Trial Outcomes & Findings for Effects of Lixisenatide Compared to Liraglutide on the Postprandial Plasma Glucose in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes (NCT NCT01175473)
NCT ID: NCT01175473
Last Updated: 2016-11-28
Results Overview
The area under the plasma glucose concentration time curve (GLU-AUC0:30-4:30h) was calculated using the linear trapezoidal rule from time of breakfast start (30 minutes after study drug administration \[time: 0.5 hours\] on Day 28) to 4 hours after breakfast start (time: 4.5 hours) and corrected by subtracting pre-breakfast plasma glucose concentration (time: 0.5 hours). GLU-AUC0:30-4:30h on Day -1 was the baseline. Change in GLU-AUC0:30-4:30h = GLU-AUC0:30-4:30h on Day 28 minus GLU-AUC0:30-4:30h on Day -1.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
148 participants
0.5 (8:00 clock time; prior to standardized breakfast), 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5 hours on Day -1 (baseline), 0.5 (prior to standardized breakfast), 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5 hours post study drug administration on Day 28
2016-11-28
Participant Flow
The study was conducted at 7 centers in Germany between August 03, 2010 and November 18, 2010.
A total of 259 patients were screened of which 111 (42.9%) were screen failures. A total of 148 patients were randomized.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Lixisenatide
1-step initiation regimen of lixisenatide: 10 microgram (mcg) once daily (QD) subcutaneously for 2 weeks, followed by 20 mcg QD up to Week 4.
|
Liraglutide
2-step initiation regimen of liraglutide: 0.6 milligram (mg) QD subcutaneously for 1 week, followed by 1.2 mg QD for 1 week, then 1.8 mg QD up to Week 4.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
77
|
71
|
|
Overall Study
Safety Population
|
77
|
71
|
|
Overall Study
Pharmacodynamic (PD) Population
|
75
|
68
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
75
|
69
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
2
|
2
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Lixisenatide
1-step initiation regimen of lixisenatide: 10 microgram (mcg) once daily (QD) subcutaneously for 2 weeks, followed by 20 mcg QD up to Week 4.
|
Liraglutide
2-step initiation regimen of liraglutide: 0.6 milligram (mg) QD subcutaneously for 1 week, followed by 1.2 mg QD for 1 week, then 1.8 mg QD up to Week 4.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
2
|
2
|
Baseline Characteristics
Effects of Lixisenatide Compared to Liraglutide on the Postprandial Plasma Glucose in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Lixisenatide
n=77 Participants
1-step initiation regimen of lixisenatide: 10 mcg QD subcutaneously for 2 weeks, followed by 20 mcg QD up to Week 4.
|
Liraglutide
n=71 Participants
2-step initiation regimen of liraglutide: 0.6 mg QD subcutaneously for 1 week, followed by 1.2 mg QD for 1 week, then 1.8 mg QD up to Week 4.
|
Total
n=148 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
60.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.5 • n=5 Participants
|
59.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.5 • n=7 Participants
|
60.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.0 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
28 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
21 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
49 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
49 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
50 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
99 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian/White
|
76 participants
n=5 Participants
|
71 participants
n=7 Participants
|
147 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Area Under Plasma Glucose Concentration Curve From Time 0.5 Hours to 4.5 Hours (GLU-AUC0:30-4:30h)
|
169.41 hour*milligram per deciliter (h*mg/dL)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 84.03 • n=5 Participants
|
183.86 hour*milligram per deciliter (h*mg/dL)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 100.89 • n=7 Participants
|
176.28 hour*milligram per deciliter (h*mg/dL)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 92.39 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Postprandial Plasma Glucose (PPG) Excursion
|
88.06 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 29.31 • n=5 Participants
|
88.06 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 35.86 • n=7 Participants
|
88.06 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 32.47 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Pro-insulin AUC(0:30-4:30h)
|
5.68 hour*micro international unit/milliliter
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.25 • n=5 Participants
|
6.54 hour*micro international unit/milliliter
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.40 • n=7 Participants
|
6.09 hour*micro international unit/milliliter
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.86 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Insulin AUC(0:30-4:30h)
|
99.55 hour*micro international unit/milliliter
STANDARD_DEVIATION 43.61 • n=5 Participants
|
93.24 hour*micro international unit/milliliter
STANDARD_DEVIATION 57.30 • n=7 Participants
|
96.55 hour*micro international unit/milliliter
STANDARD_DEVIATION 50.50 • n=5 Participants
|
|
C-Peptide AUC(0:30-4:30h)
|
10.61 hour*nanogram per milliliter (h*ng/mL)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.44 • n=5 Participants
