Trial Outcomes & Findings for Adding Sitagliptin or Pioglitazone to Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Insufficiently Controlled With Metformin and Sulfonylurea (NCT NCT01195090)
NCT ID: NCT01195090
Last Updated: 2012-10-10
Results Overview
A1C change from baseline to 24 weeks
COMPLETED
PHASE4
120 participants
24 weeks
2012-10-10
Participant Flow
The study was started from 01 OCT 2009 to 27 SEP 2011
we screened 135 patients and 120 patients were randomized in a 1: 1 ratio to one of the treatment groups. reson for excluded: 4 patients: ALT or AST \>2.5x ULN 8 patiens : withdraw informed consent 3 patiens: baseline A1C\>11%
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Sitagliptin
add sitagliptin100mg/d to pre-study OADs
|
Pioglitazone
add pioglitazone 30mg/d to pre-study OADs
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
60
|
60
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
54
|
52
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
6
|
8
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Sitagliptin
add sitagliptin100mg/d to pre-study OADs
|
Pioglitazone
add pioglitazone 30mg/d to pre-study OADs
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
1
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
2
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
|
3
|
4
|
Baseline Characteristics
Adding Sitagliptin or Pioglitazone to Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Insufficiently Controlled With Metformin and Sulfonylurea
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Sitagliptin
n=60 Participants
add sitagliptin100mg/d to pre-study OADs
|
Pioglitazone
n=60 Participants
add pioglitazone 30mg/d to pre-study OADs
|
Total
n=120 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
42 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
49 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
91 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
18 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
29 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Age Continuous
|
60.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.9 • n=93 Participants
|
58.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.3 • n=4 Participants
|
59.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.6 • n=27 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
38 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
37 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
75 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
22 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
23 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
45 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Taiwan
|
60 participants
n=93 Participants
|
60 participants
n=4 Participants
|
120 participants
n=27 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 weeksPopulation: An intent-to-treat analysis with last observation carried forward was used to assess efficacy.
A1C change from baseline to 24 weeks
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sitagliptin
n=60 Participants
add sitagliptin100mg/d to pre-study OADs
|
Pioglitazone
n=59 Participants
add pioglitazone 30mg/d to pre-study OADs
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (A1C)
|
-0.71 percentage of Hb
Standard Error 0.12
|
-0.94 percentage of Hb
Standard Error 0.12
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselinePopulation: baseline Laboratory measurements
baseline A1C
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sitagliptin
n=60 Participants
add sitagliptin100mg/d to pre-study OADs
|
Pioglitazone
n=60 Participants
add pioglitazone 30mg/d to pre-study OADs
|
|---|---|---|
|
Baseline A1C
|
8.27 percentage of Hb
Standard Deviation 0.86
|
8.54 percentage of Hb
Standard Deviation 0.97
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 weeksPopulation: The percentages of patient achieving an A1C \<7% at endpoint
The percentages of patient achieving an A1C \<7% at endpoint
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sitagliptin
n=60 Participants
add sitagliptin100mg/d to pre-study OADs
|
Pioglitazone
n=59 Participants
add pioglitazone 30mg/d to pre-study OADs
|
|---|---|---|
|
The Percentages of Patient Achieving an A1C <7%
|
28.3 percentage
|
28.8 percentage
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 weeksPopulation: An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis with last observation carried forward was used to assess efficacy.
