Trial Outcomes & Findings for Comparison Study of Narrow Band Imaging Versus White Light Resection in Patients With Bladder Tumors/Cancer (NCT NCT01180478)

NCT ID: NCT01180478

Last Updated: 2018-04-25

Results Overview

The primary outcome measure was recurrence rate at 1 year. A recurrence was defined as the new occurrence of a bladder cancer at the same site as or at a different site from the index cancer.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

965 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

1 year after treatment

Results posted on

2018-04-25

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Narrow Band Imaging
Narrow Band Imaging (NBI) Narrow Band Imaging: Narrow Band Imaging
White Light Trans Urethral Resection
White Light Trans Urethral Resection White Light: White Light Cystoscopy
Overall Study
STARTED
484
481
Overall Study
COMPLETED
303
293
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
181
188

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

Comparison Study of Narrow Band Imaging Versus White Light Resection in Patients With Bladder Tumors/Cancer

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Narrow Band Imaging
n=484 Participants
Narrow Band Imaging (NBI) Narrow Band Imaging: Narrow Band Imaging
White Light Trans Urethral Resection
n=481 Participants
White Light Trans Urethral Resection White Light: White Light Cystoscopy
Total
n=965 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
65.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.5 • n=93 Participants
66.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.3 • n=4 Participants
66.24 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.41 • n=27 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
94 Participants
n=93 Participants
98 Participants
n=4 Participants
192 Participants
n=27 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
390 Participants
n=93 Participants
383 Participants
n=4 Participants
773 Participants
n=27 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Austria
4 Participants
n=93 Participants
8 Participants
n=4 Participants
12 Participants
n=27 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
52 Participants
n=93 Participants
40 Participants
n=4 Participants
92 Participants
n=27 Participants
Region of Enrollment
China
41 Participants
n=93 Participants
34 Participants
n=4 Participants
75 Participants
n=27 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Czechia
51 Participants
n=93 Participants
67 Participants
n=4 Participants
118 Participants
n=27 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Hong Kong
23 Participants
n=93 Participants
17 Participants
n=4 Participants
40 Participants
n=27 Participants
Region of Enrollment
India
14 Participants
n=93 Participants
13 Participants
n=4 Participants
27 Participants
n=27 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Italy
3 Participants
n=93 Participants
10 Participants
n=4 Participants
13 Participants
n=27 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Japan
97 Participants
n=93 Participants
75 Participants
n=4 Participants
172 Participants
n=27 Participants
Region of Enrollment
South Korea
43 Participants
n=93 Participants
48 Participants
n=4 Participants
91 Participants
n=27 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Norway
13 Participants
n=93 Participants
16 Participants
n=4 Participants
29 Participants
n=27 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Romania
29 Participants
n=93 Participants
30 Participants
n=4 Participants
59 Participants
n=27 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Russia
9 Participants
n=93 Participants
13 Participants
n=4 Participants
22 Participants
n=27 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
9 Participants
n=93 Participants
13 Participants
n=4 Participants
22 Participants
n=27 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Netherlands
41 Participants
n=93 Participants
38 Participants
n=4 Participants
79 Participants
n=27 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Turkey
38 Participants
n=93 Participants
39 Participants
n=4 Participants
77 Participants
n=27 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
11 Participants
n=93 Participants
17 Participants
n=4 Participants
28 Participants
n=27 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United Arab Emirates
6 Participants
n=93 Participants
3 Participants
n=4 Participants
9 Participants
n=27 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 1 year after treatment

The primary outcome measure was recurrence rate at 1 year. A recurrence was defined as the new occurrence of a bladder cancer at the same site as or at a different site from the index cancer.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Narrow Band Imaging
n=484 Participants
White Light
n=481 Participants
Number of Participants With Recurrence and Recurrence Rate at 1 Year Following Narrow Band Imaging and TURB (Arm A) Versus White Light Trans Urethral Resection of Bladder Cancer (TURB) (Arm B) in Patients With Non Muscle Invasive (pTa/T1) Bladder Cancer.
104 Participants
109 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 3 months after treatment

