A Trial of Rosuvastatin in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
NCT ID: NCT01170585
Last Updated: 2015-06-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
33 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-07-31
2014-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The aim of the study is to examine what effects Rosuvastatin, a cholesterol lowering drug, given to patients has on the degree of thickening of the arteries over the course of two years. We also want to see how it affects the function of the blood vessels and also of the heart.
Individuals who agree to participate will be randomly assigned into two groups. One group will be given the active drug whereas the other will have a placebo. Subjects in the study will all have a cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) scan before treatment, at 1 year and then 2 years at the end of the treatment. Each scan will involve imaging the carotid arteries in the neck, the arteries in the arm and also the heart. Individuals will continue to have regular out-patient reviews by their own team of doctors, regular blood tests will be taken to monitor the disease and also to ensure the safety and well being of the individual.
At the end of the 2 year study we hope that we will be able to slow down the rate of arterial thickening and retard any plaque build up in the arteries. We also want to see what effect rosuvastatin has on heart function. Ultimately, we hope to prove that people with SLE should be treated with a cholesterol lowering drug as part of their routine treatment.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Efficacy and Adverse Effect of Simvastatin Compare to Rosuvastatin in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Patients With Corticosteroid Therapy and High Low-Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol Level
NCT00866229
Lupus Atherosclerosis Prevention Study
NCT00120887
The Role of Anifrolumab in Improving Markers of Vascular Risk in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) - IFN-CVD
NCT05440422
Prevention of Atherosclerosis and Heart Disease in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosis (SLE)
NCT00054938
Centrally Acting ACE Inhibition in SLE
NCT04486118
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The range of cardiovascular manifestations is varied; it includes accelerated atherosclerosis, vascular inflammation (El-Magadmi, 2002) and ventricular dysfunction (Pieretti J, 2007). The presence of carotid atherosclerosis is a strong predictor of future cardiovascular events (Belcaro G, 1996) and as such, identification of plaque within the carotid arteries has been studied using ultrasound. Studies have also been conducted to investigate endothelial dysfunction and the relationship with SLE.
* Case studies of patients with SLE have shown patients with SLE have increased carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) on ultrasound (US) studies (Svenungsson E, 2001).
* US studies in SLE have reported endothelial dysfunction as demonstrated bu US flow mediated dilatation (FMD) (Lima DS, 2002, Celermaier DS, 1994).
* Ultrasound studies in SLE have demonstrated a significant correlation between dysfunctional endothelium (reduced flow-mediated dilatation/brachial artery reactivity) and carotid IMT (Raza K, 2000).
* Myocardial dysfunction, in particular, an increased left ventricular ejection fraction and mass due to left ventricular hypertrophy has been identified in this population (Chow PC, 2007, Pieretti J, 2007).
The excess cardiovascular risk in patients with SLE has been attributed to corticosteroid usage in the treatment of the condition and as such was given as the explanation of the increased atherosclerosis (Petri M, 1992, 1996). Although, corticosteroid therapy can itself cause hypertension, diabetes and dyslipidaemia, the cumulative steroid dose is also a surrogate marker for disease severity. Studies have also shown that patients with the condition are more hypertensive and have an increased tendency to be smokers (Asanuma Y, 2003). However, a separate study showed that despite a higher incidence of hypertension, diabetes and an earlier menopause, the 10 year Framingham risk score was the same as matched healthy controls (Bruce IN, 2003). This would suggest that the risk factors present in SLE are not adequately explained by the conventional cardiovascular risk assessment model. In fact, SLE itself is a strong independent risk factor for atherosclerosis. Due to the inflammatory nature of SLE it is consistent with the recent paradigm shift towards the concept of atherosclerosis as a disease of vascular inflammation. Vascular inflammation leads to endothelial and vascular damage which can predispose to atherosclerosis (Ross R, 1999).
The association of dyslipidemia and SLE has been demonstrated (Svenungsson E, 2001). There is elevation of LDL-cholesterol, triglycerides and lipoprotein (a)(Asanuma Y, 2003) with a decrease in HDL-cholesterol (Borba EF, 1994). Together with the elevation of alpha-1 anti-trypsin and homocysteine levels lead to conditions with are conducive for the development of atherosclerosis.
The mainstay of treatment of atherosclerosis in SLE is predominantly directed at controlling inflammation with aggressive conventional cardiovascular disease risk factor management with corticosteroids, anti-inflammatories and disease modifying drugs (cyclosporin A and azathioprine). For lipid management, it has been suggested that even in the absence of atherosclerosis, the LDL-cholesterol level should be \<2.6mmol/L. However, there has been limited clinical data to demonstrate the benefit of this approach (Wajed J,2004, Bruce IN, 2005).
There has been much published data on the effect of lipid lowering drugs or statins (HMG-Co A reductase inhibitors) and plaque regression (Corti,2001, 2005, Lima J, 2004). These trials demonstrated a significant reduction in the amount of plaque within the vessel wall as well as the reduction of LDL-cholesterol. A recently published randomised placebo-controlled trial (METEOR) (Crouse J, 2007)showed that rosuvastatin 40mg once daily over 2 years arrested carotid plaque progression which continued in the placebo group. This study was was highly significant (P\<0.01). In this study, carotid plaque and carotid intima media thickness (CIMT) was assessed by B-mode ultrasound. Such studies prove that there is a benefit of using statins in those with low risk or who have established plaque disease.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Placebo
randomised to placebo.
Placebo
Placebo
Active
randomised to rosuvastatin.
Rosuvastatin
All patients will be uptitrated from an initial start dose of 5mg to 20mg rosuvastatin. This will be given once a day for 2 years.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Rosuvastatin
All patients will be uptitrated from an initial start dose of 5mg to 20mg rosuvastatin. This will be given once a day for 2 years.
Placebo
Placebo
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Male or females who are 18-80years of age, inclusive at screening
* Female subjects who are post menopausal (i.e \>6mnths without menstrual period), surgically sterile, or using effective contraceptive measures at visit 0 and the same contraception throughout the study and for 30days after discontinuing treatment
* No current or previous statin therapy
* No current indication for statin therapy (Coronary artery disease; hypercholesterolemia, renal dysfunction)
* Subjects who have given their signed consent to participate in the study
Exclusion Criteria
* Contraindications for MRI - patients with pacemakers' defibrillators or pacing wires in the heart, or other metal implants such as metal in the eye, brain or spine. Other metallic devices or implants will have to be declared by the participant and assessed to be safe prior to having an MRI current or previous statin
* Known atherosclerotic valvular disease
* Renal dysfunction
* Hyperlipidemia
* Active myositis
* All forms of liver disease
* Pregnancy
* Breastfeeding
* Patients being treated with Cyclosporin A
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Imperial College London
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Dudley J Pennell, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
CMR Unit, Royal Brompton Hospital, London
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Imperial College NHS Trust
London, London, United Kingdom
North West London Hospitals NHS Trust
London, London, United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2006-006214-16
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.