Trial Outcomes & Findings for The Effect of Aliskiren on Endothelial Function in Pre-Diabetes and Diabetes (NCT NCT01165983)
NCT ID: NCT01165983
Last Updated: 2017-03-28
Results Overview
Using ultrasound, percent change in brachial artery diameter is measured in response to an increase in shear stress from a tightened blood pressure cuff, which causes endothelium-dependent dilatation.
COMPLETED
NA
124 participants
Baseline
2017-03-28
Participant Flow
A total of 124 subjects signed the ICF, but after screening procedures, 24 were found ineligible so only 100 were randomized to placebo or Aliskiren.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Placebo
Placebo: 0mg tablet, taken orally for 12 weeks daily
|
Aliskiren
Aliskiren: 150mg tablet, taken orally for 12 weeks daily
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
51
|
49
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
46
|
42
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
5
|
7
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
The Effect of Aliskiren on Endothelial Function in Pre-Diabetes and Diabetes
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Placebo
n=51 Participants
Placebo: 0mg tablet, taken orally for 12 weeks daily
|
Aliskiren
n=49 Participants
Aliskiren: 150mg tablet, taken orally for 12 weeks daily
|
Total
n=100 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
54 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11 • n=5 Participants
|
54 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11 • n=7 Participants
|
54 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
30 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
50 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
31 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
50 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
51 participants
n=5 Participants
|
49 participants
n=7 Participants
|
100 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselineUsing ultrasound, percent change in brachial artery diameter is measured in response to an increase in shear stress from a tightened blood pressure cuff, which causes endothelium-dependent dilatation.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Subjects at Risk of DMII
n=48 Participants
|
T2DM Patients
n=52 Participants
|
|---|---|---|
|
Flow Mediated Vasodilation
|
4.8 percentage change over baseline
Standard Deviation 0.7
|
4.4 percentage change over baseline
Standard Deviation 2.6
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 Weeks post-randomizationPopulation: Number of subjects that completed the study
Using ultrasound, percent change in brachial artery diameter is measured in response to an increase in shear stress from a tightened blood pressure cuff, which causes endothelium-dependent dilatation.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Subjects at Risk of DMII
n=46 Participants
|
T2DM Patients
n=42 Participants
|
|---|---|---|
|
Flow Mediated Vasodilation
At risk of T2DM, Placebo n=21, Aliskiren n=20
|
0.3 percent change over baseline
Interval -0.3 to 1.8
|
0.8 percent change over baseline
Interval 0.3 to 2.1
|
|
Flow Mediated Vasodilation
Diabetic Patients, Placebo n=25, Aliskiren n=22
|
0.4 percent change over baseline
Interval 0.0 to 1.0
|
0.9 percent change over baseline
Interval 0.0 to 1.4
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselineUsing ultrasound, images are taken pre- and post-vasodilation of the brachial artery induced with a 0.4mg tablet of NTG.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Subjects at Risk of DMII
n=48 Participants
|
T2DM Patients
n=52 Participants
|
|---|---|---|
|
Nitroglycerin Induced Dilation
|
16.5 percent change
Standard Deviation 4.8
|
15.2 percent change
Standard Deviation 5.0
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 Weeks post-randomizationUsing ultrasound, images are taken pre- and post-vasodilation of the brachial artery induced with a 0.4mg tablet of NTG.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Subjects at Risk of DMII
n=46 Participants
|
T2DM Patients
n=42 Participants
|
|---|---|---|
|
Nitroglycerine Induced Vasodilation
At risk of T2DM, Placebo n=21, Aliskiren n=20
|
0.4 percent change
Interval -2.4 to 3.7
|
-0.8 percent change
Interval -1.8 to 2.5
|
|
Nitroglycerine Induced Vasodilation
Diabetic Patients, Placebo n=25, Aliskiren n=22
|
-1.4 percent change
Interval -3.9 to 0.4
|
-0.3 percent change
Interval -3.4 to 1.5
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselineLaser doppler imaging is used to measure microcirculatory changes pre- and post-iontophoresis of acetylcholine and sodium nitroprusside.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Subjects at Risk of DMII
n=48 Participants
|
T2DM Patients
n=52 Participants
|
|---|---|---|
|
Skin Blood Flow Before and After Iontophoresis With Acetylcholine and Sodium Nitroprusside
Acetylcholine induced skin vasodilation
|
45 percentage change over baseline
Interval 19.0 to 62.0
|
38 percentage change over baseline
Interval 22.0 to 75.0
|
|
Skin Blood Flow Before and After Iontophoresis With Acetylcholine and Sodium Nitroprusside
Sodium nitroprusside skin induced vasodilation
|
38 percentage change over baseline
Interval 23.0 to 61.0
|
36 percentage change over baseline
Interval 20.0 to 64.0
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 Weeks post-randomizationLaser doppler imaging is used to measure microcirculatory changes pre- and post-iontophoresis of acetylcholine (Ach) and sodium nitroprusside (NaNP).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Subjects at Risk of DMII
n=46 Participants
|
T2DM Patients
n=42 Participants
|
|---|---|---|
|
Skin Blood Flow Before and After Iontophoresis With Acetylcholine and Sodium Nitroprusside
At risk of T2DM, Ach, Placebo n=21, Aliskiren n=20
|
6 percent change over baseline
Interval -31.0 to 37.0
|
-1 percent change over baseline
Interval -43.0 to 15.0
|
|
Skin Blood Flow Before and After Iontophoresis With Acetylcholine and Sodium Nitroprusside
At risk of T2DM, NaNP, Placebo n=21 Aliskiren n=20
|
-1 percent change over baseline
Interval -23.0 to 30.0
|
13 percent change over baseline
Interval -34.0 to 40.0
|
|
Skin Blood Flow Before and After Iontophoresis With Acetylcholine and Sodium Nitroprusside
Diabetic Patient, Ach, Placebo n=25 Aliskiren n=22
|
-5 percent change over baseline
Interval -34.0 to 11.0
|
3 percent change over baseline
Interval -48.0 to 20.0
|
|
Skin Blood Flow Before and After Iontophoresis With Acetylcholine and Sodium Nitroprusside
Diabetic Patient, NaNP, Placebo n=25 Ali. n=22
|
-9 percent change over baseline
Interval -21.0 to 5.0
|
8 percent change over baseline
Interval -5.0 to 31.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 Weeks post-randomizationOutcome measures
| Measure |
Subjects at Risk of DMII
n=46 Participants
|
T2DM Patients
n=42 Participants
|
|---|---|---|
|
Absolute Change in Biochemical Markers of Endothelial Function, sICAM-1, ng/mL
At risk of T2DM, Placebo n=21, Aliskiren n=20
|
21 ng/mL
Interval -8.0 to 59.0
|
30 ng/mL
Interval -7.0 to 44.0
|
|
Absolute Change in Biochemical Markers of Endothelial Function, sICAM-1, ng/mL
Diabetic Patients, Placebo n=25, Aliskiren n=22
|
13 ng/mL
Interval -25.0 to 45.0
|
14 ng/mL
Interval -13.0 to 40.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 Weeks post-randomizationOutcome measures
| Measure |
Subjects at Risk of DMII
n=46 Participants
|
T2DM Patients
n=42 Participants
|
|---|---|---|
|
Absolute Change in Biochemical Markers of Endothelial Function, sVCAM-1, ng/mL
At risk of T2DM, Placebo n=21, Aliskiren n=20
|
335 ng/mL
Interval -263.0 to 629.0
|
236 ng/mL
Interval -216.0 to 636.0
|
|
Absolute Change in Biochemical Markers of Endothelial Function, sVCAM-1, ng/mL
Diabetic Patients, Placebo n=25, Aliskiren n=22
|
185 ng/mL
Interval -91.0 to 651.0
|
106 ng/mL
Interval -124.0 to 498.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 Weeks post-randomizationOutcome measures
| Measure |
Subjects at Risk of DMII
n=46 Participants
|
T2DM Patients
n=42 Participants
|
|---|---|---|
|
Absolute Change in Biochemical Markers of Endothelial Function, t-PAI, pg/mL
At risk of T2DM, Placebo n=21, Aliskiren n=20
|
45 pg/mL
Interval -29.0 to 66.0
|
30 pg/mL
Interval -15.0 to 73.0
|
|
Absolute Change in Biochemical Markers of Endothelial Function, t-PAI, pg/mL
Diabetic Patients, Placebo n=25, Aliskiren n=22
|
54 pg/mL
Interval -59.0 to 93.0
|
26 pg/mL
Interval -42.0 to 76.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 Weeks post-randomizationOutcome measures
| Measure |
Subjects at Risk of DMII
n=46 Participants
|
T2DM Patients
n=42 Participants
|
|---|---|---|
|
Absolute Change in Biochemical Markers of Endothelial Function, C-reactive Protein, μg/mL
At risk of T2DM, Placebo n=21, Aliskiren n=20
|
-1.0 μg/mL
Interval -2.6 to 10.9
|
-0.6 μg/mL
Interval -15.0 to 4.8
|
|
Absolute Change in Biochemical Markers of Endothelial Function, C-reactive Protein, μg/mL
Diabetic Patients, Placebo n=25, Aliskiren n=22
|
-1.7 μg/mL
Interval -17.5 to 5.5
|
-2.0 μg/mL
Interval -6.0 to 0.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 Weeks post-randomizationOutcome measures
| Measure |
Subjects at Risk of DMII
n=46 Participants
|
T2DM Patients
n=42 Participants
|
|---|---|---|
|
Absolute Change in Biochemical Markers of Endothelial Function, E-Selectin, ng/mL
At risk of T2DM, Placebo n=21, Aliskiren n=20
|
1.9 ng/mL
Interval -1.7 to 7.1
|
0.7 ng/mL
Interval -2.1 to 11.0
|
|
Absolute Change in Biochemical Markers of Endothelial Function, E-Selectin, ng/mL
Diabetic Patients, Placebo n=25, Aliskiren n=22
|
0.6 ng/mL
Interval -18.5 to 4.9
|
-0.7 ng/mL
Interval -48.1 to 4.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 Weeks post-randomizationOutcome measures
| Measure |
Subjects at Risk of DMII
n=46 Participants
|
T2DM Patients
n=42 Participants
|
|---|---|---|
|
Absolute Change in Inflammatory Cytokines and Growth Factors, Osteoprotegerin, pg/mL
At risk of T2DM, Placebo n=21, Aliskiren n=20
|
-36 pg/mL
Interval -78.0 to 80.0
|
97 pg/mL
Interval 15.0 to 158.0
|
|
Absolute Change in Inflammatory Cytokines and Growth Factors, Osteoprotegerin, pg/mL
Diabetic Patients, Placebo n=25, Aliskiren n=22
|
-24 pg/mL
Interval -86.0 to 75.0
|
48 pg/mL
Interval -24.0 to 127.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 Weeks post-randomizationOutcome measures
| Measure |
Subjects at Risk of DMII
n=46 Participants
|
T2DM Patients
n=42 Participants
|
|---|---|---|
|
Absolute Change in Inflammatory Cytokines and Growth Factors, Osteopontin, ng/mL
At risk of T2DM, Placebo n=21, Aliskiren n=20
|
-0.3 ng/mL
Interval -5.9 to 2.1
|
2.2 ng/mL
Interval -0.8 to 4.5
|
|
Absolute Change in Inflammatory Cytokines and Growth Factors, Osteopontin, ng/mL
Diabetic Patients, Placebo n=25, Aliskiren n=22
|
1.7 ng/mL
Interval -1.3 to 7.3
|
0.2 ng/mL
Interval -6.1 to 4.6
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 Weeks post-randomizationOutcome measures
| Measure |
Subjects at Risk of DMII
n=46 Participants
|
T2DM Patients
n=42 Participants
|
|---|---|---|
|
Absolute Change in Inflammatory Cytokines and Growth Factors, G-CSF, pg/mL
At risk of T2DM, Placebo n=21, Aliskiren n=20
|
1.1 pg/mL
Interval -8.5 to 13.0
|
4.0 pg/mL
Interval -0.8 to 12.8
|
|
Absolute Change in Inflammatory Cytokines and Growth Factors, G-CSF, pg/mL
Diabetic Patients, Placebo n=25, Aliskiren n=22
|
1.9 pg/mL
Interval -11.4 to 10.6
|
4.4 pg/mL
Interval -7.8 to 12.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 Weeks post-randomizationOutcome measures
| Measure |
Subjects at Risk of DMII
n=46 Participants
|
T2DM Patients
n=42 Participants
|
|---|---|---|
|
Absolute Change in Inflammatory Cytokines and Growth Factors, GM-CSF pg/mL
At risk of T2DM, Placebo n=21, Aliskiren n=20
|
0.4 pg/mL
Interval -1.3 to 3.7
|
-0.8 pg/mL
Interval -1.4 to 4.7
|
|
Absolute Change in Inflammatory Cytokines and Growth Factors, GM-CSF pg/mL
Diabetic Patients, Placebo n=25, Aliskiren n=22
|
-1.6 pg/mL
Interval -6.3 to 1.0
|
0.4 pg/mL
Interval -1.2 to 3.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 Weeks post-randomizationOutcome measures
| Measure |
Subjects at Risk of DMII
n=46 Participants
|
T2DM Patients
n=42 Participants
|
|---|---|---|
|
Absolute Change in Inflammatory Cytokines and Growth Factors, IL-8, pg/mL
At risk of T2DM, Placebo n=21, Aliskiren n=20
|
-2.2 pg/mL
Interval -5.8 to 0.8
|
-2.0 pg/mL
Interval -5.0 to 0.2
|
|
Absolute Change in Inflammatory Cytokines and Growth Factors, IL-8, pg/mL
Diabetic Patients, Placebo n=25, Aliskiren n=22
|
-2.4 pg/mL
Interval -5.9 to 1.6
|
0.6 pg/mL
Interval -2.6 to 4.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 Weeks post-randomizationOutcome measures
| Measure |
Subjects at Risk of DMII
n=46 Participants
|
T2DM Patients
n=42 Participants
|
|---|---|---|
|
Absolute Change in Inflammatory Cytokines and Growth Factors, MCP-1 pg/mL
At risk of T2DM, Placebo n=21, Aliskiren n=20
|
-11 pg/mL
Interval -125.0 to 23.0
|
-7 pg/mL
Interval -112.0 to 75.0
|
|
Absolute Change in Inflammatory Cytokines and Growth Factors, MCP-1 pg/mL
Diabetic Patients, Placebo n=25, Aliskiren n=22
|
36 pg/mL
Interval -76.0 to 110.0
|
8 pg/mL
Interval -154.0 to 66.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 Weeks post-randomizationOutcome measures
| Measure |
Subjects at Risk of DMII
n=46 Participants
|
T2DM Patients
n=42 Participants
|
|---|---|---|
|
Absolute Change in Inflammatory Cytokines and Growth Factors, MDC ng/mL
At risk of T2DM, Placebo n=21, Aliskiren n=20
|
-0.09 ng/mL
Interval -0.32 to 0.11
|
-0.07 ng/mL
Interval -0.32 to 0.08
|
|
Absolute Change in Inflammatory Cytokines and Growth Factors, MDC ng/mL
Diabetic Patients, Placebo n=25, Aliskiren n=22
|
-0.07 ng/mL
Interval -0.46 to 0.19
|
0.04 ng/mL
Interval -0.36 to 0.16
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 Weeks post-randomizationOutcome measures
| Measure |
Subjects at Risk of DMII
n=46 Participants
|
T2DM Patients
n=42 Participants
|
|---|---|---|
|
Absolute Change in Inflammatory Cytokines and Growth Factors, sCD-40L ng/mL
At risk of T2DM, Placebo n=21, Aliskiren n=20
|
-0.8 ng/mL
Interval -3.8 to 2.7
|
-3.2 ng/mL
Interval -9.6 to 4.1
|
|
Absolute Change in Inflammatory Cytokines and Growth Factors, sCD-40L ng/mL
Diabetic Patients, Placebo n=25, Aliskiren n=22
|
3.3 ng/mL
Interval -1.5 to 12.8
|
-3.6 ng/mL