fasting serum sugar change from baseline to 24 weeks
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sitagliptin
n=60 Participants
add sitagliptin100mg/d to pre-study OADs
|
Pioglitazone
n=59 Participants
add pioglitazone 30mg/d to pre-study OADs
|
|---|---|---|
|
Changes in Fasting Plasma Glucose
|
-23 mg/dl
Standard Error 4.0
|
-36 mg/dl
Standard Error 4.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 weeksPopulation: An intent-to-treat analysis with last observation carried forward was used to assess efficacy
fasting high sensitive serum C-reactive protein change from baseline to 24 weeks
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sitagliptin
n=60 Participants
add sitagliptin100mg/d to pre-study OADs
|
Pioglitazone
n=59 Participants
add pioglitazone 30mg/d to pre-study OADs
|
|---|---|---|
|
Changes in High Sensitive C-reactive Protein
|
-0.07 mg/dl
Standard Error 0.04
|
-0.19 mg/dl
Standard Error 0.04
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 weeksPopulation: An intent-to-treat analysis with last observation carried forward was used to assess efficacy
HOMA-IR change from baseline to 24 weeks
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sitagliptin
n=60 Participants
add sitagliptin100mg/d to pre-study OADs
|
Pioglitazone
n=59 Participants
add pioglitazone 30mg/d to pre-study OADs
|
|---|---|---|
|
Changes in Homoeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR)
|
-0.00 HOMA-IR score
Standard Error 0.35
|
-1.56 HOMA-IR score
Standard Error 0.35
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 weeksPopulation: An intent-to-treat analysis with last observation carried forward was used to assess efficacy
body weight change from baseline to 24 weeks
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sitagliptin
n=60 Participants
add sitagliptin100mg/d to pre-study OADs
|
Pioglitazone
n=59 Participants
add pioglitazone 30mg/d to pre-study OADs
|
|---|---|---|
|
Body Weight Change
|
-0.26 kg
Standard Error 0.32
|
1.34 kg
Standard Error 0.32
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 weeksPopulation: All patients who had taken at least one dose of study medication were included in the safety analysis
percentages of total adverse events
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sitagliptin
n=60 Participants
add sitagliptin100mg/d to pre-study OADs
|
Pioglitazone
n=59 Participants
add pioglitazone 30mg/d to pre-study OADs
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentages of Patients With Total Adverse Events (AE)
|
43.1 percentage
|
51.7 percentage
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 weeksPopulation: An intent-to-treat analysis with last observation carried forward was used to assess efficacy.
Total-cholesterol change from baseline to 24 weeks
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sitagliptin
n=60 Participants
add sitagliptin100mg/d to pre-study OADs
|
Pioglitazone
n=59 Participants
add pioglitazone 30mg/d to pre-study OADs
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Fasting Total-cholesterol
|
0.6 mg/dl
Standard Error 3.9
|
9.9 mg/dl
Standard Error 4.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 weeksPopulation: An intent-to-treat analysis with last observation carried forward was used to assess efficacy
LDL-C change from baseline to 24 weeks
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sitagliptin
n=60 Participants
add sitagliptin100mg/d to pre-study OADs
|
Pioglitazone
n=59 Participants
add pioglitazone 30mg/d to pre-study OADs
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Fasting Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)
|
-1.2 mg/dl
Standard Error 3.7
|
6.6 mg/dl
Standard Error 3.7
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 weeksPopulation: An intent-to-treat analysis with last observation carried forward was used to assess efficacy.
TG change from baseline to 24 weeks
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sitagliptin
n=60 Participants
add sitagliptin100mg/d to pre-study OADs
|
Pioglitazone
n=59 Participants
add pioglitazone 30mg/d to pre-study OADs
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Fasting Triglycerides(TG)
|
6.3 mg/dl
Standard Error 9.3
|
-23.9 mg/dl
Standard Error 9.4
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 weeksPopulation: An intent-to-treat analysis with last observation carried forward was used to assess efficacy.
HDL-C change from baseline to 24 weeks
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sitagliptin
n=60 Participants
add sitagliptin100mg/d to pre-study OADs
|
Pioglitazone
n=59 Participants
add pioglitazone 30mg/d to pre-study OADs
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Fasting High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol(HDL-C)
|
1.3 mg/dl
Standard Error 1.2
|
6.3 mg/dl
Standard Error 1.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 weeksPopulation: An intent-to-treat analysis with last observation carried forward was used to assess efficacy
ALT change from baseline to 24 weeks
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sitagliptin
n=60 Participants
add sitagliptin100mg/d to pre-study OADs
|
Pioglitazone
n=59 Participants
add pioglitazone 30mg/d to pre-study OADs
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Fasting Plasma Alanine-aminotransferase (ALT)
|
-0.0 IU/L
Standard Error 2.4
|
-4.5 IU/L
Standard Error 2.4
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 weeksPopulation: All patients who had taken at least one dose of study medication were included in the safety analysis
Incidence of mild to moderate hypoglycemia after treatment
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sitagliptin
n=60 Participants
add sitagliptin100mg/d to pre-study OADs
|
Pioglitazone
n=59 Participants
add pioglitazone 30mg/d to pre-study OADs
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentages of Patients With Mild to Moderate Hypoglycemia
|
10 percentage
|
8.5 percentage
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 weeksPopulation: All patients who had taken at least one dose of study medication were included in the safety analysis
proportion of edema after treatment
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sitagliptin
n=60 Participants
add sitagliptin100mg/d to pre-study OADs
|
Pioglitazone