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Narrow Band Imaging
n=484 Participants
White Light
n=481 Participants
Number of Participants With Persistence/Recurrence of Tumors at First 3 Month Follow up After NBI Versus WL Cystoscopy and Tumor Resection
59 Participants
61 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 30 days

Population: The Clavien grading of perioperative complications variable contains missings, therefore the valid percentages are presented in the outcome measure data table. The NBI group had 2 missing values, and the WL group had 3 missing values. Therfore, the overall number deviates from 484 and 481. Below shown is a categorical variable with 8 categories

Grade I Any deviation from the normal postoperative course without the need for pharmacological treatment or surgical, endoscopic and radiological interventions. Grade II Requiring pharmacological treatment with drugs other than those allowed for grade I complications. Blood transfusions and total parenteral nutrition are also included. Grade III Requiring surgical, endoscopic or radiological intervention Grade III-a Intervention not under general anaesthesia Grade III-b Intervention under general anaesthesia Grade IV Life-threatening complication (including CNS complications: brain haemorrhage, ischaemic stroke, subarachnoid bleeding, but excluding transient ischaemic attacks) requiring IC/ICU management Grade IV-a Single organ dysfunction (including dialysis) Grade IV-b Multi-organ dysfunction Grade V Death of a patient

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Narrow Band Imaging
n=482 Participants
White Light
n=478 Participants
Peri-operative Morbidity (30 Days) of TURB Between NBI and WL Resection Using the Clavien System.
None
415 Participants
429 Participants
Peri-operative Morbidity (30 Days) of TURB Between NBI and WL Resection Using the Clavien System.
I
28 Participants
19 Participants
Peri-operative Morbidity (30 Days) of TURB Between NBI and WL Resection Using the Clavien System.
II
23 Participants
21 Participants
Peri-operative Morbidity (30 Days) of TURB Between NBI and WL Resection Using the Clavien System.
IIIA
11 Participants
4 Participants
Peri-operative Morbidity (30 Days) of TURB Between NBI and WL Resection Using the Clavien System.
IIIB
3 Participants
5 Participants
Peri-operative Morbidity (30 Days) of TURB Between NBI and WL Resection Using the Clavien System.
IVA
0 Participants
0 Participants
Peri-operative Morbidity (30 Days) of TURB Between NBI and WL Resection Using the Clavien System.
IVB
0 Participants
0 Participants
Peri-operative Morbidity (30 Days) of TURB Between NBI and WL Resection Using the Clavien System.
V
2 Participants
0 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: peri-operative

Population: The variables contain missing values, therefore the numbers in the below table differs from the overall numbers reported

We looked at different perioperative complications in order to discover peri-operative morbidity after instrumental treatment. The following variables were analyzed: Bleeding, Fever, UTI, Bladder cramps, DVT, CVA/TIA, Lung embolism, Sepsis, Acute Abdomen, and Other perioperative complications.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Narrow Band Imaging
n=484 Participants
White Light
n=481 Participants
Risk Factors for the Development of Peri-operative Morbidity After Instrumental Treatment.
Bleeding
36 Participants
27 Participants
Risk Factors for the Development of Peri-operative Morbidity After Instrumental Treatment.
Fever
9 Participants
7 Participants
Risk Factors for the Development of Peri-operative Morbidity After Instrumental Treatment.
UTI
8 Participants
10 Participants
Risk Factors for the Development of Peri-operative Morbidity After Instrumental Treatment.
Bladder cramps
19 Participants
10 Participants
Risk Factors for the Development of Peri-operative Morbidity After Instrumental Treatment.
DVT
0 Participants
0 Participants
Risk Factors for the Development of Peri-operative Morbidity After Instrumental Treatment.
CVA/TIA
2 Participants
0 Participants
Risk Factors for the Development of Peri-operative Morbidity After Instrumental Treatment.
Lung embolism
0 Participants
0 Participants
Risk Factors for the Development of Peri-operative Morbidity After Instrumental Treatment.
Sepsis
2 Participants
0 Participants
Risk Factors for the Development of Peri-operative Morbidity After Instrumental Treatment.
Acute Abdomen
1 Participants
1 Participants
Risk Factors for the Development of Peri-operative Morbidity After Instrumental Treatment.
Other perioperative complication
9 Participants
13 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Until 135 days

Population: Only 61 of the patients in the total population in the NBI group, and 69 of the patients in the total population of the WL group received a Re-TURBT after initial TURBT (within 135 days). These numbers therefore differ and deviate from the Participant Flow module.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Narrow Band Imaging
n=61 Participants
White Light
n=70 Participants
Recurrence Rate Related to Additional Treatment Following TURB.
27 participants
27 participants

Adverse Events

Narrow Band Imaging

Serious events: 25 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

White Light Trans Urethral Resection

Serious events: 27 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Narrow Band Imaging
n=484 participants at risk
Narrow Band Imaging (NBI) Narrow Band Imaging: Narrow Band Imaging
White Light Trans Urethral Resection
n=481 participants at risk
White Light Trans Urethral Resection White Light: White Light Cystoscopy
Infections and infestations
urinary tract infection
0.21%
1/484
Only Serious Adverse Events were monitored
0.21%
1/481
Only Serious Adverse Events were monitored
Hepatobiliary disorders
galbladder carcinoma
0.00%
0/484
Only Serious Adverse Events were monitored
0.21%
1/481
Only Serious Adverse Events were monitored
Renal and urinary disorders
radical cystectomy
0.21%
1/484
Only Serious Adverse Events were monitored
0.00%
0/481
Only Serious Adverse Events were monitored
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
lung adenocarcinoma
0.00%
0/484
Only Serious Adverse Events were monitored
0.21%
1/481
Only Serious Adverse Events were monitored
Renal and urinary disorders
hydronephrosis
0.21%
1/484
Only Serious Adverse Events were monitored
0.00%
0/481
Only Serious Adverse Events were monitored
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
hip's fracture
0.00%
0/484
Only Serious Adverse Events were monitored
0.21%
1/481
Only Serious Adverse Events were monitored
Vascular disorders
cardiogenic embolism
0.21%
1/484
Only Serious Adverse Events were monitored
0.00%
0/481
Only Serious Adverse Events were monitored
Renal and urinary disorders
transurethral urethrotomy
0.21%
1/484
Only Serious Adverse Events were monitored
0.00%
0/481
Only Serious Adverse Events were monitored
Infections and infestations
campylobacter colitis
0.00%
0/484
Only Serious Adverse Events were monitored
0.21%
1/481
Only Serious Adverse Events were monitored
Gastrointestinal disorders
rectorrhagia
0.00%
0/484
Only Serious Adverse Events were monitored
0.21%
1/481
Only Serious Adverse Events were monitored
Gastrointestinal disorders
patient died of intestinal obstruction
0.21%
1/484
Only Serious Adverse Events were monitored
0.21%
1/481
Only Serious Adverse Events were monitored
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
patient died of chest infection
0.21%
1/484
Only Serious Adverse Events were monitored
0.21%
1/481
Only Serious Adverse Events were monitored
General disorders
patient died of unknown cause
0.41%
2/484
Only Serious Adverse Events were monitored
0.42%
2/481
Only Serious Adverse Events were monitored
Vascular disorders
cerebrovascular attack
0.21%
1/484
Only Serious Adverse Events were monitored
0.00%
0/481
Only Serious Adverse Events were monitored
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
patient died by car accident
0.00%
0/484
Only Serious Adverse Events were monitored
0.21%
1/481
Only Serious Adverse Events were monitored
Cardiac disorders
patient died of cardiac arrest
0.21%
1/484
Only Serious Adverse Events were monitored
0.21%
1/481
Only Serious Adverse Events were monitored
Renal and urinary disorders
patient died of bladder cancer
0.41%
2/484
Only Serious Adverse Events were monitored
1.0%
5/481
Only Serious Adverse Events were monitored
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
obturator kick
0.21%
1/484