|
9.99 hour*nanogram per milliliter (h*ng/mL)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.89 • n=7 Participants
|
10.31 hour*nanogram per milliliter (h*ng/mL)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.65 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Glucagon AUC(0:30-4:30h)
|
27.10 hour*picogram per milliliter (h*pg/mL)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 60.54 • n=5 Participants
|
16.47 hour*picogram per milliliter (h*pg/mL)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 78.98 • n=7 Participants
|
22.05 hour*picogram per milliliter (h*pg/mL)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 69.87 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)
|
7.20 percentage of hemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.63 • n=5 Participants
|
7.41 percentage of hemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.81 • n=7 Participants
|
7.30 percentage of hemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.72 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Peptide YY3-36 (PYY3-36) Concentration
0.5 h
|
17.60 picomole per liter (pmol/L)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.46 • n=5 Participants
|
17.83 picomole per liter (pmol/L)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.29 • n=7 Participants
|
17.71 picomole per liter (pmol/L)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.35 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Peptide YY3-36 (PYY3-36) Concentration
2.5 h
|
21.73 picomole per liter (pmol/L)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.83 • n=5 Participants
|
21.02 picomole per liter (pmol/L)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.19 • n=7 Participants
|
21.40 picomole per liter (pmol/L)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.62 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Peptide YY3-36 (PYY3-36) Concentration
4.5 h
|
21.98 picomole per liter (pmol/L)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.74 • n=5 Participants
|
20.88 picomole per liter (pmol/L)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.66 • n=7 Participants
|
21.46 picomole per liter (pmol/L)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.68 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Obestatin Concentration
0.5 h
|
0.24 nanomole per liter (nmol/L)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.12 • n=5 Participants
|
0.29 nanomole per liter (nmol/L)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.18 • n=7 Participants
|
0.26 nanomole per liter (nmol/L)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.15 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Obestatin Concentration
2.5 h
|
0.22 nanomole per liter (nmol/L)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.11 • n=5 Participants
|
0.26 nanomole per liter (nmol/L)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.15 • n=7 Participants
|
0.24 nanomole per liter (nmol/L)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.13 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Obestatin Concentration
4.5 h
|
0.24 nanomole per liter (nmol/L)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.12 • n=5 Participants
|
0.27 nanomole per liter (nmol/L)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.17 • n=7 Participants
|
0.25 nanomole per liter (nmol/L)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.15 • n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 0.5 (8:00 clock time; prior to standardized breakfast), 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5 hours on Day -1 (baseline), 0.5 (prior to standardized breakfast), 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5 hours post study drug administration on Day 28Population: Pharmacodynamic (PD) population (modified intent-to-treat \[mITT\] population) included all randomized patients, who received at least 1 dose of lixisenatide or liraglutide, and had both a baseline assessment and at least 1 post-baseline assessment of any pharmacodynamic variable, irrespective of compliance with the study protocol and procedures.
The area under the plasma glucose concentration time curve (GLU-AUC0:30-4:30h) was calculated using the linear trapezoidal rule from time of breakfast start (30 minutes after study drug administration \[time: 0.5 hours\] on Day 28) to 4 hours after breakfast start (time: 4.5 hours) and corrected by subtracting pre-breakfast plasma glucose concentration (time: 0.5 hours). GLU-AUC0:30-4:30h on Day -1 was the baseline. Change in GLU-AUC0:30-4:30h = GLU-AUC0:30-4:30h on Day 28 minus GLU-AUC0:30-4:30h on Day -1.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Lixisenatide
n=75 Participants
1-step initiation regimen of lixisenatide.
|
Liraglutide
n=68 Participants
2-step initiation regimen of liraglutide.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Area Under the Plasma Glucose Concentration Curve From Time 0.5 Hours to 4.5 Hours (GLU-AUC0:30-4:30h) at Day 28
|
-227.25 h*mg/dL
95% Confidence Interval 120.26 • Interval -246.88 to -207.61
|
-72.83 h*mg/dL
95% Confidence Interval 79.66 • Interval -93.19 to -52.46
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 0.5 (8:00 clock time; prior to standardized breakfast), 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5 hours on Day -1 (baseline), 0.5 (prior to standardized breakfast), 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5 hours post study drug administration on Day 28Population: PD population.
