Trial Outcomes & Findings for Study of Insulin Lispro in Participants With Inadequately Controlled Type 2 Diabetes (NCT NCT01215955)
NCT ID: NCT01215955
Last Updated: 2014-04-23
Results Overview
The change from baseline to 24 weeks in the percentage of HbA1c in plasma. The Least Squares (LS) mean was estimated from a mixed-effects model with repeated measures (MMRM) that included the independent variables: fixed effects for treatment, country, sulfonylurea/meglitinide use, visit, treatment by visit interaction with baseline HbA1c as a covariate.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
1117 participants
Baseline, 24 weeks
2014-04-23
Participant Flow
Protocol had 2 independent studies (Study A, Study B) from which data was analyzed separately and independently: Participants were randomized to 1of the 2 treatment arms (Q1D, Q3D) at the site level. Sites were assigned to a study according to an allocation plan that was pre-specified before initiation of the study.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Study A Q1D
Insulin lispro administered subcutaneously, up to 3 times daily for 24 weeks. Mealtime bolus of insulin lispro self-titrated dose was based on blood glucose reading from the previous day (Q1D).
Glargine participant-dependent doses, administered subcutaneously once daily for 24 weeks.
Participants were randomized to Q1D at the site level: sites were assigned to Study A according to an allocation plan that was pre-specified before initiation of Study A.
|
Study A Q3D
Insulin lispro administered subcutaneously, up to 3 times daily for 24 weeks. Mealtime bolus of insulin lispro self-titrated dose was based on blood glucose readings from the past 3 days (Q3D).
Glargine participant-dependent doses, administered subcutaneously once daily for 24 weeks.
Participants were randomized to Q3D at the site level: sites were assigned to Study A according to an allocation plan that was pre-specified before initiation of Study A.
|
Study B Q1D
Insulin lispro administered subcutaneously, up to 3 times daily for 24 weeks. Mealtime bolus of insulin lispro self-titrated dose was based on blood glucose reading from the previous day (Q1D).
Glargine participant-dependent doses, administered subcutaneously once daily for 24 weeks.
Participants were randomized to Q1D at the site level: sites were assigned to Study B according to an allocation plan that was pre-specified before initiation of Study B.
|
Study B Q3D
Insulin lispro administered subcutaneously, up to 3 times daily for 24 weeks. Mealtime bolus of insulin lispro self-titrated dose was based on blood glucose readings from the past 3 days (Q3D).
Glargine participant-dependent doses, administered subcutaneously once daily for 24 weeks.
Participants were randomized to Q3D at the site level: sites were assigned to Study B according to an allocation plan that was pre-specified before initiation of Study B.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
268
|
263
|
292
|
294
|
|
Overall Study
Received at Least 1 Dose of Study Drug
|
267
|
261
|
288
|
290
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
223
|
210
|
244
|
241
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
45
|
53
|
48
|
53
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Study A Q1D
Insulin lispro administered subcutaneously, up to 3 times daily for 24 weeks. Mealtime bolus of insulin lispro self-titrated dose was based on blood glucose reading from the previous day (Q1D).
Glargine participant-dependent doses, administered subcutaneously once daily for 24 weeks.
Participants were randomized to Q1D at the site level: sites were assigned to Study A according to an allocation plan that was pre-specified before initiation of Study A.
|
Study A Q3D
Insulin lispro administered subcutaneously, up to 3 times daily for 24 weeks. Mealtime bolus of insulin lispro self-titrated dose was based on blood glucose readings from the past 3 days (Q3D).
Glargine participant-dependent doses, administered subcutaneously once daily for 24 weeks.
Participants were randomized to Q3D at the site level: sites were assigned to Study A according to an allocation plan that was pre-specified before initiation of Study A.
|
Study B Q1D
Insulin lispro administered subcutaneously, up to 3 times daily for 24 weeks. Mealtime bolus of insulin lispro self-titrated dose was based on blood glucose reading from the previous day (Q1D).
Glargine participant-dependent doses, administered subcutaneously once daily for 24 weeks.
Participants were randomized to Q1D at the site level: sites were assigned to Study B according to an allocation plan that was pre-specified before initiation of Study B.
|
Study B Q3D
Insulin lispro administered subcutaneously, up to 3 times daily for 24 weeks. Mealtime bolus of insulin lispro self-titrated dose was based on blood glucose readings from the past 3 days (Q3D).
Glargine participant-dependent doses, administered subcutaneously once daily for 24 weeks.
Participants were randomized to Q3D at the site level: sites were assigned to Study B according to an allocation plan that was pre-specified before initiation of Study B.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
1
|
4
|
2
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
2
|
0
|
1
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Entry Criteria Not Met
|
1
|
3
|
4
|
7
|
|
Overall Study
Lack of Efficacy
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
4
|
4
|
8
|
9
|
|
Overall Study
Physician Decision
|
4
|
10
|
8
|
11
|
|
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
|
17
|
13
|
8
|
8
|
|
Overall Study
Sponsor Decision
|
1
|
2
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
14
|
15
|
13
|
9
|
|
Overall Study
Quality Issues
|
0
|
0
|
3
|
2
|
Baseline Characteristics
Study of Insulin Lispro in Participants With Inadequately Controlled Type 2 Diabetes
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Study A Q1D
n=267 Participants
Insulin lispro administered subcutaneously, up to 3 times daily for 24 weeks. Mealtime bolus of insulin lispro self-titrated dose was based on blood glucose reading from the previous day (Q1D).
Glargine participant-dependent doses, administered subcutaneously once daily for 24 weeks.
Participants were randomized to Q1D at the site level: sites were assigned to Study A according to an allocation plan that was pre-specified before initiation of Study A.
|
Study A Q3D
n=261 Participants
Insulin lispro administered subcutaneously, up to 3 times daily for 24 weeks. Mealtime bolus of insulin lispro self-titrated based dose was on blood glucose readings from the past 3 days (Q3D).
Glargine participant-dependent doses, administered subcutaneously once daily for 24 weeks.
Participants were randomized to Q3D at the site level: sites were assigned to Study A according to an allocation plan that was pre-specified before initiation of Study A.
|
Study B Q1D
n=288 Participants
Insulin lispro administered subcutaneously, up to 3 times daily for 24 weeks. Mealtime bolus of insulin lispro self-titrated dose was based on blood glucose reading from the previous day (Q1D).
Glargine participant-dependent doses, administered subcutaneously once daily for 24 weeks.
Participants were randomized to Q1D at the site level: sites were assigned to Study B according to an allocation plan that was pre-specified before initiation of Study B.
|
Study B Q3D
n=290 Participants
Insulin lispro administered subcutaneously, up to 3 times daily for 24 weeks. Mealtime bolus of insulin lispro self-titrated dose was based on blood glucose readings from the past 3 days (Q3D).
Glargine participant-dependent doses, administered subcutaneously once daily for 24 weeks.
Participants were randomized to Q3D at the site level: sites were assigned to Study B according to an allocation plan that was pre-specified before initiation of Study B.
|
Total
n=1106 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
57.89 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.25 • n=5 Participants
|
58.82 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.46 • n=7 Participants
|
57.71 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.71 • n=5 Participants
|
57.01 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.61 • n=4 Participants
|
57.83 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.03 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
133 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
138 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
155 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
155 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
581 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
134 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
123 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
133 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
135 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
525 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
100 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
96 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
91 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
95 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
382 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
150 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
153 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
182 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
177 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
662 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
62 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
22 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
20 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
64 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
35 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
29 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
99 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
219 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
218 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
228 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
240 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
905 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Argentina
|
28 participants
n=5 Participants
|
28 participants
n=7 Participants
|
37 participants
n=5 Participants
|
38 participants
n=4 Participants
|
131 participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Austria
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 participants
n=4 Participants
|
6 participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Brazil
|
2 participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 participants
n=7 Participants
|
11 participants
n=5 Participants
|
14 participants
n=4 Participants
|
31 participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Canada
|
5 participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 participants
n=7 Participants
|
7 participants
n=5 Participants
|
11 participants
n=4 Participants
|
29 participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Croatia
|
3 participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 participants
n=4 Participants
|
15 participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Denmark
|
5 participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 participants
n=4 Participants
|
6 participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
France
|
3 participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 participants
n=4 Participants
|
7 participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Lithuania
|
2 participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 participants
n=4 Participants
|
15 participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Mexico
|
31 participants
n=5 Participants
|
31 participants
n=7 Participants
|
21 participants
n=5 Participants
|
25 participants
n=4 Participants
|
108 participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Poland
|
9 participants
n=5 Participants
|
8 participants
n=7 Participants
|
15 participants
n=5 Participants
|
15 participants
n=4 Participants
|
47 participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Puerto Rico
|
26 participants
n=5 Participants
|
19 participants
n=7 Participants
|
7 participants
n=5 Participants
|
7 participants
n=4 Participants
|
59 participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Romania
|
9 participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 participants
n=7 Participants
|
11 participants
n=5 Participants
|
10 participants
n=4 Participants
|
36 participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Russian Federation
|
12 participants
n=5 Participants
|
13 participants
n=7 Participants
|
15 participants
n=5 Participants
|
16 participants
n=4 Participants
|
56 participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
South Africa
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 participants
n=7 Participants
|
11 participants
n=5 Participants
|
13 participants
n=4 Participants
|
27 participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
131 participants
n=5 Participants
|
136 participants
n=7 Participants
|
139 participants
n=5 Participants
|
127 participants
n=4 Participants
|
533 participants
n=21 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 24 weeksPopulation: Full Analysis Set: All participants who completed the lead-in period (if applicable), were randomized, received ≥1 dose of study insulin with a baseline value for HbA1C, except participants from the excluded site.
The change from baseline to 24 weeks in the percentage of HbA1c in plasma. The Least Squares (LS) mean was estimated from a mixed-effects model with repeated measures (MMRM) that included the independent variables: fixed effects for treatment, country, sulfonylurea/meglitinide use, visit, treatment by visit interaction with baseline HbA1c as a covariate.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Study A Q1D
n=267 Participants
Insulin lispro administered subcutaneously, up to 3 times daily for 24 weeks. Mealtime bolus of insulin lispro self-titrated dose was based on blood glucose reading from the previous day (Q1D).
Glargine participant-dependent doses, administered subcutaneously once daily for 24 weeks.
Participants were randomized to Q1D at the site level: sites were assigned to Study A according to an allocation plan that was pre-specified before initiation of Study A.
|
Study A Q3D
n=261 Participants
Insulin lispro administered subcutaneously, up to 3 times daily for 24 weeks. Mealtime bolus of insulin lispro self-titrated dose was based on blood glucose readings from the past 3 days (Q3D).
Glargine participant-dependent doses, administered subcutaneously once daily for 24 weeks.
Participants were randomized to Q3D at the site level: sites were assigned to Study A according to an allocation plan that was pre-specified before initiation of Study A.
|
Study B Q1D
n=288 Participants
Insulin lispro administered subcutaneously, up to 3 times daily for 24 weeks. Mealtime bolus of insulin lispro self-titrated dose was based on blood glucose reading from the previous day (Q1D).
Glargine participant-dependent doses, administered subcutaneously once daily for 24 weeks.
Participants were randomized to Q1D at the site level: sites were assigned to Study B according to an allocation plan that was pre-specified before initiation of Study B.
|
Study B Q3D
n=290 Participants
Insulin lispro administered subcutaneously, up to 3 times daily for 24 weeks. Mealtime bolus of insulin lispro self-titrated dose was based on blood glucose readings from the past 3 days (Q3D).
Glargine participant-dependent doses, administered subcutaneously once daily for 24 weeks.
Participants were randomized to Q3D at the site level: sites were assigned to Study B according to an allocation plan that was pre-specified before initiation of Study B.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to 24 Week Endpoint in Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)
|
-1.00 percentage HbA1c
Standard Error 0.08
|
-0.96 percentage HbA1c
Standard Error 0.08
|
-0.98 percentage HbA1c
Standard Error 0.07
|
-0.92 percentage HbA1c
Standard Error 0.07
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24-week endpointPopulation: Full Analysis Set: all participants who completed the lead-in period (if applicable), were randomized, received ≥1 dose of study insulin, except participants from the excluded site; last observation carried forward (LOCF) was used.
Percentage of participants who achieved HbA1c levels of ≤7.0% or ≤6.5%.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Study A Q1D
n=267 Participants
Insulin lispro administered subcutaneously, up to 3 times daily for 24 weeks. Mealtime bolus of insulin lispro self-titrated dose was based on blood glucose reading from the previous day (Q1D).
Glargine participant-dependent doses, administered subcutaneously once daily for 24 weeks.
Participants were randomized to Q1D at the site level: sites were assigned to Study A according to an allocation plan that was pre-specified before initiation of Study A.
|
Study A Q3D
n=261 Participants
Insulin lispro administered subcutaneously, up to 3 times daily for 24 weeks. Mealtime bolus of insulin lispro self-titrated dose was based on blood glucose readings from the past 3 days (Q3D).
Glargine participant-dependent doses, administered subcutaneously once daily for 24 weeks.
Participants were randomized to Q3D at the site level: sites were assigned to Study A according to an allocation plan that was pre-specified before initiation of Study A.
|
Study B Q1D
n=288 Participants
Insulin lispro administered subcutaneously, up to 3 times daily for 24 weeks. Mealtime bolus of insulin lispro self-titrated dose was based on blood glucose reading from the previous day (Q1D).
Glargine participant-dependent doses, administered subcutaneously once daily for 24 weeks.
Participants were randomized to Q1D at the site level: sites were assigned to Study B according to an allocation plan that was pre-specified before initiation of Study B.
|
Study B Q3D
n=290 Participants
Insulin lispro administered subcutaneously, up to 3 times daily for 24 weeks. Mealtime bolus of insulin lispro self-titrated dose was based on blood glucose readings from the past 3 days (Q3D).
Glargine participant-dependent doses, administered subcutaneously once daily for 24 weeks.
Participants were randomized to Q3D at the site level: sites were assigned to Study B according to an allocation plan that was pre-specified before initiation of Study B.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Target Values
HbA1c ≤7.0%
|
49.81 percentage of participants
|
42.53 percentage of participants
|
49.31 percentage of participants
|
42.41 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Target Values
HbA1c ≤6.5%
|
26.22 percentage of participants
|
23.37 percentage of participants
|
25.00 percentage of participants
|
22.76 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24-week endpointPopulation: A subset of the Full Analysis Set: all participants who completed the lead-in period (if applicable), were randomized, received ≥1 dose of study insulin and were ≥65 years of age, except participants from the excluded site. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) was used.
Percentage of participants ≥65 years of age achieving HbA1c target concentration of ≤7.0% or ≤6.5%.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Study A Q1D
n=65 Participants
Insulin lispro administered subcutaneously, up to 3 times daily for 24 weeks. Mealtime bolus of insulin lispro self-titrated dose was based on blood glucose reading from the previous day (Q1D).
Glargine participant-dependent doses, administered subcutaneously once daily for 24 weeks.
Participants were randomized to Q1D at the site level: sites were assigned to Study A according to an allocation plan that was pre-specified before initiation of Study A.
|
Study A Q3D
n=69 Participants
Insulin lispro administered subcutaneously, up to 3 times daily for 24 weeks. Mealtime bolus of insulin lispro self-titrated dose was based on blood glucose readings from the past 3 days (Q3D).
Glargine participant-dependent doses, administered subcutaneously once daily for 24 weeks.
Participants were randomized to Q3D at the site level: sites were assigned to Study A according to an allocation plan that was pre-specified before initiation of Study A.
|
Study B Q1D
n=56 Participants
Insulin lispro administered subcutaneously, up to 3 times daily for 24 weeks. Mealtime bolus of insulin lispro self-titrated dose was based on blood glucose reading from the previous day (Q1D).
Glargine participant-dependent doses, administered subcutaneously once daily for 24 weeks.
Participants were randomized to Q1D at the site level: sites were assigned to Study B according to an allocation plan that was pre-specified before initiation of Study B.
|
Study B Q3D
n=65 Participants
Insulin lispro administered subcutaneously, up to 3 times daily for 24 weeks. Mealtime bolus of insulin lispro self-titrated dose was based on blood glucose readings from the past 3 days (Q3D).
Glargine participant-dependent doses, administered subcutaneously once daily for 24 weeks.
Participants were randomized to Q3D at the site level: sites were assigned to Study B according to an allocation plan that was pre-specified before initiation of Study B.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants ≥65 Years of Age Achieving Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Target Concentration
HbA1c ≤7%
|
58.46 percentage of participants
|
57.97 percentage of participants
|
67.86 percentage of participants
|
46.15 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants ≥65 Years of Age Achieving Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Target Concentration
HbA1c ≤6.5%
|
27.69 percentage of participants
|
36.23 percentage of participants
|
35.71 percentage of participants
|
21.54 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 24-weeksPopulation: Full Analysis Set: all participants who completed the lead-in period (if applicable), were randomized and received ≥1 dose of study insulin with a baseline body weight, except participants from the excluded site.
Body weight was measured twice at each indicated visit and the average of the 2 measurements was used for analyses. Least Squares (LS) mean calculated using mixed model repeating measure (MMRM) analysis that included baseline, treatment, country, sulfonylurea/meglitinide use, baseline glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) strata (≤8% and \>8%), visit and treatment-by-visit interaction .
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Study A Q1D
n=267 Participants
Insulin lispro administered subcutaneously, up to 3 times daily for 24 weeks. Mealtime bolus of insulin lispro self-titrated dose was based on blood glucose reading from the previous day (Q1D).
Glargine participant-dependent doses, administered subcutaneously once daily for 24 weeks.
Participants were randomized to Q1D at the site level: sites were assigned to Study A according to an allocation plan that was pre-specified before initiation of Study A.
|
Study A Q3D
n=261 Participants
Insulin lispro administered subcutaneously, up to 3 times daily for 24 weeks. Mealtime bolus of insulin lispro self-titrated dose was based on blood glucose readings from the past 3 days (Q3D).