n=59 Participants
add pioglitazone 30mg/d to pre-study OADs
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentages of Patients With Edema
|
0 percentage
|
27.1 percentage
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 weeksPopulation: All patients who had taken at least one dose of study medication were included in the safety analysis
Proportion of Gastrointestinal adverse events after treatment
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sitagliptin
n=60 Participants
add sitagliptin100mg/d to pre-study OADs
|
Pioglitazone
n=59 Participants
add pioglitazone 30mg/d to pre-study OADs
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentages of Patients With Gastrointestinal Adverse Events
|
20.0 percentge
|
6.8 percentge
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 weeksPopulation: All patients who had taken at least one dose of study medication were included in the safety analysis
Proportion of Nasopharyngitis after treatment
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sitagliptin
n=60 Participants
add sitagliptin100mg/d to pre-study OADs
|
Pioglitazone
n=59 Participants
add pioglitazone 30mg/d to pre-study OADs
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentages of Patients With Nasopharyngitis
|
20.0 percentage
|
18.6 percentage
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 weeksPopulation: Proportion of severe ypoglycemia after treatment
Proportion of severe hypoglycemia after treatment
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sitagliptin
n=60 Participants
add sitagliptin100mg/d to pre-study OADs
|
Pioglitazone
n=59 Participants
add pioglitazone 30mg/d to pre-study OADs
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentages of Patients With Severe Hypoglycemia
|
0 percentage
|
0 percentage
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baselinePopulation: Baseline fasting plasma glucose
Baseline fasting plasma glucose
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sitagliptin
n=60 Participants
add sitagliptin100mg/d to pre-study OADs
|
Pioglitazone
n=60 Participants
add pioglitazone 30mg/d to pre-study OADs
|
|---|---|---|
|
Baseline Fasting Plasma Glucose
|
177 mg/dl
Standard Deviation 47
|
182 mg/dl
Standard Deviation 38
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baselinePopulation: Baseline high sensitive C-reactive Protein
Baseline high sensitive C-reactive Protein
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sitagliptin
n=60 Participants
add sitagliptin100mg/d to pre-study OADs
|
Pioglitazone
n=60 Participants
add pioglitazone 30mg/d to pre-study OADs
|
|---|---|---|
|
Baseline High Sensitive C-reactive Protein
|
0.38 mg/dl
Standard Deviation 0.36
|
0.42 mg/dl
Standard Deviation 0.68
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline HOMA-IRPopulation: Baseline HOMA-IR
Baseline HOMA-IR
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sitagliptin
n=60 Participants
add sitagliptin100mg/d to pre-study OADs
|
Pioglitazone
n=60 Participants
add pioglitazone 30mg/d to pre-study OADs
|
|---|---|---|
|
Baseline Homoeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR)
|
5.6 HOMA-IR score
Standard Deviation 3.8
|
4.8 HOMA-IR score
Standard Deviation 3.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselinePopulation: Baseline alanine-aminotransferase
Baseline alanine-aminotransferase
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sitagliptin
n=60 Participants
add sitagliptin100mg/d to pre-study OADs
|
Pioglitazone
n=60 Participants
add pioglitazone 30mg/d to pre-study OADs
|
|---|---|---|
|
Baseline Alanine-aminotransferase (ALT)
|
34.2 IU/L
Standard Deviation 17.5
|
28.5 IU/L
Standard Deviation 15.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselinePopulation: Baseline body weight
Baseline body weight
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sitagliptin
n=60 Participants
add sitagliptin100mg/d to pre-study OADs
|
Pioglitazone
n=60 Participants
add pioglitazone 30mg/d to pre-study OADs
|
|---|---|---|
|
Baseline Body Weight
|
69.4 kg
Standard Deviation 13.6
|
65.4 kg
Standard Deviation 10.4
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselinePopulation: Baseline Total cholesterol
Baseline Total cholesterol
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sitagliptin
n=60 Participants
add sitagliptin100mg/d to pre-study OADs
|
Pioglitazone
n=60 Participants
add pioglitazone 30mg/d to pre-study OADs
|
|---|---|---|
|
Baseline Total Cholesterol
|
174 mg/dl
Standard Deviation 31
|
194 mg/dl
Standard Deviation 33
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselinePopulation: Baseline TG
Baseline TG
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sitagliptin
n=60 Participants
add sitagliptin100mg/d to pre-study OADs
|
Pioglitazone
n=60 Participants
add pioglitazone 30mg/d to pre-study OADs
|
|---|---|---|
|
Baseline Triglyceride (TG)
|
137 mg/dl
Standard Deviation 74
|
164 mg/dl
Standard Deviation 73
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselinePopulation: Baseline LDL-C
Baseline LDL-C
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sitagliptin
n=60 Participants
add sitagliptin100mg/d to pre-study OADs
|
Pioglitazone
n=60 Participants
add pioglitazone 30mg/d to pre-study OADs
|
|---|---|---|
|
Baseline Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)
|
102 mg/dl
Standard Deviation 25
|
111 mg/dl
Standard Deviation 31
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselinePopulation: Baseline HDL-C
Baseline HDL-C
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sitagliptin
n=60 Participants
add sitagliptin100mg/d to pre-study OADs
|
Pioglitazone
n=60 Participants
add pioglitazone 30mg/d to pre-study OADs
|
|---|---|---|
|
Baseline High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C)
|
42 mg/dl
Standard Deviation 12
|
43 mg/dl
Standard Deviation 12
|
Adverse Events
Sitagliptin
Pioglitazone
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Sitagliptin
n=60 participants at risk
add sitagliptin100mg/d to pre-study OADs
|
Pioglitazone
n=60 participants at risk
add pioglitazone 30mg/d to pre-study OADs
|
|---|---|---|
|
General disorders
edema
|
0.00%
0/60 • adverse event was recorded after 12 weeks and 24 weeks treatment or was recorded if adverse event was noted at any time during the study period.
All adverse events was recorded after treatment. Symptomatic hypoglycemia was defined as an event with clinical symptoms consistent with hypoglycemia and severe hypoglycemia was defined as an event with symptoms consistent with hypoglycemia in which the patient required the assistance of another person.
|
26.7%
16/60 • Number of events 16 • adverse event was recorded after 12 weeks and 24 weeks treatment or was recorded if adverse event was noted at any time during the study period.
All adverse events was recorded after treatment. Symptomatic hypoglycemia was defined as an event with clinical symptoms consistent with hypoglycemia and severe hypoglycemia was defined as an event with symptoms consistent with hypoglycemia in which the patient required the assistance of another person.
|
|
General disorders
Hypoglycemia
|
10.0%
6/60 • Number of events 6 • adverse event was recorded after 12 weeks and 24 weeks treatment or was recorded if adverse event was noted at any time during the study period.
All adverse events was recorded after treatment. Symptomatic hypoglycemia was defined as an event with clinical symptoms consistent with hypoglycemia and severe hypoglycemia was defined as an event with symptoms consistent with hypoglycemia in which the patient required the assistance of another person.
|
8.3%
5/60 • Number of events 5 • adverse event was recorded after 12 weeks and 24 weeks treatment or was recorded if adverse event was noted at any time during the study period.
All adverse events was recorded after treatment. Symptomatic hypoglycemia was defined as an event with clinical symptoms consistent with hypoglycemia and severe hypoglycemia was defined as an event with symptoms consistent with hypoglycemia in which the patient required the assistance of another person.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal adverse event
|
20.0%
12/60 • Number of events 12 • adverse event was recorded after 12 weeks and 24 weeks treatment or was recorded if adverse event was noted at any time during the study period.
All adverse events was recorded after treatment. Symptomatic hypoglycemia was defined as an event with clinical symptoms consistent with hypoglycemia and severe hypoglycemia was defined as an event with symptoms consistent with hypoglycemia in which the patient required the assistance of another person.
|
6.7%
4/60 • Number of events 4 • adverse event was recorded after 12 weeks and 24 weeks treatment or was recorded if adverse event was noted at any time during the study period.
All adverse events was recorded after treatment. Symptomatic hypoglycemia was defined as an event with clinical symptoms consistent with hypoglycemia and severe hypoglycemia was defined as an event with symptoms consistent with hypoglycemia in which the patient required the assistance of another person.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Nasopharyngitis
|
20.0%
12/60 • Number of events 12 • adverse event was recorded after 12 weeks and 24 weeks treatment or was recorded if adverse event was noted at any time during the study period.
All adverse events was recorded after treatment. Symptomatic hypoglycemia was defined as an event with clinical symptoms consistent with hypoglycemia and severe hypoglycemia was defined as an event with symptoms consistent with hypoglycemia in which the patient required the assistance of another person.
|
18.3%
11/60 • Number of events 11 • adverse event was recorded after 12 weeks and 24 weeks treatment or was recorded if adverse event was noted at any time during the study period.
All adverse events was recorded after treatment. Symptomatic hypoglycemia was defined as an event with clinical symptoms consistent with hypoglycemia and severe hypoglycemia was defined as an event with symptoms consistent with hypoglycemia in which the patient required the assistance of another person.
|
Additional Information
Dr. Sung-Chen Liu
Department of Internal Medicine, Mackay Memorial Hospital
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place