A Phase I Imaging and Pharmacodynamic Trial of CS-1008 in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

NCT ID: NCT01220999

Last Updated: 2022-10-28

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE1

Total Enrollment

19 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-10-12

Study Completion Date

2012-06-27

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This was a Phase 1, open-label, single-center study of CS-1008, an immunoglobulin G subclass 1 (IgG1) humanized monoclonal antibody, in subjects with advanced colorectal carcinoma who had received ≥ 1 prior chemotherapy regimen for metastatic disease. Primary study objectives were to determine the influence of the CS-1008 dose on the biodistribution, pharmacokinetics (PK) and tumor uptake of radiolabeled CS-1008 following a single infusion and following continuous sequential doses of CS-1008. Secondary objectives were to evaluate changes in tumor metabolism, antitumor response, and changes in serum apoptosis biomarkers and tumor response markers following treatment with CS-1008.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Eligible subjects were to be enrolled into one of 5 dose-escalation cohorts to receive CS-1008 administered weekly as an intravenous (IV) infusion over 30 ± 10 minutes. Each cohort initially comprised 2 subjects but was expanded in up to 5 subjects if additional biodistribution and/or PK data were required.

The initial infusion of CS-1008 on Day 1 was trace labeled with Indium-111 (111\^In-CS-1008; 5-7 mCi) and was investigated at escalating doses up to the standard loading dose, as follows: Cohort 1 (0.2 mg/kg), Cohort 2 (1 mg/kg), Cohort 3 (2 mg/kg), Cohort 4 (4 mg/kg), and Cohort 5 (6 mg/kg). The initial 111\^In-CS-1008 dose was followed by gamma camera imaging with blood sampling over a 10-day period to evaluate biodistribution, tumor uptake, PK, and serum biomarkers. Day 8 dosing comprised non-labeled CS-1008 at doses of 6 mg/kg in Cohorts 1-3, 4 mg/kg in Cohort 4, and 2 mg/kg in Cohort 5. Subsequent weekly infusions of standard dose CS-1008 (2 mg/kg) were administered on Days 15, 22, 29, 36, and 43. The Day 36 infusion of CS-1008 was also trace labeled with 111\^In (5-7 mCi), with subsequent gamma camera imaging and blood sampling.

Subjects were assessed for disease status using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1, serum tumor biomarkers (carcinoembryonic antigen \[CEA\]), and human-anti-CS-1008-antibody development (HAHA). Subjects were assessed for changes in tumor metabolism following CS-1008 administration using computed tomography (CT) or fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18\^F-FDG PET) scans.

Cycle 1 encompassed the first 7 weeks of therapy. Within 1 week (Days 44-50) after the last infusion of CS-1008, subjects completed an End of Study/End of Cycle 1 assessment. Subjects with stable disease or better (according to RECIST version 1.1) at the Day 44-50 reassessment were permitted to receive additional 4-week cycles of CS-1008 (2 mg/kg) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or subject/physician decision.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Colorectal Neoplasms

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Cohort 1

Subjects received an initial loading dose of 111\^In-CS-1008 (0.2 mg/kg) on Day 1, CS-1008 (6 mg/kg) on Day 8, and subsequent weekly doses of CS-1008 (2 mg/kg) on Days 15, 22, 29, 36, and 43; the Day 36 dose was also radiolabeled with 111\^In. Additional 4-week cycles of weekly CS-1008 (2 mg/kg) were permitted for subjects benefiting from treatment.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CS-1008

Intervention Type DRUG

CS-1008 was administered once weekly as an intravenous infusion over 30 ± 10 minutes at a dose range of 0.2 to 6 mg/kg. On Days 1 and 36, CS-1008 infusions were radiolabeled with 111\^In (5-7 mCi).

Cohort 2

Subjects received an initial loading dose of 111\^In-CS-1008 (1 mg/kg) on Day 1, CS-1008 (6 mg/kg) on Day 8, and subsequent weekly doses of CS-1008 (2 mg/kg) on Days 15, 22, 29, 36, and 43; the Day 36 dose was also radiolabeled with 111\^In. Additional 4-week cycles of weekly CS-1008 (2 mg/kg) were permitted for subjects benefiting from treatment.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CS-1008

Intervention Type DRUG

CS-1008 was administered once weekly as an intravenous infusion over 30 ± 10 minutes at a dose range of 0.2 to 6 mg/kg. On Days 1 and 36, CS-1008 infusions were radiolabeled with 111\^In (5-7 mCi).

Cohort 3

Subjects received an initial loading dose of 111\^In-CS-1008 (2 mg/kg) on Day 1, CS-1008 (6 mg/kg) on Day 8, and subsequent weekly doses of CS-1008 (2 mg/kg) on Days 15, 22, 29, 36, and 43; the Day 36 dose was also radiolabeled with 111\^In. Additional 4-week cycles of weekly CS-1008 (2 mg/kg) were permitted for subjects benefiting from treatment.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CS-1008

Intervention Type DRUG

CS-1008 was administered once weekly as an intravenous infusion over 30 ± 10 minutes at a dose range of 0.2 to 6 mg/kg. On Days 1 and 36, CS-1008 infusions were radiolabeled with 111\^In (5-7 mCi).