Glargine participant-dependent doses, administered subcutaneously once daily for 24 weeks.
Participants were randomized to Q3D at the site level: sites were assigned to Study A according to an allocation plan that was pre-specified before initiation of Study A.
|
Study B Q1D
n=288 Participants
Insulin lispro administered subcutaneously, up to 3 times daily for 24 weeks. Mealtime bolus of insulin lispro self-titrated dose was based on blood glucose reading from the previous day (Q1D).
Glargine participant-dependent doses, administered subcutaneously once daily for 24 weeks.
Participants were randomized to Q1D at the site level: sites were assigned to Study B according to an allocation plan that was pre-specified before initiation of Study B.
|
Study B Q3D
n=290 Participants
Insulin lispro administered subcutaneously, up to 3 times daily for 24 weeks. Mealtime bolus of insulin lispro self-titrated dose was based on blood glucose readings from the past 3 days (Q3D).
Glargine participant-dependent doses, administered subcutaneously once daily for 24 weeks.
Participants were randomized to Q3D at the site level: sites were assigned to Study B according to an allocation plan that was pre-specified before initiation of Study B.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to 24 Week Endpoint in Body Weight
|
2.15 kilograms (kg)
Standard Error 0.27
|
2.96 kilograms (kg)
Standard Error 0.28
|
2.47 kilograms (kg)
Standard Error 0.24
|
1.97 kilograms (kg)
Standard Error 0.24
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline through 24 weeksPopulation: Full Analysis Set: all participants who completed the lead-in period (if applicable), were randomized, received ≥1 dose of study insulin, except participants from the excluded site. Censored participants: Study A: ≤6.5% Q1D=186 and Q3D=197; Study A ≤7.0% Q1D=120 and Q3D=134; Study B: ≤6.5% Q1D=206 and Q3D=212, Study B ≤7.0% Q1D=135 and Q3D=152.
Percentage of participants is the number of participants who achieved HbA1c target values of ≤6.5% or ≤7.0% during the specified time period divided by the total number of participants who did not discontinue from the study but had not reached HbA1c target at the beginning of the specified post baseline time period (≤100 days and ≥101 days). Participants who did not experience an outcome before discontinuation or completion of the study were censored using the date of discontinuation. Participants who were lost to follow up the date of discontinuation were considered to be the date of last contact.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Study A Q1D
n=267 Participants
Insulin lispro administered subcutaneously, up to 3 times daily for 24 weeks. Mealtime bolus of insulin lispro self-titrated dose was based on blood glucose reading from the previous day (Q1D).
Glargine participant-dependent doses, administered subcutaneously once daily for 24 weeks.
Participants were randomized to Q1D at the site level: sites were assigned to Study A according to an allocation plan that was pre-specified before initiation of Study A.
|
Study A Q3D
n=261 Participants
Insulin lispro administered subcutaneously, up to 3 times daily for 24 weeks. Mealtime bolus of insulin lispro self-titrated dose was based on blood glucose readings from the past 3 days (Q3D).
Glargine participant-dependent doses, administered subcutaneously once daily for 24 weeks.
Participants were randomized to Q3D at the site level: sites were assigned to Study A according to an allocation plan that was pre-specified before initiation of Study A.
|
Study B Q1D
n=288 Participants
Insulin lispro administered subcutaneously, up to 3 times daily for 24 weeks. Mealtime bolus of insulin lispro self-titrated dose was based on blood glucose reading from the previous day (Q1D).
Glargine participant-dependent doses, administered subcutaneously once daily for 24 weeks.
Participants were randomized to Q1D at the site level: sites were assigned to Study B according to an allocation plan that was pre-specified before initiation of Study B.
|
Study B Q3D
n=290 Participants
Insulin lispro administered subcutaneously, up to 3 times daily for 24 weeks. Mealtime bolus of insulin lispro self-titrated dose was based on blood glucose readings from the past 3 days (Q3D).
Glargine participant-dependent doses, administered subcutaneously once daily for 24 weeks.
Participants were randomized to Q3D at the site level: sites were assigned to Study B according to an allocation plan that was pre-specified before initiation of Study B.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Time to Reach Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Target Values
HbA1c ≤6.5% Post-Baseline ≤100 days
|
19.48 percentage of participants
|
10.73 percentage of participants
|
17.36 percentage of participants
|
14.48 percentage of participants
|
|
Time to Reach Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Target Values
HbA1c ≤7.0% ≥101 days post-baseline
|
31.54 percentage of participants
|
26.90 percentage of participants
|
28.75 percentage of participants
|
24.56 percentage of participants
|
|
Time to Reach Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Target Values
HbA1c ≤6.5% ≥101 days post-baseline
|
14.80 percentage of participants
|
18.00 percentage of participants
|
14.81 percentage of participants
|
16.14 percentage of participants
|
|
Time to Reach Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Target Values
HbA1c ≤7.0% Post-Baseline ≤100 days
|
37.45 percentage of participants
|
33.72 percentage of participants
|
37.15 percentage of participants
|
33.10 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 24 weeksPopulation: Full Analysis Set: all participants who completed the lead-in period (if applicable), were randomized, received ≥1 dose of study insulin with baseline fasting glucose values, except participants from the excluded site.
Least Squares (LS) mean calculated using mixed model repeating measure (MMRM) analysis that included baseline, treatment, country, sulfonylurea/meglitinide use, baseline glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) strata (≤8% and \>8%), visit and treatment-by-visit interaction.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Study A Q1D
n=267 Participants
Insulin lispro administered subcutaneously, up to 3 times daily for 24 weeks. Mealtime bolus of insulin lispro self-titrated dose was based on blood glucose reading from the previous day (Q1D).
Glargine participant-dependent doses, administered subcutaneously once daily for 24 weeks.
Participants were randomized to Q1D at the site level: sites were assigned to Study A according to an allocation plan that was pre-specified before initiation of Study A.
|
Study A Q3D
n=261 Participants
Insulin lispro administered subcutaneously, up to 3 times daily for 24 weeks. Mealtime bolus of insulin lispro self-titrated dose was based on blood glucose readings from the past 3 days (Q3D).
Glargine participant-dependent doses, administered subcutaneously once daily for 24 weeks.
Participants were randomized to Q3D at the site level: sites were assigned to Study A according to an allocation plan that was pre-specified before initiation of Study A.
|
Study B Q1D
n=287 Participants
Insulin lispro administered subcutaneously, up to 3 times daily for 24 weeks. Mealtime bolus of insulin lispro self-titrated dose was based on blood glucose reading from the previous day (Q1D).
Glargine participant-dependent doses, administered subcutaneously once daily for 24 weeks.
Participants were randomized to Q1D at the site level: sites were assigned to Study B according to an allocation plan that was pre-specified before initiation of Study B.
|
Study B Q3D
n=290 Participants
Insulin lispro administered subcutaneously, up to 3 times daily for 24 weeks. Mealtime bolus of insulin lispro self-titrated dose was based on blood glucose readings from the past 3 days (Q3D).
Glargine participant-dependent doses, administered subcutaneously once daily for 24 weeks.
Participants were randomized to Q3D at the site level: sites were assigned to Study B according to an allocation plan that was pre-specified before initiation of Study B.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to 24 Week Endpoint in Fasting Glucose
|
0.08 millimoles/liter (mmoles/L)
Standard Error 0.22
|
0.37 millimoles/liter (mmoles/L)
Standard Error 0.23
|
-0.36 millimoles/liter (mmoles/L)
Standard Error 0.21
|
0.45 millimoles/liter (mmoles/L)
Standard Error 0.21
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 24 weeksPopulation: A subset of the Full Analysis Set: all participants who completed the lead-in period (if applicable), were randomized, received ≥1 dose of study insulin, who are ≥65 years of age with baseline fasting glucose values, except participants from the excluded site.
Least Squares (LS) mean calculated using mixed model repeating measure (MMRM) analysis that included baseline, treatment, country, sulfonylurea/meglitinide use, baseline glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) strata (≤8% and \>8%), visit and treatment-by-visit interaction.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Study A Q1D
n=65 Participants
Insulin lispro administered subcutaneously, up to 3 times daily for 24 weeks. Mealtime bolus of insulin lispro self-titrated dose was based on blood glucose reading from the previous day (Q1D).
Glargine participant-dependent doses, administered subcutaneously once daily for 24 weeks.
Participants were randomized to Q1D at the site level: sites were assigned to Study A according to an allocation plan that was pre-specified before initiation of Study A.
|
Study A Q3D
n=69 Participants
Insulin lispro administered subcutaneously, up to 3 times daily for 24 weeks. Mealtime bolus of insulin lispro self-titrated dose was based on blood glucose readings from the past 3 days (Q3D).
Glargine participant-dependent doses, administered subcutaneously once daily for 24 weeks.
Participants were randomized to Q3D at the site level: sites were assigned to Study A according to an allocation plan that was pre-specified before initiation of Study A.
|
Study B Q1D
n=55 Participants
Insulin lispro administered subcutaneously, up to 3 times daily for 24 weeks. Mealtime bolus of insulin lispro self-titrated dose was based on blood glucose reading from the previous day (Q1D).
Glargine participant-dependent doses, administered subcutaneously once daily for 24 weeks.
