Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Phase 3 Study of DU-176b, Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients After Total Knee Arthroplasty (NCT NCT01181102)

NCT ID: NCT01181102

Last Updated: 2019-03-05

Results Overview

The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of subjects who experienced at least one of the thromboembolic events listed below during the period from the start of study treatment to the venography at the end of study treatment. * Lower extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) confirmed by unilateral venography at the end of study treatment * Definite diagnosis of symptomatic Pulmonary Embolism (PE) * Symptomatic DVT confirmed before the venography at the end of study treatment The objectives were to verify the non-inferiority of edoxaban to enoxaparin with regard to prevention of venous Thromboembolism (VTE)

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE3

Target enrollment

716 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

2 weeks

Results posted on

2019-03-05

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
DU-176b
DU-176b oral tablets, 30 mg., taken once daily for 2 weeks edoxaban
Enoxaparin Sodium
enoxaparin sodium 20mg(=2000IU)/0.2ml twice daily, subcutaneous injection for 2 weeks enoxaparin sodium
Overall Study
STARTED
360
356
Overall Study
Safety Analysis Set
354
349
Overall Study
Efficacy Analysis Population
299
295
Overall Study
COMPLETED
309
310
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
51
46

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
DU-176b
DU-176b oral tablets, 30 mg., taken once daily for 2 weeks edoxaban
Enoxaparin Sodium
enoxaparin sodium 20mg(=2000IU)/0.2ml twice daily, subcutaneous injection for 2 weeks enoxaparin sodium
Overall Study
Adverse Event
28
26
Overall Study
Lack of Efficacy
3
1
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
2
0
Overall Study
Physician Decision
3
1
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
5
6
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
10
12

Baseline Characteristics

A Phase 3 Study of DU-176b, Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients After Total Knee Arthroplasty

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
DU-176b
n=299 Participants
DU-176b oral tablets, 30 mg., taken once daily for 2 weeks edoxaban
Enoxaparin Sodium
n=295 Participants
enoxaparin sodium 20mg(=2000IU)/0.2ml twice daily, subcutaneous injection for 2 weeks enoxaparin sodium
Total
n=594 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
72.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.5 • n=5 Participants
72.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.8 • n=7 Participants
72.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.6 • n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
245 Participants
n=5 Participants
229 Participants
n=7 Participants
474 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
54 Participants
n=5 Participants
66 Participants
n=7 Participants
120 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
299 Participants
n=5 Participants
295 Participants
n=7 Participants
594 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Taiwan
26 participants
n=5 Participants
25 participants
n=7 Participants
51 participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Japan
273 participants
n=5 Participants
270 participants
n=7 Participants
543 participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 2 weeks

Population: Efficacy Analysis population. 22 (7.4%) - DU-176b 41 (13.9%) - enoxaparin

The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of subjects who experienced at least one of the thromboembolic events listed below during the period from the start of study treatment to the venography at the end of study treatment. * Lower extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) confirmed by unilateral venography at the end of study treatment * Definite diagnosis of symptomatic Pulmonary Embolism (PE) * Symptomatic DVT confirmed before the venography at the end of study treatment The objectives were to verify the non-inferiority of edoxaban to enoxaparin with regard to prevention of venous Thromboembolism (VTE)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
DU-176b
n=299 Participants
DU-176b oral tablets, 30 mg., taken once daily for 2 weeks edoxaban
Enoxaparin Sodium
n=295 Participants
enoxaparin sodium 20mg(=2000IU)/0.2ml twice daily, subcutaneous injection for 2 weeks enoxaparin sodium
Incidence of Subjects With Venous Thromboembolism Events.
7.4 percent of participants with VTE events
Interval 4.4 to 10.3
13.9 percent of participants with VTE events
Interval 10.0 to 17.8

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 2 weeks

Population: The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
DU-176b
n=354 Participants
DU-176b oral tablets, 30 mg., taken once daily for 2 weeks edoxaban
Enoxaparin Sodium
n=349 Participants
enoxaparin sodium 20mg(=2000IU)/0.2ml twice daily, subcutaneous injection for 2 weeks enoxaparin sodium
Incidence of Major Bleeding or Clinically Relevant Non-major Bleeding.
6.2 percentage of subjects with bleeds
Interval 4.1 to 9.2
3.7 percentage of subjects with bleeds
Interval 2.2 to 6.3

Adverse Events

DU-176b

Serious events: 10 serious events
Other events: 237 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Enoxaparin Sodium

