Conservative Versus Aggressive Discectomy for Primary Disc Herniation With Radiculopathy

NCT ID: NCT01204008

Last Updated: 2010-09-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-09-30

Study Completion Date

2015-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Summary: This is a prospective randomize study to compare conservative and aggressive discectomy for treatment of disc herniation with radiculopathy.

Study hypothesis: The investigators believe that conservative discectomy could preserve a higher disc space and has a better long-term outcomes.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

objectives:to compare the effect of two type surgery(conservative discectomy and aggressive discectomy)on disc herniation with radiculopathy after long-term follow-up.

methods:the patients who were confirmed suffer from disc herniation with radiculopathy and failed to nonsurgical treatment will be divided into two groups, and will be follow up 3\~6 years for seeking the effect on disc space preservation and recurrent.

outcome measures:the rate of pain release and patients satisfaction were measured by SF-36,ODI,VAS,score post-OP. the height of disc was measured on X-ray film by the end point.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Herniated Disc

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

CS

conservative discectomy

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

conservative discectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

a smaller incision with removal of the disc fragment with little invasion of the disc

AS

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

aggressive discectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

a large open incision with aggressive removal of the disc fragments and curettage of the disc space

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

conservative discectomy

a smaller incision with removal of the disc fragment with little invasion of the disc

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

aggressive discectomy

a large open incision with aggressive removal of the disc fragments and curettage of the disc space

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Duration of symptoms: 6 or more weeks.
* Treatments tried: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medical therapy and physical therapy.
* Surgical screening: Persistent radicular pain provoked by moderate exercise, sitting, increased abdominal pressure, decreased mobility, list (scoliosis), straight leg raising.
* Tests: MRI to confirm diagnosis and level(s).

Exclusion Criteria

* Previous lumbar spine surgery.
* Not a surgical candidate for any of these reasons: Overall health which makes spinal surgery too life-threatening to be an appropriate alternative, dramatic improvement with conservative care, or inability (for any reason) to undergo surgery within 6 months.
* Possible pregnancy.
* Active malignancy: A patient with a history of any invasive malignancy (except non-melanoma skin cancer) is ineligible unless he or she has been treated with a curative intent AND there has been no clinical signs or symptoms of the malignancy for at least 5 years.
* Current fracture, infection, and/or deformity (greater than 15 degrees of lumbar scoliosis, using Cobb measure technique) of the spine.
* Age less than 18 years.
* Cauda Equina syndrome or progressive neurological deficit (usually requiring urgent surgery).
* Unavailability for follow-up (planning to move, no telephone, etc.) or inability to complete data surveys.
* Symptoms less than 6 weeks.
* Patient currently enrolled in any experimental "spine related" study.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Sun Yat-sen University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Sun Yat-sen University

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Dongsheng Huang, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Sun Yat-sen University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Sun Yat-Sen memorial hospital

Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Dongsheng Huang, MD.

Role: CONTACT

00862081332553

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Dongsheng Huang, MD

Role: primary

00862081332553

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

zseyhds2

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id