Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Comparative Clinical Trial of the TensorTip, a Novel Non Invasive Device for Measurement Blood Parameters (NCT NCT01196533)
NCT ID: NCT01196533
Last Updated: 2019-01-31
Results Overview
To validate the parameters with similar measures obtained with standard invasive techniques in hospitalized patients. Methodology: Eligible real time color signal obtained by the TensorTip shall be recorded simultaneously during the monitoring performed. An algorithm shall be designed according to the blood color distribution to each parameter and a final test shall be recorded signals. Statistical analysis for each parameter shall perform on the entire eligible recorded signals. Determination of Accuracy: Err = √(1/N ∑N (Ref(k)-NewDevice(k)) \^2 ) (k=1) For each parameter a satisfactory result is considered when Err satisfies the industry requirement. Results viewing Each parameter comparative study shall be presented on a (X,Y) plan versus a regression line where X - represents the results measured by TensorTip and Y - the reference results.
COMPLETED
NA
94 participants
one year
2019-01-31
Participant Flow
during 2009
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Non Invasive Monitoring
Single group of hospitalized cardiovascular patients.
Non invasive peripheral blood monitoring: non invasive monitoring
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
94
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
94
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
A Comparative Clinical Trial of the TensorTip, a Novel Non Invasive Device for Measurement Blood Parameters
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Non Invasive Monitoring
n=94 Participants
single group of hospitalized cardiovascular patients
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
51.5 years
n=93 Participants
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
number of participants
|
94 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Male
|
45 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female
|
49 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
94 participants
n=93 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: one yearTo validate the parameters with similar measures obtained with standard invasive techniques in hospitalized patients. Methodology: Eligible real time color signal obtained by the TensorTip shall be recorded simultaneously during the monitoring performed. An algorithm shall be designed according to the blood color distribution to each parameter and a final test shall be recorded signals. Statistical analysis for each parameter shall perform on the entire eligible recorded signals. Determination of Accuracy: Err = √(1/N ∑N (Ref(k)-NewDevice(k)) \^2 ) (k=1) For each parameter a satisfactory result is considered when Err satisfies the industry requirement. Results viewing Each parameter comparative study shall be presented on a (X,Y) plan versus a regression line where X - represents the results measured by TensorTip and Y - the reference results.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Non Invasive Monitoring
n=94 Participants
single group of hospitalized cardiovascular patients
|
|---|---|
|
Comparison of the TensorTip Accuracy Against Hospital Periodical Readings.
pulse
|
0.6 percentage of error
|
|
Comparison of the TensorTip Accuracy Against Hospital Periodical Readings.
Blood Pressure-systolic
|
7.9 percentage of error
|
|
Comparison of the TensorTip Accuracy Against Hospital Periodical Readings.
Blood Pressure-diastolic
|
7.5 percentage of error
|
|
Comparison of the TensorTip Accuracy Against Hospital Periodical Readings.
Spo2
|
2.33 percentage of error
|
|
Comparison of the TensorTip Accuracy Against Hospital Periodical Readings.
PO2
|
5.99 percentage of error
|
|
Comparison of the TensorTip Accuracy Against Hospital Periodical Readings.
PCO2
|
5.3 percentage of error
|
|
Comparison of the TensorTip Accuracy Against Hospital Periodical Readings.
MAP
|
6.67 percentage of error
|
|
Comparison of the TensorTip Accuracy Against Hospital Periodical Readings.
Hemoglobin
|
8.9 percentage of error
|
|
Comparison of the TensorTip Accuracy Against Hospital Periodical Readings.
cardiac output
|
26.9 percentage of error
|
|
Comparison of the TensorTip Accuracy Against Hospital Periodical Readings.
Hematocrit
|
3.8 percentage of error
|
|
Comparison of the TensorTip Accuracy Against Hospital Periodical Readings.
RBC
|
4 percentage of error
|
|
Comparison of the TensorTip Accuracy Against Hospital Periodical Readings.
O2
|
1.15 percentage of error
|
|
Comparison of the TensorTip Accuracy Against Hospital Periodical Readings.
CO2
|
4.75 percentage of error
|
|
Comparison of the TensorTip Accuracy Against Hospital Periodical Readings.
Stroke volume
|
26.9 percentage of error
|
|
Comparison of the TensorTip Accuracy Against Hospital Periodical Readings.
pH
|
0.03 percentage of error
|
Adverse Events
Non Invasive Monitoring
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place