24 Months Follow-up, Two Arm Study to Compare the Cardiovascular Profile in a Regimen With Everolimus + Mycophenolic Acid (MPA) Versus (vs.) a Regimen of CNI+MPA in Maintenance Renal Transplant Recipients

NCT ID: NCT01169701

Last Updated: 2015-12-07

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

71 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-08-31

Study Completion Date

2014-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The objective of the study is to compare the cardiovascular profile of an everolimus and mycophenolic acid immunosuppressive regimen with a calcineurin inhibitor and mycophenolic acid regimen in maintenance renal transplant patients

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Renal Transplant

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Tacrolimus

Participants continued with the same tacrolimus+Mycophenolic acid (MPA) (Myfortic® or Cell-Cept®) doses that were taken before study initiation (tacrolimus levels 4-7 ng/ml).

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Tacrolimus

Intervention Type DRUG

Tacrolimus was administrated as Prograf® or Advagraf®, but could not be changed during study.

Mycophenolic acid (MPA)

Intervention Type DRUG

Myfortic® (MFS) was given as 720-1440 mg/day or 360-1440 mg/day. Cell-Cept® (MMF) was given as 1000-2000 mg/day or 500-2000 mg/day.

Everolimus

Participants received an initial dose (day 1) of Everolimus (EVL) 2mg at night and tacrolimus (if taking Prograf®, a full dose of Prograf® in the morning and a 50% dose of Prograf® at night; if taking Advagraf®, a 75% dose in the morning. On days 2 and 3, participants took EVL 2 mg twice daily (bid) without tacrolimus. On days 4 and 5, the EVL dose was adjusted and levels maintained between 5-8 ng/mL. Participants also continued with their MPA doses that were taken prior to study initiation.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Everolimus

Intervention Type DRUG

Everolimus was supplied in boxes with 60 tablets. Available tablets: 1.0 mg, 0.5 mg and 0.25 mg.

Tacrolimus

Intervention Type DRUG

Tacrolimus was administrated as Prograf® or Advagraf®, but could not be changed during study.

Mycophenolic acid (MPA)

Intervention Type DRUG

Myfortic® (MFS) was given as 720-1440 mg/day or 360-1440 mg/day. Cell-Cept® (MMF) was given as 1000-2000 mg/day or 500-2000 mg/day.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Everolimus

Everolimus was supplied in boxes with 60 tablets. Available tablets: 1.0 mg, 0.5 mg and 0.25 mg.

Intervention Type DRUG

Tacrolimus

Tacrolimus was administrated as Prograf® or Advagraf®, but could not be changed during study.

Intervention Type DRUG

Mycophenolic acid (MPA)

Myfortic® (MFS) was given as 720-1440 mg/day or 360-1440 mg/day. Cell-Cept® (MMF) was given as 1000-2000 mg/day or 500-2000 mg/day.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Certican® Prograf®, Advagraf® Myfortic® Cell-Cept®

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Received kidney transplant \> 6 months and \< 3 years prior to study enrollment
* Receiving immunosuppressive regimen that includes tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid
* Between 18 and 70 years of age
* Willing to provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with an actual serum creatinine ≥ 2 mg/dl and/or eGFR≤ 40 ml/min and/or proteinuria≥ 500mg/day
* Patients who suffered from severe humoral and/or cellular rejection (≥ BANFF IIb, recurrent acute rejection or steroid resistant acute rejection in the previous years
* Patients who have severe hypercholesterolemia (\>350 mg/dL; \>9 mmol/L) or hypertriglyceridemia (\>500 mg/dL; \>8.5 mmol/L). Patients with controlled hyperlipidemia are acceptable.
* Diabetic patients
* Woman of child-bearing potential who is planning to become pregnant or is pregnant and/or lactating who is unwilling to use effective means of contraception
* Presence of psychiatric illness (i.e., schizophrenia, major depression) that, in the opinion of the site investigator, would interfere with study requirements
* Any other medical condition that, in the opinion of the site investigator based on recall or chart review would interfere with completing the study
* Receiving any investigational drug or have received any investigational drug within 30 days prior to study enrollment
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Novartis Pharmaceuticals

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Novartis Investigative Site

Málaga, Andalusia, Spain

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Madrid, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Madrid, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Madrid, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Cruzado JM, Pascual J, Sanchez-Fructuoso A, Seron D, Diaz JM, Rengel M, Oppenheimer F, Hernandez D, Paravisini A, Saval N, Morales JM; Evita Study Group. Controlled randomized study comparing the cardiovascular profile of everolimus with tacrolimus in renal transplantation. Transpl Int. 2016 Dec;29(12):1317-1328. doi: 10.1111/tri.12862. Epub 2016 Oct 17.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 27648523 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2009-013780-19

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CRAD001AES07

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id