Interval -7.9 to 1.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 Weeks post-randomizationOutcome measures
| Measure |
Subjects at Risk of DMII
n=46 Participants
|
T2DM Patients
n=42 Participants
|
|---|---|---|
|
Absolute Change in Inflammatory Cytokines and Growth Factors, TNFα, pg/mL
At risk of T2DM, Placebo n=21, Aliskiren n=20
|
-0.15 pg/mL
Interval -0.78 to 1.8
|
-0.21 pg/mL
Interval -1.65 to 2.3
|
|
Absolute Change in Inflammatory Cytokines and Growth Factors, TNFα, pg/mL
Diabetic Patients, Placebo n=25, Aliskiren n=22
|
0.30 pg/mL
Interval -3.26 to 1.67
|
-0.09 pg/mL
Interval -3.2 to 1.13
|
Adverse Events
Placebo
Aliskiren
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo
n=46 participants at risk
Placebo: 0mg tablet, taken orally for 12 weeks daily
|
Aliskiren
n=42 participants at risk
Aliskiren: 150mg tablet, taken orally for 12 weeks daily
|
|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac event
|
0.00%
0/46
Number for "at risk" of Diabetic Ketoacidosis reduced to reflect number of subjects enrolled who were diagnosed with T2DM. Diabetic ketoacidosis is primarily a concern in patients with T1DM, however the patient who experienced ketoacidosis was later shown to have undiagnosed T1DM, improperly diagnosed as T2DM.
|
4.8%
2/42
Number for "at risk" of Diabetic Ketoacidosis reduced to reflect number of subjects enrolled who were diagnosed with T2DM. Diabetic ketoacidosis is primarily a concern in patients with T1DM, however the patient who experienced ketoacidosis was later shown to have undiagnosed T1DM, improperly diagnosed as T2DM.
|
|
Endocrine disorders
Diabetic Ketoacidosis
|
0.00%
0/27
Number for "at risk" of Diabetic Ketoacidosis reduced to reflect number of subjects enrolled who were diagnosed with T2DM. Diabetic ketoacidosis is primarily a concern in patients with T1DM, however the patient who experienced ketoacidosis was later shown to have undiagnosed T1DM, improperly diagnosed as T2DM.
|
4.8%
1/21
Number for "at risk" of Diabetic Ketoacidosis reduced to reflect number of subjects enrolled who were diagnosed with T2DM. Diabetic ketoacidosis is primarily a concern in patients with T1DM, however the patient who experienced ketoacidosis was later shown to have undiagnosed T1DM, improperly diagnosed as T2DM.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Cellulitis
|
0.00%
0/46
Number for "at risk" of Diabetic Ketoacidosis reduced to reflect number of subjects enrolled who were diagnosed with T2DM. Diabetic ketoacidosis is primarily a concern in patients with T1DM, however the patient who experienced ketoacidosis was later shown to have undiagnosed T1DM, improperly diagnosed as T2DM.
|
2.4%
1/42
Number for "at risk" of Diabetic Ketoacidosis reduced to reflect number of subjects enrolled who were diagnosed with T2DM. Diabetic ketoacidosis is primarily a concern in patients with T1DM, however the patient who experienced ketoacidosis was later shown to have undiagnosed T1DM, improperly diagnosed as T2DM.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo
n=46 participants at risk
Placebo: 0mg tablet, taken orally for 12 weeks daily
|
Aliskiren
n=42 participants at risk
Aliskiren: 150mg tablet, taken orally for 12 weeks daily
|
|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
2.2%
1/46
Number for "at risk" of Diabetic Ketoacidosis reduced to reflect number of subjects enrolled who were diagnosed with T2DM. Diabetic ketoacidosis is primarily a concern in patients with T1DM, however the patient who experienced ketoacidosis was later shown to have undiagnosed T1DM, improperly diagnosed as T2DM.
