A Pychoeducational Intervention for Women With Diabetes

NCT ID: NCT01185561

Last Updated: 2016-12-14

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

74 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-03-31

Study Completion Date

2009-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This proposal describes a small randomized study to determine whether usual medical care (UMC) for diabetes combined with a psychoeducational program is more effective than UMC for diabetes alone. This program differs from other diabetes programs by focusing on the management of dysphoric symptoms (depressive symptoms, anxiety, and anger). Diabetes self-care behaviors will be discussed and measured, but they are not the primary focus of the intervention. The psychoeducational program will address: 1) education about how dysphoric symptoms affect glycemic control; 2) recognition of dysphoric symptoms; and 3) management of dysphoric symptoms using Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT). Subjects will be randomized to receive the group psychoeducational intervention or no additional treatment. All subjects will receive UMC for diabetes.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Diabetes is the fifth deadliest disease in the United States with no known cure, and cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death in persons with diabetes. Diabetes is the only disease that causes women to have as much heart disease as men. The relative risk of cardiac mortality has been reported to be 2.6 for women with diabetes as compared to 1.9 for men with diabetes after controlling for other cardiac risk factors. While cardiac mortality for men with diabetes has declined (13.1%), there has been a 23% increase in age-adjusted cardiac mortality for women with diabetes. This poor outcome, occurring in a time of significant advances in the management of heart disease, suggests the need to consider directing treatment at other risk factors. Depression may be one such risk factor.

Depression is an independent risk factor for CVD, and is associated with poorer self-management and decreased health-related quality of life. Approximately 25% of persons with diabetes have depression, and the rate of depression in women with diabetes is double that of men with diabetes. Women with diabetes exhibit worse diabetes self-care, glycemic control, and poorer quality of life than men with diabetes, which are exacerbated by depression. Other affective symptoms including anxiety and anger commonly accompany depressive symptoms appear to impose similar risks for poor medical outcomes, and occur more often in women with diabetes than men with diabetes.

Research has shown that treatment of depression with medication and/or cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) effectively relieves depression and improves glycemic control in persons with diabetes. More recent evidence suggests that these benefits are more durable in patients treated with CBT vs. antidepressants alone. There has been no research on "symptom clusters" (i.e., depression, anxiety, and anger) in persons with diabetes, and their effect on glycemic control and self-management. In addition, a CBT program to treat a cluster of dysphoric symptoms has not been tested in persons with diabetes. Since women with diabetes have greater depression and anxiety, worse glycemic control, and increased cardiac mortality than men with diabetes, we are proposing to test the feasibility and effectiveness of a psychoeducational intervention to promote emotional health in women with type 2 diabetes.

This proposal describes a small randomized controlled trial to determine whether usual medical care (UMC) for diabetes combined with a psychoeducational program is more effective than UMC for diabetes alone. This program differs from other diabetes programs by focusing on the management of dysphoric symptoms (depressive symptoms, anxiety, and anger). Diabetes self-care behaviors will be discussed and measured, but they are not the primary focus of the intervention. The psychoeducational program will address: 1) education about how dysphoric symptoms affect glycemic control; 2) recognition of dysphoric symptoms; and 3) management of dysphoric symptoms using CBT. A repeated measures, experimental design will be used. Subjects will be randomized to receive the group psychoeducational intervention or no additional treatment. All subjects will receive UMC for diabetes. The aims and hypotheses for the study are:

Primary Aim: To determine the effect of a psychoeducational intervention on dysphoric symptoms. The primary hypothesis is that women receiving a psychoeducational intervention plus UMC will report fewer dysphoric symptoms (depression, anxiety, and anger) at three and six months follow-up.

Secondary Aim: To determine the effect of a psychoeducational intervention on glycemic control, diabetes self-management, and health-related quality of life. The secondary hypothesis is that women receiving a psychoeducational intervention plus UMC will have decreased hemoglobin A1c, report better diabetes self-management (increased self-care behaviors and self-efficacy), and report increased health-related quality of life (increased functional status, life satisfaction, and decreased diabetes-related distress) at three and six months follow-up.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Depression Anxiety Anger

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Diabetes SWEEP Dysphoria

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Usual medical care

Participants assigned to this arm represent the control group and will receive usual medical care only.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Psychoeducational intervention

Participants assigned to this arm represent the experimental group and will receive group therapy for depression treatment based on cognitive behavioral therapy principles developed for women with type 2 diabetes

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Psychoeducational intervention

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The intervention is group therapy for depression treatment based on cognitive behavioral therapy principles developed for women with type 2 diabetes. Specifically, the intervention comprises activities including (1) Education about how dysphoric symptoms (i.e., depressive symptoms, anxiety, and anger) affect glycemic control; (2) Recognition of dysphoric symptoms; and (3) Management of dysphoric symptoms using cognitive-behavioral skills.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Psychoeducational intervention

The intervention is group therapy for depression treatment based on cognitive behavioral therapy principles developed for women with type 2 diabetes. Specifically, the intervention comprises activities including (1) Education about how dysphoric symptoms (i.e., depressive symptoms, anxiety, and anger) affect glycemic control; (2) Recognition of dysphoric symptoms; and (3) Management of dysphoric symptoms using cognitive-behavioral skills.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. aged 18 to 75 years;
2. have type 2 diabetes greater than six months and being medically managed
3. score greater than or equal to 16 on the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression (CES-D) scale which is indicative of depressive symptoms.
4. score greater than or equal to 12 on the CES-D plus a history of depression or currently being treated for depression.

Exclusion Criteria

Women with current alcohol or substance abuse disorders, or a history of bipolar depression or any other psychotic disorder will be excluded.

Women will also be excluded if they have a diabetes knowledge test score of less than 70% and severe complications of diabetes (blindness, renal failure, or major amputation which includes most toes, foot, knee, or leg)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Loyola University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Sue Penckofer

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sue Penckofer, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Loyola University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Loyola University Medical Center

Maywood, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

108324

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id