Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
174 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
In the Japanese 3x3 factorial trial of telmisartan and hydrochlorothiazide in essential hypertension patients whose diastolic blood pressure (DBP) are equal or more than 95 mmHg, the DBP control rate (less than 90 mmHg) after 8 weeks treatment of the telmisartan 80 mg monotherapy group (66 patients) was 41.5%. There should be medical needs of the telmisartan 80 mg and amlodipine 5 mg fixed dose combination because some patients cannot have his or her blood pressure controlled with telmisartan 80 mg.
Thus, this clinical trial is being conducted to evaluate the antihypertensive effect and safety of a fixed-dose combination (FDC) drug of 2 antihypertensive agents with different pharmacological effects, telmisartan 80 mg and amlodipine 5 mg (T80/A5 mg), compared with telmisartan 80 mg (T80 mg) monotherapy in Japanese patients with essential hypertension who fail to respond adequately to treatment with the maximum dose of telmisartan 80 mg monotherapy. In this trial, a multi-centre, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, parallel group comparison method is employed.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Compare Efficacy and Safety of Telmisartan/Hydrochlorothiazide With Telmisartan/Hydrochlorothiazide Plus Amlodipine
NCT01911780
Filtered Trial for Telmisartan 40mg Non-responder
NCT00550953
Comparison in Japan T80/A5 (Telmisartan 80 mg and Amlodipine 5 mg) and T40/A5 (Telmisartan 40 mg and Amlodipine 5 mg)
NCT01286558
Telmisartan/Amlodipine (80/5) vs. Telmisartan/Amlodipine (40/5) vs. Amlodipine 10 or 5 in Resistant Hypertension
NCT00558428
An Eight-week Randomized,Double-blind Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Fixed-dose Combinations of T80+A5 Versus A5 Monotherapy in Patients With Hypertension Who Fail to Respond Adequately to Treatment With A5 Monotherapy
NCT01103960
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Telmisartan and amlodipine FDC
once a daily
Telmisartan and amlodipine
Telmisartan 80 mg and amlodipine 5 mg once a daily
Telmisartan monotherapy
once a daily
Telmisartan
80 mg once a daily
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Telmisartan and amlodipine
Telmisartan 80 mg and amlodipine 5 mg once a daily
Telmisartan
80 mg once a daily
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* If already taking antihypertensive drugs, mean seated diastolic blood pressure (DBP) must be \>=90 and \>=114 mmHg
* If not taking any antihypertensive drugs, mean seated DBP must be \>=95 and \>=114 mmHg
* Able to stop all current antihypertensive drugs without risk to the patient based on the investigators opinion.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with known or suspected secondary hypertension
* Patients with clinically relevant cardiac arrhythmia
* Congestive heart failure with New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class III-IV
* Patients with recent cardiovascular events
* Patients with a history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack within last 6 months before signing the informed consent form
* Patients with a history of sudden deterioration of renal function with angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) or angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors; or patients with post-renal transplant or post-nephrectomy
* Patients who have previously experienced characteristic symptoms of angioedema (such as facial, tongue, pharyngeal, or laryngeal swelling with dyspnea) during treatment with ARBs or ACE inhibitors
* Patients with known hypersensitivity to any component of the investigational product, or a known hypersensitivity to dihydropyridine-derived drugs
* Patients with hepatic and/or renal dysfunction
* Pre-menopausal women who are nursing or pregnant
20 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Boehringer Ingelheim
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Boehringer Ingelheim
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Boehringer Ingelheim
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
1235.36.01 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Chuo-ku,Tokyo, , Japan
1235.36.04 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Hiroshima, Hiroshima, , Japan
1235.36.02 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, , Japan
1235.36.03 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Suita, Osaka, , Japan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1235.36
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.