Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Phase 3 Study of DU-176b, Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients After Total Knee Arthroplasty (NCT NCT01181102)
NCT ID: NCT01181102
Last Updated: 2019-03-05
Results Overview
The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of subjects who experienced at least one of the thromboembolic events listed below during the period from the start of study treatment to the venography at the end of study treatment. * Lower extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) confirmed by unilateral venography at the end of study treatment * Definite diagnosis of symptomatic Pulmonary Embolism (PE) * Symptomatic DVT confirmed before the venography at the end of study treatment The objectives were to verify the non-inferiority of edoxaban to enoxaparin with regard to prevention of venous Thromboembolism (VTE)
COMPLETED
PHASE3
716 participants
2 weeks
2019-03-05
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
DU-176b
DU-176b oral tablets, 30 mg., taken once daily for 2 weeks
edoxaban
|
Enoxaparin Sodium
enoxaparin sodium 20mg(=2000IU)/0.2ml twice daily, subcutaneous injection for 2 weeks
enoxaparin sodium
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
360
|
356
|
|
Overall Study
Safety Analysis Set
|
354
|
349
|
|
Overall Study
Efficacy Analysis Population
|
299
|
295
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
309
|
310
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
51
|
46
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
DU-176b
DU-176b oral tablets, 30 mg., taken once daily for 2 weeks
edoxaban
|
Enoxaparin Sodium
enoxaparin sodium 20mg(=2000IU)/0.2ml twice daily, subcutaneous injection for 2 weeks
enoxaparin sodium
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
28
|
26
|
|
Overall Study
Lack of Efficacy
|
3
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
2
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Physician Decision
|
3
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
|
5
|
6
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
10
|
12
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Phase 3 Study of DU-176b, Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients After Total Knee Arthroplasty
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
DU-176b
n=299 Participants
DU-176b oral tablets, 30 mg., taken once daily for 2 weeks
edoxaban
|
Enoxaparin Sodium
n=295 Participants
enoxaparin sodium 20mg(=2000IU)/0.2ml twice daily, subcutaneous injection for 2 weeks
enoxaparin sodium
|
Total
n=594 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
72.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.5 • n=5 Participants
|
72.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.8 • n=7 Participants
|
72.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.6 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
245 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
229 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
474 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
54 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
66 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
120 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
299 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
295 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
594 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Taiwan
|
26 participants
n=5 Participants
|
25 participants
n=7 Participants
|
51 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Japan
|
273 participants
n=5 Participants
|
270 participants
n=7 Participants
|
543 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 weeksPopulation: Efficacy Analysis population. 22 (7.4%) - DU-176b 41 (13.9%) - enoxaparin
The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of subjects who experienced at least one of the thromboembolic events listed below during the period from the start of study treatment to the venography at the end of study treatment. * Lower extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) confirmed by unilateral venography at the end of study treatment * Definite diagnosis of symptomatic Pulmonary Embolism (PE) * Symptomatic DVT confirmed before the venography at the end of study treatment The objectives were to verify the non-inferiority of edoxaban to enoxaparin with regard to prevention of venous Thromboembolism (VTE)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
DU-176b
n=299 Participants
DU-176b oral tablets, 30 mg., taken once daily for 2 weeks
edoxaban
|
Enoxaparin Sodium
n=295 Participants
enoxaparin sodium 20mg(=2000IU)/0.2ml twice daily, subcutaneous injection for 2 weeks
enoxaparin sodium
|
|---|---|---|
|
Incidence of Subjects With Venous Thromboembolism Events.
|
7.4 percent of participants with VTE events
Interval 4.4 to 10.3
|
13.9 percent of participants with VTE events
Interval 10.0 to 17.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 weeksPopulation: The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment
Outcome measures
| Measure |
DU-176b
n=354 Participants
DU-176b oral tablets, 30 mg., taken once daily for 2 weeks
edoxaban
|
Enoxaparin Sodium
n=349 Participants
enoxaparin sodium 20mg(=2000IU)/0.2ml twice daily, subcutaneous injection for 2 weeks
enoxaparin sodium
|
|---|---|---|
|
Incidence of Major Bleeding or Clinically Relevant Non-major Bleeding.
|
6.2 percentage of subjects with bleeds
Interval 4.1 to 9.2
|
3.7 percentage of subjects with bleeds
Interval 2.2 to 6.3
|
Adverse Events
DU-176b
Enoxaparin Sodium
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
DU-176b
n=354 participants at risk
DU-176b oral tablets, 30 mg., taken once daily for 2 weeks
edoxaban
|
Enoxaparin Sodium
n=349 participants at risk
enoxaparin sodium 20mg(=2000IU)/0.2ml twice daily, subcutaneous injection for 2 weeks
enoxaparin sodium
|
|---|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
postoperative wound infection
|
0.28%
1/354 • Number of events 1
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/349
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
stitch abcess
|
0.28%
1/354 • Number of events 1
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/349
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
carotid artery stenosis
|
0.00%
0/354
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
0.29%
1/349 • Number of events 1
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
cerebellar infarction
|
0.28%
1/354 • Number of events 1
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/349
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
convulsion
|
0.00%
0/354
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
0.29%
1/349 • Number of events 1
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
syncope
|
0.00%
0/354
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
0.29%
1/349 • Number of events 1
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
|
Eye disorders
retinal artery occlusion
|
0.00%
0/354
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
0.29%
1/349 • Number of events 1
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
cyanosis
|
0.00%
0/354
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
0.29%
1/349 • Number of events 1
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
myocardial infarction
|
0.28%
1/354 • Number of events 1
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/349
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
|
Vascular disorders
hypotension
|
0.00%
0/354
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
0.29%
1/349 • Number of events 1
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
|
Vascular disorders
deep vein thrombosis
|
0.00%
0/354
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
0.29%
1/349 • Number of events 1
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
gastrointestinal haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/354
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
0.29%
1/349 • Number of events 1
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
melaena
|
0.28%
1/354 • Number of events 1
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/349
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
pyoderma gangrenosum
|
0.00%
0/354
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
0.29%
1/349 • Number of events 1
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
urticaria
|
0.28%
1/354 • Number of events 1
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/349
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
haemarthrosis
|
0.28%
1/354 • Number of events 1
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/349
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
joint contracture
|
0.00%
0/354
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
0.29%
1/349 • Number of events 1
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
|
General disorders
pyrexia
|
0.00%
0/354
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
0.29%
1/349 • Number of events 1
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
|
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
|
0.00%
0/354
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
0.29%
1/349 • Number of events 1
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
|
Investigations
Aspartate aminotransferase increased
|
0.00%
0/354
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
0.29%
1/349 • Number of events 1
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
|
Investigations
C-reactive protein increased
|
0.00%
0/354
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
0.29%
1/349 • Number of events 1
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Femoral neck fracture
|
0.00%
0/354
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
0.29%
1/349 • Number of events 1
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Lumbar vertebral fracture
|
0.28%
1/354 • Number of events 1
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/349
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Wound complication
|
0.28%
1/354 • Number of events 1
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/349
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Ligament rupture
|
0.28%
1/354 • Number of events 1
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/349
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
DU-176b
n=354 participants at risk
DU-176b oral tablets, 30 mg., taken once daily for 2 weeks
edoxaban
|
Enoxaparin Sodium
n=349 participants at risk
enoxaparin sodium 20mg(=2000IU)/0.2ml twice daily, subcutaneous injection for 2 weeks
enoxaparin sodium
|
|---|---|---|
|
Vascular disorders
wound haemorrhage
|
5.1%
18/354 • Number of events 19
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
2.9%
10/349 • Number of events 10
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Haemorrhage subcutaneous
|
6.2%
22/354 • Number of events 25
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
8.0%
28/349 • Number of events 30
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
|
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
|
7.1%
25/354 • Number of events 25
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
26.9%
94/349 • Number of events 94
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
|
Investigations
Aspartate aminotransferase increased
|
3.4%
12/354 • Number of events 12
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
24.9%
87/349 • Number of events 87
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
|
Investigations
Gamma-glutamyltransferase increased
|
9.3%
33/354 • Number of events 33
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
18.3%
64/349 • Number of events 65
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
|
Investigations
blood urine present
|
9.6%
34/354 • Number of events 35
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
8.9%
31/349 • Number of events 32
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cystitis
|
2.3%
8/354 • Number of events 8
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
1.7%
6/349 • Number of events 6
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
4.5%
16/354 • Number of events 16
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
4.3%
15/349 • Number of events 15
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
rash
|
2.5%
9/354 • Number of events 9
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
1.1%
4/349 • Number of events 4
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
3.4%
12/354 • Number of events 12
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
2.9%
10/349 • Number of events 12
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
2.5%
9/354 • Number of events 9
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
2.0%
7/349 • Number of events 7
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Haemarthrosis
|
2.0%
7/354 • Number of events 7
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
2.0%
7/349 • Number of events 7
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
|
Investigations
Blood bilirubin increased
|
4.0%
14/354 • Number of events 14
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
2.0%
7/349 • Number of events 8
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
|
Investigations
Blood lactate dehydrogenase increased
|
1.7%
6/354 • Number of events 6
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
4.6%
16/349 • Number of events 16
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
|
Investigations
Blood triglycerides increased
|
2.5%
9/354 • Number of events 9
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
1.7%
6/349 • Number of events 6
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
|
Investigations
Haemoglobin decreased
|
9.6%
34/354 • Number of events 35
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
8.9%
31/349 • Number of events 32
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
|
Investigations
Blood alkaline phosphatase increased
|
9.6%
34/354 • Number of events 35
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
8.9%
31/349 • Number of events 32
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee PI shall not publish the results of the Study at any time without the prior written approval of Sponsor.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER