomised and received at least one dose of iron isomaltoside 1000 or iron sulphate. The safety analyses was performed on the safety population
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
road traffic accident
|
0.00%
0/230
The safety population included all subjects who were randomised and received at least one dose of iron isomaltoside 1000 or iron sulphate. The safety analyses was performed on the safety population
|
0.88%
1/114 • Number of events 1
The safety population included all subjects who were randomised and received at least one dose of iron isomaltoside 1000 or iron sulphate. The safety analyses was performed on the safety population
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
fluid overload
|
0.43%
1/230 • Number of events 1
The safety population included all subjects who were randomised and received at least one dose of iron isomaltoside 1000 or iron sulphate. The safety analyses was performed on the safety population
|
0.00%
0/114
The safety population included all subjects who were randomised and received at least one dose of iron isomaltoside 1000 or iron sulphate. The safety analyses was performed on the safety population
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
musculoskeletal pain
|
0.43%
1/230 • Number of events 1
The safety population included all subjects who were randomised and received at least one dose of iron isomaltoside 1000 or iron sulphate. The safety analyses was performed on the safety population
|
0.00%
0/114
The safety population included all subjects who were randomised and received at least one dose of iron isomaltoside 1000 or iron sulphate. The safety analyses was performed on the safety population
|
|
Nervous system disorders
brain stem infarction
|
0.43%
1/230 • Number of events 1
The safety population included all subjects who were randomised and received at least one dose of iron isomaltoside 1000 or iron sulphate. The safety analyses was performed on the safety population
|
0.00%
0/114
The safety population included all subjects who were randomised and received at least one dose of iron isomaltoside 1000 or iron sulphate. The safety analyses was performed on the safety population
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
nephrolithiasis
|
0.43%
1/230 • Number of events 1
The safety population included all subjects who were randomised and received at least one dose of iron isomaltoside 1000 or iron sulphate. The safety analyses was performed on the safety population
|
0.00%
0/114
The safety population included all subjects who were randomised and received at least one dose of iron isomaltoside 1000 or iron sulphate. The safety analyses was performed on the safety population
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
prostatitis
|
0.00%
0/230
The safety population included all subjects who were randomised and received at least one dose of iron isomaltoside 1000 or iron sulphate. The safety analyses was performed on the safety population
|
0.88%
1/114 • Number of events 1
The safety population included all subjects who were randomised and received at least one dose of iron isomaltoside 1000 or iron sulphate. The safety analyses was performed on the safety population
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
dyspnoea
|
0.00%
0/230
The safety population included all subjects who were randomised and received at least one dose of iron isomaltoside 1000 or iron sulphate. The safety analyses was performed on the safety population
|
0.88%
1/114 • Number of events 1
The safety population included all subjects who were randomised and received at least one dose of iron isomaltoside 1000 or iron sulphate. The safety analyses was performed on the safety population
|
|
Vascular disorders
aortic stenosis
|
0.43%
1/230 • Number of events 1
The safety population included all subjects who were randomised and received at least one dose of iron isomaltoside 1000 or iron sulphate. The safety analyses was performed on the safety population
|
0.00%
0/114
The safety population included all subjects who were randomised and received at least one dose of iron isomaltoside 1000 or iron sulphate. The safety analyses was performed on the safety population
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Iron Isomaltoside 1000
n=230 participants at risk
Iron isomaltoside 1000 (Monofer)administered as 500 mg intravenous single bolus injections OR administered as 500 mg fractionated (100mg+200mg+200mg) intravenous bolus injection
Monofer: Iron isomaltoside 1000 (Monofer®) administered as 500 mg intravenous single bolus injection over approximately 2 minutes
|
Iron Sucrose
n=114 participants at risk
Iron sucrose administered as 500 mg fractionated (100mg+200mg+200mg) intravenous bolus injection
Iron sucrose: Iron sucrose is administered undiluted in doses of 100mg at baseline, 200mg at week 2 and 200 mg at week 4 as fractionated IV bolus injections according to local Summary of Product Characteristics
|
|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
diarrhoea
|
2.2%
5/230 • Number of events 5
The safety population included all subjects who were randomised and received at least one dose of iron isomaltoside 1000 or iron sulphate. The safety analyses was performed on the safety population
|
1.8%
2/114 • Number of events 2
The safety population included all subjects who were randomised and received at least one dose of iron isomaltoside 1000 or iron sulphate. The safety analyses was performed on the safety population
|
|
Infections and infestations
nasopharyngitis
|
2.6%
6/230 • Number of events 6
The safety population included all subjects who were randomised and received at least one dose of iron isomaltoside 1000 or iron sulphate. The safety analyses was performed on the safety population
|
0.88%
1/114 • Number of events 1
The safety population included all subjects who were randomised and received at least one dose of iron isomaltoside 1000 or iron sulphate. The safety analyses was performed on the safety population
|
|
Infections and infestations
lower respiratory tract infection
|
1.7%
4/230 • Number of events 5
The safety population included all subjects who were randomised and received at least one dose of iron isomaltoside 1000 or iron sulphate. The safety analyses was performed on the safety population
|
2.6%
3/114 • Number of events 4
The safety population included all subjects who were randomised and received at least one dose of iron isomaltoside 1000 or iron sulphate. The safety analyses was performed on the safety population
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
fall
|
3.0%
7/230 • Number of events 7
The safety population included all subjects who were randomised and received at least one dose of iron isomaltoside 1000 or iron sulphate. The safety analyses was performed on the safety population
|
0.00%
0/114
The safety population included all subjects who were randomised and received at least one dose of iron isomaltoside 1000 or iron sulphate. The safety analyses was performed on the safety population
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
procedural hypotension
|
2.2%
5/230 • Number of events 18
The safety population included all subjects who were randomised and received at least one dose of iron isomaltoside 1000 or iron sulphate. The safety analyses was performed on the safety population
|
0.88%
1/114 • Number of events 2
The safety population included all subjects who were randomised and received at least one dose of iron isomaltoside 1000 or iron sulphate. The safety analyses was performed on the safety population
|
|
Investigations
C-reactive protein increased
|
2.6%
6/230 • Number of events 6
The safety population included all subjects who were randomised and received at least one dose of iron isomaltoside 1000 or iron sulphate. The safety analyses was performed on the safety population
|
0.88%
1/114 • Number of events 1
The safety population included all subjects who were randomised and received at least one dose of iron isomaltoside 1000 or iron sulphate. The safety analyses was performed on the safety population
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
hyperphosphataemia
|
2.2%
5/230 • Number of events 5
The safety population included all subjects who were randomised and received at least one dose of iron isomaltoside 1000 or iron sulphate. The safety analyses was performed on the safety population
|
3.5%
4/114 • Number of events 4
The safety population included all subjects who were randomised and received at least one dose of iron isomaltoside 1000 or iron sulphate. The safety analyses was performed on the safety population
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
pain in extremity
|
2.2%
5/230 • Number of events 6
The safety population included all subjects who were randomised and received at least one dose of iron isomaltoside 1000 or iron sulphate. The safety analyses was performed on the safety population
|
0.00%
0/114
The safety population included all subjects who were randomised and received at least one dose of iron isomaltoside 1000 or iron sulphate. The safety analyses was performed on the safety population
|
|
Nervous system disorders
headache
|
3.0%
7/230 • Number of events 7
The safety population included all subjects who were randomised and received at least one dose of iron isomaltoside 1000 or iron sulphate. The safety analyses was performed on the safety population
|
3.5%
4/114 • Number of events 5
The safety population included all subjects who were randomised and received at least one dose of iron isomaltoside 1000 or iron sulphate. The safety analyses was performed on the safety population
|
Additional Information
Vice President Research & Development Department
Pharmacosmos A/S
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee If Pharmacosmos or its agents has not prepared a draft for submission to a peer reviewed journal prior to 1 year following completion of the study report, the investigators have the right to publish the results. Such publications are to be submitted to Pharmacosmos for comment 30 days prior to submission for publication.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER