Safety and Efficacy of 72-hour and 120-hour Infusion of Rigosertib in Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) and Acute Lymphoid Leukemia (ALL)
NCT ID: NCT01167166
Last Updated: 2017-06-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE1/PHASE2
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-07-31
2014-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Inotuzumab Ozogamicin and Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
NCT01371630
Safety of MT-401-OTS in Patients With Relapsed AML or MDS
NCT06552416
AG-013736 (Axitinib) In Patients With Poor Prognosis Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Or Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS)
NCT00071006
A Phase 1, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation & Expanded Cohort, Continuous IV Infusion, Multi-center Study of the Safety, Tolerability,PK & PD of EPZ-5676 in Treatment Relapsed/Refractory Patients With Leukemias Involving
NCT01684150
Combination Chemotherapy Followed By Filgrastim or Sargramostim in Treating Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
NCT00053131
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In the phase 1 component of the trial, a standard dose escalation scheme will be followed with the enrolment of at least three patients treated with a daily dose of 2400 mg ON 01910.Na IVCI over 24 hours for 72 hours. The dose escalation scheme will follow a traditional dose escalation rule, also known as the "3+3" rule:
If none of the initial three patients treated in the 72-hour cohort experience dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), during the first two 2-week cycles, then a new cohort of three patients will be treated at the same 2400 mg/24h daily dose but for an increased 120 hours duration.
DLT is defined as an adverse event possibly related to ON 01910.Na that is:
* Grade ≥ 3 non-hematological toxicity other than nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, fever, esophagitis/dysphagia
* Grade ≥ 3 nausea and vomiting uncontrolled by antiemetics; grade ≥ 3 diarrhea uncontrolled by antidiarrheal agents; grade ≥ 3 drug-induced fever uncontrolled by antipyretics; grade ≥3 metabolic abnormalities that are not controlled by optimal supportive care measures
* Grade ≥ 3 stomatitis and/or esophagitis/dysphagia lasting \> 3 days
* Marrow cellularity \<5% on day 42 or later (6 weeks) from start of therapy without evidence of leukemia
If one of the three patients in the 72-hour cohort experiences a DLT during the first two cycles, then three additional patients will be treated for the same 72 hours duration. Escalation to the 120-hour cohort will proceed only if no more than one of the six patients treated in the 72-hour cohort experiences a DLT.
If two or more patients in the 72-hour cohort experience DLT during the first two cycles, then the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) will have been exceeded, no further dosing extension will occur, and a full safety review will determine if further enrollment of patients will proceed.
If none of the initial three patients in the 120-hour cohort experiences DLT during the first two cycles, this regimen will be confirmed as the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) and no further dose escalation will occur.
If one of the three patients in the 120-hour cohort experiences DLT during the first two cycles, then three additional patients will be treated for the same duration. If no more than one patient experiences a DLT, the 120-hour regimen will be confirmed as the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) and no further dose escalation will occur.
If two or more patients in the 120 hours cohort experience DLT during the first two cycles, then the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) will be determined to be 2400 mg/24h administered for 72 hours every other week.
Once the phase 1 portion of the study is completed, accrual to the phase 2 portion will begin. Patients treated at the MTD during the phase 1 portion will be included in the phase 2 component and will be evaluated for response and secondary end points.
The total study duration is 30 weeks, which includes a 2-week screening phase, a 24-week dosing phase (4-week rigosertib CIV administration, followed by 20 weeks of oral rigosertib administration), and a 4-week follow-up phase that begins after the last dose of rigosertib. Beginning at week 5, patients will be assessed for response every time a complete blood count (CBC) is performed and followed up.
Patients who achieve by week 24 a response or stabilization of their disease are eligible to receive an additional 24 weeks of rigosertib at the same dose and will be followed up.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
rigosertib
Patients will receive 2400 mg dose of rigosertib as a intravenous continuous infusion over 24 hours for 72 to 120 consecutive hours every 2 weeks for the first 4 weeks then will receive oral rigosertib at a 560 mg twice-daily dose as capsules taken continuously.
rigosertib
The dose of rigosertib will be 2400 mg/24h as an intravenous continuous infusion over 72 or 120 hours every 2 weeks for 2 cycles then as oral capsules administered at a dose of 560 mg twice daily on a continuous basis.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
rigosertib
The dose of rigosertib will be 2400 mg/24h as an intravenous continuous infusion over 72 or 120 hours every 2 weeks for 2 cycles then as oral capsules administered at a dose of 560 mg twice daily on a continuous basis.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Acute myelocytic leukemia (AML) refractory to standard induction treatment, or relapsed after standard therapy (including transformed myeloproliferative diseases with at least 10% blasts in bone marrow and chronic myeloid leukemia in a blast phase)
* Transformed myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs; i.e., myelofibrosis, essential thrombocythemia (ET), polycythemia vera (PV)) with at least 10% blasts in bone marrow and chronic myeloid leukemia in a blast phase refractory or relapsing after standard therapy
* Acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) refractory to induction treatment, or relapsed after standard therapy
2. Patients should not have received any prior chemotherapy for their leukemia or transformed MPN within 14 days and should have recovered from any toxicity related to prior chemotherapy to at least grade 1. In the presence of rapidly proliferating disease, patients can be included after a washout period of 7 days. Hydroxyurea can be administered as clinically indicated, and no washout is required.
3. Patients may not be candidates for, or must have declined, bone marrow transplantation from an HLA-identical donor in the immediate future (ie, within 4 weeks) or other chemotherapeutic regimens known to produce consistent remissions.
4. Patients with known meningeal infiltration may be enrolled only if radiation has been completed, and a clearing of peripheral blood blasts has been noted. Intrathecal therapy can be continued if judged to be in the best interest of the patient to prevent recurrence, provided there is no toxicity associated with it and there has been clearance of blasts in the cerebrospinal fluid.
5. ECOG Performance Status 0, 1 or 2.
6. Willing to adhere to the prohibitions and restrictions specified in this protocol.
7. Patient must have signed an informed consent document indicating that he/she understands the purpose of and procedures required for the study and is willing to participate in the study.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Known HIV-1 seropositivity.
3. Uncontrolled intercurrent illness including, but not limited to symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris or cardiac arrhythmia.
4. Uncontrolled active systemic infection not adequately responding to appropriate therapy.
5. Total bilirubin ≥ 1.5 mg/dL not related to hemolysis or Gilbert's disease.
6. ALT or AST ≥ 2.5 X ULN.
7. Serum creatinine ≥ 2.0 mg/dL.
8. Ascites requiring active medical management including paracentesis, or hyponatremia (defined as serum sodium value of \<130 Meq/L).
9. Female patients who are pregnant or lactating; Male patients with female sexual partners who are unwilling to follow the strict contraception requirements (condom use). Patients of reproductive potential who do not agree to use adequate contraceptive before entry and throughout the study; Female patients with reproductive potential who do not have a negative serum or urine beta-HCG pregnancy test at screening.
10. Major surgery without full recovery or major surgery within 3 weeks of rigosertib treatment start.
11. Uncontrolled hypertension (defined as a systolic pressure equal to or greater than 160 and/or a diastolic pressure equal to or greater than 100).
12. New onset seizures (within 3 months prior to the first dose of rigosertib) or poorly controlled seizures
13. Any concurrent investigational agent or chemotherapy, radiotherapy or immunotherapy.
14. Psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit the patient's ability to tolerate and/or comply with study requirements.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Traws Pharma, Inc.
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jorge Cortes, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Garcia-Manero G, Fenaux P. Comprehensive Analysis of Safety: Rigosertib in 557 Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) and Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML). Blood Dec 2016, 128 (22) 2011; ASH 2016.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Patient and cancer information on M. D. Anderson Cancer Center web site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
04-19
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.