TRINOVA-1: A Study of AMG 386 or Placebo, in Combination With Weekly Paclitaxel Chemotherapy, as Treatment for Ovarian Cancer, Primary Peritoneal Cancer and Fallopian Tube Cancer

NCT ID: NCT01204749

Last Updated: 2016-12-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

919 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-11-30

Study Completion Date

2016-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine if treatment with paclitaxel plus AMG 386 is superior to paclitaxel plus placebo in women with recurrent partially platinum sensitive or resistant epithelial ovarian cancer, primary peritoneal cancer or fallopian tube cancer.

AMG 386 is a man-made medication that is designed to stop the development of blood vessels in cancer tissues. Cancer tissues rely on the development of new blood vessels, a process called angiogenesis, to obtain a supply of oxygen and nutrients to grow.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Fallopian Tube Cancer Ovarian Cancer Primary Peritoneal Cancer

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

AMGEN AMG 386 Angiogenesis Inhibitors Fallopian Tube Cancer Primary Peritoneal Cancer Paclitaxel Ovarian Cancer TRINOVA-1

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

AMG 386

Arm A: Paclitaxel 80mg/m2 IV QW and Blinded AMG 386 15mg/kg IV QW

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

AMG 386

Intervention Type DRUG

Weekly Intravenous (IV) AMG 386 15 mg/kg

Paclitaxel

Intervention Type DRUG

Paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 intravenous (IV) weekly (3 on/1 off)

AMG 386 Placebo

Arm B: Paclitaxel 80mg/m2 IV QW and Blinded AMG 386 Placebo IV QW

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

AMG 386 Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Weekly Intravenous (IV) placebo 15 mg/kg

Paclitaxel

Intervention Type DRUG

Paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 intravenous (IV) weekly (3 on/1 off)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

AMG 386

Weekly Intravenous (IV) AMG 386 15 mg/kg

Intervention Type DRUG

AMG 386 Placebo

Weekly Intravenous (IV) placebo 15 mg/kg

Intervention Type DRUG

Paclitaxel

Paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 intravenous (IV) weekly (3 on/1 off)

Intervention Type DRUG

Paclitaxel

Paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 intravenous (IV) weekly (3 on/1 off)

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Angiogenesis inhibitor Placebo comparator Taxol USPI, 2007; Taxol SPC, 2009 Taxol USPI, 2007; Taxol SPC, 2009

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Female 18 years of age or older at the time the written informed consent is obtained
* Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) Performance Status of 0 or 1
* Life expectancy \>= 3 months (per investigator opinion)
* Histologically or cytologically documented invasive epithelial ovarian cancer, primary peritoneal cancer, or fallopian tube cancer (Subjects with pseudomyxoma , mesothelioma, unknown primary tumor, sarcoma, or neuroendocrine histology, with borderline ovarian cancer, ie, subjects with low malignant potential tumors, and with clear cell or mucinous histology are excluded)
* Subjects must have undergone surgery for ovarian cancer, primary peritoneal cancer, or fallopian tube cancer including at least a unilateral oophorectomy
* Radiologically evaluable disease per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 with modifications
* Subjects must have had one prior platinum-based chemotherapeutic regimen for management of primary disease containing carboplatin, cisplatin, or another organoplatinum compound. This initial treatment may have included intraperitoneal therapy, high-dose therapy, consolidation therapy, bevacizumab or extended therapy administered after surgical or non-surgical assessment.
* Adequate organ and hematological function
* Generally well controlled blood pressure with systolic blood pressure \<= 140 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure \<= 90 mmHg prior to randomization. The use of anti-hypertensive medications to control hypertension is permitted
* Radiographically documented disease progression either on or following the last dose of prior chemotherapy regimen for epithelial ovarian cancer, primary peritoneal cancer, or fallopian tube cancer

Exclusion Criteria

* Subjects who have received more than 3 previous regimens of anti-cancer therapy for epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal or fallopian tube cancers
* Subjects who have received paclitaxel as consolidation therapy, maintenance, or monotherapy are excluded
* Subjects with primary platinum-refractory disease
* Subjects with platinum-free interval (PFI) \> 12 months from their last platinum based therapy
* Radiotherapy \<= 14 days prior to randomization. Subjects must have recovered from all radiotherapy-related toxicities
* Previous abdominal or pelvic radiotherapy
* History of arterial or venous thromboembolism within 12 months prior to randomization
* History of clinically significant bleeding within 6 months prior to randomization
* History of central nervous system metastasis
* Has not yet completed a 21 day washout period prior to randomization for any previous anti cancer systemic therapies (30 days for prior bevacizumab)
* Enrolled in or has not yet completed at least 30 days (prior to randomization) since ending other investigational device or drug, or currently receiving other investigational treatments
* Unresolved toxicities from prior systemic therapy that are Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 3.0 \>= Grade 2 in severity except alopecia
* Known active or ongoing infection (except uncomplicated urinary tract infection \[UTI\]) within 14 days prior to randomization
* Currently or previously treated with AMG 386, or other molecules that inhibit the angiopoietins or Tie2 receptor
* Treatment within 30 days prior to randomization with strong immune modulators including but not limited to systemic cyclosporine, tacrolimus, sirolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, methotrexate, azathioprine, rapamycin, thalidomide, and lenalidomide
* Clinically significant cardiovascular disease within 12 months prior to randomization
* Major surgery within 28 days prior to randomization or still recovering from prior surgery
* Minor surgical procedures, except placement of tunneled central venous access device within 3 days prior to randomization. Diagnostic laparoscopy is regarded as a minor surgical procedure.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Amgen