Serious events: 11 serious events
Other events: 256 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
DU-176b
n=354 participants at risk
DU-176b oral tablets, 30 mg., taken once daily for 2 weeks edoxaban
Enoxaparin Sodium
n=349 participants at risk
enoxaparin sodium 20mg(=2000IU)/0.2ml twice daily, subcutaneous injection for 2 weeks enoxaparin sodium
Infections and infestations
postoperative wound infection
0.28%
1/354 • Number of events 1
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
0.00%
0/349
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
Infections and infestations
stitch abcess
0.28%
1/354 • Number of events 1
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
0.00%
0/349
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
Nervous system disorders
carotid artery stenosis
0.00%
0/354
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
0.29%
1/349 • Number of events 1
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
Nervous system disorders
cerebellar infarction
0.28%
1/354 • Number of events 1
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
0.00%
0/349
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
Nervous system disorders
convulsion
0.00%
0/354
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
0.29%
1/349 • Number of events 1
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
Nervous system disorders
syncope
0.00%
0/354
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
0.29%
1/349 • Number of events 1
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
Eye disorders
retinal artery occlusion
0.00%
0/354
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
0.29%
1/349 • Number of events 1
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
Cardiac disorders
cyanosis
0.00%
0/354
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
0.29%
1/349 • Number of events 1
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
Cardiac disorders
myocardial infarction
0.28%
1/354 • Number of events 1
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
0.00%
0/349
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
Vascular disorders
hypotension
0.00%
0/354
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
0.29%
1/349 • Number of events 1
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
Vascular disorders
deep vein thrombosis
0.00%
0/354
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
0.29%
1/349 • Number of events 1
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
gastrointestinal haemorrhage
0.00%
0/354
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
0.29%
1/349 • Number of events 1
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
melaena
0.28%
1/354 • Number of events 1
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
0.00%
0/349
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
pyoderma gangrenosum
0.00%
0/354
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
0.29%
1/349 • Number of events 1
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
urticaria
0.28%
1/354 • Number of events 1
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
0.00%
0/349
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
haemarthrosis
0.28%
1/354 • Number of events 1
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
0.00%
0/349
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
joint contracture
0.00%
0/354
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
0.29%
1/349 • Number of events 1
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
General disorders
pyrexia
0.00%
0/354
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
0.29%
1/349 • Number of events 1
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
0.00%
0/354
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
0.29%
1/349 • Number of events 1
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
Investigations
Aspartate aminotransferase increased
0.00%
0/354
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
0.29%
1/349 • Number of events 1
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
Investigations
C-reactive protein increased
0.00%
0/354
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
0.29%
1/349 • Number of events 1
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Femoral neck fracture
0.00%
0/354
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
0.29%
1/349 • Number of events 1
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Lumbar vertebral fracture
0.28%
1/354 • Number of events 1
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
0.00%
0/349
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Wound complication
0.28%
1/354 • Number of events 1
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
0.00%
0/349
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Ligament rupture
0.28%
1/354 • Number of events 1
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
0.00%
0/349
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
DU-176b
n=354 participants at risk
DU-176b oral tablets, 30 mg., taken once daily for 2 weeks edoxaban
Enoxaparin Sodium
n=349 participants at risk
enoxaparin sodium 20mg(=2000IU)/0.2ml twice daily, subcutaneous injection for 2 weeks enoxaparin sodium
Vascular disorders
wound haemorrhage
5.1%
18/354 • Number of events 19
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
2.9%
10/349 • Number of events 10
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Haemorrhage subcutaneous
6.2%
22/354 • Number of events 25
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
8.0%
28/349 • Number of events 30
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
7.1%
25/354 • Number of events 25
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
26.9%
94/349 • Number of events 94
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
Investigations
Aspartate aminotransferase increased
3.4%
12/354 • Number of events 12
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
24.9%
87/349 • Number of events 87
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
Investigations
Gamma-glutamyltransferase increased
9.3%
33/354 • Number of events 33
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
18.3%
64/349 • Number of events 65
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
Investigations
blood urine present
9.6%
34/354 • Number of events 35
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
8.9%
31/349 • Number of events 32
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
Infections and infestations
Cystitis
2.3%
8/354 • Number of events 8
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
1.7%
6/349 • Number of events 6
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
4.5%
16/354 • Number of events 16
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
4.3%
15/349 • Number of events 15
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
rash
2.5%
9/354 • Number of events 9
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
1.1%
4/349 • Number of events 4
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
3.4%
12/354 • Number of events 12
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
2.9%
10/349 • Number of events 12
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
2.5%
9/354 • Number of events 9
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
2.0%
7/349 • Number of events 7
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Haemarthrosis
2.0%
7/354 • Number of events 7
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
2.0%
7/349 • Number of events 7
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
Investigations
Blood bilirubin increased
4.0%
14/354 • Number of events 14
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
2.0%
7/349 • Number of events 8
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
Investigations
Blood lactate dehydrogenase increased
1.7%
6/354 • Number of events 6
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
4.6%
16/349 • Number of events 16
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
Investigations
Blood triglycerides increased
2.5%
9/354 • Number of events 9
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
1.7%
6/349 • Number of events 6
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
Investigations
Haemoglobin decreased
9.6%
34/354 • Number of events 35
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
8.9%
31/349 • Number of events 32
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
Investigations
Blood alkaline phosphatase increased
9.6%
34/354 • Number of events 35
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.
8.9%
31/349 • Number of events 32
The Safety Analysis Set was defined as all subjects who were enrolled in the study, but excluded those who had significant GCP violations, who did not receive any doses of the study drug, or who had no safety data after the start of study treatment.

Additional Information

Kei Ibusuki, Associate Director

Daiichi Sankyo.,LTD

Phone: 81-90-2732-9505

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee PI shall not publish the results of the Study at any time without the prior written approval of Sponsor.
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER