SubCutaneous (SC) Versus Intravenous (IV) Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factors (G-CSF) for the Treatment of Neutropenia in Hospitalized Haemato-oncological Patients
NCT ID: NCT01222819
Last Updated: 2016-04-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE4
120 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-01-31
2013-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Filgrastim is a recombinant human CSF whose biological activity is similar to that of endogenous G-CSF.
In the treatment of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in patients with various types of cancer CSFs significantly reduced the time to neutrophil recovery and length of hospitalization.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Pegfilgrastim on Day +3 Compared to Day +1 After Salvage Chemotherapy for Patients With Refractory or Relapsed Aggressive Lymphoma
NCT02238873
G-CSF in Preventing Neutropenia in Patients With Solid Tumors Who Are Receiving Chemotherapy
NCT00770172
Comparison of Filgrastim and Filgrastim SD/01in Boosting White Cell Counts After Intensive Chemotherapy
NCT00004853
Use of Biosimilar Nivestim® to Prevent Chemo-induced Neutropenia. Real Life Study
NCT02454530
Antibiotic Therapy With or Without G-CSF in Treating Children With Neutropenia and Fever Caused by Chemotherapy
NCT00003739
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Objectives: To compare the time to neutropenia resolution with Intravenous (IV) versus Subcutaneous (SC) filgrastim administration among patients with acute leukemia, lymphoma or multiple myeloma in hospital. Secondarily, the investigators aim to assess comparative rates of infection, adverse effects and patients' satisfaction.
Methods: The investigators plan a randomized controlled trial comparing the effects of IV versus SC filgrastim (Neupogen®) given as per clinical indication on neutrophil counts in hospitalized patients. The investigators will include patients hospitalized in haemato-oncology ward starting filgrastim for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. The investigators will compare SC vs. IV filgrastim, both given as a single daily dose of 5 mcg/kg (rounded to 300 mcg or 480 mcg). No blinding will be used. Patients will be approached to obtain informed consent and randomized to the mode of filgrastim administration after the decision to administer the drug has been made. Patients will be crossed over to the alternative study arm on the subsequent chemotherapy course, if filgrastim is clinically indicated.
Outcomes:
Primary efficacy: Time to stable neutrophil recovery, defined as the number of days from start of filgrastim (day 1) until the neutrophil count has reached \>500/mcL for 3 consecutive days.
Primary safety: 30-day mortality or documented infection (CDI, MDI, bacteremia or probable/ proven IFI, see definitions below) within the chemotherapy course (before or after neutrophil recovery).
Secondary outcomes will include rates of infection, fever days, hospital stay, patient's satisfaction, other clinical endpoints and adverse events.
The investigators will assess the distribution pattern of the time to neutrophil recovery and compare groups using Student's t-test or the Mann-Whitney U test, as appropriate. The investigators will construct Kaplan-Meier curves for time to neutrophil recovery and compare treatment arms using a two-tailed log rank test. Dichotomous outcomes will be compared using a chi-square test. A sample of 96 patients with AML (48 in each group) was calculated to demonstrate equivalence allowing a 2-day difference between treatment arms (power of 90%, alpha 0.05).
Interim analysis and stopping rules: We will conduct interim analyses for safety assessment after every 50 patients recruited. Stopping rules will be based on the primary safety outcome (p\<0.1 for stopping) and deaths alone (p\<0.2 for stopping).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
IV filgrastim
as a single daily dose of 5 mcg/kg (rounded to 300 mcg or 480 mcg) in bolus IV injection, as per manufacturer's recommendations.
filgrastim
5 mcg/kg (rounded to 300 mcg or 480 mcg)
SC filgrastim
given as a single daily dose of 5 mcg/kg (rounded to 300 mcg or 480 mcg)
filgrastim
5 mcg/kg (rounded to 300 mcg or 480 mcg)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
filgrastim
5 mcg/kg (rounded to 300 mcg or 480 mcg)
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Will include patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), aggressive lymphoma or multiple myeloma.
* Will include both patients with or without a documented infection at the time of CSF initiation. Initiation of filgrastim treatment will follow the 2006 ASCO guidelines (departmental routines).
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
90 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Rabin Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mical Paul
Dr.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mical Paul, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Rabin Medical Center
Pia Raanani, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Rabin Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Rabin Medical Center; Beilinson Hospital and Davidoff Cancer Center
Petah Tikva, , Israel
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
5981
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.