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Amgen

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Research Site

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Stanford, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Englewood, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Danbury, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Research Site

New Haven, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Hollywood, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Honolulu, Hawaii, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Honolulu, Hawaii, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Boise, Idaho, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Peoria, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Skokie, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Metairie, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Hackensack, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Brightwaters, New York, United States

Site Status

Research Site

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Research Site

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Abington, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Ogden, Utah, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Tacoma, Washington, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Research Site

New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Greenslopes, Queensland, Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Bendigo, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Bentleigh East, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Footscray, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Malvern, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Parkville, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Edegem, , Belgium

Site Status

Research Site

Leuven, , Belgium

Site Status

Research Site

Namur, , Belgium

Site Status

Research Site

Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Site Status

Research Site

Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Site Status

Research Site

Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Site Status

Research Site

ItajaÃ-, Santa Catarina, Brazil

Site Status

Research Site

Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Research Site

São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Research Site

Gabrovo, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Research Site

Plovdiv, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Research Site

Sofia, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Research Site

Stara Zagora, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Research Site

Varna, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Research Site

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Québec, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Temuco, CautÃ-n, Chile

Site Status

Research Site

Valparaíso, ValparaÃ-so, Chile

Site Status

Research Site

Zagreb, , Croatia

Site Status

Research Site

Brno, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Brno, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Tallinn, , Estonia

Site Status

Research Site

Tartu, , Estonia

Site Status

Research Site

Amiens, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Angers, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Avignon, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Bayonne, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Besançon, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Bordeaux, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Bordeaux, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Brest, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Dijon, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Le Mans, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Lille, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Lyon, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Montpellier, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Nancy, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Nantes, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Nice, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Orléans Cedex 2, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Paris, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Périgueux Cedex, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Reims, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Saint Grégoire Cedex, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Saint-Herblain, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Strasbourg, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Villejuif, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Athens, , Greece

Site Status

Research Site

Heraklion, , Greece

Site Status

Research Site

Larissa, , Greece

Site Status

Research Site

Pátrai, , Greece

Site Status

Research Site

Thessaloniki, , Greece

Site Status

Research Site

Hong Kong, , Hong Kong

Site Status

Research Site

Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India

Site Status

Research Site

Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

Site Status

Research Site

Nashik, Maharashtra, India

Site Status

Research Site

Pune, Maharashtra, India

Site Status

Research Site

Pune, Maharashtra, India

Site Status

Research Site

Haifa, , Israel

Site Status

Research Site

Holon, , Israel

Site Status

Research Site

Kefar Sava, , Israel

Site Status

Research Site

Tel Aviv, , Israel

Site Status

Research Site

Tel Litwinsky, , Israel

Site Status

Research Site

Benevento, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Catania, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Cosenza (CS), , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Genova, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Milan, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Milan, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Napoli, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Padua, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Potenza, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Roma, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Roma, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Nagoya, Aichi-ken, Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Fukuoka, Fukuoka, Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Kure, Hiroshima, Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Morioka, Iwate, Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Niigata, Niigata, Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Sayama, Osaka, Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Hidaka-Shi, Saitama, Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Suntou-gun, Shizuoka, Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Yonago, Tottori, Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Kurume, , Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Tokyo, , Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Tokyo, , Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Tokyo, , Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Daugavpils, , Latvia

Site Status

Research Site

Riga, , Latvia

Site Status

Research Site

Riga, , Latvia

Site Status

Research Site

Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia

Site Status

Research Site

Kota Bharu, Kelantan, Malaysia

Site Status

Research Site

Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Site Status

Research Site

Distrito Federal, Mexico City, Mexico

Site Status

Research Site

Mexico City, Mexico City, Mexico

Site Status

Research Site

Mexico City, Mexico City, Mexico

Site Status

Research Site

San Luis Potosí City, San Luis PotosÃ-, Mexico

Site Status

Research Site

Lima, Lima Province, Peru

Site Status

Research Site

Lima, Lima Province, Peru

Site Status

Research Site

Bydgoszcz, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Gdansk, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Lodz, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Lublin, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Poznan, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Coimbra, , Portugal

Site Status

Research Site

Guimarães, , Portugal

Site Status

Research Site

Lisbon, , Portugal

Site Status

Research Site

Porto, , Portugal

Site Status

Research Site

Porto, , Portugal

Site Status

Research Site

Santa Maria da Feira, , Portugal

Site Status

Research Site

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Research Site

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Research Site

Cluj-Napoca, , Romania

Site Status

Research Site

Suceava, , Romania

Site Status

Research Site

Târgu Mureş, , Romania

Site Status

Research Site

Ivanovo, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Krasnodar, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Obninsk, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Pyatigorsk, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Ufa, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Voronezh, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Ljubljana, , Slovenia

Site Status

Research Site

Groenkloof, Gauteng, South Africa

Site Status

Research Site

Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa

Site Status

Research Site

Kraaifontein, Western Cape, South Africa

Site Status

Research Site

Observatory, , South Africa

Site Status

Research Site

Port Elizabeth, , South Africa

Site Status

Research Site

Pretoria, , South Africa

Site Status

Research Site

Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, , South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Córdoba, AndalucÃ-a, Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Huelva, AndalucÃ-a, Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Málaga, AndalucÃ-a, Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Seville, AndalucÃ-a, Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Palma de Mallorca, Balearic Islands, Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Salamanca, Castilla León, Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Badalona, Cataluña, Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Barcelona, Cataluña, Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Barcelona, Cataluña, Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Barcelona, Cataluña, Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Santiago de Compostela, Galicia, Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Vigo, Galicia, Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Madrid, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Madrid, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Madrid, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Madrid, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Madrid, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Research Site

San Sebastián, PaÃ-s Vasco, Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Elche, Valencia, Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Valencia, Valencia, Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Umeå, , Sweden

Site Status

Research Site

Uppsala, , Sweden

Site Status

Research Site

Baden, , Switzerland

Site Status

Research Site

Bellinzona, , Switzerland

Site Status

Research Site

Chur, , Switzerland

Site Status

Research Site

Geneva, , Switzerland

Site Status

Research Site

Zurich, , Switzerland

Site Status

Research Site

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Research Site

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Research Site

Manchester, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Research Site

Northwood, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Research Site

Nottingham, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Research Site

Poole, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Research Site

Sutton, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Australia Belgium Brazil Bulgaria Canada Chile Croatia Czechia Estonia France Greece Hong Kong India Israel Italy Japan Latvia Malaysia Mexico Peru Poland Portugal Romania Russia Slovenia South Africa South Korea Spain Sweden Switzerland United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Monk BJ, Poveda A, Vergote I, Raspagliesi F, Fujiwara K, Bae DS, Oaknin A, Ray-Coquard I, Provencher DM, Karlan BY, Lhomme C, Richardson G, Rincon DG, Coleman RL, Herzog TJ, Marth C, Brize A, Fabbro M, Redondo A, Bamias A, Tassoudji M, Navale L, Warner DJ, Oza AM. Anti-angiopoietin therapy with trebananib for recurrent ovarian cancer (TRINOVA-1): a randomised, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014 Jul;15(8):799-808. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70244-X. Epub 2014 Jun 17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24950985 (View on PubMed)

Monk BJ, Poveda A, Vergote I, Raspagliesi F, Fujiwara K, Bae DS, Oaknin A, Ray-Coquard I, Provencher DM, Karlan BY, Lhomme C, Richardson G, Rincon DG, Coleman RL, Marth C, Brize A, Fabbro M, Redondo A, Bamias A, Ma H, Vogl FD, Bach BA, Oza AM. Final results of a phase 3 study of trebananib plus weekly paclitaxel in recurrent ovarian cancer (TRINOVA-1): Long-term survival, impact of ascites, and progression-free survival-2. Gynecol Oncol. 2016 Oct;143(1):27-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.07.112. Epub 2016 Aug 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27546885 (View on PubMed)

Gaitskell K, Rogozinska E, Platt S, Chen Y, Abd El Aziz M, Tattersall A, Morrison J. Angiogenesis inhibitors for the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Apr 18;4(4):CD007930. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007930.pub3.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37185961 (View on PubMed)

Fujiwara K, Monk BJ, Lhomme C, Coleman RL, Brize A, Oaknin A, Ray-Coquard I, Fabbro M, Provencher D, Bamias A, Vergote I, DeCensi A, Zhang K, Vogl FD, Bach BA, Raspagliesi F. Health-related quality of life in women with recurrent ovarian cancer receiving paclitaxel plus trebananib or placebo (TRINOVA-1). Ann Oncol. 2016 Jun;27(6):1006-1013. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw147. Epub 2016 Mar 30.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 27029706 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.amgentrials.com

AmgenTrials clinical trials website

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

20090508

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id