Only Serious Adverse Events were monitored
0.00%
0/481
Only Serious Adverse Events were monitored
Renal and urinary disorders
patient died by renal insuffiency and prostate cancer
0.21%
1/484
Only Serious Adverse Events were monitored
0.00%
0/481
Only Serious Adverse Events were monitored
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
acute exacerbation of COPD
0.00%
0/484
Only Serious Adverse Events were monitored
0.21%
1/481
Only Serious Adverse Events were monitored
Gastrointestinal disorders
herniainguinalis
0.00%
0/484
Only Serious Adverse Events were monitored
0.21%
1/481
Only Serious Adverse Events were monitored
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
patient died of respiratory insuffiency by bilaterial pneumonia
0.21%
1/484
Only Serious Adverse Events were monitored
0.00%
0/481
Only Serious Adverse Events were monitored
Vascular disorders
pulmonary embolism
0.00%
0/484
Only Serious Adverse Events were monitored
0.21%
1/481
Only Serious Adverse Events were monitored
Infections and infestations
acute prostatitis
0.00%
0/484
Only Serious Adverse Events were monitored
0.21%
1/481
Only Serious Adverse Events were monitored
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
patient died of another neoplasm
0.21%
1/484
Only Serious Adverse Events were monitored
0.00%
0/481
Only Serious Adverse Events were monitored
Renal and urinary disorders
transurethral resection prostate
0.00%
0/484
Only Serious Adverse Events were monitored
0.21%
1/481
Only Serious Adverse Events were monitored
Renal and urinary disorders
transurethral urinary resection
0.00%
0/484
Only Serious Adverse Events were monitored
0.21%
1/481
Only Serious Adverse Events were monitored
Renal and urinary disorders
patient died of kidney failure
0.00%
0/484
Only Serious Adverse Events were monitored
0.21%
1/481
Only Serious Adverse Events were monitored
Cardiac disorders
patient died of heart attack
0.21%
1/484
Only Serious Adverse Events were monitored
0.00%
0/481
Only Serious Adverse Events were monitored
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
urethral injury occurred at time of TUR
0.21%
1/484
Only Serious Adverse Events were monitored
0.00%
0/481
Only Serious Adverse Events were monitored
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
patient died of cancer
0.21%
1/484
Only Serious Adverse Events were monitored
0.00%
0/481
Only Serious Adverse Events were monitored
Renal and urinary disorders
hematuria
0.00%
0/484
Only Serious Adverse Events were monitored
0.21%
1/481
Only Serious Adverse Events were monitored
Infections and infestations
infection of unknown origin
0.00%
0/484
Only Serious Adverse Events were monitored
0.21%
1/481
Only Serious Adverse Events were monitored
General disorders
euthanasia
0.00%
0/484
Only Serious Adverse Events were monitored
0.21%
1/481
Only Serious Adverse Events were monitored
Cardiac disorders
patient died of asystolia
0.21%
1/484
Only Serious Adverse Events were monitored
0.00%
0/481
Only Serious Adverse Events were monitored
Hepatobiliary disorders
patient died of biliary tract cancer
0.21%
1/484
Only Serious Adverse Events were monitored
0.00%
0/481
Only Serious Adverse Events were monitored
Gastrointestinal disorders
patient died of pancreas cancer
0.21%
1/484
Only Serious Adverse Events were monitored
0.00%
0/481
Only Serious Adverse Events were monitored
Infections and infestations
patient died of septicaemia
0.21%
1/484
Only Serious Adverse Events were monitored
0.00%
0/481
Only Serious Adverse Events were monitored
Renal and urinary disorders
radical cystectomy + bricker
0.21%
1/484
Only Serious Adverse Events were monitored
0.00%
0/481
Only Serious Adverse Events were monitored

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

J. de la Rosette, chairman CROES

CROES

Phone: +31 20 5666030

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place