Participants were randomized to Q1D at the site level: sites were assigned to Study B according to an allocation plan that was pre-specified before initiation of Study B.
|
Study B Q3D
n=65 Participants
Insulin lispro administered subcutaneously, up to 3 times daily for 24 weeks. Mealtime bolus of insulin lispro self-titrated dose was based on blood glucose readings from the past 3 days (Q3D).
Glargine participant-dependent doses, administered subcutaneously once daily for 24 weeks.
Participants were randomized to Q3D at the site level: sites were assigned to Study B according to an allocation plan that was pre-specified before initiation of Study B.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to 24 Week Endpoint in Fasting Glucose in Participants ≥65 Years of Age
|
0.42 millimoles/liter (mmoles/L)
Standard Error 0.44
|
1.01 millimoles/liter (mmoles/L)
Standard Error 0.46
|
-0.18 millimoles/liter (mmoles/L)
Standard Error 0.50
|
0.96 millimoles/liter (mmoles/L)
Standard Error 0.46
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 24 weeksPopulation: Full Analysis Set: all participants who completed the lead-in period (if applicable), were randomized, received ≥1 dose of study insulin with baseline 1,5-AG value, except participants from the excluded site.
Least Squares (LS) mean calculated using mixed model repeating measure (MMRM) analysis that included baseline treatment, country, sulfonylurea/meglitinide use, baseline glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) strata (≤8% and \>8%), visit and treatment-by-visit interaction.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Study A Q1D
n=266 Participants
Insulin lispro administered subcutaneously, up to 3 times daily for 24 weeks. Mealtime bolus of insulin lispro self-titrated dose was based on blood glucose reading from the previous day (Q1D).
Glargine participant-dependent doses, administered subcutaneously once daily for 24 weeks.
Participants were randomized to Q1D at the site level: sites were assigned to Study A according to an allocation plan that was pre-specified before initiation of Study A.
|
Study A Q3D
n=261 Participants
Insulin lispro administered subcutaneously, up to 3 times daily for 24 weeks. Mealtime bolus of insulin lispro self-titrated dose was based on blood glucose readings from the past 3 days (Q3D).
Glargine participant-dependent doses, administered subcutaneously once daily for 24 weeks.
Participants were randomized to Q3D at the site level: sites were assigned to Study A according to an allocation plan that was pre-specified before initiation of Study A.
|
Study B Q1D
n=288 Participants
Insulin lispro administered subcutaneously, up to 3 times daily for 24 weeks. Mealtime bolus of insulin lispro self-titrated dose was based on blood glucose reading from the previous day (Q1D).
Glargine participant-dependent doses, administered subcutaneously once daily for 24 weeks.
Participants were randomized to Q1D at the site level: sites were assigned to Study B according to an allocation plan that was pre-specified before initiation of Study B.
|
Study B Q3D
n=290 Participants
Insulin lispro administered subcutaneously, up to 3 times daily for 24 weeks. Mealtime bolus of insulin lispro self-titrated dose was based on blood glucose readings from the past 3 days (Q3D).
Glargine participant-dependent doses, administered subcutaneously once daily for 24 weeks.
Participants were randomized to Q3D at the site level: sites were assigned to Study B according to an allocation plan that was pre-specified before initiation of Study B.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to 24 Week Endpoint in 1,5-anhydroglucitol (1,5-AG)
|
3.24 microgram/milliliter (mcg/mL)
Standard Error 0.35
|
3.09 microgram/milliliter (mcg/mL)
Standard Error 0.36
|
3.22 microgram/milliliter (mcg/mL)
Standard Error 0.32
|
2.95 microgram/milliliter (mcg/mL)
Standard Error 0.31
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 24 weeksPopulation: Full Analysis Set: all participants who completed the lead-in period (if applicable), were randomized, received ≥1 dose of study insulin and had values at baseline and the specified timepoint, except participants from the excluded site.
7-Point Self-Monitored Blood Glucose profiles are measures of blood glucose concentration taken 7 time a day at the morning pre-meal, morning 2-hours (HR) postprandial (PP), midday pre-meal, midday 2-hours post-meal, evening pre-meal, bedtime and 0300 hour (3 am). Each participant took measures over any 3 days and the average was calculated for each of the 7 time points. Least Squares (LS) mean calculated using mixed model repeating measure (MMRM) analysis that included baseline, treatment, country, sulfonylurea/meglitinide use, baseline glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) strata (≤8% and \>8%), visit and treatment-by-visit interaction.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Study A Q1D
n=266 Participants
Insulin lispro administered subcutaneously, up to 3 times daily for 24 weeks. Mealtime bolus of insulin lispro self-titrated dose was based on blood glucose reading from the previous day (Q1D).
Glargine participant-dependent doses, administered subcutaneously once daily for 24 weeks.
Participants were randomized to Q1D at the site level: sites were assigned to Study A according to an allocation plan that was pre-specified before initiation of Study A.
|
Study A Q3D
n=261 Participants
Insulin lispro administered subcutaneously, up to 3 times daily for 24 weeks. Mealtime bolus of insulin lispro self-titrated dose was based on blood glucose readings from the past 3 days (Q3D).
Glargine participant-dependent doses, administered subcutaneously once daily for 24 weeks.
Participants were randomized to Q3D at the site level: sites were assigned to Study A according to an allocation plan that was pre-specified before initiation of Study A.
|
Study B Q1D
n=288 Participants
Insulin lispro administered subcutaneously, up to 3 times daily for 24 weeks. Mealtime bolus of insulin lispro self-titrated dose was based on blood glucose reading from the previous day (Q1D).
Glargine participant-dependent doses, administered subcutaneously once daily for 24 weeks.
Participants were randomized to Q1D at the site level: sites were assigned to Study B according to an allocation plan that was pre-specified before initiation of Study B.
|
Study B Q3D
n=290 Participants
Insulin lispro administered subcutaneously, up to 3 times daily for 24 weeks. Mealtime bolus of insulin lispro self-titrated dose was based on blood glucose readings from the past 3 days (Q3D).
Glargine participant-dependent doses, administered subcutaneously once daily for 24 weeks.
Participants were randomized to Q3D at the site level: sites were assigned to Study B according to an allocation plan that was pre-specified before initiation of Study B.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to 24 Weeks in 7-Point Self-Monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) Profile
Bedtime (214, 200, 214, 216)
|
-60.61 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL)
Standard Error 4.78
|
-62.86 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL)
Standard Error 4.91
|
-54.71 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL)
Standard Error 4.10
|
-43.52 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL)
Standard Error 4.00
|
|
Change From Baseline to 24 Weeks in 7-Point Self-Monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) Profile
0300 hour (3 am) (203, 192, 194, 193)
|
-26.33 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL)
Standard Error 3.87
|
-23.96 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL)
Standard Error 3.98
|
-22.40 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL)
Standard Error 3.75
|
-13.39 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL)
Standard Error 3.71
|
|
Change From Baseline to 24 Weeks in 7-Point Self-Monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) Profile
Morning Pre-Meal (215, 200, 214, 219)
|
-3.97 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL)
Standard Error 3.02
|
-0.65 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL)
Standard Error 3.12
|
-1.24 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL)
Standard Error 2.22
|
0.85 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL)
Standard Error 2.18
|
|
Change From Baseline to 24 Weeks in 7-Point Self-Monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) Profile
Morning 2-HR PP (208, 194, 202, 201)
|
-41.57 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL)
Standard Error 3.74
|
-42.28 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL)
Standard Error 3.86
|
-43.80 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL)
Standard Error 2.94
|
-39.42 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL)
Standard Error 2.93
|
|
Change From Baseline to 24 Weeks in 7-Point Self-Monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) Profile
Midday Pre-Meal (214, 199, 213, 219)
|
-42.37 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL)
Standard Error 3.07
|
-40.94 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL)
Standard Error 3.16
|
38.57 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL)
Standard Error 2.59
|
-32.35 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL)
Standard Error 2.52
|
|
Change From Baseline to 24 Weeks in 7-Point Self-Monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) Profile
Midday 2-HR PP (207, 195, 201, 203)
|
-45.75 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL)
Standard Error 3.95
|
-49.23 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL)
Standard Error 4.06
|
-53.45 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL)
Standard Error 3.35
|
-50.38 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL)
Standard Error 3.33
|
|
Change From Baseline to 24 Weeks in 7-Point Self-Monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) Profile
Evening Pre-Meal (214, 200, 214, 215)
|
-46.75 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL)
Standard Error 3.60
|
-43.38 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL)
Standard Error 3.70
|
-41.59 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL)
Standard Error 3.27
|
-35.94 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL)
Standard Error 3.21
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 weeksPopulation: Full Analysis Set: all participants who completed the lead-in period (if applicable), were randomized, received ≥1 dose of study insulin and with values in the specified category, except participants from the excluded site.
