Single Agent Ofatumumab Vs. Single Agent Rituximab in Indolent B-Cell Non Hodgkin Lymphoma Relapsed After Rituximab-Containing Therapy

NCT ID: NCT01200589

Last Updated: 2018-05-16

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

438 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-10-11

Study Completion Date

2016-12-19

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This was a multi-center, parallel, active comparator controlled, open-label, randomized (1:1) phase III study of single agent ofatumumab compared to single agent rituximab in subjects with rituximab-sensitive indolent B-cell non hodgkin lymphoma that has relapsed at least 6 months after completing treatment with single agent rituximab or a rituximab-containing regimen. Subjects must have attained a Complete Response or Partial Response to their last prior rituximab containing therapy lasting at least six months beyond the end of rituximab therapy. Subjects were to receive four weekly doses of single agent ofatumumab (1000 mg) or rituximab (375 mg/m2), followed by ofatumumab (1000 mg) or rituximab (375 mg/m2) every 2 months for four additional doses. Therefore, subjects were to receive a total of eight doses of anti-CD20 antibody over 9 months. Subjects were evaluated for response after completion of the first four doses of therapy, after six doses of therapy, and after completion of study therapy. Subjects were to be followed until the end of the designated follow-up period (total study duration of 200 weeks) or until they meet the withdrawal criteria.

The primary objective of the study OMB157D 2303 was to demonstrate the efficacy of Arzerra based on the primary endpoint (Progression-free survival (PFS) as assessed by the IRC) in patients with Indolent B-cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Relapsed After Rituximab-Containing Regimen.

The Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC) met on November 22, 2015 and recommended the termination of the study due to futility (cut-off date = 12Jun2015). The IDMC reviewed analyses results for progression free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), and overall survival (OS). Novartis accepted this recommendation and the study was closed.

Final analysis was performed (cut-off date =19 Dec 2016). As the study was stopped for futility, the primary objective was not met and some secondary endpoints, supportive of primary objective (Duration of Response (DOR), time to next therapy, and pharmacokinetics) were removed as secondary end points.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Arm A: Ofatumumab

Four weekly doses of single agent ofatumumab (1000 mg), followed by ofatumumab (1000 mg) every two months for four additional doses.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Ofatumumab

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

liquid concentrate for solution for infusion in glass vials containing 50 mL of solution at a concentration of 20mg/ml to provide 1000 mg per vial.

Ofatumumab

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Four weekly doses of single agent ofatumumab (1000 mg), followed by ofatumumab (1000 mg) every two months for four additional doses.

Arm B: Rituximab

Four weekly doses of single agent rituximab (375 mg/m2), followed by rituximab (375 mg/m2) every two months for four additional doses.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Rituximab

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

sourced locally from commercial stock

Rituximab

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Four weekly doses of single agent rituximab (375 mg/m2), followed by rituximab (375 mg/m2) every two months for four additional doses.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ofatumumab

liquid concentrate for solution for infusion in glass vials containing 50 mL of solution at a concentration of 20mg/ml to provide 1000 mg per vial.

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Rituximab

sourced locally from commercial stock

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Ofatumumab

Four weekly doses of single agent ofatumumab (1000 mg), followed by ofatumumab (1000 mg) every two months for four additional doses.

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Rituximab

Four weekly doses of single agent rituximab (375 mg/m2), followed by rituximab (375 mg/m2) every two months for four additional doses.

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Arzerra Mabthera Rituxan Arzerra Mabthera Rituxan

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Indolent NHL subtypes defined according to World Health Organization guidelines:

1. Follicular lymphoma Grades 1, 2, 3 A
2. Small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL)
3. Marginal zone lymphoma
4. Lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma
2. Rituximab-sensitive iNHL, defined as a partial or complete response to their last prior treatment with rituximab or a rituximab-containing regimen lasting at least 6 months following completion of rituximab treatment.
3. Relapse or disease progression following response to prior rituximab-based therapy, as defined by 2007 RRCML criteria, which requires therapy.
4. Radiographically measurable disease, defined as: 2 or more clearly demarcated lesions/nodes with a long axis \>1.5 cm and short axis ≥1.0cm. OR 1 clearly demarcated lesion/node with a long axis \>2.0 cm and short axis ≥1.0cm.
5. ECOG Performance Status of 0, 1, or 2.
6. Age ≥18 years.
7. Life expectancy of at least 6 months in the opinion of the investigator.
8. The patient or their legally acceptable representative must be capable of giving written informed consent prior to performing any study-specific tests or procedures.
9. All prior treatment related non-hematologic toxicities (with the exception of alopecia) must have resolved to CTCAE (Version 4.0) ≤ Grade 2 at the time of randomization.
10. One or more of the following indications for treatment:

