Efficacy of Quetiapine XR Versus Placebo as Concomitant Treatment to Mood Stabilizers in the Control of Subsyndromal Symptoms of Bipolar Disorder

NCT ID: NCT01197846

Last Updated: 2012-09-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

28 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-09-30

Study Completion Date

2012-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Pilot multicentric, prospective, placebo controlled, randomized double blinded, study of 12 weeks follow-up Adult patients diagnosed of bipolar disorder I or II, in previous treatment with no more than two concomitant mood stabilizers at stable doses and current subsyndromal symptoms, defined as YMRS ≤14 and/ or MADRS≥8 and ≤14 would be included Sub-acute phases would be excluded (at least 8 weeks from last exacerbation would be required for inclusion).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Remission of acute episodes usually doesn't correlate with symptomatic or functional recovery in occupational and social domains after (McQueen et al, 2001; Tohen et al, 2000) Ongoing depressive symptoms are the strongest predictor of functional deficits in persons with bipolar disorder (Bauer et al, 2001; Judd et al, 2005). Depressive subsyndromal symptoms are associated to functional impairment in bipolar disorder (Vojta et al, 2001; Altshuler et al, 2002; Yatham et al, 2004) The addition of olanzapine to valproate or lithium provided superior efficacy to valproate or lithium plus placebo in non completely remitted manic and mixed bipolar episodes, mainly through a control of depressive symptoms (Tohen et al, 2002) Quetiapine has demonstrated to be efficacious in the control of depressive symptoms in Bipolar Disorder (BOLDER, EMBOLDEN studies) and in the prevention of recurrences, maintaining the patient in YMRS and MADRS scores under the cut-off point between asymptomatic and subsyndromal states (Studies 126, 127 and 144) Thus it's expectable that adding quetiapine to previous mood stabilizers in bipolar patients with subsyndromal symptoms probably would improve their symptoms, mainly depressive, to levels not only of syndromic but of symptomatic remission, driving to a better functional status Quetiapine extended release would be used because its advantages on quetiapine immediate release regarding an easier and comfortable posology and potential better adherence

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Bipolar Disorder

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Quetiapine

Quetiapine 300 mg or 600 mg

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Quetiapine

Intervention Type DRUG

quetiapine 300 mg or 600 mg

Placebo

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Quetiapine

quetiapine 300 mg or 600 mg

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Quetiapine XR

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Informed Consent signature
2. At least 18 years old
3. Diagnoses of bipolar disorder I or II (as DSM-IV-TR 4ª Ed codes)
4. Previous treatment with a mood stabilizer (lithium, valproate or lamotrigine) at stable and optimum doses for at least six weeks prior to the start of the trial (i.e., on the same dose and serum levels within the therapeutic ranges: 0.6-1.2 mEq/l of lithium or 50-100 ug/ml of valproate)
5. Presenting subsyndromal symptoms at enrolment and randomization point, defined as YMRS ≤ 14 and/ or MADRS ≥ 8 and ≤14
6. At least one manic, mixed, or depressed episode in the last 5 years
7. Being able to understand and meet the study requirements

Exclusion Criteria

1. Pregnant or nursing women
2. Mental retardation.
3. Current active diagnoses of any axis I or II DSM-IV-TR diagnoses different from bipolar disorder I or II. This doesn't apply to nicotine nor caffeine abuse-dependence. Punctual alcohol and/or substances use not constitutive of a diagnoses of abuse or dependence following DSM-IV-TR criteria wouldn't suppose the exclusion of the patient from the study. Anxiety in levels not constitutive of any anxiety disorder within those codified in DSM-IV-TR wouldn't either suppose the exclusion of the patient from the study
4. Having suffered any acute episode (depressive, manic, or mixed) within the 8 weeks prior to enrolment, as defined in DSM-IV-TR
5. Patients that, in the investigator's opinion, are at a high risk of suicide or mean a risk of aggression to others.
6. Having been treated with any antidepressant at randomization.
7. Having been treated with any mood stabilizer other than lithium/valproate/lamotrigine at randomization.
8. Having been treated with any oral antipsychotic drug at randomization. Administration of a depot antipsychotic medication within one dosing interval prior to randomization (e.g. Long acting Risperidone 2 weeks; Zuclopenthixol 4 weeks; Pipotiazine 4 weeks; Flufenazine 6 weeks)
9. Having been treated with any of the following P450-3A4 cytochrome inhibitors in the 14 days prior to inclusion, including: ketoconazole, itraconazole, fluconazole, erythromycin, clarithromycin, fluvoxamine, indinavir, nelfinavir, ritonavir and saquinavir.
10. Having been treated with any of the following P450-3A4 cytochrome inducers in the 14 days prior to inclusion, including: phenytoin, carbamazepine, barbiturates, rifampicin, St. John's wart, and glucocorticoids.
11. Any contraindication to the use of quetiapine fumarate in the investigator's opinion (including lack of response to it in previous treatment attempts)
12. Suffering any medical condition that can effect the absorption, distribution, metabolism or excretion of the study treatment(s).
13. Suffering any medical condition in decompensation or not receiving inappropriate treatment for it in the investigator's opinion (e.g., hyperthyroidism, angina pectoris, hypertension...)
14. Suffering unstable diabetes at enrolment or randomization
15. Absolute neutrophil count ≤ 1.5 x 109 per litre at randomization
16. Non-compliance with the study plan.
17. Participation in another clinical trial in the four weeks prior to randomization
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental

NETWORK

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Celso Arango Lopez

MD; PhD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Eduard Vieta, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hospital Clinic I Provincial. Barcelona. Spain

Ana Gonzalez Pinto

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hospital Santiago Apostol. Vitoria. Spain

Benedikt Amann

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hospital Benito Menni. Barcelona. Spain

Celso Arango

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon. Madrid. Spain

Jose Manuel Crespo

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge. Barcelona. Spain

Julio Bobes

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Centro de Salud Mental II. Oviedo. Spain

Josefina Perez

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hospital Santa Creu I Sant Pau. Barcelona. Spain

Gabriel Selva

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hospital Clinico de Valencia/ CSM Foios. Valencia. Spain

Belen Arranz

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Deu. Barcelona. Spain

Jeronimo Saiz

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hospital Universitario Ramon y Cajal. Madrid. Spain

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hospital Santa Creu I Sant Pau

Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Clinic I Provincial

Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Hosptial Benito Menni

Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge

Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Deu

Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon

Madrid, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitario Ramon Y Cajal

Madrid, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Centro de Salud Menta II

Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain

Site Status

Hosptial Clinico Valencia/ CSM Foios

Valencia, Valencia, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Santiago Apostol

Vitoria-Gasteiz, Vitoria, Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

D1443L00079

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id