Total insulin was the sum of basal insulin (glargine) that was required to manage normal daily blood fluctuations and prandial insulin that was taken at meal time. Least Squares (LS) mean calculated using mixed model repeating measure (MMRM) analysis that included baseline, treatment, country, sulfonylurea/meglitinide use, baseline glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) strata (≤8% and \>8%), visit and treatment-by-visit interaction.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Study A Q1D
n=267 Participants
Insulin lispro administered subcutaneously, up to 3 times daily for 24 weeks. Mealtime bolus of insulin lispro self-titrated dose was based on blood glucose reading from the previous day (Q1D).
Glargine participant-dependent doses, administered subcutaneously once daily for 24 weeks.
Participants were randomized to Q1D at the site level: sites were assigned to Study A according to an allocation plan that was pre-specified before initiation of Study A.
|
Study A Q3D
n=261 Participants
Insulin lispro administered subcutaneously, up to 3 times daily for 24 weeks. Mealtime bolus of insulin lispro self-titrated dose was based on blood glucose readings from the past 3 days (Q3D).
Glargine participant-dependent doses, administered subcutaneously once daily for 24 weeks.
Participants were randomized to Q3D at the site level: sites were assigned to Study A according to an allocation plan that was pre-specified before initiation of Study A.
|
Study B Q1D
n=288 Participants
Insulin lispro administered subcutaneously, up to 3 times daily for 24 weeks. Mealtime bolus of insulin lispro self-titrated dose was based on blood glucose reading from the previous day (Q1D).
Glargine participant-dependent doses, administered subcutaneously once daily for 24 weeks.
Participants were randomized to Q1D at the site level: sites were assigned to Study B according to an allocation plan that was pre-specified before initiation of Study B.
|
Study B Q3D
n=290 Participants
Insulin lispro administered subcutaneously, up to 3 times daily for 24 weeks. Mealtime bolus of insulin lispro self-titrated dose was based on blood glucose readings from the past 3 days (Q3D).
Glargine participant-dependent doses, administered subcutaneously once daily for 24 weeks.
Participants were randomized to Q3D at the site level: sites were assigned to Study B according to an allocation plan that was pre-specified before initiation of Study B.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Daily Dose of Insulin: Total, Basal and Prandial (Bolus)
Basal Insulin (223, 213, 243, 239)
|
65.53 international units (IU)
Standard Error 1.41
|
66.67 international units (IU)
Standard Error 1.44
|
61.24 international units (IU)
Standard Error 1.16
|
62.33 international units (IU)
Standard Error 1.15
|
|
Daily Dose of Insulin: Total, Basal and Prandial (Bolus)
Prandial (Bolus) Insulin (226, 213, 244, 241)
|
47.10 international units (IU)
Standard Error 2.82
|
53.81 international units (IU)
Standard Error 2.87
|
43.03 international units (IU)
Standard Error 2.69
|
48.40 international units (IU)
Standard Error 2.68
|
|
Daily Dose of Insulin: Total, Basal and Prandial (Bolus)
Total Insulin (227, 213, 244, 242)
|
110.52 international units (IU)
Standard Error 3.32
|
119.38 international units (IU)
Standard Error 3.43
|
103.08 international units (IU)
Standard Error 3.53
|
109.13 international units (IU)
Standard Error 3.51
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 weeksPopulation: Full Analysis Set: all participants who completed the lead-in period (if applicable), were randomized, received ≥1 dose of study insulin and with values in the specified category, except participants from the excluded site.
Total insulin was the sum of basal insulin (glargine) that was required to manage normal daily blood fluctuations and prandial insulin that was taken at meal time. Total, basal and prandial amounts were then divided by the participant's body weight in kilograms (kg). Least Squares (LS) mean calculated using mixed model repeating measure (MMRM) analysis that included baseline, treatment, country, sulfonylurea/meglitinide use, baseline glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) strata (≤8% and \>8%), visit and treatment-by-visit interaction.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Study A Q1D
n=267 Participants
Insulin lispro administered subcutaneously, up to 3 times daily for 24 weeks. Mealtime bolus of insulin lispro self-titrated dose was based on blood glucose reading from the previous day (Q1D).
Glargine participant-dependent doses, administered subcutaneously once daily for 24 weeks.
Participants were randomized to Q1D at the site level: sites were assigned to Study A according to an allocation plan that was pre-specified before initiation of Study A.
|
Study A Q3D
n=261 Participants
Insulin lispro administered subcutaneously, up to 3 times daily for 24 weeks. Mealtime bolus of insulin lispro self-titrated dose was based on blood glucose readings from the past 3 days (Q3D).
Glargine participant-dependent doses, administered subcutaneously once daily for 24 weeks.
Participants were randomized to Q3D at the site level: sites were assigned to Study A according to an allocation plan that was pre-specified before initiation of Study A.
|
Study B Q1D
n=288 Participants
Insulin lispro administered subcutaneously, up to 3 times daily for 24 weeks. Mealtime bolus of insulin lispro self-titrated dose was based on blood glucose reading from the previous day (Q1D).
Glargine participant-dependent doses, administered subcutaneously once daily for 24 weeks.
Participants were randomized to Q1D at the site level: sites were assigned to Study B according to an allocation plan that was pre-specified before initiation of Study B.
|
Study B Q3D
n=290 Participants
Insulin lispro administered subcutaneously, up to 3 times daily for 24 weeks. Mealtime bolus of insulin lispro self-titrated dose was based on blood glucose readings from the past 3 days (Q3D).
Glargine participant-dependent doses, administered subcutaneously once daily for 24 weeks.
Participants were randomized to Q3D at the site level: sites were assigned to Study B according to an allocation plan that was pre-specified before initiation of Study B.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Daily Dose of Insulin Per Kilogram of Body Weight: Total, Basal and Prandial (Bolus)
Basal Insulin Dose (223, 213, 243, 239)
|
0.68 international units/kilogram (IU/kg)
Standard Error 0.01
|
0.70 international units/kilogram (IU/kg)
Standard Error 0.01
|
0.64 international units/kilogram (IU/kg)
Standard Error 0.01
|
0.66 international units/kilogram (IU/kg)
Standard Error 0.01
|
|
Daily Dose of Insulin Per Kilogram of Body Weight: Total, Basal and Prandial (Bolus)
Bolus Insulin Dose (226, 213, 244, 241)
|
0.48 international units/kilogram (IU/kg)
Standard Error 0.02
|
0.55 international units/kilogram (IU/kg)
Standard Error 0.03
|
0.44 international units/kilogram (IU/kg)
Standard Error 0.02
|
0.47 international units/kilogram (IU/kg)
Standard Error 0.02
|
|
Daily Dose of Insulin Per Kilogram of Body Weight: Total, Basal and Prandial (Bolus)
Total Insulin Dose (227, 213, 244, 242)
|
1.12 international units/kilogram (IU/kg)
Standard Error 0.03
|
1.22 international units/kilogram (IU/kg)
Standard Error 0.03
|
1.09 international units/kilogram (IU/kg)
Standard Error 0.03
|
1.14 international units/kilogram (IU/kg)
Standard Error 0.03
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Randomization through 24 weeks overallPopulation: All randomized participants except from the excluded site.
A hypoglycemic episode was defined as any time a participant felt they were experiencing a sign or symptom that was associated with hypoglycemia, or had a blood glucose level of ≤70 milligram per deciliter \[mg/dL, ≤3.9 millimoles per liter (mmol/L)\] even if it was not associated with signs, symptoms or treatment (consistent with current American Diabetes Association 2005 guidelines).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Study A Q1D
n=268 Participants
Insulin lispro administered subcutaneously, up to 3 times daily for 24 weeks. Mealtime bolus of insulin lispro self-titrated dose was based on blood glucose reading from the previous day (Q1D).
Glargine participant-dependent doses, administered subcutaneously once daily for 24 weeks.
Participants were randomized to Q1D at the site level: sites were assigned to Study A according to an allocation plan that was pre-specified before initiation of Study A.
|
Study A Q3D
n=263 Participants
Insulin lispro administered subcutaneously, up to 3 times daily for 24 weeks. Mealtime bolus of insulin lispro self-titrated dose was based on blood glucose readings from the past 3 days (Q3D).
Glargine participant-dependent doses, administered subcutaneously once daily for 24 weeks.
Participants were randomized to Q3D at the site level: sites were assigned to Study A according to an allocation plan that was pre-specified before initiation of Study A.
|
Study B Q1D
n=289 Participants
Insulin lispro administered subcutaneously, up to 3 times daily for 24 weeks. Mealtime bolus of insulin lispro self-titrated dose was based on blood glucose reading from the previous day (Q1D).
Glargine participant-dependent doses, administered subcutaneously once daily for 24 weeks.
Participants were randomized to Q1D at the site level: sites were assigned to Study B according to an allocation plan that was pre-specified before initiation of Study B.
|
Study B Q3D
n=292 Participants
Insulin lispro administered subcutaneously, up to 3 times daily for 24 weeks. Mealtime bolus of insulin lispro self-titrated dose was based on blood glucose readings from the past 3 days (Q3D).
Glargine participant-dependent doses, administered subcutaneously once daily for 24 weeks.
Participants were randomized to Q3D at the site level: sites were assigned to Study B according to an allocation plan that was pre-specified before initiation of Study B.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
The Number of Participants With a Hypoglycemic Episode (Incidence)
|
231 participants
|
218 participants
|
238 participants
|
231 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Randomization through 24 weeks overallPopulation: All randomized participants ≥65 years old except those from the excluded site.
A hypoglycemic episode in participants ≥ 65 years of age was defined as any time a participant felt they were experiencing a sign or symptom that was associated with hypoglycemia, or had a blood glucose level of ≤70 milligram per deciliter \[mg/dL, ≤3.9 millimoles per liter (mmol/L)\] even if it was not associated with signs, symptoms or treatment (consistent with current American Diabetes Association 2005 guidelines).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Study A Q1D
n=66 Participants
Insulin lispro administered subcutaneously, up to 3 times daily for 24 weeks. Mealtime bolus of insulin lispro self-titrated dose was based on blood glucose reading from the previous day (Q1D).
Glargine participant-dependent doses, administered subcutaneously once daily for 24 weeks.
Participants were randomized to Q1D at the site level: sites were assigned to Study A according to an allocation plan that was pre-specified before initiation of Study A.
|
Study A Q3D
n=69 Participants
Insulin lispro administered subcutaneously, up to 3 times daily for 24 weeks. Mealtime bolus of insulin lispro self-titrated dose was based on blood glucose readings from the past 3 days (Q3D).
Glargine participant-dependent doses, administered subcutaneously once daily for 24 weeks.
Participants were randomized to Q3D at the site level: sites were assigned to Study A according to an allocation plan that was pre-specified before initiation of Study A.
|
Study B Q1D
n=56 Participants
Insulin lispro administered subcutaneously, up to 3 times daily for 24 weeks. Mealtime bolus of insulin lispro self-titrated dose was based on blood glucose reading from the previous day (Q1D).
Glargine participant-dependent doses, administered subcutaneously once daily for 24 weeks.
Participants were randomized to Q1D at the site level: sites were assigned to Study B according to an allocation plan that was pre-specified before initiation of Study B.
|
Study B Q3D
n=65 Participants
Insulin lispro administered subcutaneously, up to 3 times daily for 24 weeks. Mealtime bolus of insulin lispro self-titrated dose was based on blood glucose readings from the past 3 days (Q3D).
Glargine participant-dependent doses, administered subcutaneously once daily for 24 weeks.
Participants were randomized to Q3D at the site level: sites were assigned to Study B according to an allocation plan that was pre-specified before initiation of Study B.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
The Number of Participants ≥65 Years of Age With Hypoglycemic Episodes (Incidence)
|
60 participants
|
61 participants
|
51 participants
|
53 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Randomization through 24 weeks overallPopulation: All randomized participants except those from the excluded site.
The hypoglycemia rate per 30 days was calculated as the number of hypoglycemic episodes reported divided by the number of days at risk times 30.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Study A Q1D
n=268 Participants
Insulin lispro administered subcutaneously, up to 3 times daily for 24 weeks. Mealtime bolus of insulin lispro self-titrated dose was based on blood glucose reading from the previous day (Q1D).
Glargine participant-dependent doses, administered subcutaneously once daily for 24 weeks.
Participants were randomized to Q1D at the site level: sites were assigned to Study A according to an allocation plan that was pre-specified before initiation of Study A.
|
Study A Q3D
n=263 Participants
Insulin lispro administered subcutaneously, up to 3 times daily for 24 weeks. Mealtime bolus of insulin lispro self-titrated dose was based on blood glucose readings from the past 3 days (Q3D).
Glargine participant-dependent doses, administered subcutaneously once daily for 24 weeks.
Participants were randomized to Q3D at the site level: sites were assigned to Study A according to an allocation plan that was pre-specified before initiation of Study A.
|
Study B Q1D
n=289 Participants
Insulin lispro administered subcutaneously, up to 3 times daily for 24 weeks. Mealtime bolus of insulin lispro self-titrated dose was based on blood glucose reading from the previous day (Q1D).
Glargine participant-dependent doses, administered subcutaneously once daily for 24 weeks.
Participants were randomized to Q1D at the site level: sites were assigned to Study B according to an allocation plan that was pre-specified before initiation of Study B.
|
Study B Q3D
n=292 Participants
Insulin lispro administered subcutaneously, up to 3 times daily for 24 weeks. Mealtime bolus of insulin lispro self-titrated dose was based on blood glucose readings from the past 3 days (Q3D).
Glargine participant-dependent doses, administered subcutaneously once daily for 24 weeks.
Participants were randomized to Q3D at the site level: sites were assigned to Study B according to an allocation plan that was pre-specified before initiation of Study B.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
The Rate of Hypoglycemic Episodes
|
3.15 hypoglycemic episodes per 30 day period
Standard Deviation 0.23
|
3.33 hypoglycemic episodes per 30 day period
Standard Deviation 0.25
|
3.18 hypoglycemic episodes per 30 day period
Standard Deviation 0.26
|
3.33 hypoglycemic episodes per 30 day period
Standard Deviation 0.27
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Randomization up to 24 weeksPopulation: All randomized participants except those from the excluded site.
Severe hypoglycemia is defined as an event requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or other resuscitative actions. These episodes may be associated with sufficient neuroglycopenia to induce seizure or coma. Plasma glucose measurements may not be available during such an event, but neurological recovery attributable to the restoration of plasma glucose to normal is considered sufficient evidence that the event was induced by low plasma glucose.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Study A Q1D
n=268 Participants
Insulin lispro administered subcutaneously, up to 3 times daily for 24 weeks. Mealtime bolus of insulin lispro self-titrated dose was based on blood glucose reading from the previous day (Q1D).
Glargine participant-dependent doses, administered subcutaneously once daily for 24 weeks.
Participants were randomized to Q1D at the site level: sites were assigned to Study A according to an allocation plan that was pre-specified before initiation of Study A.
|
Study A Q3D
n=263 Participants
Insulin lispro administered subcutaneously, up to 3 times daily for 24 weeks. Mealtime bolus of insulin lispro self-titrated dose was based on blood glucose readings from the past 3 days (Q3D).
Glargine participant-dependent doses, administered subcutaneously once daily for 24 weeks.
Participants were randomized to Q3D at the site level: sites were assigned to Study A according to an allocation plan that was pre-specified before initiation of Study A.
|
Study B Q1D
n=289 Participants
Insulin lispro administered subcutaneously, up to 3 times daily for 24 weeks. Mealtime bolus of insulin lispro self-titrated dose was based on blood glucose reading from the previous day (Q1D).
Glargine participant-dependent doses, administered subcutaneously once daily for 24 weeks.
Participants were randomized to Q1D at the site level: sites were assigned to Study B according to an allocation plan that was pre-specified before initiation of Study B.
|
Study B Q3D
n=292 Participants
Insulin lispro administered subcutaneously, up to 3 times daily for 24 weeks. Mealtime bolus of insulin lispro self-titrated dose was based on blood glucose readings from the past 3 days (Q3D).
Glargine participant-dependent doses, administered subcutaneously once daily for 24 weeks.
Participants were randomized to Q3D at the site level: sites were assigned to Study B according to an allocation plan that was pre-specified before initiation of Study B.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Severe Hypoglycemic Episodes
|
1.9 percentage of participants
|
0.8 percentage of participants
|
2.4 percentage of participants
|
2.7 percentage of participants
|
Adverse Events
Study A Q1D
Study A Q3D
Study B Q1D
Study B Q3D
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Study A Q1D
n=268 participants at risk
Insulin lispro administered subcutaneously, up to 3 times daily for 24 weeks. Mealtime bolus of insulin lispro self-titrated based on blood glucose reading from the previous day (Q1D).
Glargine participant-dependent doses, administered subcutaneously once daily for 24 weeks.
Participants were randomized to Q1D at the site level: sites were assigned to Study A according to an allocation plan that was pre-specified before initiation of Study A.
|
Study A Q3D
n=263 participants at risk
Insulin lispro administered subcutaneously, up to 3 times daily for 24 weeks. Mealtime bolus of insulin lispro self-titrated based on blood glucose readings from the past 3 days (Q3D).
Glargine participant-dependent doses, administered subcutaneously once daily for 24 weeks.
Participants were randomized to Q3D at the site level: sites were assigned to Study A according to an allocation plan that was pre-specified before initiation of Study A.
|
Study B Q1D
n=289 participants at risk
Insulin lispro administered subcutaneously, up to 3 times daily for 24 weeks. Mealtime bolus of insulin lispro self-titrated based on blood glucose reading from the previous day (Q1D).
Glargine participant-dependent doses, administered subcutaneously once daily for 24 weeks.
Participants were randomized to Q1D at the site level: sites were assigned to Study B according to an allocation plan that was pre-specified before initiation of Study B.
|
Study B Q3D
n=292 participants at risk
Insulin lispro administered subcutaneously, up to 3 times daily for 24 weeks. Mealtime bolus of insulin lispro self-titrated based on blood glucose reading from the previous day (Q1D).
Glargine participant-dependent doses, administered subcutaneously once daily for 24 weeks.
