Trial Outcomes & Findings for Fractional Laser and Ultrasound for Striae Distensae (NCT NCT01186848)
NCT ID: NCT01186848
Last Updated: 2021-12-03
Results Overview
The primary outcome was a blinded rating of the treatment area (Fractional Laser vs. Fractional Laser plus Intense Focused Ultrasound) with the best cosmetic appearance. Two dermatologists blindly evaluated the treated and control areas of each side from live subjects on the final follow up visit (week 10). This was reported as percentages of participants for whom "1550-nm Erbium-doped Fractionated Laser" or "Micro-focused Ultrasound and 1550nm-fractionated Laser" resulted in the "best cosmetic appearance".
COMPLETED
NA
30 participants
week 10
2021-12-03
Participant Flow
Recruitment period took place over approximately 6 months at an urban academic hospital.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Subjects Receiving Split Body Treatment
The unit of randomization was the individual side of a body within each subject to receive either 1550-nm erbium-doped fractionated laser treatment or the combination of the laser and ultrasound treatment for the treatment of striae.
Each side of thigh (or abdomen) was randomized to receive 1550nm-fractionated laser treatment every 2 weeks for a total of 4 treatments on one side and the contralateral side received micro-focused ultrasound treatment and 1550nm-fractionated laser alternatively every 2 weeks for a total of 4 treatments with site-match control area of baseline striae on each side.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
30
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
22
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
8
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Subjects Receiving Split Body Treatment
The unit of randomization was the individual side of a body within each subject to receive either 1550-nm erbium-doped fractionated laser treatment or the combination of the laser and ultrasound treatment for the treatment of striae.
Each side of thigh (or abdomen) was randomized to receive 1550nm-fractionated laser treatment every 2 weeks for a total of 4 treatments on one side and the contralateral side received micro-focused ultrasound treatment and 1550nm-fractionated laser alternatively every 2 weeks for a total of 4 treatments with site-match control area of baseline striae on each side.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
4
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
2
|
Baseline Characteristics
Fractional Laser and Ultrasound for Striae Distensae
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Subjects Receiving Split Body Treatment
n=30 Participants
The unit of randomization was the individual side of a body within each subject to receive either 1550-nm erbium-doped fractionated laser treatment or the combination of the laser and ultrasound treatment for the treatment of striae.
Each side of thigh (or abdomen) was randomized to receive 1550nm-fractionated laser treatment every 2 weeks for a total of 4 treatments on one side and the contralateral side received micro-focused ultrasound treatment and 1550nm-fractionated laser alternatively every 2 weeks for a total of 4 treatments with site-match control area of baseline striae on each side.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
30 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
36 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.2 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
28 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
30 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: week 10The primary outcome was a blinded rating of the treatment area (Fractional Laser vs. Fractional Laser plus Intense Focused Ultrasound) with the best cosmetic appearance. Two dermatologists blindly evaluated the treated and control areas of each side from live subjects on the final follow up visit (week 10). This was reported as percentages of participants for whom "1550-nm Erbium-doped Fractionated Laser" or "Micro-focused Ultrasound and 1550nm-fractionated Laser" resulted in the "best cosmetic appearance".
Outcome measures
| Measure |
1550-nm Erbium-doped Fractionated Laser
n=22 Participants
1550-nm erbium-doped fractionated laser : Each side of thigh (or abdomen) was randomized to receive 1550nm-fractionated laser treatment every 2 weeks for a total of 4 treatments on one side.
|
Combination Treatment
n=22 Participants
Combination of micro-focused ultrasound and 1550nm-fractionated laser : The treated sites were randomized to receive 1550nm-fractionated laser treatment every 2 weeks for a total of 4 treatments on one side and the contralateral side received micro-focused ultrasound treatment and 1550nm-fractionated laser alternatively every 2 weeks for a total of 4 treatments with site-match control area of baseline striae on each side.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Live-rater by Two Blinded Dermatologists
|
77.27 Percentage of participants
Interval 54.63 to 92.18
|
22.73 Percentage of participants
Interval 7.82 to 45.37
|
Adverse Events
1550-nm Erbium-doped Fractionated Laser
Combination Treatment
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
1550-nm Erbium-doped Fractionated Laser
n=30 participants at risk
1550-nm erbium-doped fractionated laser : Each side of thigh (or abdomen) was randomized to receive 1550nm-fractionated laser treatment every 2 weeks for a total of 4 treatments on one side.
|
Combination Treatment
n=30 participants at risk
Combination of micro-focused ultrasound and 1550nm-fractionated laser : The treated sites were randomized to receive 1550nm-fractionated laser treatment every 2 weeks for a total of 4 treatments on one side and the contralateral side received micro-focused ultrasound treatment and 1550nm-fractionated laser alternatively every 2 weeks for a total of 4 treatments with site-match control area of baseline striae on each side.
|
|---|---|---|
|
General disorders
pain
|
0.00%
0/30
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1
|
|
General disorders
numbness
|
0.00%
0/30
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1
|
|
General disorders
hyperpigmentation
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place