Trial Outcomes & Findings for Safety and Effectiveness of Juvederm(R) Ultra XC Injectable Gel for Lip Augmentation (NCT NCT01197495)
NCT ID: NCT01197495
Last Updated: 2019-04-16
Results Overview
Overall lip fullness is assessed by the blinded Evaluating Investigator compared to baseline using the 5-point LFS2. Scores range from 1=minimal improvement to 5=very marked improvement.
COMPLETED
NA
213 participants
Baseline, Month 3
2019-04-16
Participant Flow
The modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population is presented and includes all treated subjects.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Treatment
Juvederm(R) Ultra XC Injectable Gel
|
Control
No treatment for 3 months followed by Juvederm(R) Ultra XC Injectable Gel at Month 3.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
157
|
56
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
144
|
49
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
13
|
7
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Safety and Effectiveness of Juvederm(R) Ultra XC Injectable Gel for Lip Augmentation
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Treatment
n=157 Participants
Juvederm(R) Ultra XC Injectable Gel
|
Control
n=56 Participants
No treatment for 3 months followed by Juvederm(R) Ultra XC Injectable Gel at Month 3.
|
Total
n=213 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
48.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.46 • n=5 Participants
|
49.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.72 • n=7 Participants
|
48.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.01 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
150 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
54 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
204 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat: all treated subjects with data at the designated time point
Overall lip fullness is assessed by the blinded Evaluating Investigator compared to baseline using the 5-point LFS2. Scores range from 1=minimal improvement to 5=very marked improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Treatment
n=139 Participants
Juvederm(R) Ultra XC Injectable Gel
|
Control
n=46 Participants
No treatment for 3 months followed by Juvederm(R) Ultra XC Injectable Gel at Month 3.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Subjects With ≥1-Point Improvement on the Investigator Assessed 5-point Lip Fullness Scale 2 (LFS2)
|
79.1 Percentage of Subjects
Interval 71.43 to 85.56
|
26.1 Percentage of Subjects
Interval 14.27 to 41.13
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3Population: Subjects treated for POL at the designated time points
Subject's upper lip perioral lines are assessed compared to baseline using the 4-point validated POL Severity Scale. Scores range from 0=None (best) to 3=Severe (worst).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Treatment
n=61 Participants
Juvederm(R) Ultra XC Injectable Gel
|
Control
No treatment for 3 months followed by Juvederm(R) Ultra XC Injectable Gel at Month 3.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Subjects With ≥1-Point Improvement on the Perioral Line (POL) Severity Scale
|
47.5 Percentage of Subjects
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3Population: Subjects treated for OCS at the designated time points
Subject's right and left oral commissures are assessed compared to baseline using the validated OCS Scale. Scores range from 0=none (best) to 3=severe (worst).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Treatment
n=241 Oral Commissures
Juvederm(R) Ultra XC Injectable Gel
|
Control
No treatment for 3 months followed by Juvederm(R) Ultra XC Injectable Gel at Month 3.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Oral Commissures With ≥1-Point Improvement on the Oral Commissures Severity (OCS) Scale
|
47.3 Percentage of Oral Commissures
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3Population: Treated subjects in the Treatment group
Subjects assessed their personal treatment goal of overall lip fullness as 'achieved' or 'not achieved.'
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Treatment
n=137 Participants
Juvederm(R) Ultra XC Injectable Gel
|
Control
No treatment for 3 months followed by Juvederm(R) Ultra XC Injectable Gel at Month 3.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Subjects Achieving Their Personal Treatment Goal of Overall Lip Fullness
|
81.8 Percentage of Subjects
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 1, Month 3, Month 6, Month 7.5, Month 9, Month 10.5, Month 12Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat: all treated subjects with data at the designated time point
Duration of treatment effect on lip fullness is assessed by the blinded Evaluating Investigator as ≥1-point Improvement from baseline in overall lip fullness of the eligible lip at each visit.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Treatment
n=142 Participants
Juvederm(R) Ultra XC Injectable Gel
|
Control
n=48 Participants
No treatment for 3 months followed by Juvederm(R) Ultra XC Injectable Gel at Month 3.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Duration Effect of Treatment on Lip Fullness
Month 7.5 (N=89, 29)
|
64.4 % of Pts Retaining ≥1-point Improvement
Interval 56.51 to 72.2
|
63.9 % of Pts Retaining ≥1-point Improvement
Interval 49.37 to 78.36
|
|
Duration Effect of Treatment on Lip Fullness
Month 9 (N=75, 24)
|
54.1 % of Pts Retaining ≥1-point Improvement
Interval 45.58 to 62.54
|
55.4 % of Pts Retaining ≥1-point Improvement
Interval 39.97 to 70.82
|
|
Duration Effect of Treatment on Lip Fullness
Month 10.5 (N=69, 19)
|
48.9 % of Pts Retaining ≥1-point Improvement
Interval 40.29 to 57.53
|
45.8 % of Pts Retaining ≥1-point Improvement
Interval 29.64 to 61.92
|
|
Duration Effect of Treatment on Lip Fullness
Month 12 (N=51, 8)
|
45.1 % of Pts Retaining ≥1-point Improvement
Interval 36.32 to 53.78
|
36.6 % of Pts Retaining ≥1-point Improvement
Interval 16.02 to 57.23
|
|
Duration Effect of Treatment on Lip Fullness
Month 1
|
93.5 % of Pts Retaining ≥1-point Improvement
Interval 89.53 to 97.38
|
98.0 % of Pts Retaining ≥1-point Improvement
Interval 94.0 to 100.0
|
|
Duration Effect of Treatment on Lip Fullness
Month 3 (N=114, 37)
|
77.5 % of Pts Retaining ≥1-point Improvement
Interval 70.78 to 84.13
|
77.3 % of Pts Retaining ≥1-point Improvement
Interval 65.42 to 89.08
|
|
Duration Effect of Treatment on Lip Fullness
Month 6 (N=99, 35)
|
69.1 % of Pts Retaining ≥1-point Improvement
Interval 61.64 to 76.54
|
74.8 % of Pts Retaining ≥1-point Improvement
Interval 62.34 to 87.18
|
Adverse Events
Onset Prior to Repeat Treatment
Onset After Repeat Treatment
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Onset Prior to Repeat Treatment
n=208 participants at risk
Juvederm(R) Ultra XC Injectable Gel
|
Onset After Repeat Treatment
n=114 participants at risk
Juvederm(R) Ultra XC Injectable Gel
|
|---|---|---|
|
Congenital, familial and genetic disorders
Development Hip Dysplasia
|
0.48%
1/208
208 subjects includes subjects who received initial treatment in both groups (157 in the treatment group and 51 in the control group). 114 subjects includes subjects who had repeat treatment from both treatment groups.
|
0.00%
0/114
208 subjects includes subjects who received initial treatment in both groups (157 in the treatment group and 51 in the control group). 114 subjects includes subjects who had repeat treatment from both treatment groups.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Drug Hypersensitivity
|
0.48%
1/208
208 subjects includes subjects who received initial treatment in both groups (157 in the treatment group and 51 in the control group). 114 subjects includes subjects who had repeat treatment from both treatment groups.
|
0.00%
0/114
208 subjects includes subjects who received initial treatment in both groups (157 in the treatment group and 51 in the control group). 114 subjects includes subjects who had repeat treatment from both treatment groups.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Diabetes Mellitus
|
0.48%
1/208
208 subjects includes subjects who received initial treatment in both groups (157 in the treatment group and 51 in the control group). 114 subjects includes subjects who had repeat treatment from both treatment groups.
|
0.00%
0/114
208 subjects includes subjects who received initial treatment in both groups (157 in the treatment group and 51 in the control group). 114 subjects includes subjects who had repeat treatment from both treatment groups.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Angioedema
|
0.48%
1/208
208 subjects includes subjects who received initial treatment in both groups (157 in the treatment group and 51 in the control group). 114 subjects includes subjects who had repeat treatment from both treatment groups.
|
0.00%
0/114
208 subjects includes subjects who received initial treatment in both groups (157 in the treatment group and 51 in the control group). 114 subjects includes subjects who had repeat treatment from both treatment groups.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Squamous Cell Carcinoma
|
0.00%
0/208
208 subjects includes subjects who received initial treatment in both groups (157 in the treatment group and 51 in the control group). 114 subjects includes subjects who had repeat treatment from both treatment groups.
|
0.88%
1/114
208 subjects includes subjects who received initial treatment in both groups (157 in the treatment group and 51 in the control group). 114 subjects includes subjects who had repeat treatment from both treatment groups.
|
|
Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
Premature Baby
|
0.00%
0/208
208 subjects includes subjects who received initial treatment in both groups (157 in the treatment group and 51 in the control group). 114 subjects includes subjects who had repeat treatment from both treatment groups.
|
0.88%
1/114
208 subjects includes subjects who received initial treatment in both groups (157 in the treatment group and 51 in the control group). 114 subjects includes subjects who had repeat treatment from both treatment groups.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Onset Prior to Repeat Treatment
n=208 participants at risk
Juvederm(R) Ultra XC Injectable Gel
|
Onset After Repeat Treatment
n=114 participants at risk
Juvederm(R) Ultra XC Injectable Gel
|
|---|---|---|
|
General disorders
Injection Site Mass
|
15.9%
33/208
208 subjects includes subjects who received initial treatment in both groups (157 in the treatment group and 51 in the control group). 114 subjects includes subjects who had repeat treatment from both treatment groups.
|
9.6%
11/114
208 subjects includes subjects who received initial treatment in both groups (157 in the treatment group and 51 in the control group). 114 subjects includes subjects who had repeat treatment from both treatment groups.
|
|
General disorders
Injection Site Induration
|
10.1%
21/208
208 subjects includes subjects who received initial treatment in both groups (157 in the treatment group and 51 in the control group). 114 subjects includes subjects who had repeat treatment from both treatment groups.
|
9.6%
11/114
208 subjects includes subjects who received initial treatment in both groups (157 in the treatment group and 51 in the control group). 114 subjects includes subjects who had repeat treatment from both treatment groups.
|
|
General disorders
Injection Site Pain
|
4.3%
9/208
208 subjects includes subjects who received initial treatment in both groups (157 in the treatment group and 51 in the control group). 114 subjects includes subjects who had repeat treatment from both treatment groups.
|
5.3%
6/114
208 subjects includes subjects who received initial treatment in both groups (157 in the treatment group and 51 in the control group). 114 subjects includes subjects who had repeat treatment from both treatment groups.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee A disclosure restriction on the PI is that the sponsor can review results communications prior to public release and can embargo communications regarding trial results for a period that is less than or equal to 90 days from the time submitted to the sponsor for review. The sponsor cannot require changes to the communication and cannot extend the embargo.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER