Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2/PHASE3
182 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2003-09-30
2004-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The design was a randomised control trial involving three groups, which aimed to manipulate possible changes in dentist behaviour and patient expectancy. In Group 1, the MDAS was left at reception, as expected by the patient. In Group 2, the dentist received the MDAS, although the patient did not expect this. In Group 3 the dentist received the MDAS and the patient did expect this. The sample (N=182) was taken from two dental access centres, and included participants obtaining a score of 19 or above, or 5 on any one item of the MDAS. Pre- and post-dental consultation measures of state anxiety were taken using the six-item short-form of the state scale of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-S, Marteau \& Bekker, 1992).
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
METHODS Design of study A three group pre-and post-test design was adopted, a control group (Group1: patient completed the MDAS (Modified Dental Anxiety Scale) questionnaire and handed it to the receptionist) and the experimental group where the patient handed the MDAS to the dentist (Group 3). An additional group was included (Group 2). Patients completed the MDAS and handed it to the receptionist whereupon it was given to the dentist contrary to patient expectation. The dental staff were kept blind to the actual design of the study. The Local Research and Ethics Committee approved the study.
Test the hypothesis that patients sharing assessment information about their dental anxiety to members of the dental team has beneficial effects on their state anxiety.
Randomisation A block randomisation schedule was computer generated by University of Manchester statistician (BT). Pre-sealed opaque envelopes that contained questionnaires specific to the three groups were prepared by a colleague to minimise selection bias. All materials were pre-coded with the participant number.
Sample
Dental Access Centers provide: general dental services to those who are not registered with a NHS dentist, NHS patient charges and receipt of easily available treatment and advice (appointment not always necessary). The study was conducted at two Greater Manchester Dental Access Centers. These sites offered treatment to emergency dental patients who were more likely to become dentally anxious than regular attenders (Maggirias and Locker, 2002) . Participants were volunteers recruited, from October 2003 to April 2004.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Dentist behaviour
Patient completes the MDAS which is handed to receptionist who then gives the information to the dentist with patient knowledge
Information to health provider without patient knowledge
The intervention consists of the assessment information from the MDAS questionnaire being given to the dentist via the receptionist without the knowledge of the patient
Dentist behaviour and patient expectancy
Patient completes the MDAS and hands to the dentist
dentist behaviour and patient expectancy
patient give information about their dental anxiety to the dentist
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Information to health provider without patient knowledge
The intervention consists of the assessment information from the MDAS questionnaire being given to the dentist via the receptionist without the knowledge of the patient
dentist behaviour and patient expectancy
patient give information about their dental anxiety to the dentist
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* read and write English
* 18 years of age and above
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Manchester
OTHER
University of St Andrews
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
University of Manchester
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Gerald M Humphris, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
University of St Andrews
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Manchester
Manchester, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Denanx0103
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id