|
0.00%
0/42
Number for "at risk" of Diabetic Ketoacidosis reduced to reflect number of subjects enrolled who were diagnosed with T2DM. Diabetic ketoacidosis is primarily a concern in patients with T1DM, however the patient who experienced ketoacidosis was later shown to have undiagnosed T1DM, improperly diagnosed as T2DM.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Tinnitus
|
0.00%
0/46
Number for "at risk" of Diabetic Ketoacidosis reduced to reflect number of subjects enrolled who were diagnosed with T2DM. Diabetic ketoacidosis is primarily a concern in patients with T1DM, however the patient who experienced ketoacidosis was later shown to have undiagnosed T1DM, improperly diagnosed as T2DM.
|
2.4%
1/42
Number for "at risk" of Diabetic Ketoacidosis reduced to reflect number of subjects enrolled who were diagnosed with T2DM. Diabetic ketoacidosis is primarily a concern in patients with T1DM, however the patient who experienced ketoacidosis was later shown to have undiagnosed T1DM, improperly diagnosed as T2DM.
|
|
General disorders
Mild increase in Serum Calcium Level
|
4.3%
2/46
Number for "at risk" of Diabetic Ketoacidosis reduced to reflect number of subjects enrolled who were diagnosed with T2DM. Diabetic ketoacidosis is primarily a concern in patients with T1DM, however the patient who experienced ketoacidosis was later shown to have undiagnosed T1DM, improperly diagnosed as T2DM.
|
2.4%
1/42
Number for "at risk" of Diabetic Ketoacidosis reduced to reflect number of subjects enrolled who were diagnosed with T2DM. Diabetic ketoacidosis is primarily a concern in patients with T1DM, however the patient who experienced ketoacidosis was later shown to have undiagnosed T1DM, improperly diagnosed as T2DM.
|
|
Endocrine disorders
Decrease in Blood Glucose
|
2.2%
1/46
Number for "at risk" of Diabetic Ketoacidosis reduced to reflect number of subjects enrolled who were diagnosed with T2DM. Diabetic ketoacidosis is primarily a concern in patients with T1DM, however the patient who experienced ketoacidosis was later shown to have undiagnosed T1DM, improperly diagnosed as T2DM.
|
0.00%
0/42
Number for "at risk" of Diabetic Ketoacidosis reduced to reflect number of subjects enrolled who were diagnosed with T2DM. Diabetic ketoacidosis is primarily a concern in patients with T1DM, however the patient who experienced ketoacidosis was later shown to have undiagnosed T1DM, improperly diagnosed as T2DM.
|
|
General disorders
Increase in serum creatinine levels
|
0.00%
0/46
Number for "at risk" of Diabetic Ketoacidosis reduced to reflect number of subjects enrolled who were diagnosed with T2DM. Diabetic ketoacidosis is primarily a concern in patients with T1DM, however the patient who experienced ketoacidosis was later shown to have undiagnosed T1DM, improperly diagnosed as T2DM.
|
2.4%
1/42
Number for "at risk" of Diabetic Ketoacidosis reduced to reflect number of subjects enrolled who were diagnosed with T2DM. Diabetic ketoacidosis is primarily a concern in patients with T1DM, however the patient who experienced ketoacidosis was later shown to have undiagnosed T1DM, improperly diagnosed as T2DM.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Numbness and cramping
|
2.2%
1/46
Number for "at risk" of Diabetic Ketoacidosis reduced to reflect number of subjects enrolled who were diagnosed with T2DM. Diabetic ketoacidosis is primarily a concern in patients with T1DM, however the patient who experienced ketoacidosis was later shown to have undiagnosed T1DM, improperly diagnosed as T2DM.
|
2.4%
1/42
Number for "at risk" of Diabetic Ketoacidosis reduced to reflect number of subjects enrolled who were diagnosed with T2DM. Diabetic ketoacidosis is primarily a concern in patients with T1DM, however the patient who experienced ketoacidosis was later shown to have undiagnosed T1DM, improperly diagnosed as T2DM.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
GI virus
|
2.2%
1/46
Number for "at risk" of Diabetic Ketoacidosis reduced to reflect number of subjects enrolled who were diagnosed with T2DM. Diabetic ketoacidosis is primarily a concern in patients with T1DM, however the patient who experienced ketoacidosis was later shown to have undiagnosed T1DM, improperly diagnosed as T2DM.