Participants were randomized to Q3D at the site level: sites were assigned to Study B according to an allocation plan that was pre-specified before initiation of Study B.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Tibia fracture
|
0.00%
0/268
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/263
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/289
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.34%
1/292 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Angina pectoris
|
0.75%
2/268 • Number of events 2
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/263
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/289
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/292
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
|
0.37%
1/268 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/263
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.69%
2/289 • Number of events 2
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/292
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure
|
0.37%
1/268 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/263
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.35%
1/289 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/292
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure congestive
|
0.75%
2/268 • Number of events 2
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/263
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.35%
1/289 • Number of events 2
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.34%
1/292 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Coronary artery disease
|
0.00%
0/268
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.38%
1/263 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/289
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.34%
1/292 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Coronary artery occlusion
|
0.00%
0/268
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.38%
1/263 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/289
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/292
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial infarction
|
0.37%
1/268 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/263
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.69%
2/289 • Number of events 2
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/292
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial ischaemia
|
0.00%
0/268
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/263
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/289
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.34%
1/292 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Endocrine disorders
Adrenal mass
|
0.00%
0/268
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.38%
1/263 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/289
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/292
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Eye disorders
Vitreous haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/268
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/263
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/289
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.34%
1/292 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal hernia
|
0.37%
1/268 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.38%
1/263 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/289
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/292
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
0.00%
0/268
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/263
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.35%
1/289 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/292
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Pancreatitis
|
0.37%
1/268 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/263
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/289
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.34%
1/292 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Pancreatitis acute
|
0.00%
0/268
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/263
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.35%
1/289 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/292
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
General disorders
Cardiac death
|
0.00%
0/268
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/263
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.35%
1/289 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/292
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
General disorders
Chest pain
|
0.37%
1/268 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.38%
1/263 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.35%
1/289 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/292
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
General disorders
Death
|
0.00%
0/268
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/263
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/289
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.34%
1/292 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
General disorders
Non-cardiac chest pain
|
0.37%
1/268 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/263
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/289
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/292
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
0.00%
0/268
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.38%
1/263 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/289
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/292
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholecystitis
|
0.00%
0/268
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/263
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/289
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.34%
1/292 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholecystitis acute
|
0.37%
1/268 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/263
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/289
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/292
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholelithiasis
|
0.37%
1/268 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/263
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/289
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/292
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Atypical pneumonia
|
0.00%
0/268
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.38%
1/263 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/289
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/292
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
0.37%
1/268 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/263
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/289
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/292
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis
|
0.00%
0/268
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/263
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/289
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.68%
2/292 • Number of events 2
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Diverticulitis
|
0.00%
0/268
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.38%
1/263 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/289
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.34%
1/292 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
0.00%
0/268
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/263
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.35%
1/289 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/292
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis viral
|
0.00%
0/268
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/263
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/289
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.34%
1/292 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Osteomyelitis
|
0.00%
0/268
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/263
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/289
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.34%
1/292 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Rickettsiosis
|
0.00%
0/268
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/263
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/289
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.34%
1/292 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sepsis syndrome
|
0.37%
1/268 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/263
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/289
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/292
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Tooth abscess
|
0.37%
1/268 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/263
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/289
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/292
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
0.00%
0/268
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/263
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/289
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.34%
1/292 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urosepsis
|
0.00%
0/268
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.38%
1/263 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/289
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/292
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Chest injury
|
0.00%
0/268
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.38%
1/263 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/289
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/292
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Contusion
|
0.00%
0/268
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/263
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/289
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.34%
1/292 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Femoral neck fracture
|
0.00%
0/268
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/263
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/289
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.34%
1/292 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Femur fracture
|
0.00%
0/268
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.38%
1/263 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/289
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/292
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fibula fracture
|
0.00%
0/268
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/263
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/289
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.34%
1/292 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Hip fracture
|
0.00%
0/268
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/263
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/289
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.34%
1/292 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Rib fracture
|
0.00%
0/268
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.38%
1/263 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/289
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/292
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Road traffic accident
|
0.37%
1/268 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.38%
1/263 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/289
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/292
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Spinal compression fracture
|
0.00%
0/268
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.38%
1/263 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/289
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/292
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Subdural haematoma
|
0.00%
0/268
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.38%
1/263 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/289
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/292
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Wrist fracture
|
0.00%
0/268
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/263
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/289
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.34%
1/292 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Investigations
Blood creatine phosphokinase increased
|
0.00%
0/268
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.38%
1/263 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/289
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/292
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Investigations
Blood creatine phosphokinase mb increased
|
0.00%
0/268
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.38%
1/263 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/289
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/292
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Diabetic ketoacidosis
|
0.00%
0/268
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/263
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/289
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.34%
1/292 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoglycaemia
|
2.2%
6/268 • Number of events 6
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.76%
2/263 • Number of events 4
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
3.1%
9/289 • Number of events 10
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
2.7%
8/292 • Number of events 8
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Lactic acidosis
|
0.00%
0/268
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.38%
1/263 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/289
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/292
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
0.37%
1/268 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/263
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/289
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/292
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Lumbar spinal stenosis
|
0.00%
0/268
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/263
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/289
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.34%
1/292 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoarthritis
|
0.00%
0/268
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.38%
1/263 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/289
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/292
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Bone neoplasm
|
0.37%
1/268 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/263
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/289
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/292
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Breast cancer
|
0.00%
0/268
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/263
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.35%
1/289 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/292
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Lung neoplasm
|
0.00%
0/268
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/263
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/289
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.34%
1/292 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Malignant neoplasm progression
|
0.00%
0/268
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/263
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/289
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.34%
1/292 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Prostate cancer
|
0.00%
0/135
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/124
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/134
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.74%
1/136 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Renal cell carcinoma
|
0.00%
0/268
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.38%
1/263 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/289
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/292
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Renal neoplasm
|
0.37%
1/268 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/263
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/289
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/292
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Squamous cell carcinoma of skin
|
0.37%
1/268 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/263
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/289
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/292
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Uterine leiomyoma
|
0.00%
0/133
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/139
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.65%
1/155 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/156
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebrovascular accident
|
0.00%
0/268
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/263
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/289
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.34%
1/292 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Neuropathy peripheral
|
0.00%
0/268
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/263
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.35%
1/289 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/292
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Syncope
|
0.00%
0/268
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/263
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.35%
1/289 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/292
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Transient ischaemic attack
|
0.00%
0/268
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/263
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/289
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.34%
1/292 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Completed suicide
|
0.00%
0/268
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/263
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/289
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.34%
1/292 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Confusional state
|
0.00%
0/268
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.38%
1/263 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/289
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/292
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
|
0.00%
0/268
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/263
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.35%
1/289 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/292
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Calculus urinary
|
0.00%
0/268
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.76%
2/263 • Number of events 2
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/289
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/292
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Cystocele
|
0.00%
0/133
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/139
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.65%
1/155 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/156
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Acute pulmonary oedema
|
0.00%
0/268
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/263
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.35%
1/289 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/292
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Acute respiratory failure
|
0.00%
0/268
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.38%
1/263 • Number of events 2
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/289
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/292
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
|
0.00%
0/268
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/263
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/289
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.34%
1/292 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Haemothorax
|
0.00%
0/268
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.38%
1/263 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/289
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/292
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumonia aspiration
|
0.37%
1/268 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/263
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/289
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/292
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumonitis
|
0.00%
0/268
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/263
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.35%
1/289 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/292
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory failure
|
0.37%
1/268 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/263
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.35%
1/289 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/292
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Diabetic foot
|
0.37%
1/268 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/263
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/289
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/292
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Urticaria
|
0.00%
0/268
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/263
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.35%
1/289 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/292
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Study A Q1D
n=268 participants at risk
Insulin lispro administered subcutaneously, up to 3 times daily for 24 weeks. Mealtime bolus of insulin lispro self-titrated based on blood glucose reading from the previous day (Q1D).
Glargine participant-dependent doses, administered subcutaneously once daily for 24 weeks.
Participants were randomized to Q1D at the site level: sites were assigned to Study A according to an allocation plan that was pre-specified before initiation of Study A.
|
Study A Q3D
n=263 participants at risk
Insulin lispro administered subcutaneously, up to 3 times daily for 24 weeks. Mealtime bolus of insulin lispro self-titrated based on blood glucose readings from the past 3 days (Q3D).
Glargine participant-dependent doses, administered subcutaneously once daily for 24 weeks.
Participants were randomized to Q3D at the site level: sites were assigned to Study A according to an allocation plan that was pre-specified before initiation of Study A.
|
Study B Q1D
n=289 participants at risk
Insulin lispro administered subcutaneously, up to 3 times daily for 24 weeks. Mealtime bolus of insulin lispro self-titrated based on blood glucose reading from the previous day (Q1D).
Glargine participant-dependent doses, administered subcutaneously once daily for 24 weeks.
Participants were randomized to Q1D at the site level: sites were assigned to Study B according to an allocation plan that was pre-specified before initiation of Study B.
|
Study B Q3D
n=292 participants at risk
Insulin lispro administered subcutaneously, up to 3 times daily for 24 weeks. Mealtime bolus of insulin lispro self-titrated based on blood glucose reading from the previous day (Q1D).
Glargine participant-dependent doses, administered subcutaneously once daily for 24 weeks.
Participants were randomized to Q3D at the site level: sites were assigned to Study B according to an allocation plan that was pre-specified before initiation of Study B.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Eye disorders
Diabetic retinopathy
|
0.75%
2/268 • Number of events 2
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.38%
1/263 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
1.0%
3/289 • Number of events 3
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/292
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
0.37%
1/268 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.76%
2/263 • Number of events 2
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
1.4%
4/289 • Number of events 4
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
1.4%
4/292 • Number of events 4
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
|
1.5%
4/268 • Number of events 4
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
1.1%
3/263 • Number of events 3
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
1.0%
3/289 • Number of events 3
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
1.4%
4/292 • Number of events 4
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
4.5%
12/268 • Number of events 13
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
2.3%
6/263 • Number of events 6
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
5.2%
15/289 • Number of events 16
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
4.5%
13/292 • Number of events 13
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dyspepsia
|
0.75%
2/268 • Number of events 2
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/263
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.35%
1/289 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
1.0%
3/292 • Number of events 3
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Enterocolitis
|
0.00%
0/268
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/263
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
1.0%
3/289 • Number of events 3
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/292
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrooesophageal reflux disease
|
0.75%
2/268 • Number of events 2
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/263
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.69%
2/289 • Number of events 3
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
1.0%
3/292 • Number of events 3
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
1.1%
3/268 • Number of events 3
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
3.4%
9/263 • Number of events 9
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
3.8%
11/289 • Number of events 11
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
2.7%
8/292 • Number of events 8
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Toothache
|
0.37%
1/268 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.76%
2/263 • Number of events 3
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
1.4%
4/289 • Number of events 4
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.68%
2/292 • Number of events 3
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
2.2%
6/268 • Number of events 7
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
1.5%
4/263 • Number of events 4
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
3.1%
9/289 • Number of events 10
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
2.1%
6/292 • Number of events 6
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
General disorders
Chest pain
|
0.37%
1/268 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
1.9%
5/263 • Number of events 6
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.35%
1/289 • Number of events 2
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
1.0%
3/292 • Number of events 3
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
1.5%
4/268 • Number of events 4
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
1.1%
3/263 • Number of events 3
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.35%
1/289 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
2.7%
8/292 • Number of events 8
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
General disorders
Influenza like illness
|
1.9%
5/268 • Number of events 5
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
1.9%
5/263 • Number of events 9
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/289
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/292
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
|
1.1%
3/268 • Number of events 3
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
1.9%
5/263 • Number of events 5
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
2.1%
6/289 • Number of events 6
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
1.0%
3/292 • Number of events 3
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
General disorders
Pain
|
0.37%
1/268 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.38%
1/263 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/289
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
1.0%
3/292 • Number of events 3
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
1.1%
3/268 • Number of events 3
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
1.1%
3/263 • Number of events 3
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.35%
1/289 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
1.0%
3/292 • Number of events 3
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
2.2%
6/268 • Number of events 6
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
3.8%
10/263 • Number of events 11
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
1.4%
4/289 • Number of events 4
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
2.4%
7/292 • Number of events 7
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Ear infection
|
0.37%
1/268 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
1.9%
5/263 • Number of events 5
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.35%
1/289 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/292
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
1.1%
3/268 • Number of events 3
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.76%
2/263 • Number of events 2
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
1.7%
5/289 • Number of events 5
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
2.4%
7/292 • Number of events 7
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis viral
|
2.2%
6/268 • Number of events 6
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
1.1%
3/263 • Number of events 3
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.35%
1/289 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
1.4%
4/292 • Number of events 4
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
2.2%
6/268 • Number of events 7
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
3.0%
8/263 • Number of events 8
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
3.1%
9/289 • Number of events 14
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
4.1%
12/292 • Number of events 13
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
7.1%
19/268 • Number of events 23
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
7.2%
19/263 • Number of events 19
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
4.2%
12/289 • Number of events 15
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
4.1%
12/292 • Number of events 12
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pharyngitis
|
1.9%
5/268 • Number of events 6
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/263
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.35%
1/289 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/292
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
0.75%
2/268 • Number of events 2
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
1.1%
3/263 • Number of events 4
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.35%
1/289 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.34%
1/292 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
|
2.6%
7/268 • Number of events 7
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
3.0%
8/263 • Number of events 9
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
1.4%
4/289 • Number of events 4
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
1.7%
5/292 • Number of events 5
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
3.4%
9/268 • Number of events 10
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
2.7%
7/263 • Number of events 8
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
1.7%
5/289 • Number of events 6
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
3.4%
10/292 • Number of events 10
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
3.0%
8/268 • Number of events 8
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
2.7%
7/263 • Number of events 8
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
1.0%
3/289 • Number of events 3
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
2.4%
7/292 • Number of events 9
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Back injury
|
0.00%
0/268
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/263
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
1.0%
3/289 • Number of events 3
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/292
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Laceration
|
0.00%
0/268
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/263
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
1.0%
3/289 • Number of events 3
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
1.0%
3/292 • Number of events 3
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Limb injury
|
0.00%
0/268
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.38%
1/263 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
1.0%
3/289 • Number of events 3
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.68%
2/292 • Number of events 2
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Investigations
Weight increased
|
0.75%
2/268 • Number of events 2
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
1.1%
3/263 • Number of events 3
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.35%
1/289 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
1.7%
5/292 • Number of events 5
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dyslipidaemia
|
2.6%
7/268 • Number of events 7
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
2.3%
6/263 • Number of events 6
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/289
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/292
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
1.1%
3/268 • Number of events 3
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
1.9%
5/263 • Number of events 5
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
1.7%
5/289 • Number of events 7
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
1.4%
4/292 • Number of events 5
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
0.75%
2/268 • Number of events 2
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
1.5%
4/263 • Number of events 4
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
3.8%
11/289 • Number of events 11
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
2.1%
6/292 • Number of events 6
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Intervertebral disc protrusion
|
1.1%
3/268 • Number of events 3
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/263
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/289
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.68%
2/292 • Number of events 2
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle spasms
|
1.9%
5/268 • Number of events 5
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
1.1%
3/263 • Number of events 3
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.69%
2/289 • Number of events 2
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.34%
1/292 • Number of events 3
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal pain
|
0.00%
0/268
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.76%
2/263 • Number of events 2
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
1.0%
3/289 • Number of events 3
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.68%
2/292 • Number of events 2
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
|
1.5%
4/268 • Number of events 4
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/263
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/289
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
1.0%
3/292 • Number of events 3
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoarthritis
|
0.00%
0/268
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
1.5%
4/263 • Number of events 4
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/289
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.34%
1/292 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
1.1%
3/268 • Number of events 3
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
1.9%
5/263 • Number of events 5
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
1.4%
4/289 • Number of events 4
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
1.0%
3/292 • Number of events 3
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
1.1%
3/268 • Number of events 3
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.76%
2/263 • Number of events 3
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
1.7%
5/289 • Number of events 6
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
1.4%
4/292 • Number of events 4
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
1.5%
4/268 • Number of events 5
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
3.4%
9/263 • Number of events 10
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
4.5%
13/289 • Number of events 15
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
2.4%
7/292 • Number of events 7
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Hypoaesthesia
|
0.37%
1/268 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.76%
2/263 • Number of events 2
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.35%
1/289 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
1.0%
3/292 • Number of events 3
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
|
1.1%
3/268 • Number of events 3
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
1.1%
3/263 • Number of events 3
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.35%
1/289 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.34%
1/292 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
1.9%
5/268 • Number of events 5
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
1.5%
4/263 • Number of events 4
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.69%
2/289 • Number of events 2
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.68%
2/292 • Number of events 2
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
1.9%
5/268 • Number of events 5
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
2.3%
6/263 • Number of events 6
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
1.4%
4/289 • Number of events 4
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
1.4%
4/292 • Number of events 4
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea exertional
|
1.1%
3/268 • Number of events 3
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/263
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/289
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/292
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal pain
|
1.5%
4/268 • Number of events 4
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
1.1%
3/263 • Number of events 3
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
1.4%
4/289 • Number of events 4
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
3.1%
9/292 • Number of events 9
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory tract congestion
|
0.37%
1/268 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
1.1%
3/263 • Number of events 3
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.69%
2/289 • Number of events 2
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.68%
2/292 • Number of events 2
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Sinus congestion
|
1.9%
5/268 • Number of events 5
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
1.9%
5/263 • Number of events 5
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
1.0%
3/289 • Number of events 3
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
1.0%
3/292 • Number of events 3
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Cataract operation
|
1.1%
3/268 • Number of events 5
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/263
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
1.0%
3/289 • Number of events 3
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/292
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Tooth extraction
|
0.00%
0/268
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.38%
1/263 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.00%
0/289
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
1.0%
3/292 • Number of events 3
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
3.0%
8/268 • Number of events 8
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
4.9%
13/263 • Number of events 13
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
0.35%
1/289 • Number of events 1
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
1.7%
5/292 • Number of events 5
The number of participants at risk does not include 3 participants in Study B Q1D and 2 participants in Study B Q3D who were from the site excluded due to quality issues and data validity.
|
Additional Information
Chief Medical Officer
Eli Lilly and Company
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: GT60