24 Months Follow-up, Two Arm Study to Compare the Cardiovascular Profile in a Regimen With Everolimus + Mycophenolic Acid (MPA) Versus (vs.) a Regimen of CNI+MPA in Maintenance Renal Transplant Recipients
NCT ID: NCT01169701
Last Updated: 2015-12-07
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
71 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-08-31
2014-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Tacrolimus
Participants continued with the same tacrolimus+Mycophenolic acid (MPA) (Myfortic® or Cell-Cept®) doses that were taken before study initiation (tacrolimus levels 4-7 ng/ml).
Tacrolimus
Tacrolimus was administrated as Prograf® or Advagraf®, but could not be changed during study.
Mycophenolic acid (MPA)
Myfortic® (MFS) was given as 720-1440 mg/day or 360-1440 mg/day. Cell-Cept® (MMF) was given as 1000-2000 mg/day or 500-2000 mg/day.
Everolimus
Participants received an initial dose (day 1) of Everolimus (EVL) 2mg at night and tacrolimus (if taking Prograf®, a full dose of Prograf® in the morning and a 50% dose of Prograf® at night; if taking Advagraf®, a 75% dose in the morning. On days 2 and 3, participants took EVL 2 mg twice daily (bid) without tacrolimus. On days 4 and 5, the EVL dose was adjusted and levels maintained between 5-8 ng/mL. Participants also continued with their MPA doses that were taken prior to study initiation.
Everolimus
Everolimus was supplied in boxes with 60 tablets. Available tablets: 1.0 mg, 0.5 mg and 0.25 mg.
Tacrolimus
Tacrolimus was administrated as Prograf® or Advagraf®, but could not be changed during study.
Mycophenolic acid (MPA)
Myfortic® (MFS) was given as 720-1440 mg/day or 360-1440 mg/day. Cell-Cept® (MMF) was given as 1000-2000 mg/day or 500-2000 mg/day.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Everolimus
Everolimus was supplied in boxes with 60 tablets. Available tablets: 1.0 mg, 0.5 mg and 0.25 mg.
Tacrolimus
Tacrolimus was administrated as Prograf® or Advagraf®, but could not be changed during study.
Mycophenolic acid (MPA)
Myfortic® (MFS) was given as 720-1440 mg/day or 360-1440 mg/day. Cell-Cept® (MMF) was given as 1000-2000 mg/day or 500-2000 mg/day.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Receiving immunosuppressive regimen that includes tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid
* Between 18 and 70 years of age
* Willing to provide written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients who suffered from severe humoral and/or cellular rejection (≥ BANFF IIb, recurrent acute rejection or steroid resistant acute rejection in the previous years
* Patients who have severe hypercholesterolemia (\>350 mg/dL; \>9 mmol/L) or hypertriglyceridemia (\>500 mg/dL; \>8.5 mmol/L). Patients with controlled hyperlipidemia are acceptable.
* Diabetic patients
* Woman of child-bearing potential who is planning to become pregnant or is pregnant and/or lactating who is unwilling to use effective means of contraception
* Presence of psychiatric illness (i.e., schizophrenia, major depression) that, in the opinion of the site investigator, would interfere with study requirements
* Any other medical condition that, in the opinion of the site investigator based on recall or chart review would interfere with completing the study
* Receiving any investigational drug or have received any investigational drug within 30 days prior to study enrollment
18 Years
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Novartis Investigative Site
Málaga, Andalusia, Spain
Novartis Investigative Site
L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
Novartis Investigative Site
Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
Novartis Investigative Site
Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
Novartis Investigative Site
Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
Novartis Investigative Site
Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
Novartis Investigative Site
Madrid, Madrid, Spain
Novartis Investigative Site
Madrid, Madrid, Spain
Novartis Investigative Site
Madrid, Madrid, Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Cruzado JM, Pascual J, Sanchez-Fructuoso A, Seron D, Diaz JM, Rengel M, Oppenheimer F, Hernandez D, Paravisini A, Saval N, Morales JM; Evita Study Group. Controlled randomized study comparing the cardiovascular profile of everolimus with tacrolimus in renal transplantation. Transpl Int. 2016 Dec;29(12):1317-1328. doi: 10.1111/tri.12862. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2009-013780-19
Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
CRAD001AES07
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id