PPG excursion was determined on Day -1 (Baseline) and 28 as the maximum change in PPG from time of breakfast start (time: 0.5 hours) until 4 hours later subtracted from pre-meal plasma concentration.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Lixisenatide
n=75 Participants
1-step initiation regimen of lixisenatide.
|
Liraglutide
n=68 Participants
2-step initiation regimen of liraglutide.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Postprandial Plasma Glucose (PPG) Excursion at Day 28
|
-70.43 mg/dL
95% Confidence Interval 42.04 • Interval -77.83 to -63.03
|
-24.93 mg/dL
95% Confidence Interval 33.67 • Interval -32.57 to -17.29
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 0.5 (8:00 clock time; prior to standardized breakfast), 1, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5 hours on Day -1 (baseline), 0.5 (prior to standardized breakfast), 1, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5 hours post study drug administration on Day 28Population: PD population.
The area under the pro-insulin concentration time curve (AUC0:30-4:30h) was calculated using the linear trapezoidal rule from time of breakfast start (30 minutes after study drug administration \[time: 0.5 hours\] on Day 28) to 4 hours after breakfast start (time: 4.5 hours) and corrected by subtracting pre-breakfast pro-insulin concentration (time: 0.5 hours). Pro-insulin AUC0:30-4:30h on Day -1 was the baseline. Change in pro-insulin AUC0:30-4:30h = pro-insulin AUC0:30-4:30h on Day 28 minus pro-insulin AUC0:30-4:30h on Day -1.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Lixisenatide
n=75 Participants
1-step initiation regimen of lixisenatide.
|
Liraglutide
n=68 Participants
2-step initiation regimen of liraglutide.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Pro-insulin AUC(0:30-4:30h) at Day 28
|
-1.27 hour*micro international unit/milliliter
95% Confidence Interval 6.18 • Interval -2.36 to -0.18
|
-2.47 hour*micro international unit/milliliter
95% Confidence Interval 4.86 • Interval -3.59 to -1.34
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 0.5 (8:00 clock time; prior to standardized breakfast), 1, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5 hours on Day -1 (baseline), 0.5 (prior to standardized breakfast), 1, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5 hours post study drug administration on Day 28Population: PD population.
The area under the insulin concentration time curve (AUC0:30-4:30h) was calculated using the linear trapezoidal rule from time of breakfast start (30 minutes after study drug administration \[time: 0.5 hours\] on Day 28) to 4 hours after breakfast start (time: 4.5 hours) and corrected by subtracting pre-breakfast insulin concentration (time: 0.5 hours). Insulin AUC0:30-4:30h on Day -1 was the baseline. Change in insulin AUC0:30-4:30h = insulin AUC0:30-4:30h on Day 28 minus insulin AUC0:30-4:30h on Day -1.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Lixisenatide
n=75 Participants
1-step initiation regimen of lixisenatide.
|
Liraglutide
n=68 Participants
2-step initiation regimen of liraglutide.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Insulin AUC(0:30-4:30h) at Day 28
|
-64.22 hour*micro international unit/milliliter
95% Confidence Interval 59.74 • Interval -78.2 to -50.24
|
5.34 hour*micro international unit/milliliter
95% Confidence Interval 57.82 • Interval -9.16 to 19.84
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 0.5 (8:00 clock time; prior to standardized breakfast), 1, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5 hours on Day -1 (baseline), 0.5 (prior to standardized breakfast), 1, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5 hours post study drug administration on Day 28Population: PD population.
