Study of Lenalidomide to Evaluate Safety and Effectiveness in Patients With Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)
NCT ID: NCT01197560
Last Updated: 2019-11-25
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2/PHASE3
111 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-09-02
2018-04-05
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Lenalidomide, Rituximab, and Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Newly Diagnosed Stage II, Stage III, or Stage IV Diffuse Large Cell or Follicular B-Cell Lymphoma
NCT00670358
Rituximab and Combination Chemotherapy With or Without Lenalidomide in Treating Patients With Newly Diagnosed Stage II-IV Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma
NCT01856192
Phase I/II Carfilzomib Plus Lenalidomide and Rituximab in the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma
NCT01729104
Study of Lenalidomide(Revlimid) Plus Rituximab (Revlirit Regimen) in Elderly Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)
NCT00968331
Study of Lenzilumab and Axicabtagene Ciloleucel in Participants With Relapsed or Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma
NCT04314843
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This study will have two stages, 1 and 2. The main purpose of Stage 1 is to separate patients by subtype and then test whether patients taking lenalidomide or any one of four other drugs have a better response. It is possible that lenalidomide will work better than one of the other drugs in zero, one, or both subtypes. Stage 2 will further test only the subtype(s) from Stage 1 that showed a good response to lenalidomide. The main purpose of Stage 2 is to test how long patients are disease free on lenalidomide compared to one of the four other drugs.
On 29 January 2013 the enrolment goal for the Stage 1 portion of the study was met and enrollment was stopped. The final analysis for Stage 1 was performed as of the 04 Jul 2013 data cutoff date. According to the Stage 1 results as assessed by the independent response adjudication committee (IRAC), neither subtype met the pre specified requirement to be further studied in Stage 2. Additionally, a suitable assay for the selection of participants for the Stage 2 study was not available. Therefore, on 6 January 2014, Celgene decided to not open Stage 2.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Lenalidomide
Lenalidomide 25 mg capsules by mouth on days 1-21 of each 28 day cycle. For patients with Creatinine Clearance ≥ 30 mL/min but \< 60 mL/min, lenalidomide 10 mg (max escalation is 15 mg).
Lenalidomide
Lenalidomide 25 mg orally for 21/28 days until Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) progressive disease. For patients with Creatinine Clearance ≥ 30 mL/min but \< 60 mL/min, lenalidomide 10 mg (max escalation is 15 mg).
Investigators Choice
One of the following:
Gemcitabine, Oxaliplatin, Rituximab, or Etoposide
Gemcitabine
Suggested starting doses and regimens for Gemcitabine is 1,250 mg/m\^2 intravenous (IV) administration on days 1, 8, 15 every 28 days for 6 Cycles or 1,000 mg/m\^2 IV days 1 and 15 every 28 days for 6 Cycles
Oxaliplatin
Suggested starting dose and regimen for Oxaliplatin is 100 mg/m\^2 IV day 1 for 21 days for 6 Cycles
Rituximab
Suggested starting dose for Rituximab is 375 mg/m\^2 IV days 1, 8, 15, 22 during Cycle 1, and if stable disease at Week 12, also on Day 1 of Cycles 4, 6, 8, and 10 (CD20+ patients only)
Etoposide
Suggested starting doses for Etoposide are:
100 mg/m\^2 IV days 1-5 every 28 days for 6 Cycles, or 100 mg/m\^2 IV days 1-3 every 28 days for 6 Cycles, or 50 mg/m\^2 oral days 1-21 every 28 days for 6 Cycles, or 50 mg/m\^2 oral days 1-14 every 28 days for 6 Cycles, or 50 mg/m\^2 oral days 1-10 every 28 days for 6 Cycles
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Lenalidomide
Lenalidomide 25 mg orally for 21/28 days until Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) progressive disease. For patients with Creatinine Clearance ≥ 30 mL/min but \< 60 mL/min, lenalidomide 10 mg (max escalation is 15 mg).
Gemcitabine
Suggested starting doses and regimens for Gemcitabine is 1,250 mg/m\^2 intravenous (IV) administration on days 1, 8, 15 every 28 days for 6 Cycles or 1,000 mg/m\^2 IV days 1 and 15 every 28 days for 6 Cycles
Oxaliplatin
Suggested starting dose and regimen for Oxaliplatin is 100 mg/m\^2 IV day 1 for 21 days for 6 Cycles
Rituximab
Suggested starting dose for Rituximab is 375 mg/m\^2 IV days 1, 8, 15, 22 during Cycle 1, and if stable disease at Week 12, also on Day 1 of Cycles 4, 6, 8, and 10 (CD20+ patients only)
Etoposide
Suggested starting doses for Etoposide are:
100 mg/m\^2 IV days 1-5 every 28 days for 6 Cycles, or 100 mg/m\^2 IV days 1-3 every 28 days for 6 Cycles, or 50 mg/m\^2 oral days 1-21 every 28 days for 6 Cycles, or 50 mg/m\^2 oral days 1-14 every 28 days for 6 Cycles, or 50 mg/m\^2 oral days 1-10 every 28 days for 6 Cycles
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Relapsed or refractory to combination chemotherapy for DLBCL that contains rituximab and an anthracycline, and one additional combination chemotherapy or stem cell transplant.
* Measurable DLBCL disease by computed tomograph (CT) / magnetic resonance imagining (MRI).
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0 - 2.
Exclusion Criteria
* History of malignancies, other than DLBCL, unless the patient has been disease free for 3 years or more.
* Eligible for autologous stem cell transplant.
* Known seropositive for, or history of, active human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV)
* Neuropathy grade 4.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Celgene
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Adrian Kilcoyne, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Celgene Corporation
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Providence St Joseph Medical Center/Cancer Center
Burbank, California, United States
MD Anderson Cancer Center Orlando
Orlando, Florida, United States
Emory University
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Northwestern University
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
University of Michigan, Comprehensive Cancer Center
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
Hattiesburg Clinic
Hattiesburg, Mississippi, United States
Washington University Siteman Cancer Center
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Roswell Park Cancer Institute
Buffalo, New York, United States
Avera Cancer Institute
Sioux Falls, South Dakota, United States
Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
MD Anderson Houston
Houston, Texas, United States
Royal Adelaide Hospital
Adelaide, , Australia
Royal Brisbaine and Womens Hospital
Herston, , Australia
Princess Alexandra Hospital
Woolloongabba, , Australia
Innsbruck University Hospital
Innsbruck, , Austria
Universitätsklinikum Salzburg
Salzburg, , Austria
Medical University of Vienna
Vienna, , Austria
University Hospital Hradec Kralove
Hradec Králové, , Czechia
Charles University
Prague, , Czechia
ICH CHU Brest- C.H.U. MORAVAN
Brest, , France
CHU de Grenoble-Hopital Albert Michallon
Grenoble, , France
Chd -Vendee
La Roche-sur-Yon, , France
Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud
Lyon, , France
Institute Paoli-Calmette
Marsielle, , France
Hotel Dieu
Nantes, , France
Hôpital Saint Jean
Perpignan, , France
CHRU-Hopital du Haut -Leveque
Pessac, , France
CHU de Rennes Hopital de Pontchaillou
Rennes, , France
University Hospital OF Toulouse Purpan
Toulouse, , France
Hopital de Brabois Adultes
Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, , France
Istituto di Ematologica Istituto di Ematologica " L.e. A. Seragnoli' Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico
Bologna, , Italy
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi
Florence, , Italy
Clinica Ematologica, A.O.U. San Martino di Genova
Genova, , Italy
IEO istituto Europeo di Oncologia
Miano, , Italy
Universita Federico II di Napoli Nuovo Policlinico
Napoli, , Italy
Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo
Pavia, , Italy
Irccs/Crob
Rionero in Vulture (PZ), , Italy
Policlinico Tor Vergata (Universta Tor Vergata)
Roma, , Italy
Azienda Ospedaliera di Perugai Ospedale S. Maria della Miseri
Terni, , Italy
Hospital Universitari Vll D' Hebron
Barcelona, , Spain
Hospital Universitario Reina Sofia
Córdoba, , Spain
Hospital Costa Del Sol
Marbella, , Spain
CH de Orense
Ourense, , Spain
Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra
Pamplona, , Spain
Hosptial Clinico Universitario de Salamanca
Salamanca, , Spain
Onkologiska kliniken
Umeå, , Sweden
Akademiska Sjukhuset
Uppsala, , Sweden
Royal Bournemouth Hospital Haematology
Bournemouth, , United Kingdom
Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital Haematology Department
Exeter, , United Kingdom
St. James Institute of Oncology
Leeds, , United Kingdom
Royal Mardsen Hospital - Fulham (Satellite Site)
London, , United Kingdom
The Christie Foundation Trust, I'st Floor, Haemotology Oncology Outpatients, Lymphoma Team
Manchester, , United Kingdom
Derrford Hospital
Plymouth, , United Kingdom
Southhampton University Hospital NHS Trust
Southhampton, , United Kingdom
Royal Mardsen NHS Foundation Trust
Sutton, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Czuczman MS, Trneny M, Davies A, Rule S, Linton KM, Wagner-Johnston N, Gascoyne RD, Slack GW, Brousset P, Eberhard DA, Hernandez-Ilizaliturri FJ, Salles G, Witzig TE, Zinzani PL, Wright GW, Staudt LM, Yang Y, Williams PM, Lih CJ, Russo J, Thakurta A, Hagner P, Fustier P, Song D, Lewis ID. A Phase 2/3 Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Lenalidomide Versus Investigator's Choice in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Aug 1;23(15):4127-4137. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-2818. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
Hernandez-Ilizaliturri FJ, Deeb G, Zinzani PL, Pileri SA, Malik F, Macon WR, Goy A, Witzig TE, Czuczman MS. Higher response to lenalidomide in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in nongerminal center B-cell-like than in germinal center B-cell-like phenotype. Cancer. 2011 Nov 15;117(22):5058-66. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26135. Epub 2011 Apr 14.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CC-5013-DLC-001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.