Trial Outcomes & Findings for Longitudinal Study of Dental Implant Therapy in HIV Positive Patients (NCT NCT01211288)
NCT ID: NCT01211288
Last Updated: 2020-06-02
Results Overview
Dental implant supported restorations functioning in the mouth with no pain, no mobility, no infection and less than 50% bone loss around the implant site.
COMPLETED
NA
41 participants
Baseline to 12 months after implant restoration complete
2020-06-02
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
HIV Negative Group
This group contains participants consented to receive implants and identified as negative for HIV
Astra implants: Root form OsseoSpeed TX Astra Tech Implant System
|
HIV Positive Group
This group contains participants consented to receive implants and identified as positive for HIV
Astra implants: Root form OsseoSpeed TX Astra Tech Implant System
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
21
|
20
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
20
|
19
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
1
|
1
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
HIV Negative Group
This group contains participants consented to receive implants and identified as negative for HIV
Astra implants: Root form OsseoSpeed TX Astra Tech Implant System
|
HIV Positive Group
This group contains participants consented to receive implants and identified as positive for HIV
Astra implants: Root form OsseoSpeed TX Astra Tech Implant System
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
1
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Longitudinal Study of Dental Implant Therapy in HIV Positive Patients
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
HIV Negative Group
n=21 Participants
This group contains participants consented to receive implants and identified as negative for HIV
Astra implants: Root form OsseoSpeed TX Astra Tech Implant System
|
HIV Positive Group
n=20 Participants
This group contains participants consented to receive implants and identified as positive for HIV
Astra implants: Root form OsseoSpeed TX Astra Tech Implant System
|
Total
n=41 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
17 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
20 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
37 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
4 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
14 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
7 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
22 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
6 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
1 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
12 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
21 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
2 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
21 participants
n=93 Participants
|
20 participants
n=4 Participants
|
41 participants
n=27 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months after implant restoration completePopulation: Unable to do follow up on 3 participants - two participants from HIV negative group and one participant from HIV positive group, and one implant failure from HIV positive group
Dental implant supported restorations functioning in the mouth with no pain, no mobility, no infection and less than 50% bone loss around the implant site.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
HIV Negative Group
n=28 implants
This group contains participants consented to receive implants and identified as negative for HIV
Astra implants: Root form OsseoSpeed TX Astra Tech Implant System
|
HIV Positive Group
n=26 implants
This group contains participants consented to receive implants and identified as positive for HIV
Astra implants: Root form OsseoSpeed TX Astra Tech Implant System
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Implants Functioning in HIV Positive Subjects Compared to HIV Negative Subjects
|
28 implants
|
25 implants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 24 months after implant restoration completePopulation: Unable to do follow up on 7 participants, three participants from HIV negative group and four participants from HIV positive group
Dental Implant supported restoration functioning in the mouth with no pain, no mobility, no infection and less than 50% bone loss around the implant site.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
HIV Negative Group
n=27 implants
This group contains participants consented to receive implants and identified as negative for HIV
Astra implants: Root form OsseoSpeed TX Astra Tech Implant System
|
HIV Positive Group
n=20 implants
This group contains participants consented to receive implants and identified as positive for HIV
Astra implants: Root form OsseoSpeed TX Astra Tech Implant System
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Implants Functioning in HIV Positive Subjects Compared to HIV Negative Subjects
|
27 implants
|
20 implants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 36 months after implant restoration completePopulation: Unable to do follow up on 11 participants, five participants from HIV negative group and six participants from HIV positive group
Dental implant supported restoration functioning in the mouth with no pain, no mobility, no infection and less than 50% bone loss around the implant site.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
HIV Negative Group
n=25 implants
This group contains participants consented to receive implants and identified as negative for HIV
Astra implants: Root form OsseoSpeed TX Astra Tech Implant System
|
HIV Positive Group
n=17 implants
This group contains participants consented to receive implants and identified as positive for HIV
Astra implants: Root form OsseoSpeed TX Astra Tech Implant System
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Implants Functioning in HIV Positive Subjects Compared to HIV Negative Subjects
|
25 implants
|
17 implants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 months after implant restorationPopulation: Unable to do follow up on three participants, two from HIV negative group and one from HIV positive group
Radiographic examination of implant osseointegration and bone loss by using traditional periapical and/or bitewing radiographs.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
HIV Negative Group
n=28 implants
This group contains participants consented to receive implants and identified as negative for HIV
Astra implants: Root form OsseoSpeed TX Astra Tech Implant System
|
HIV Positive Group
n=25 implants
This group contains participants consented to receive implants and identified as positive for HIV
Astra implants: Root form OsseoSpeed TX Astra Tech Implant System
|
|---|---|---|
|
Peri-implant Health and Bone Maintenance as Measured by Radiographic Examination in HIV Positive Subjects Compared to HIV Negative Subjects
|
0.34 millmeters
Standard Deviation 0.58
|
0.35 millmeters
Standard Deviation 0.71
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 months after implant restorationPopulation: Unable to do follow up on 7 participants, three from HIV negative group and four from HIV positive group
Radiographic examination of implant osseointegration and bone loss by using traditional periapical and/or bitewing radiographs.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
HIV Negative Group
n=27 implants
This group contains participants consented to receive implants and identified as negative for HIV
Astra implants: Root form OsseoSpeed TX Astra Tech Implant System
|
HIV Positive Group
n=20 implants
This group contains participants consented to receive implants and identified as positive for HIV
Astra implants: Root form OsseoSpeed TX Astra Tech Implant System
|
|---|---|---|
|
Peri-implant Health and Bone Maintenance as Measured by Radiographic Examination in HIV Positive Subjects Compared to HIV Negative Subjects
|
0.39 millmeters
Standard Deviation 0.49
|
0.33 millmeters
Standard Deviation 0.61
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 36 months after implant restorationPopulation: Unable to do follow up on 11 participants, five from HIV negative group and six from HIV positive group
Radiographic examination of implant osseointegration and bone loss by using traditional periapical and /or bitewing radiographs.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
HIV Negative Group
n=25 implants
This group contains participants consented to receive implants and identified as negative for HIV
Astra implants: Root form OsseoSpeed TX Astra Tech Implant System
|
HIV Positive Group
n=17 implants
This group contains participants consented to receive implants and identified as positive for HIV
Astra implants: Root form OsseoSpeed TX Astra Tech Implant System
|
|---|---|---|
|
Peri-implant Health and Bone Maintenance as Measured by Radiographic Examination in HIV Positive Subjects Compared to HIV Negative Subjects
|
0.44 millmeters
Standard Deviation 0.52
|
0.48 millmeters
Standard Deviation 0.95
|
Adverse Events
HIV Negative Group
HIV Positive Group
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Dr. Toni Tien Neumeier
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place