Trial Outcomes & Findings for Observational Non-Interventional Study With Enbrel (Etanercept) in Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis (NCT NCT01188655)
NCT ID: NCT01188655
Last Updated: 2011-09-12
Results Overview
BASDAI is a validated self assessment tool used to determine disease activity in participant with Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS). Utilizing a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of 0-10 (0=none and 10=very severe) participant's answered 6 questions measuring discomfort, pain and fatigue. The final BASDAI score averages the individual assessments for a final score range of 0-10. Participants who achieved a decrease of 40 percent or more from baseline to the following visits are called as responders.
COMPLETED
89 participants
Week 24
2011-09-12
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Etanercept
Participants were treated in accordance with the requirements of the labeling of Enbrel in Austria. The dosage and duration of therapy was to be determined by the physician to meet participant's individual needs for treatment. To record complete dosing information, initial dose was documented at baseline and any change was documented with date, dose and reason at the subsequent visits.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
89
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
76
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
13
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Etanercept
Participants were treated in accordance with the requirements of the labeling of Enbrel in Austria. The dosage and duration of therapy was to be determined by the physician to meet participant's individual needs for treatment. To record complete dosing information, initial dose was documented at baseline and any change was documented with date, dose and reason at the subsequent visits.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Lack of Efficacy
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Other
|
11
|
Baseline Characteristics
Observational Non-Interventional Study With Enbrel (Etanercept) in Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=89 Participants
Participants were treated in accordance with the requirements of the labeling of Enbrel in Austria. The dosage and duration of therapy was to be determined by the physician to meet participant's individual needs for treatment. To record complete dosing information, initial dose was documented at baseline and any change was documented with date, dose and reason at the subsequent visits.
|
|---|---|
|
Age Continuous
|
41.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.7 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
32 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
57 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) at baseline
|
5.3 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.6 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) at baseline
|
4.7 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.3 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Participant's Global Assessment Visual Analog Scale at baseline
|
6.7 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.0 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Physician's Global Assessment Visual Analog Scale at baseline
|
6.6 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.4 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Duration of morning stiffness at baseline
|
88.3 minutes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 67.5 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life Scale (ASQoL) at baseline
|
11.9 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.9 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Without Enthesitis
|
57.5 Percentage of Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Without Peripheral Arthritis
|
70.1 Percentage of Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Occiput-to-wall distance
|
3.8 centimeter (cm)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.0 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Spine agility function by Schober test
|
6.3 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.5 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Spine agility function by Ott test
|
11.8 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.3 • n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 24Population: Safety population: all participants who recieved at least one dose of study medication during the study period, n equals number of participants analyzed at the given time point
BASDAI is a validated self assessment tool used to determine disease activity in participant with Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS). Utilizing a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of 0-10 (0=none and 10=very severe) participant's answered 6 questions measuring discomfort, pain and fatigue. The final BASDAI score averages the individual assessments for a final score range of 0-10. Participants who achieved a decrease of 40 percent or more from baseline to the following visits are called as responders.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=67 Participants
Participants were treated in accordance with the requirements of the labeling of Enbrel in Austria. The dosage and duration of therapy was to be determined by the physician to meet participant's individual needs for treatment. To record complete dosing information, initial dose was documented at baseline and any change was documented with date, dose and reason at the subsequent visits.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving BASDAI 40 Response at Week 24
|
83.6 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12 and Week 24Population: Safety population: all participants who recieved at least one dose of study medication during the study period, n equals number of participants analyzed at the given time point.
BASDAI is a validated self assessment tool used to determine disease activity in participant with Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS). Utilizing a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of 0-10 (0=none and 10=very severe) participant's answered 6 questions measuring discomfort, pain and fatigue. The final BASDAI score averages the individual assessments for a final score range of 0-10.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=67 Participants
Participants were treated in accordance with the requirements of the labeling of Enbrel in Austria. The dosage and duration of therapy was to be determined by the physician to meet participant's individual needs for treatment. To record complete dosing information, initial dose was documented at baseline and any change was documented with date, dose and reason at the subsequent visits.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in BASDAI at Week 12 and 24
Week 12 (n= 70)
|
-2.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.4
|
|
Change From Baseline in BASDAI at Week 12 and 24
Week 24 (n= 68)
|
-3.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12 and Week 24Population: Safety population: all participants who recieved at least one dose of study medication during the study period, n equals number of participants analyzed at the given time point.
BASFI is a validated self assessment tool that determines the degree of functional limitation in AS. Utilizing a VAS of 0-10 (0 = easy, 10 = impossible), participants answered 10 questions assessing their ability in completing normal daily activities or physically demanding activities. The BASFI score is a mean score of the 10 questions.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=83 Participants
Participants were treated in accordance with the requirements of the labeling of Enbrel in Austria. The dosage and duration of therapy was to be determined by the physician to meet participant's individual needs for treatment. To record complete dosing information, initial dose was documented at baseline and any change was documented with date, dose and reason at the subsequent visits.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the BASFI at Weeks 12 and 24
Week 12 (n= 73)
|
-2.1 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.1
|
|
Change From Baseline in the BASFI at Weeks 12 and 24
Week 24 (n= 70)
|
-2.7 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 12 and Week 24Population: Safety population: all participants who recieved at least one dose of study medication during the study period, n equals number of participants analyzed at the given time point.
Measured using a 100mm VAS ranging from 0=very good to 100=very bad.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=84 Participants
Participants were treated in accordance with the requirements of the labeling of Enbrel in Austria. The dosage and duration of therapy was to be determined by the physician to meet participant's individual needs for treatment. To record complete dosing information, initial dose was documented at baseline and any change was documented with date, dose and reason at the subsequent visits.
|
|---|---|
|
Participant's Global Assessment Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12 and 24
Week 12 (n= 73)
|
2.8 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.2
|
|
Participant's Global Assessment Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12 and 24
Week 24 (n= 70)
|
1.9 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 12 and Week 24Population: Safety population: all participants who recieved at least one dose of study medication during the study period, n equals number of participants analyzed at the given time point.
Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity was measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS, with 0 mm= no disease activity.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=89 Participants
Participants were treated in accordance with the requirements of the labeling of Enbrel in Austria. The dosage and duration of therapy was to be determined by the physician to meet participant's individual needs for treatment. To record complete dosing information, initial dose was documented at baseline and any change was documented with date, dose and reason at the subsequent visits.
|
|---|---|
|
Physician's Global Assessment Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12 and 24
Week 12 (n= 81)
|
2.5 mm
Standard Deviation 1.6
|
|
Physician's Global Assessment Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12 and 24
Week 24 (n= 78)
|
1.7 mm
Standard Deviation 1.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 12 and Week 24Population: Safety population: all participants who recieved at least one dose of study medication during the study period, n equals number of participants analyzed at the given time point.
Duration of morning stiffness is defined as the time elapsed when participant woke up in the morning and was able to resume normal activities without stiffness in minutes (If none was present = 0; If morning stiffness was continuing, average of duration of stiffness over the past 3 days was reported; If stiffness persisted the entire day, 1440 minutes (24h x 60 minutes) was recorded).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=80 Participants
Participants were treated in accordance with the requirements of the labeling of Enbrel in Austria. The dosage and duration of therapy was to be determined by the physician to meet participant's individual needs for treatment. To record complete dosing information, initial dose was documented at baseline and any change was documented with date, dose and reason at the subsequent visits.
|
|---|---|
|
Mean Duration of Morning Stiffness
Week 12 (n= 54)
|
34.2 minutes
Standard Deviation 39.8
|
|
Mean Duration of Morning Stiffness
Week 24 (n= 45)
|
30.0 minutes
Standard Deviation 46.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12 and Week 24Population: Safety population: all participants who recieved at least one dose of study medication during the study period, n equals number of participants analyzed at the given time point.
ASQoL is a questionnaire that assesses disease-specific quality of life (QoL). It consists of 18 statements that are relevant to the physical and mental conditions for a participant with AS: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each statement is answered by the participant as a 'Yes' (scored as 1) or 'No' (scored as 0). All item scores are summed to give a total score. Total score can range from 0 (good QoL) to 18 (poor QoL).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=70 Participants
Participants were treated in accordance with the requirements of the labeling of Enbrel in Austria. The dosage and duration of therapy was to be determined by the physician to meet participant's individual needs for treatment. To record complete dosing information, initial dose was documented at baseline and any change was documented with date, dose and reason at the subsequent visits.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in ASQoL at Week 12 and Week 24
Week 12
|
-6.8 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.2
|
|
Change From Baseline in ASQoL at Week 12 and Week 24
Week 24
|
-8.3 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 12 and Week 24Population: Safety population: all participants who recieved at least one dose of study medication during the study period, n equals number of participants analyzed at the given time point.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=87 Participants
Participants were treated in accordance with the requirements of the labeling of Enbrel in Austria. The dosage and duration of therapy was to be determined by the physician to meet participant's individual needs for treatment. To record complete dosing information, initial dose was documented at baseline and any change was documented with date, dose and reason at the subsequent visits.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Without Enthesitis
Week 12 (n= 81)
|
86.4 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Without Enthesitis
Week 24 (n= 78)
|
85.9 Percentage of Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 12 and Week 24Population: Safety population: all participants who recieved at least one dose of study medication during the study period, n equals number of participants analyzed at the given time point.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=87 Participants
Participants were treated in accordance with the requirements of the labeling of Enbrel in Austria. The dosage and duration of therapy was to be determined by the physician to meet participant's individual needs for treatment. To record complete dosing information, initial dose was documented at baseline and any change was documented with date, dose and reason at the subsequent visits.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Without Peripheral Arthritis
Week 12 (n= 81)
|
81.5 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Without Peripheral Arthritis
Week 24 (n= 78)
|
85.9 Percentage of Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 12 and Week 24Population: Safety population: all participants who recieved at least one dose of study medication during the study period, n equals number of participants analyzed at the given time point
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=67 Participants
Participants were treated in accordance with the requirements of the labeling of Enbrel in Austria. The dosage and duration of therapy was to be determined by the physician to meet participant's individual needs for treatment. To record complete dosing information, initial dose was documented at baseline and any change was documented with date, dose and reason at the subsequent visits.
|
|---|---|
|
Mean Occiput-to-wall Distance at Week 12 and Week 24
Week 12 (n= 58)
|
3.2 cm
Standard Deviation 5.5
|
|
Mean Occiput-to-wall Distance at Week 12 and Week 24
Week 24 (n= 56)
|
3.2 cm
Standard Deviation 5.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 12 and Week 24Population: Safety population: all participants who recieved at least one dose of study medication during the study period, n equals number of participants analyzed at the given time point
Schober test determines agility of lumbar spine. It measures participant's ability to flex the lower back. Examiner makes a mark at fifth lumbar vertebra (L5); places 1 finger 5 cm below and another 10 cm above the mark. Participant is asked to touch the toes. Examiner measures the increase in distance between 2 fingers.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=58 Participants
Participants were treated in accordance with the requirements of the labeling of Enbrel in Austria. The dosage and duration of therapy was to be determined by the physician to meet participant's individual needs for treatment. To record complete dosing information, initial dose was documented at baseline and any change was documented with date, dose and reason at the subsequent visits.
|
|---|---|
|
Spine Agility Function by Schober Test
Week 12 (n= 50)
|
7.6 cm
Standard Deviation 5.7
|
|
Spine Agility Function by Schober Test
Week 24 (n= 49)
|
7.7 cm
Standard Deviation 5.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 12 and Week 24Population: Safety population: all participants who recieved at least one dose of study medication during the study period, n equals number of participants analyzed at the given time point
The Ott index determines the agility of the thoracic spine.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=48 Participants
Participants were treated in accordance with the requirements of the labeling of Enbrel in Austria. The dosage and duration of therapy was to be determined by the physician to meet participant's individual needs for treatment. To record complete dosing information, initial dose was documented at baseline and any change was documented with date, dose and reason at the subsequent visits.
|
|---|---|
|
Spine Agility Function by Ott Test
Week 12 (n= 40)
|
13.6 cm
Standard Deviation 14.8
|
|
Spine Agility Function by Ott Test
Week 24 (n= 43)
|
13.3 cm
Standard Deviation 14.6
|
Adverse Events
Etanercept
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=89 participants at risk
Participants were treated in accordance with the requirements of the labeling of Enbrel in Austria. The dosage and duration of therapy was to be determined by the physician to meet participant's individual needs for treatment. To record complete dosing information, initial dose was documented at baseline and any change was documented with date, dose and reason at the subsequent visits.
|
|---|---|
|
General disorders
Application site hypersensitivity
|
1.1%
1/89 • Number of events 1
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site erythema
|
1.1%
1/89 • Number of events 1
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Prostatitis
|
1.1%
1/89 • Number of events 1
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Pfizer has the right to review disclosures, requesting a delay of less than 60 days. Investigator will postpone single center publications until after disclosure of pooled data (all sites), less than 12 months from study completion/termination at all participating sites. Investigator may not disclose previously undisclosed confidential information other than study results.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER