Stereotactic Boost for Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
NCT ID: NCT01222572
Last Updated: 2015-06-04
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE1/PHASE2
1 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-12-31
2012-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Phase I Hypofractionated Stereotactic Boost (Radiotherapy) for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
NCT02252796
Study of Low-Dose Radiotherapy (LDRT) Concurrent Cisplatin/Carboplatin Plus Etoposide With Atezolizumab for Patients With Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer
NCT04622228
Radiation Therapy Plus Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Small Cell Lung Cancer
NCT00005022
Pembrolizumab After Lung SBRT for Medically Inoperable Early Stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
NCT03574220
Feasibility Study of SBRT Plus Chemotherapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma
NCT02319889
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Phase II: Two-year local control rate
Secondary Objectives
* To evaluate the safety and tolerability of a stereotactic boost to chemoradiotherapy.
* To determine the 2-year overall survival.
* To determine the 2-year disease-free survival.
* To determine the 2-year regional control rate.
* To characterize the change in pulmonary function tests over the first 2 years after chemoradiotherapy.
Statistical Design The Phase I study followed a standard 3+3 dose escalation design. Three dose levels were evaluated. The DLT observation period was the 7-week chemoradiotherapy period and the subsequent 8-week recovery period.
To better study the toxicity at the MTD of the stereotactic boost, there was a 10 patient expansion cohort.The primary endpoint of the phase II portion of the study was two-year local failure rate of the protocol treatment. Local failure was defined as biopsy-proven recurrent disease, or if a biopsy was not attainable, by increasing FDG-avidity on PET-CT on 2 consecutive scans at least 1 month apart. Based on prior studies, a 2-year local failure rate of 15% would be worthy of further study, while a 2-year local failure rate of 35% would not justify further utilization of the treatment. With 32 eligible patients on this study, the treatment will be deemed promising if at least 25 patients are free of local failure at 2 years. Using this design, there was an 8% probability of declaring the treatment worthy of further study if the true 2-year local failure rate was 35%, and a 90% probability of declaring the treatment worthy of further study if the true 2-year local failure rate was 15% by using a one-sided one-sample exact binomial test.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Stereotactic Boost to Chemoradiotherapy (Dose Level 1)
Chemotherapy: Etoposide 50 mg/m2, d1-5, 29-33 and Cisplatin 50 mg/m2, d1, 8, 29, 36; Conventional RT Dose to Primary: 54 Gy; Stereotactic Boost to Primary: 10 Gy; Total Dose to Primary: 64 Gy
\- Patients were to start radiation to the primary tumor site and to the lymph nodes and chemotherapy in the same week. The treatment was identical to standard chemotherapy and radiation treatment until the 5th week. During the fifth week, patents would undergo another radiation mapping session to prepare for the stereotactic boost. After that, the radiation treatments to the lymph nodes would continue but the radiation treatment to the primary cancer site would stop until the last week (week 7). During week 7, participants would receive 2 doses of stereotactic radiotherapy to the site of the primary tumor instead of the lower doses of radiotherapy that they were treated with up to that point.
Stereotactic boost
Conventional RT
Etoposide
Cisplatin
Stereotactic Boost to Chemoradiotherapy (Dose Level 2)
Chemotherapy: Etoposide 50 mg/m2, d1-5, 29-33 and Cisplatin 50 mg/m2, d1, 8, 29, 36; Conventional RT Dose to Primary: 50 Gy; Stereotactic Boost to Primary: 15 Gy; Total Dose to Primary: 65 Gy
\- Patients were to start radiation to the primary tumor site and to the lymph nodes and chemotherapy in the same week. The treatment was identical to standard chemotherapy and radiation treatment until the 5th week. During the fifth week, patents would undergo another radiation mapping session to prepare for the stereotactic boost. After that, the radiation treatments to the lymph nodes would continue but the radiation treatment to the primary cancer site would stop until the last week (week 7). During week 7, participants would receive 2 doses of stereotactic radiotherapy to the site of the primary tumor instead of the lower doses of radiotherapy that they were treated with up to that point.
Stereotactic boost
Conventional RT
Etoposide
Cisplatin
Stereotactic Boost to Chemoradiotherapy (Dose Level 3)
Chemotherapy: Etoposide 50 mg/m2, d1-5, 29-33 and Cisplatin 50 mg/m2, d1, 8, 29, 36; Conventional RT Dose to Primary: 46 Gy; Stereotactic Boost to Primary: 20 Gy; Total Dose to Primary: 66 Gy
\- Patients were to start radiation to the primary tumor site and to the lymph nodes and chemotherapy in the same week. The treatment was identical to standard chemotherapy and radiation treatment until the 5th week. During the fifth week, patents would undergo another radiation mapping session to prepare for the stereotactic boost. After that, the radiation treatments to the lymph nodes would continue but the radiation treatment to the primary cancer site would stop until the last week (week 7). During week 7, participants would receive 2 doses of stereotactic radiotherapy to the site of the primary tumor instead of the lower doses of radiotherapy that they were treated with up to that point.
Stereotactic boost
Conventional RT
Etoposide
Cisplatin
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Stereotactic boost
Conventional RT
Etoposide
Cisplatin
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Evaluated by a surgeon and deemed inoperable
* Measurable disease, defined as at least one lesion that can be accurately measured in at least one dimension as 10mm or greater with chest CT scan.
* No active malignancy within the past 5 years, except for non-melanoma skin cancers or carcinoma in situ of the cervix
* 18 years or older
* Life expectancy of greater then 6 months
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0, 1 or 2
* Normal organ and marrow function as outlined in the protocol
* Forced expiratory volume (FEV1) of 1 L or greater OR 50% or greater of predicted
Exclusion Criteria
* Prior history of thoracic radiotherapy
* May not be receiving any other study agents
* History of pulmonary fibrosis
* History of allergic reactions attributed to compounds of similar chemical or biologic composition to cisplatin or etoposide
* Primary tumor \< 1.5 cm beyond hilar lymphadenopathy (if any) and 1.5 cm from proximal bronchial tree, defined as the trachea, right and left mainstem bronchus, and lobar bronchi until the 1st lobar segment
* Uncontrolled intercurrent illness including but not limited to ongoing or active infection, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, cardiac arrhythmia, or psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements
* Pregnant or breast feeding women
* Individuals with a history of a different malignancy are ineligible except for the following circumstances. Individuals with a history of other malignancies are eligible if they have been disease-free for at least 5 years and are deemed by the investigator to be at low risk for recurrence of that malignancy. Individuals with the following cancers are eligible if diagnosed and treated within the past 5 years: cervical cancer in situ, and basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin
* Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive individuals on combination antiretroviral therapy
* Patients who are planned to receive the following medication: granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), bevacizumab, cetuximab, cyclosporine, anti-tumor necrosis factor agents, amifostine.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Brigham and Women's Hospital
OTHER
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Raymond H. Mak
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Raymond H. Mak, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
10-240
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.