Cohort 4

Subjects received an initial loading dose of 111\^In-CS-1008 (4 mg/kg) on Day 1, CS-1008 (4 mg/kg) on Day 8, and subsequent weekly doses of CS-1008 (2 mg/kg) on Days 15, 22, 29, 36, and 43; the Day 36 dose was also radiolabeled with 111\^In. Additional 4-week cycles of weekly CS-1008 (2 mg/kg) were permitted for subjects benefiting from treatment.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CS-1008

Intervention Type DRUG

CS-1008 was administered once weekly as an intravenous infusion over 30 ± 10 minutes at a dose range of 0.2 to 6 mg/kg. On Days 1 and 36, CS-1008 infusions were radiolabeled with 111\^In (5-7 mCi).

Cohort 5

Subjects received an initial loading dose of 111\^In-CS-1008 (6 mg/kg) on Day 1, CS-1008 (2 mg/kg) on Day 8, and subsequent weekly doses of CS-1008 (2 mg/kg) on Days 15, 22, 29, 36, and 43; the Day 36 dose was also radiolabeled with 111\^In. Additional 4-week cycles of weekly CS-1008 (2 mg/kg) were permitted for subjects benefiting from treatment.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CS-1008

Intervention Type DRUG

CS-1008 was administered once weekly as an intravenous infusion over 30 ± 10 minutes at a dose range of 0.2 to 6 mg/kg. On Days 1 and 36, CS-1008 infusions were radiolabeled with 111\^In (5-7 mCi).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

CS-1008

CS-1008 was administered once weekly as an intravenous infusion over 30 ± 10 minutes at a dose range of 0.2 to 6 mg/kg. On Days 1 and 36, CS-1008 infusions were radiolabeled with 111\^In (5-7 mCi).

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Tigatuzumab

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Histologically proven metastatic colorectal cancer with 1 target lesion ≥ 2 cm and evaluable by gamma camera imaging. If this lesion was previously irradiated, progression must have been documented following radiotherapy.
2. Received at least 1 prior course of chemotherapy for metastatic disease.
3. Expected survival of at least 3 months.
4. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤ 2.
5. Age ≥ 18 years old.
6. Able and willing to give valid written informed consent.
7. Within the last 1 week prior to first study drug administration, laboratory parameters for vital functions were to be in the normal range. Laboratory abnormalities that were not clinically significant were generally permitted, except for the following laboratory parameters, which were to be within the ranges specified:

* Neutrophil count: ≥ 1.5 x 10\^9/L
* Platelet count: ≥ 90 x 10\^9/L
* International normalized ratio: ≤ 1.5
* Serum bilirubin: ≤ 1.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN)
* Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT): ≤ 2 x ULN (≤ 5 x ULN if liver metastases)
* Calculated creatinine clearance (Cockcroft-Gault formula): ≥ 55 mL/min

Exclusion Criteria

1. Active central nervous system metastases. Definitively treated metastases were allowed if stable for 6 weeks off therapy.
2. Known immunodeficiency or human immunodeficiency virus positivity.
3. Serious illnesses, e.g., serious infections requiring antibiotics, bleeding disorders, or any condition that in the opinion of the Investigator would have interfered with the ability of the subject to fulfill the study requirements.
4. Other malignancy, apart from non-melanoma skin cancer, within 3 years prior to first study drug administration, that in the opinion of the Investigator had \>10% risk of relapse within 12 months.
5. Chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or investigational agent within 4 weeks prior to first study drug administration.
6. Regular corticosteroid, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) (other than paracetamol or low-dose aspirin) or other immunosuppressive treatment within 3 weeks prior to first drug administration. Intermittent dosing of corticosteroid or NSAID was permitted if less than 4 doses within a 3-day period.
7. Mental impairment that may have compromised the ability to give informed consent and comply with the requirements of the study.
8. Lack of availability for clinical follow-up assessments.
9. Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
10. Women of childbearing potential: refusal or inability to use effective means of contraception.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Daiichi Sankyo

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Andrew M Scott, MBBS, MD, FRACP, DDU

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research & Austin Health

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ludwig Institute Tumor Targeting Program, Austin Health

Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Australia

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, Dancey J, Arbuck S, Gwyther S, Mooney M, Rubinstein L, Shankar L, Dodd L, Kaplan R, Lacombe D, Verweij J. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jan;45(2):228-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19097774 (View on PubMed)

Young H, Baum R, Cremerius U, Herholz K, Hoekstra O, Lammertsma AA, Pruim J, Price P. Measurement of clinical and subclinical tumour response using [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography: review and 1999 EORTC recommendations. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) PET Study Group. Eur J Cancer. 1999 Dec;35(13):1773-82. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(99)00229-4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10673991 (View on PubMed)

Ciprotti M, Tebbutt NC, Lee FT, Lee ST, Gan HK, McKee DC, O'Keefe GJ, Gong SJ, Chong G, Hopkins W, Chappell B, Scott FE, Brechbiel MW, Tse AN, Jansen M, Matsumura M, Kotsuma M, Watanabe R, Venhaus R, Beckman RA, Greenberg J, Scott AM. Phase I Imaging and Pharmacodynamic Trial of CS-1008 in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Aug 20;33(24):2609-16. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.60.4256. Epub 2015 Jun 29.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 26124477 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

LUD2010-002

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.