The area under the C-peptide concentration time curve (AUC0:30-4:30h) was calculated using the linear trapezoidal rule from time of breakfast start (30 minutes after study drug administration \[time: 0.5 hours\] on Day 28) to 4 hours after breakfast start (time: 4.5 hours) and corrected by subtracting pre-breakfast C-peptide concentration (time: 0.5 hours). C-peptide AUC0:30-4:30h on Day -1 was the baseline. Change in C-peptide AUC0:30-4:30h = C-peptide AUC0:30-4:30h on Day 28 minus C-peptide AUC0:30-4:30h on Day -1.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Lixisenatide
n=75 Participants
1-step initiation regimen of lixisenatide.
|
Liraglutide
n=68 Participants
2-step initiation regimen of liraglutide.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in C-Peptide AUC(0:30-4:30h) at Day 28
|
-5.03 h*ng/mL
95% Confidence Interval 5.97 • Interval -6.33 to -3.72
|
1.04 h*ng/mL
95% Confidence Interval 4.71 • Interval -0.31 to 2.39
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 0.5 (8:00 clock time; prior to standardized breakfast), 1, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5 hours on Day -1 (baseline), 0.5 (prior to standardized breakfast), 1, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5 hours post study drug administration on Day 28Population: PD population.
The area under the glucagon concentration time curve (AUC0:30-4:30h) was calculated using the linear trapezoidal rule from time of breakfast start (30 minutes after study drug administration \[time: 0.5 hours\] on Day 28) to 4 hours after breakfast start (time: 4.5 hours) and corrected by subtracting pre-breakfast glucagon concentration (time: 0.5 hours). Glucagon AUC0:30-4:30h on Day -1 was the baseline. Change in glucagon AUC0:30-4:30h = glucagon AUC0:30-4:30h on Day 28 minus glucagon AUC0:30-4:30h on Day -1.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Lixisenatide
n=75 Participants
1-step initiation regimen of lixisenatide.
|
Liraglutide
n=68 Participants
2-step initiation regimen of liraglutide.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Glucagon AUC(0:30-4:30h) at Day 28
|
-46.71 h*pg/mL
95% Confidence Interval 67.90 • Interval -61.6 to -31.83
|
-25.28 h*pg/mL
95% Confidence Interval 68.07 • Interval -40.65 to -9.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-dose (Hour 0) on Day 1 and 29 (that is, 24 hours post-dose on Day 28)Population: PD population. Here, number of patients analyzed = patients with post-baseline HbA1c assessment.
Change = HbA1c value at Day 29 (24 hours post-dose on Day 28) minus HbA1c value at baseline (pre-dose \[Hour 0\] on Day 1).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Lixisenatide
n=75 Participants
1-step initiation regimen of lixisenatide.
|
Liraglutide
n=67 Participants
2-step initiation regimen of liraglutide.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Day 29
|
-0.32 percentage of hemoglobin
95% Confidence Interval 0.30 • Interval -0.4 to -0.24
|
-0.45 percentage of hemoglobin
95% Confidence Interval 0.40 • Interval -0.54 to -0.37
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 0.5 (8:00 clock time; prior to standardized breakfast), 2.5, 4.5 hours on Day -1 (baseline), 0.5 (prior to standardized breakfast), 2.5, 4.5 hours post study drug administration on Day 28Population: PD population.
Change was calculated by subtracting time-matched baseline value from Day 28 value. Baseline value was the Day -1 time-matched PYY-36 assessment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Lixisenatide
n=75 Participants
1-step initiation regimen of lixisenatide.
|
Liraglutide
n=68 Participants
2-step initiation regimen of liraglutide.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Time-matched Baseline in Peptide YY3-36 (PYY3-36) Concentration at Day 28
Change at Day 28: 2.5 h
|
-7.09 pmol/L
Standard Deviation 8.38
|
-3.14 pmol/L
Standard Deviation 6.67
|
|
Change From Time-matched Baseline in Peptide YY3-36 (PYY3-36) Concentration at Day 28
Change at Day 28: 0.5 h
|
0.02 pmol/L
Standard Deviation 5.32
|
-0.79 pmol/L
Standard Deviation 6.77
|
|
Change From Time-matched Baseline in Peptide YY3-36 (PYY3-36) Concentration at Day 28
Change at Day 28: 4.5 h
|
-8.33 pmol/L
Standard Deviation 6.73
|
-2.47 pmol/L
Standard Deviation 7.66
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 0.5 (8:00 clock time; prior to standardized breakfast), 2.5, 4.5 hours on Day -1 (baseline), 0.5 (prior to standardized breakfast), 2.5, 4.5 hours post study drug administration on Day 28Population: PD population.
Change was calculated by subtracting time-matched baseline value from Day 28 value. Baseline value was the Day -1 time-matched obestatin assessment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Lixisenatide
n=75 Participants
1-step initiation regimen of lixisenatide.
|
Liraglutide
n=68 Participants
2-step initiation regimen of liraglutide.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Time-matched Baseline in Obestatin Concentration at Day 28
Change at Day 28: 0.5 h
|
0.04 nmol/L
Standard Deviation 0.09
|
0.02 nmol/L
Standard Deviation 0.11
|
|
Change From Time-matched Baseline in Obestatin Concentration at Day 28
Change at Day 28: 2.5 h
|
0.03 nmol/L
Standard Deviation 0.09
|
0.01 nmol/L
Standard Deviation 0.11
|
|
Change From Time-matched Baseline in Obestatin Concentration at Day 28
Change at Day 28: 4.5 h
|
-0.01 nmol/L
Standard Deviation 0.08
|
-0.01 nmol/L
Standard Deviation 0.12
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 0.5 (8:00 clock time; prior to standardized breakfast), 2.5, 4.5 hours on Day -1 (baseline), 0.5 (prior to standardized breakfast), 2.5, 4.5 hours post study drug administration on Day 28Population: PD population. Here, 'n' signifies patients with oxyntomodulin assessment at the specified time point.
Percentage of patients with oxyntomodulin level less than or equal to (\<=) limit of detection (LOD), above limit of quantification (LOQ) and between LOD and LOQ were reported. The LOD and LOQ values for oxyntomodulin were 70 and 200 picogram per milliliter (pg/mL) respectively.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Lixisenatide
n=75 Participants
1-step initiation regimen of lixisenatide.
|
Liraglutide
n=68 Participants
2-step initiation regimen of liraglutide.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentages of Patients by Ranges of Oxyntomodulin Levels
Day -1, 0.5 h: <=LOD (n = 75, 68)
|
33.3 percentage of participants
|
20.6 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentages of Patients by Ranges of Oxyntomodulin Levels
Day -1, 0.5 h: LOD-LOQ (n = 75, 68)
|
49.3 percentage of participants
|
55.9 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentages of Patients by Ranges of Oxyntomodulin Levels
Day -1, 0.5 h: >LOQ (n = 75, 68)
|
17.3 percentage of participants
|
23.5 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentages of Patients by Ranges of Oxyntomodulin Levels
Day -1, 2.5 h: <=LOD (n = 75, 68)
|
12.0 percentage of participants
|
8.8 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentages of Patients by Ranges of Oxyntomodulin Levels
Day -1, 2.5 h: LOD-LOQ (n = 75, 68)
|
25.3 percentage of participants
|
23.5 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentages of Patients by Ranges of Oxyntomodulin Levels
Day -1, 2.5 h: >LOQ (n = 75, 68)
|
62.7 percentage of participants
|
67.6 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentages of Patients by Ranges of Oxyntomodulin Levels
Day -1, 4.5 h: <=LOD (n = 75, 68)
|
17.3 percentage of participants
|
11.8 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentages of Patients by Ranges of Oxyntomodulin Levels
Day -1, 4.5 h: LOD-LOQ (n = 75, 68)
|
34.7 percentage of participants
|
39.7 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentages of Patients by Ranges of Oxyntomodulin Levels
Day -1, 4.5 h: >LOQ (n = 75, 68)
|
48.0 percentage of participants
|
48.5 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentages of Patients by Ranges of Oxyntomodulin Levels
Day 28, 0.5 h: <=LOD (n = 75, 68)
|
38.7 percentage of participants
|
30.9 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentages of Patients by Ranges of Oxyntomodulin Levels
Day 28, 0.5 h: LOD-LOQ (n = 75, 68)
|
40.0 percentage of participants
|
51.5 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentages of Patients by Ranges of Oxyntomodulin Levels
Day 28, 0.5 h: >LOQ (n = 75, 68)
|
21.3 percentage of participants
|
17.6 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentages of Patients by Ranges of Oxyntomodulin Levels
Day 28, 2.5 h: <=LOD (n = 74, 68)
|
52.7 percentage of participants
|
16.2 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentages of Patients by Ranges of Oxyntomodulin Levels
Day 28, 2.5 h: LOD-LOQ (n = 74, 68)
|
32.4 percentage of participants
|
48.5 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentages of Patients by Ranges of Oxyntomodulin Levels
Day 28, 2.5 h: >LOQ (n = 74, 68)
|