|
0.00%
0/42
Number for "at risk" of Diabetic Ketoacidosis reduced to reflect number of subjects enrolled who were diagnosed with T2DM. Diabetic ketoacidosis is primarily a concern in patients with T1DM, however the patient who experienced ketoacidosis was later shown to have undiagnosed T1DM, improperly diagnosed as T2DM.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Decreased hematocrit
|
2.2%
1/46
Number for "at risk" of Diabetic Ketoacidosis reduced to reflect number of subjects enrolled who were diagnosed with T2DM. Diabetic ketoacidosis is primarily a concern in patients with T1DM, however the patient who experienced ketoacidosis was later shown to have undiagnosed T1DM, improperly diagnosed as T2DM.
|
0.00%
0/42
Number for "at risk" of Diabetic Ketoacidosis reduced to reflect number of subjects enrolled who were diagnosed with T2DM. Diabetic ketoacidosis is primarily a concern in patients with T1DM, however the patient who experienced ketoacidosis was later shown to have undiagnosed T1DM, improperly diagnosed as T2DM.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Bloating and gas
|
0.00%
0/46
Number for "at risk" of Diabetic Ketoacidosis reduced to reflect number of subjects enrolled who were diagnosed with T2DM. Diabetic ketoacidosis is primarily a concern in patients with T1DM, however the patient who experienced ketoacidosis was later shown to have undiagnosed T1DM, improperly diagnosed as T2DM.
|
2.4%
1/42
Number for "at risk" of Diabetic Ketoacidosis reduced to reflect number of subjects enrolled who were diagnosed with T2DM. Diabetic ketoacidosis is primarily a concern in patients with T1DM, however the patient who experienced ketoacidosis was later shown to have undiagnosed T1DM, improperly diagnosed as T2DM.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Increased urination
|
0.00%
0/46
Number for "at risk" of Diabetic Ketoacidosis reduced to reflect number of subjects enrolled who were diagnosed with T2DM. Diabetic ketoacidosis is primarily a concern in patients with T1DM, however the patient who experienced ketoacidosis was later shown to have undiagnosed T1DM, improperly diagnosed as T2DM.
|
2.4%
1/42
Number for "at risk" of Diabetic Ketoacidosis reduced to reflect number of subjects enrolled who were diagnosed with T2DM. Diabetic ketoacidosis is primarily a concern in patients with T1DM, however the patient who experienced ketoacidosis was later shown to have undiagnosed T1DM, improperly diagnosed as T2DM.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Increase in eosinophil levels
|
0.00%
0/46
Number for "at risk" of Diabetic Ketoacidosis reduced to reflect number of subjects enrolled who were diagnosed with T2DM. Diabetic ketoacidosis is primarily a concern in patients with T1DM, however the patient who experienced ketoacidosis was later shown to have undiagnosed T1DM, improperly diagnosed as T2DM.
|
2.4%
1/42
Number for "at risk" of Diabetic Ketoacidosis reduced to reflect number of subjects enrolled who were diagnosed with T2DM. Diabetic ketoacidosis is primarily a concern in patients with T1DM, however the patient who experienced ketoacidosis was later shown to have undiagnosed T1DM, improperly diagnosed as T2DM.
|
|
General disorders
Decrease in serum calcium
|
0.00%
0/46
Number for "at risk" of Diabetic Ketoacidosis reduced to reflect number of subjects enrolled who were diagnosed with T2DM. Diabetic ketoacidosis is primarily a concern in patients with T1DM, however the patient who experienced ketoacidosis was later shown to have undiagnosed T1DM, improperly diagnosed as T2DM.
|
2.4%
1/42
Number for "at risk" of Diabetic Ketoacidosis reduced to reflect number of subjects enrolled who were diagnosed with T2DM. Diabetic ketoacidosis is primarily a concern in patients with T1DM, however the patient who experienced ketoacidosis was later shown to have undiagnosed T1DM, improperly diagnosed as T2DM.
|
Additional Information
Aristidis Veves, Research Director
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: LTE60