The Effectiveness of Personalized Stroke Risk Communication
NCT ID: NCT01178060
Last Updated: 2010-08-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
90 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2008-09-30
2009-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Stroke Education Intervention Trial - Pilot
NCT01115660
Early Versus Late Initiation of Anticoagulation in Mild-to-moderate AIS Patients With NVAF
NCT06057467
REcurrent Stroke Prevention Through Personalized Education by Clinical Trainers (RESPPECT Trial)
NCT03861494
Intravenous Thrombosis and Patients with Prior Ischemic Stroke Within 3 Months
NCT06841978
New Oral Anticoagulants (NOAC) in Stroke Patients
NCT03826927
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In 2005, over 17,000 patients were treated for stroke within the VA with a cost of almost $315 million. Prevention of stroke through reduction of established risk factors is an essential part of the VA Stroke QUERI strategic plan for the VA. In spite of this, in the Veterans Affairs, only 13% of patients with known CVD achieve target BP and cholesterol control. Combining risk factors into a composite measure of risk offers a better global assessment of individual risk and is recommended by the American Heart Association and American Stroke Association for prioritizing interventions. This practice is rarely done in routine clinical practice and its use as a tool to motivate patient behavior has not been tested. Current evidence from VA patients suggests that patients with hypertension do not adequately translate their risk factors into an accurate estimation of stroke risk. Improving the accuracy of stroke risk perceptions may be particularly important in motivating risk reduction in patients.
Objectives:
The objectives of this study are to: 1.) Assess the impact of personalized stroke risk communication to patients at risk for stroke on patient knowledge, beliefs, and preferences for risk reduction behaviors. 2.) Evaluate the impact of personalized risk communication on medication adherence and blood pressure. 3.) Explore the feasibility and obtain sample size estimates for a larger, investigator initiative research (IIR) application testing this tool.
Methods:
A two-group randomized controlled trial testing a personalized risk communication intervention compared to an education-only control group was conducted. Eighty-nine patients were randomized and followed for 3months. Both groups received written and verbal patient education on stroke risk factors and prevention. Patients in the intervention arm also received personalized risk communication based on the Framingham stroke and coronary heart disease risk scores. A verbal and graphic presentation of their personal risk, risk relative to an age matched cohort, and their optimal or target risk based on optimal risk factor modification was presented. Outcomes measured immediately following the intervention and at 3months included: risk perception and worry; risk factor knowledge; decision preference and conflict; medication adherence; health behaviors; and blood pressure.
Status:
The study finished enrollment and all follow-up visits have been completed. The data from this project is being analyzed.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
FACTORIAL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Personalized Risk Information
Patients received personalized stroke and heart attack risk assessment information.
Personalized Heart Attack and Stroke Risk
Personalized assessment of heart attack and stroke risk based on 10yr predictors with individual risk factors.
Standard Education
Patients received general risk information on heart attack and stroke.
Standard Education
Patients received a general handout describing risk factors for heart attack and stroke.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Personalized Heart Attack and Stroke Risk
Personalized assessment of heart attack and stroke risk based on 10yr predictors with individual risk factors.
Standard Education
Patients received a general handout describing risk factors for heart attack and stroke.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age ≥ 55 years old
* Diagnosis ICD 401.0, 401.1, or 401.9 on outpatient electronic encounter forms in the prior year
* Received a prescription for hypertensive medication (ACE inhibitors, beta blockers, calcium channel blockers, diuretics, alpha1 blockers, and/or central alpha2 agonists) in the previous year
* Inadequate BP control based on an average of prior 12-month clinic BP measurements
* Have a baseline EKG within the last 5 years to evaluate the presence of left ventricular hypertrophy.
Exclusion Criteria
* Prior history of stroke
* Active diagnosis of psychosis or dementia documented in medical record
* Participating in another chronic disease self-management study
* Resident of a nursing home
* Does not have access to a telephone
* Refusal to provide informed consent
55 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Durham VA Medical Center
FED
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Durham VA Medical Center
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Hayden Bosworth, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Durham VA Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Durham VA Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Powers BJ, Danus S, Grubber JM, Olsen MK, Oddone EZ, Bosworth HB. The effectiveness of personalized coronary heart disease and stroke risk communication. Am Heart J. 2011 Apr;161(4):673-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.12.021.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
RRP 08-240
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.