1. Cytopenias
2. One or more of the following lymphoma-related symptoms:

* Night sweats without signs of infection
* Unintentional weight loss (10% within the previous 6 months)
* Recurrent, unexplained fever of greater than 100.5F (38C) without signs of infection
* Fatigue which interferes with the patient's quality of life
3. Progressive or massive lymphadenopathy OR
4. Progressive or massive organomegaly French subjects: In France, a subject will be eligible for inclusion in this study only if either affiliated to or a beneficiary of a social security category.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Previous treatment with ofatumumab.
2. Previous anti-CD20 radioimmunotherapy (RIT) or non-rituximab anti-CD20 therapy (such as obinutuzumab) within 6 months prior to randomization. Patients who have received previous anti-CD20 RIT or non-rituximab anti-CD20 therapy (such as obinutuzumab) must have attained a partial or complete response lasting at least 6 months, and must have recovered from any hematologic or other toxicity.
3. Previous autologous stem cell transplantation within 6 months prior to randomization.
4. Previous allogeneic stem cell transplantation.
5. Previous anti-lymphoma monoclonal antibody therapy (excluding anti-CD20 therapy and anti-CD20 RIT), chemotherapy, glucocorticoid, or other systemic therapy for lymphoma within 3 months prior to randomization.
6. Current or previous participation in the treatment phase of another interventional clinical study within 4 weeks prior to randomization. Patients may continue in the follow-up phase of another interventional clinical study, but may not have undergone any treatment on the other study within 4 weeks prior to randomization.
7. Current or previous other malignancy within 2 years prior to randomization. Subjects who have been free of malignancy for at least 2 years, or have a history of completely resected non-melanoma skin cancer or successfully treated carcinoma in situ, are eligible.
8. Chronic or current active infectious disease requiring systemic antibiotics, antifungal, or antiviral treatment such as, but not limited to, chronic renal infection, chronic chest infection with bronchiectasis, tuberculosis, active Hepatitis C, and known HIV disease. All HIV-positive patients are excluded from this study, regardless of whether they have an Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS) defining disease and/or are on antiviral therapy. Prophylactic antiviral and/or antibacterial antibiotics to prevent recurrence of previous infections are permitted.
9. Clinically significant cardiac disease as judged by the investigator including unstable angina, acute myocardial infarction within 6 months prior to randomization, uncontrolled congestive heart failure, and uncontrolled arrhythmia. Subjects with congestive heart disease or arrhythmias such as atrial fibrillation whose cardiac disease is well controlled on a stable medical regimen are eligible.
10. Other significant concurrent, uncontrolled medical conditions including, but not limited to, renal, hepatic, autoimmune, hematological, gastrointestinal, endocrine, pulmonary, neurological, cerebral or psychiatric disease which, in the investigator's opinion, will impact study participation.
11. Screening laboratory values:

1. Neutrophils \< 1.5 x 10\^9/L (unless due to iNHL involvement of the bone marrow)
2. Platelets \< 50 x 10\^9/L (unless due to iNHL involvement of the bone marrow)
3. ALT or AST \> 3 x ULN
4. Alkaline phosphatase \> 1.5 x ULN (unless due to lymphoma or a non-malignant, non-hepatic cause such as Paget's disease)
5. Total bilirubin \> 1.5 x ULN (unless due to lymphoma or isolated, predominantly indirect hyperbilirubinemia due to Gilbert's syndrome)
12. Known or suspected inability to fully comply with study protocol
13. Because the effects of ofatumumab on fetuses and nursing infants are not known, the following are ineligible for study entry:

1. Lactating women.
2. Women with a positive pregnancy test at study entry.
3. Men with partners of childbearing potential and women of childbearing potential who are not willing to use adequate contraception from study entry through one year following last treatment dose. (Adequate contraception is defined as abstinence, oral hormonal birth control, hormonal birth control injections, implants of levonorgestrel, estrogenic vaginal ring, percutaneous contraceptive patches, intrauterine device, and male partner sterilization if male partner is the sole partner for a female subject. The double barrier method can be used in regions where considered acceptable and adequate, defined as condom or occlusive cap plus spermicidal agent).
14. Current active liver or biliary disease (with the exception of Gilbert's syndrome or asymptomatic gallstones).
15. Positive serology for Hepatitis B (HB) defined as a positive test for HBsAg. In addition, if negative for HBsAg but HBcAb positive (regardless of HBsAb status), a HB DNA test will be performed and if positive the subject will be excluded.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

GlaxoSmithKline

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Novartis Pharmaceuticals

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Novartis Investigative Site

Anchorage, Alaska, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Gilbert, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Hot Springs, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Greenbrae, California, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Monterey, California, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Pleasant Hill, California, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Rancho Mirage, California, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Salinas, California, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

San Pablo, California, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Santa Monica, California, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

New Milford, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Torrington, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Lakeland, Florida, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Pembroke Pines, Florida, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Port Saint Lucie, Florida, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

West Palm Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Macon, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Marietta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Evanston, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Peoria, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Quincy, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Skokie, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Anderson, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Ames, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Mount Sterling, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Metairie, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Shreveport, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Waterville, Maine, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Silver Spring, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Kalamazoo, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Jackson, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Columbia, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Kansas City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Saint Joseph, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Springfield, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Bozeman, Montana, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Lincoln, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Lincoln, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Lake Success, New York, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Mount Kisco, New York, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Greensboro, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Bismarck, North Dakota, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Canton, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Canton, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Danville, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Ephrata, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Lancaster, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Willow Grove, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Germantown, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Knoxville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Fort Sam Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Ogden, Utah, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Fredericksburg, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Kennewick, Washington, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Kirkland, Washington, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Mount Vernon, Washington, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Sequim, Washington, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Spokane, Washington, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Antwerp, , Belgium

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Antwerp, , Belgium

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Bruges, , Belgium

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Kortrijk, , Belgium

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Leuven, , Belgium

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Wilrijk, , Belgium

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Salvador, Estado de Bahia, Brazil

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Betim, Minas Gerais, Brazil

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Barretos, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Jaú, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Rio de Janeiro, , Brazil

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Rio de Janeiro, , Brazil

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Pleven, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Plovdiv, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Sofia, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Sofia, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Sofia, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Varna, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Kitchener, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Québec, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Beijing, , China

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Beijing, , China

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Beijing, , China

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Beijing, , China

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Beijing, , China

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Shanghai, , China

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Shanghai, , China

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Tianjin, , China

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Brno, , Czechia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Hradec Králové, , Czechia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Ostrava, , Czechia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Boulogne-sur-Mer, , France

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Clermont-Ferrand, , France

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

La Roche-sur-Yon, , France

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Le Mans, , France

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Montpellier, , France

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Pessac, , France

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Debrecen, , Hungary

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Győr, , Hungary

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Szeged, , Hungary

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Aichi, , Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Kyoto, , Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Miyagi, , Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Nagasaki, , Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Saitama, , Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Tochigi, , Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Tokyo, , Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Tokyo, , Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Miraflores, Lima region, Peru

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

San Isidro, Lima region, Peru

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Lima, , Peru

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Lima, , Peru

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Lima, , Peru

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

San Juan, , Puerto Rico

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Bratislava, , Slovakia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Košice, , Slovakia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Martin, , Slovakia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Parktown, Gauteng, South Africa

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Athlone Park, Amanzimtoti, , South Africa

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Port Elizabeth, , South Africa

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Saxonwold, Johannesburg, , South Africa

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Busan, , South Korea

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Donetsk, , Ukraine

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Kyiv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Kyiv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Lviv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Makiivka, , Ukraine

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Simferopil, , Ukraine

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Belgium Brazil Bulgaria Canada China Czechia France Hungary Japan Peru Puerto Rico Slovakia South Africa South Korea Ukraine

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Maloney DG, Ogura M, Fukuhara N, Davis J, Lasher J, Izquierdo M, Banerjee H, Tobinai K. A phase 3 randomized study (HOMER) of ofatumumab vs rituximab in iNHL relapsed after rituximab-containing therapy. Blood Adv. 2020 Aug 25;4(16):3886-3893. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020001942.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32810220 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

113676

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.