14.9 percentage of participants
|
35.3 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentages of Patients by Ranges of Oxyntomodulin Levels
Day 28, 4.5 h: <=LOD (n = 75, 68)
|
52.0 percentage of participants
|
20.6 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentages of Patients by Ranges of Oxyntomodulin Levels
Day 28, 4.5 h: LOD-LOQ (n = 75, 68)
|
33.3 percentage of participants
|
52.9 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentages of Patients by Ranges of Oxyntomodulin Levels
Day 28, 4.5 h: >LOQ (n = 75, 68)
|
14.7 percentage of participants
|
26.5 percentage of participants
|
Adverse Events
Lixisenatide
Liraglutide
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Lixisenatide
n=77 participants at risk
1-step initiation regimen of lixisenatide.
|
Liraglutide
n=71 participants at risk
2-step initiation regimen of liraglutide.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
3.9%
3/77 • First dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose administration, up to 31 days
Median exposure to study treatment was 28 days in both treatment arms. The analysis was performed on safety population, defined as all randomized patients who were exposed to at least 1 dose of study drug, regardless of the amount of treatment administered.
|
7.0%
5/71 • First dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose administration, up to 31 days
Median exposure to study treatment was 28 days in both treatment arms. The analysis was performed on safety population, defined as all randomized patients who were exposed to at least 1 dose of study drug, regardless of the amount of treatment administered.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Decreased appetite
|
18.2%
14/77 • First dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose administration, up to 31 days
Median exposure to study treatment was 28 days in both treatment arms. The analysis was performed on safety population, defined as all randomized patients who were exposed to at least 1 dose of study drug, regardless of the amount of treatment administered.
|
36.6%
26/71 • First dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose administration, up to 31 days
Median exposure to study treatment was 28 days in both treatment arms. The analysis was performed on safety population, defined as all randomized patients who were exposed to at least 1 dose of study drug, regardless of the amount of treatment administered.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
1.3%
1/77 • First dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose administration, up to 31 days
Median exposure to study treatment was 28 days in both treatment arms. The analysis was performed on safety population, defined as all randomized patients who were exposed to at least 1 dose of study drug, regardless of the amount of treatment administered.
|
5.6%
4/71 • First dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose administration, up to 31 days
Median exposure to study treatment was 28 days in both treatment arms. The analysis was performed on safety population, defined as all randomized patients who were exposed to at least 1 dose of study drug, regardless of the amount of treatment administered.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
11.7%
9/77 • First dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose administration, up to 31 days
Median exposure to study treatment was 28 days in both treatment arms. The analysis was performed on safety population, defined as all randomized patients who were exposed to at least 1 dose of study drug, regardless of the amount of treatment administered.
|
15.5%
11/71 • First dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose administration, up to 31 days
Median exposure to study treatment was 28 days in both treatment arms. The analysis was performed on safety population, defined as all randomized patients who were exposed to at least 1 dose of study drug, regardless of the amount of treatment administered.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal distension
|
6.5%
5/77 • First dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose administration, up to 31 days
Median exposure to study treatment was 28 days in both treatment arms. The analysis was performed on safety population, defined as all randomized patients who were exposed to at least 1 dose of study drug, regardless of the amount of treatment administered.
|
12.7%
9/71 • First dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose administration, up to 31 days
Median exposure to study treatment was 28 days in both treatment arms. The analysis was performed on safety population, defined as all randomized patients who were exposed to at least 1 dose of study drug, regardless of the amount of treatment administered.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
2.6%
2/77 • First dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose administration, up to 31 days
Median exposure to study treatment was 28 days in both treatment arms. The analysis was performed on safety population, defined as all randomized patients who were exposed to at least 1 dose of study drug, regardless of the amount of treatment administered.
|
7.0%
5/71 • First dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose administration, up to 31 days
Median exposure to study treatment was 28 days in both treatment arms. The analysis was performed on safety population, defined as all randomized patients who were exposed to at least 1 dose of study drug, regardless of the amount of treatment administered.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
2.6%
2/77 • First dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose administration, up to 31 days
Median exposure to study treatment was 28 days in both treatment arms. The analysis was performed on safety population, defined as all randomized patients who were exposed to at least 1 dose of study drug, regardless of the amount of treatment administered.
|
15.5%
11/71 • First dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose administration, up to 31 days
Median exposure to study treatment was 28 days in both treatment arms. The analysis was performed on safety population, defined as all randomized patients who were exposed to at least 1 dose of study drug, regardless of the amount of treatment administered.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dyspepsia
|
7.8%
6/77 • First dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose administration, up to 31 days
Median exposure to study treatment was 28 days in both treatment arms. The analysis was performed on safety population, defined as all randomized patients who were exposed to at least 1 dose of study drug, regardless of the amount of treatment administered.
|
16.9%
12/71 • First dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose administration, up to 31 days
Median exposure to study treatment was 28 days in both treatment arms. The analysis was performed on safety population, defined as all randomized patients who were exposed to at least 1 dose of study drug, regardless of the amount of treatment administered.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
22.1%
17/77 • First dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose administration, up to 31 days
Median exposure to study treatment was 28 days in both treatment arms. The analysis was performed on safety population, defined as all randomized patients who were exposed to at least 1 dose of study drug, regardless of the amount of treatment administered.
|
22.5%
16/71 • First dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose administration, up to 31 days
Median exposure to study treatment was 28 days in both treatment arms. The analysis was performed on safety population, defined as all randomized patients who were exposed to at least 1 dose of study drug, regardless of the amount of treatment administered.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
10.4%
8/77 • First dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose administration, up to 31 days
Median exposure to study treatment was 28 days in both treatment arms. The analysis was performed on safety population, defined as all randomized patients who were exposed to at least 1 dose of study drug, regardless of the amount of treatment administered.
|
7.0%
5/71 • First dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose administration, up to 31 days
Median exposure to study treatment was 28 days in both treatment arms. The analysis was performed on safety population, defined as all randomized patients who were exposed to at least 1 dose of study drug, regardless of the amount of treatment administered.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
3.9%
3/77 • First dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose administration, up to 31 days
Median exposure to study treatment was 28 days in both treatment arms. The analysis was performed on safety population, defined as all randomized patients who were exposed to at least 1 dose of study drug, regardless of the amount of treatment administered.
|
11.3%
8/71 • First dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose administration, up to 31 days
Median exposure to study treatment was 28 days in both treatment arms. The analysis was performed on safety population, defined as all randomized patients who were exposed to at least 1 dose of study drug, regardless of the amount of treatment administered.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
6.5%
5/77 • First dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose administration, up to 31 days
Median exposure to study treatment was 28 days in both treatment arms. The analysis was performed on safety population, defined as all randomized patients who were exposed to at least 1 dose of study drug, regardless of the amount of treatment administered.
|
5.6%
4/71 • First dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose administration, up to 31 days
Median exposure to study treatment was 28 days in both treatment arms. The analysis was performed on safety population, defined as all randomized patients who were exposed to at least 1 dose of study drug, regardless of the amount of treatment administered.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee If no publication has occurred within 12 months of the completion of the study, the Investigator shall have the right to publish/present independently the results of the study. The Investigator shall provide the Sponsor with a copy of any such presentation/publication for comment at least 30 days before any presentation/submission for publication. If requested by the Sponsor, any presentation/submission shall be delayed up to 90 days, to allow the Sponsor to preserve its proprietary rights.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER