Physiotherapy on the Airway of Bruxist Children

NCT ID: NCT01178229

Last Updated: 2010-08-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE1/PHASE2

Total Enrollment

26 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-01-31

Study Completion Date

2007-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Objective: to evaluate the effects of physiotherapy on the anteroposterior airway size in a group of bruxist children

Question: Is a physiotherapeutic technique aiming at changing the head posture, effective to increase the anteroposterior dimensions of the upper airway in bruxist children?

Hypothesis: The bruxist children treated with physiotherapy will present higher airway dimensions

Design: randomized clinical trial with allocation and blinding of the examiners.

Participants: 3 to 6 year old children with complete primary dentition, dental and skeletal class I occlusion. The participants were classified as bruxist according to the minimal criteria of the ICSD for bruxism. The children were randomized in an experimental (n=13) and a control (n=13) group.

Intervention: A physiotherapeutic intervention using the Awareness through movement technique was applied to the children of the experimental group once a week, until 10 sessions were completed.

Outcome measures: anteroposterior measurements of the nasopharynx, oropharynx and hypopharynx taken in a lateral cephalogram with standardized techniques.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The physiotherapeutic intervention was based on the Awareness Through Movement (ATM) (Goldman 2003, Malmgren-Olson et al 2001) technique. It is an established method of movement re-education where coordination and posture are significant factors. Its proponents believe more effective and efficient actions can emerge from guided exploration of movement that promotes improved attention and awareness and refines the ability to detect information and make perceptual discriminations.

"Awareness through Movement" (ATM) (Stephens et al 2006) is a process which facilitates the learning of strategies for improving organization and coordination of body movement by developing spatial and kinesthetic awareness of body-segment relationships at rest and during motion, awareness of ease of movement, reducing effort in action, and increasing learning of feeling the muscles longer in action and while breathing .

Ten physiotherapeutic sessions were planed during a ten week period, all of them based in children games. Each session lasted three hours.

The children of the experimental group and their parents were guided by two expert physiotherapist previously standardized and the sessions took place in a room rounded by mirrors, where the children were able to see their own movements. The parents helped their own children during the session and in their home plan indicated weekly.

Each session pursued the following steps:

1. Presentation to the parents of the somatic awareness technique for each day.
2. Movements, games, motor tales and exercises performed by the children, guided by the parents and with the guide of the physiotherapists.
3. In each session, a guide book with cartoons was given to the children and their parents to reinforce the exercises at home to keep a long-term result regarding the body and head posture. The guide book was designed and created by physiotherapists, teachers and advertisers that were not participating in the study.
4. After the first session, a feedback was given before starting the next session, so the exercises at home and the difficulties were reviewed and solved.

All the children assisted together to all the sessions and the instructions and instruments given to the children and their parents were the same for all of them.

Error of method There were not statistically significant differences, regarding the age of the two groups.

Standardizations of the examiners and calibration of all the techniques to evaluate the children regarding the clinical examination and the physiotherapeutic evaluation were made on 12 subjects different from the ones included in the investigation. The Intratester (ICC\> 0.9 2-way ANOVA) and intertester error (Kappa \> 0.7) were not statistically significant.

A calibration of the x-ray technique and a standardization of the digital tracing of both the cephalogram were also performed. The tracing of the cephalogram was standardized between three investigators with 5 x-rays, scanned and traced two times each by each of three of the investigators. To determine the Intratester and intertester reliability, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC \> 0.3) and Kappa test were applied.

A lateral cephalogram was taken before and immediately after the 10 session physiotherapeutic intervention for each child with the Natural Head Posture technique, described previously by different authors (Solow and Tallgren 1976). The technique is reproducible (Siersbaek-Nielsen and Solow 1982) and allows the clinician to evaluate the natural position of the cervical vertebras and the inclination of the cervical column and head posture.

Afterwards, the digital record of lateral cephalograms were processed in agree with Sayinsu et al 2006, using a program developed under Matlab 5.3 (MathWorks, Inc., MA. USA). Anteroposterior measurements of the nasopharynx, oropharynx and hypopharynx were taken in a lateral cephalogram with standardized techniques.

The method error ranged from 0.27 to 0.64 degrees and the coefficients of reliability from 0.97 to 1.00

Data analysis The sample size was calculated with a confidence of 95% and a statistical power of 80%. The number of subjects required in each group in order to make the comparisons was 12.

Distributions were tested using the Shapiro-Wilk test. The data were compared using the Mann Whitney and chi square tests. For all tests, significance was set at 5% (p \< 0.05). Comparisons among and between groups were performed for all the variables (measurements of the airway) in order to answer the research question.

Results: Statistically significant increases were found for the measurements of the oropharynx (3 mm increase. 95% CI 0.22 to 0.32) and hypopharynx (3 mm increase 95% CI 0.11 to 0.20) for the children that received treatment with physiotherapy.

Conclusion: The physical therapy to change the head posture in bruxist children was useful to increase some of the dimensions of the airway in bruxist children.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Sleep Bruxism Airway Remodeling Physical Therapy Modalities

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Physiotherapy

group of bruxist children that received physiotherapy to change the head posture

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Physiotherapy

Intervention Type OTHER

The physiotherapeutic intervention was based on the Awareness through Movement technique. Ten sessions were planed. Each session lasted three hours.

The children of the experimental group and their parents were guided by two physiotherapist and the sessions took place in a room rounded by mirrors.

Each session developed as follows: presentation to the parents of the somatic awareness technique for each day; movements, games, motor tales and exercises performed by the children; in each session, a guide book with cartoons was given to the children and their parents to reinforce the exercises at home to keep a long-term result.

All the children assisted together to all the sessions and the instructions and instruments given to the children and their parents were the same for all of them.

Control

Group of bruxist children that did not receive treatment

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Physiotherapy

The physiotherapeutic intervention was based on the Awareness through Movement technique. Ten sessions were planed. Each session lasted three hours.

The children of the experimental group and their parents were guided by two physiotherapist and the sessions took place in a room rounded by mirrors.

Each session developed as follows: presentation to the parents of the somatic awareness technique for each day; movements, games, motor tales and exercises performed by the children; in each session, a guide book with cartoons was given to the children and their parents to reinforce the exercises at home to keep a long-term result.

All the children assisted together to all the sessions and the instructions and instruments given to the children and their parents were the same for all of them.

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Awareness through movement

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All the children accomplished the minimal criteria of the International Classification of Sleep Disorders (ICSD) for sleep bruxism.
* High anxiety level according to the Conners' Parents' Rating Scales.
* Three to six year old.

Exclusion Criteria

* Skeletal malocclusions confirmed with cephalometric x-rays
* Dental malocclusions confirmed with dental casts.
* The reports of respiratory diseases.
* Presence of mouth breathing.
* Functional alterations in the body posture, due to any illness
Minimum Eligible Age

3 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

6 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

CES University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Director CES-LPH Research Group. CES University

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Claudia Restrepo, DDS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Director CES-LPH Research Group

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CES Sabaneta Physiotheray Center

Sabaneta, Antioquia, Colombia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Colombia

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

via aerea 01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.