A Study Comparing Modified Lund Concept and Cerebral Perfusion Pressure-targeted Therapy in Secondary Brain Ischaemia.

NCT ID: NCT01206283

Last Updated: 2010-09-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-01-31

Study Completion Date

2008-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Secondary brain ischaemia (SBI) usually develops after aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) and severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). The current management strategies are based on intracranial pressure-targeted therapy (ICP-targeted) with cerebral microdialysis monitoring (modified Lund concept) or cerebral perfusion pressure-targeted therapy (CPP-targeted). We present a randomised controlled study to compare the two management strategies.

The hypotheses of the study were:

* SBI developed after aneurysmal SAH and severe TBI share the same crucial characteristics and any treatment applied will essentially treat the same underlying pathophysiology.
* ICP-targeted therapy with cerebral microdialysis monitoring according to the modified Lund concept is superior to CPP-targeted therapy in managing comatose patients with SBI after aneurysmal SAH and severe TBI.

Sixty comatose operated patients with SBI following aneurysmal SAH and severe TBI were randomized into ICP-targeted therapy with cerebral microdialysis monitoring and CPP-targeted therapy groups. Mortality rates in both groups were calculated and biochemical signs of cerebral ischaemia were analysed using cerebral microdialysis. Outcome for cerebral microdialysis was measured as poor outcome (Glasgow Outcome Scale score 1, 2 and 3) or good outcome (Glasgow Outcome Scale score 4 and 5).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Brain Injuries Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Cerebral perfusion pressure-targeted

15 comatose operated patients after aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage and severe traumatic brain injury respectively were managed postoperatively using cerebral perfusion pressure-targeted therapy according to the American Associations of Neurological Surgeons. Results were categorised into different Glasgow Outcome Scores.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Cerebral perfusion pressure-targeted therapy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

* ICP monitoring using an external ventricular drain and CSF drainage as a first measure if ICP was increased (over 15-20 mmHg);
* Maintenance of CPP over 70-80 mmHg (Triple 'H' therapy = 3L/24 hours including 1L of colloids - 5% albumin; drugs = dopamine, dobutamine);
* No hyperventilation if ICP was under 20-25 mmHg and hyperventilation as a third measure if ICP was increased;
* Osmotherapy (20% manitol, bolus 150-350 ml or 10% manitol, 50 ml/h for 10 hours and standard electrolytes \[Na, Cl and K\]);

Intracranial pressure-targeted therapy

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Modified Lund concept

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

After surgical evacuation of intracranial mass lesion and clipping of aneurysm the objectives were achieved:

* Reduction of cerebral energy metabolism with fentanyl (2-5 µg/kg/h) and thiopenthal (0.5-3 mg/kg/h);
* Maintenance of colloid osmotic pressure with administration of red cell and albumin/plasma transfusions to maintain Hb/s 125-140 g/L and Alb/s ≈40 g/L;
* Reduction of capillary hydrostatic pressure with α2-agonist clonidine (0.4-0.8 µg/kg, 1 x 4-6 iv.) and maintaining normovolaemia;
* Reduction of mean arterial pressure and neuroprotection with Nimodipine infusion 5 ml per hour for 21 days and Urapidil 200 mg /200 ml, 7-10 ml/h.
* Control of ICP, which can be in majority of patients, kept at values below 15 mmHg.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Modified Lund concept

After surgical evacuation of intracranial mass lesion and clipping of aneurysm the objectives were achieved:

* Reduction of cerebral energy metabolism with fentanyl (2-5 µg/kg/h) and thiopenthal (0.5-3 mg/kg/h);
* Maintenance of colloid osmotic pressure with administration of red cell and albumin/plasma transfusions to maintain Hb/s 125-140 g/L and Alb/s ≈40 g/L;
* Reduction of capillary hydrostatic pressure with α2-agonist clonidine (0.4-0.8 µg/kg, 1 x 4-6 iv.) and maintaining normovolaemia;
* Reduction of mean arterial pressure and neuroprotection with Nimodipine infusion 5 ml per hour for 21 days and Urapidil 200 mg /200 ml, 7-10 ml/h.
* Control of ICP, which can be in majority of patients, kept at values below 15 mmHg.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Cerebral perfusion pressure-targeted therapy

* ICP monitoring using an external ventricular drain and CSF drainage as a first measure if ICP was increased (over 15-20 mmHg);
* Maintenance of CPP over 70-80 mmHg (Triple 'H' therapy = 3L/24 hours including 1L of colloids - 5% albumin; drugs = dopamine, dobutamine);
* No hyperventilation if ICP was under 20-25 mmHg and hyperventilation as a third measure if ICP was increased;
* Osmotherapy (20% manitol, bolus 150-350 ml or 10% manitol, 50 ml/h for 10 hours and standard electrolytes \[Na, Cl and K\]);

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage who had anterior circulation aneurysm rupture only
* multiple anterior aneurysm rupture
* severe traumatic brain injury with isolated head injury and intradural focal lesions only

Exclusion Criteria

* Glasgow Outcome Score of 3 with or without brainstem reflexes
* Significant co-morbidities
* posterior circulation aneurysm
* multisystem injuries
* diffuse axonal injuries
Minimum Eligible Age

16 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Sarajevo

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Clinical Center University of Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Kemal Dizdarevic, MD, MSc, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Centre University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Centre University of Sarajevo

Sarajevo, , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Bosnia and Herzegovina

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

030531674

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id