Trial Outcomes & Findings for Pilot Study of AcrySof® IQ ReSTOR® +3.0 D Multifocal Toric Intraocular Lens (IOL) (NCT NCT01200511)
NCT ID: NCT01200511
Last Updated: 2018-07-02
Results Overview
Visual acuity (VA) was tested binocularly (both eyes together) unaided across a range of distances under well-lit conditions using Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) charts. VA was measured in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), with 0.1 logMAR increment corresponding to 5 letters, or 1 line, on an ETDRS chart. A lower numeric value represents better visual acuity.
COMPLETED
NA
49 participants
Month 6 from second eye implantation
2018-07-02
Participant Flow
Subjects were recruited from 5 investigational sites located in Germany (2), Venezuela (2), and Spain (1).
This reporting population includes all enrolled subjects.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
ReSTOR +3.0 Toric
AcrySof® IQ ReSTOR® +3.0 D Multifocal Toric IOL, model determined by preoperative keratometric astigmatism, bilateral implantation
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
49
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
44
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
5
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
ReSTOR +3.0 Toric
AcrySof® IQ ReSTOR® +3.0 D Multifocal Toric IOL, model determined by preoperative keratometric astigmatism, bilateral implantation
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Pilot Study of AcrySof® IQ ReSTOR® +3.0 D Multifocal Toric Intraocular Lens (IOL)
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
ReSTOR +3.0 Toric
n=44 Participants
AcrySof® IQ ReSTOR® +3.0 D Multifocal Toric IOL, model determined by preoperative keratometric astigmatism, bilateral implantation
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
62.52 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.49 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
30 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 6 from second eye implantationPopulation: This analysis population includes all subjects receiving IOL implantation in both eyes with data at visit.
Visual acuity (VA) was tested binocularly (both eyes together) unaided across a range of distances under well-lit conditions using Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) charts. VA was measured in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), with 0.1 logMAR increment corresponding to 5 letters, or 1 line, on an ETDRS chart. A lower numeric value represents better visual acuity.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ReSTOR +3.0 Toric
n=42 Participants
AcrySof® IQ ReSTOR® +3.0 D Multifocal Toric IOL, model determined by preoperative keratometric astigmatism, bilateral implantation
|
ReSTOR +3.0 Toric/With
AcrySof® IQ ReSTOR® +3.0 D Multifocal Toric IOL, model determined by preoperative keratometric astigmatism, bilateral implantation, with corrective aids if needed
|
|---|---|---|
|
Uncorrected Visual Acuity Across a Range of Distances at Month 6
Intermediate 50 cm
|
0.05 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.09
|
—
|
|
Uncorrected Visual Acuity Across a Range of Distances at Month 6
Near 40 cm
|
0.07 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.09
|
—
|
|
Uncorrected Visual Acuity Across a Range of Distances at Month 6
Near - preferred
|
0.04 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.08
|
—
|
|
Uncorrected Visual Acuity Across a Range of Distances at Month 6
Far distance 4 meters (m)
|
0.05 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.10
|
—
|
|
Uncorrected Visual Acuity Across a Range of Distances at Month 6
Intermediate 70 centimeters (cm)
|
0.15 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.13
|
—
|
|
Uncorrected Visual Acuity Across a Range of Distances at Month 6
Intermediate 60 cm
|
0.09 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.11
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 6 from second eye implantationPopulation: This analysis population includes all subjects receiving IOL implantation in both eyes with data at visit.
VA was tested binocularly with correction in place if needed across a range of distances under well-lit conditions using Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) charts. VA was measured in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), with 0.1 logMAR increment corresponding to 5 letters, or 1 line, on an ETDRS chart. A lower numeric value represents better visual acuity.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ReSTOR +3.0 Toric
n=42 Participants
AcrySof® IQ ReSTOR® +3.0 D Multifocal Toric IOL, model determined by preoperative keratometric astigmatism, bilateral implantation
|
ReSTOR +3.0 Toric/With
AcrySof® IQ ReSTOR® +3.0 D Multifocal Toric IOL, model determined by preoperative keratometric astigmatism, bilateral implantation, with corrective aids if needed
|
|---|---|---|
|
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Across a Range of Distances at Month 6
Far distance 4 m
|
0.00 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.06
|
—
|
|
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Across a Range of Distances at Month 6
Intermediate 70 cm
|
0.19 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.14
|
—
|
|
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Across a Range of Distances at Month 6
Intermediate 60 cm
|
0.14 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.14
|
—
|
|
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Across a Range of Distances at Month 6
Intermediate 50 cm
|
0.06 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.10
|
—
|
|
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Across a Range of Distances at Month 6
Near 40 cm
|
0.04 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.07
|
—
|
|
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Across a Range of Distances at Month 6
Near - preferred distance
|
0.05 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.08
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 6 from second eye implantationPopulation: This analysis population includes all subjects receiving IOL implantation in both eyes with data at visit.
Manifest refraction was performed under well-lit conditions using an ETDRS chart. The subject was manually refracted to his/her best correction by an outcomes assessor using a phoropter or trial lenses. Manifest refraction was performed for each eye. Proportion of subjects that achieved spherical equivalent within ± 0.5D/ ± 0.75D/ ± 1.0D at Month 6 is reported as percentage of subjects.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ReSTOR +3.0 Toric
n=44 Participants
AcrySof® IQ ReSTOR® +3.0 D Multifocal Toric IOL, model determined by preoperative keratometric astigmatism, bilateral implantation
|
ReSTOR +3.0 Toric/With
AcrySof® IQ ReSTOR® +3.0 D Multifocal Toric IOL, model determined by preoperative keratometric astigmatism, bilateral implantation, with corrective aids if needed
|
|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of Subjects That Achieved Spherical Equivalent Within ± 0.5D, ± 0.75D, and ± 1.0D at Month 6
± 0.75D
|
92.9 percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Proportion of Subjects That Achieved Spherical Equivalent Within ± 0.5D, ± 0.75D, and ± 1.0D at Month 6
±1.0D
|
95.2 percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Proportion of Subjects That Achieved Spherical Equivalent Within ± 0.5D, ± 0.75D, and ± 1.0D at Month 6
± 0.5D
|
84.5 percentage of participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 6 from second eye implantationPopulation: This analysis population includes all subjects receiving IOL implantation in both eyes with data at visit. A subject may have responded with and without.
The Visual Task Difficulty Assessment (VISTAS) questionnaire was completed by the subject to assess difficulty in completing everyday tasks that depend on good vision. Distance specific tasks were rated (without / with corrective aids) using a 1 to 5 point scale, where 1 = no difficulty; 2 = minor difficulty; 3 = moderate difficulty; 4 = major difficulty; 5 = cannot accomplish. Individual scores for each task were averaged to obtain the overall score for each vision type/function. Near vision was defined as less than 50 cm; intermediate vision as 50 cm to 1 m; extended intermediate vision as 90 cm to 4 m; and distant vision as more than 4 m.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ReSTOR +3.0 Toric
n=44 Participants
AcrySof® IQ ReSTOR® +3.0 D Multifocal Toric IOL, model determined by preoperative keratometric astigmatism, bilateral implantation
|
ReSTOR +3.0 Toric/With
n=44 Participants
AcrySof® IQ ReSTOR® +3.0 D Multifocal Toric IOL, model determined by preoperative keratometric astigmatism, bilateral implantation, with corrective aids if needed
|
|---|---|---|
|
Patient Reported Outcomes at Month 6
Near function scale score
|
1.72 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.65
|
1.65 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.60
|
|
Patient Reported Outcomes at Month 6
Intermediate function scale score
|
1.49 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.59
|
1.21 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.51
|
|
Patient Reported Outcomes at Month 6
Extended intermediate function scale score
|
1.24 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.38
|
1.20 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.37
|
Adverse Events
ReSTOR +3.0 Toric
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
ReSTOR +3.0 Toric
n=49 participants at risk
AcrySof® IQ ReSTOR® +3.0 D Multifocal Toric IOL, model determined by preoperative keratometric astigmatism, bilateral implantation
|
|---|---|
|
Eye disorders
Macular oedema
|
2.0%
1/49 • An Adverse Event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a subject, user, or other persons regardless of causal relationship.
This analysis population includes all enrolled subjects that underwent surgery independent of IOL implantation.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal bleeding
|
2.0%
1/49 • An Adverse Event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a subject, user, or other persons regardless of causal relationship.
This analysis population includes all enrolled subjects that underwent surgery independent of IOL implantation.
|
|
General disorders
Device dislocation
|
6.1%
3/49 • An Adverse Event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a subject, user, or other persons regardless of causal relationship.
This analysis population includes all enrolled subjects that underwent surgery independent of IOL implantation.
|
|
Investigations
Intraocular pressure test abnormal
|
2.0%
1/49 • An Adverse Event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a subject, user, or other persons regardless of causal relationship.
This analysis population includes all enrolled subjects that underwent surgery independent of IOL implantation.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
2.0%
1/49 • An Adverse Event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a subject, user, or other persons regardless of causal relationship.
This analysis population includes all enrolled subjects that underwent surgery independent of IOL implantation.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Intraocular Lens Repositioning
|
6.1%
3/49 • An Adverse Event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a subject, user, or other persons regardless of causal relationship.
This analysis population includes all enrolled subjects that underwent surgery independent of IOL implantation.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
ReSTOR +3.0 Toric
n=49 participants at risk
AcrySof® IQ ReSTOR® +3.0 D Multifocal Toric IOL, model determined by preoperative keratometric astigmatism, bilateral implantation
|
|---|---|
|
Eye disorders
Posterior capsule opacification
|
6.1%
3/49 • An Adverse Event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a subject, user, or other persons regardless of causal relationship.
This analysis population includes all enrolled subjects that underwent surgery independent of IOL implantation.
|
Additional Information
Brand Lead, Surgical, Global Medical Affairs
Alcon Research, Ltd.
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Sponsor reserves the right of prior review of any publication or presentation of information related to the study.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER