Project PREVAM : Prospective Comparison of Capsule Endoscopy Pillcam II™ Versus Colonoscopy

NCT ID: NCT01184781

Last Updated: 2023-09-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-08-31

Study Completion Date

2013-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of the study is to perform a prospective, multicenter research comparing capsule endoscopy with the video colonoscopy in the detection of the adenomatous polyps and cancer specifically in a high risk population (sensibility, specificity, NPV, PPV and diagnostic accuracy). The investigators will used the Pillcam II™ colon capsule (second generation) and a high resolution colonoscope (with high definition). Both procedures will be perform in the same day with an adapted bowel preparation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Adenomatous Polyps Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

A

On the same patient, we compare both methods (video-colonoscopy vs capsule endoscopy)

Group Type OTHER

Comparison of capsule endoscopy Pillcam II™ versus colonoscopy

Intervention Type DEVICE

On the same patient, we compare both methods (video-colonoscopy vs capsule endoscopy)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Comparison of capsule endoscopy Pillcam II™ versus colonoscopy

On the same patient, we compare both methods (video-colonoscopy vs capsule endoscopy)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age \> 18 years old
* Patient with 40 years old and first degree relative affected by colo rectal cancer at age ≥ 60 ans
* Patient with 40 years old or ten years before the age at affected disease in case or first deree relative colo rectal cancer before 60 years old.
* Fecal occult blood test positive
* Personal history of adenomatous polyps
* Personnal history of acromegaly
* Patient with social insurance
* Persons already participating in another clinical trial..
* Signature of informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnancy or breast feeding woman
* Déficience mentale du sujet rendant sa participation à l'essai impossible
* Pacemaker or all electronic devices implanted
* Patient with swallowing disorder, or digestive stricture know or suspected by the investigator
* Previous history of intestinal surgery, radiotherapy or inflammatory bowel disease
* Previous history of polyadenomatous congenital disease, Lynch syndrome
* Intolerance with dompéridon and/or bisacodyl
* Intolerance with oral intake of NaP, polyethylen glycol (PEG) or macrogol
* Colonoscopy contre indication for anesthesiologic reasons
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

HEBUTERNE Xavier, PU-PH

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Digestive department

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Digestive department - Archet hospital

Nice, , France

Site Status

Gastro entérology department

Sanremo, , Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France Italy

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Parodi A, Vanbiervliet G, Hassan C, Hebuterne X, De Ceglie A, Filiberti RA, Spada C, Conio M. Colon capsule endoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in those with family histories of colorectal cancer. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Mar;87(3):695-704. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.05.023. Epub 2017 May 26.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28554656 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

10-PP-02

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.