Dose Response of Functionally Critical Brain Regions for Brain Radiotherapy
NCT ID: NCT01212237
Last Updated: 2019-07-29
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
OBSERVATIONAL
2012-05-14
2013-04-13
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of Preoperative Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) in Patients With Brain Tumors
NCT03604302
Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and 1H-Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopic Imaging in Treating Patients With Newly Diagnosed Brain Tumors
NCT00005083
Dose Escalated MRSI Guided Radiation Therapy in Glioblastoma
NCT02394665
MRI Mapping in Planning Radiation Therapy to the Base of Skull and Brain in Patients With Nonmetastatic Head and Neck Cancer
NCT00984074
MRI Scans in Evaluating the Effects of Radiation Therapy and Chemotherapy in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma Multiforme or Anaplastic Glioma
NCT00756106
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Our goal is to answer the following three research questions in this study:
1. What is the dose response curve (degree of radiation complications/radiological changes vs. radiation dose) for brain regions involved in the processing of visual, language and working memory functions?
2. What is the limiting dose for these functionally critical brain regions that can be applied to radiotherapy treatment planning to minimize (e.g., less than 5%) the possibility of radiation-induced injury?
3. Can brain fMRI be used to guide the radiotherapy treatment planning to minimize the dose to functionally critical brain regions and evaluate treatment responses of these regions?
Research Method:
Imaging before radiotherapy: For each patient, active stimulation and resting fMRI examinations will be performed in addition to standard anatomic MRI for brain radiotherapy. Activation maps of regions involved in visual, language and working memory functions will be generated from the fMRI scans and the patient's responses on of the working memory task (i.e., the N-Back task) will be recorded during the fMRI studies. The MRI and fMRI will, combined, take approximately 90 minutes - 60 minutes for the standard MRI and 30 minutes for the fMRI. The activation maps will be overlaid onto the FLAIR MRI images, imported into the radiotherapy treatment planning system and co-registered with the simulation CT scan.
Radiotherapy and routine follow-up: Functionally critical areas in the fMRI activation maps will be separately contoured as critical organs but will not be considered for plan optimization. Dose volume histograms (DVHs) of functionally critically brain regions will be calculated and documented. Each patient will receive fractionated brain radiotherapy according to the treatment plan and will be followed up with every three months after radiotherapy.
Follow-up evaluations: The 3MS examination will be administered prior to initiation of treatment onset and every three months after treatment during routine follow-up to screen neuropsychological functions. Anatomic MRI (standard) and brain fMRI (research) will be acquired at 6 months after radiotherapy to determine the radiological and functional changes in regions involved in the processing of visual, language and working memory functions.
Minimizing the interference of tumor recurrence or progression: Two actions will be taken to minimize the interference of tumor recurrence or progression with the evaluation of performance alterations caused by radiation. First, patient inclusion will be restricted to patients with slow growing tumors, e.g., meningioma, low grade glioma and anaplastic astrocytoma so that the chance for tumor recurrence or progression is small. Secondly, patients who develop disease progression at any of the post-radiotherapy follow-ups will be excluded from the study, as it would not be possible to distinguish the effects of disease progression from radiotherapy side effects on the fMRI or the 3MS examination, and the findings would not be interpretable.
Dose Response Analysis: Logistic regression analysis will be used to assess the likelihood of complications to functionally critical brain regions as a function of radiation dose. The dependent variable will be the binary indicator that identifies patients' manifesting complications (decline of 3MS examination score and N-Back test, radiological/functional changes identified on MRI and fMRI) attributed to radiation exposure. The logistic regression model will include relevant subject level factors (e.g., age, gender, baseline Karnofsky performance status, tumor location, recent seizures, anti-epleptic medications) as covariates. The fitted logistic normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) model will permit estimation of the probability of significant complications associated with any radiation dose to the area, allowing the limiting dose to be calculated as the dose expected to induce complication with an acceptable probability (e.g., 5%).
Incorporation of limiting dose for radiotherapy treatment planning: The limiting dose from the above "Dose Response Analysis" will be used for IMRT re-planning considering the functionally critical brain regions. The optimization goal is to minimize the dose to functionally critical brain regions while maintaining similar PTV (planning target volume) coverage and keeping dose to the critical structures within accepted tolerance. DVHs of the functionally critical brain regions, PTV and all other critical structures will be compared for both treatment plans with and without considering the functionally critical brain regions. A Wilcoxon matched pair signed rank test will be performed to compare the plans in terms of calculated NTCP of critical organs. The McNemar test will be used to compare plans with and without dose constraints of functional areas in terms of yield rate (i.e., the proportion of patients for whom the IMRT plan was successfully devised).
The primary study endpoint of this study is normal tissue complication. The primary objective of this study is to determine the dose response curve and limiting dose for functionally critically brain regions for brain radiotherapy. The second objective of this study is to investigate the accuracy of active stimulation or resting state fMRI for avoidance of the functionally critical brain regions for radiotherapy treatment planning of brain tumors and for evaluating the treatment responses of these critical regions.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
fMRI Evaluation
All patients will undergo the following standard imaging and radiotherapy procedures will be performed for each patient:
1. Standard MRI for radiotherapy treatment planning which takes about 60 minutes.
2. Radiotherapy treatment simulation with CT.
3. Radiotherapy treatment planning
4. Radiotherapy treatment
5. Routine follow-up every 3 months after the radiotherapy.
Special Procedures.
The following special imaging and radiotherapy procedures will be performed for each patient:
1. fMRI (30 minutes)
2. The 3MS examination, administered every 3 months during routine follow-up for one year after the completion of the radiotherapy.
fMRI Evaluation
Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) uses MR imaging to measure the tiny metabolic changes that take place in an active part of the brain. fMRIs are used for many reasons, for example, to determine precisely which part of the brain is handling critical functions such as thought, speech, movement and sensation, to help assess the effects of stroke, trauma or degenerative disease (such as Alzheimer's) on brain function, and to guide the planning of surgery and radiation therapy.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
fMRI Evaluation
Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) uses MR imaging to measure the tiny metabolic changes that take place in an active part of the brain. fMRIs are used for many reasons, for example, to determine precisely which part of the brain is handling critical functions such as thought, speech, movement and sensation, to help assess the effects of stroke, trauma or degenerative disease (such as Alzheimer's) on brain function, and to guide the planning of surgery and radiation therapy.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2\. A diagnostic contrast enhanced CT/MRI demonstrating the lesion prior to registration.
3\. Karnofsky performance status ≥60. 4. Ability to undergo MR imaging with the use of Gadolinium contrast. 5. Ability to undergo brain fMRI. 6. Patient must sign a study specific informed consent form. Patients who cannot provide consent due to cognitive impairment will not be enrolled in the study. The investigators will follow the recently published guidelines (Binder \& Guze, Am. J. Psy., 155, 1649-1650, 1998) to assess the subject's understanding of the procedure and his/her decision making capacity,.
Exclusion Criteria
2\. Any condition including taking anti-anxiety medicines such as Benzodiazepines or requiring sedative to overcome claustrophobia that makes the candidate ineligible brain fMRI.
3\. Karnofsky performance status of ≤60 4. Prior history of radiation therapy to the brain 5. Pregnancy 6. Significant medical or neurological disorders that would affect the outcome of the evaluations and/or make a successful MRI/fMRI unduly difficult 7. Major psychiatric conditions, whether medicated or unmedicated, as such conditions can affect the validity of the evaluations
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
OTHER
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jenghwa Chang, Ph.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Weill Cornell Medical College
New York, New York, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1003010928
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.