Differential Effects of Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) on Mental Health
NCT ID: NCT01206192
Last Updated: 2014-12-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
600 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2010-09-30
2012-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Johnson's typology of control has been used increasingly to classify intimate partner violence based on physical assault and controlling behavior. Two distinct types of the violence, Intimate Terrorism and Situational Couple Violence, have received much attention. The two differ not only in the cause and trajectory of the violence but also in the effects including mental health outcomes. Although control is a critical factor in distinguishing intimate terrorism from situational couple violence, there is no consensus on what constitutes high or low control in physically violent intimate relationships. Partly, this may be due to the sole reliance on quantitative measures to determine the levels of control. By understanding the context in which control tactics are used, qualitatively different phenomena between violent relationships with high control and those with low control may be more apparent. Thus, there is a need to collect both quantitative and qualitative data on the use of controlling behaviors.
It has also been hypothesized that intimate terrorism and situational couple violence have different mental health outcomes but few studies have examined this empirically and none has studied women's experiences of the negative psychological consequences as victims of these two types of violence.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Abused Chinese women
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* The perpetrator is not an intimate partner
18 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
TIWARI, Agnes
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
TIWARI, Agnes
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Agnes Tiwari, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
The University of Hong Kong
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Po Leung Kuk
Hong Kong, , China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Tiwari A, Chan KL, Cheung DS, Fong DY, Yan EC, Tang DH. The differential effects of intimate terrorism and situational couple violence on mental health outcomes among abused Chinese women: a mixed-method study. BMC Public Health. 2015 Mar 31;15:314. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1649-x.
Tiwari A, Cheung DS, Chan KL, Fong DY, Yan EC, Lam GL, Tang DH. Intimate partner sexual aggression against Chinese women: a mixed methods study. BMC Womens Health. 2014 May 25;14:70. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-14-70.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
GRF753510
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
UW 10-095
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id