Comparison of Intravenous Adenosine Infusion With Regadenoson Bolus for Inducing Maximal Coronary Hyperemia

NCT ID: NCT01161121

Last Updated: 2017-06-23

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE1

Total Enrollment

46 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-07-31

Study Completion Date

2013-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine if regadenoson is as safe and effective as adenosine when used in the cardiac catheterization lab during measurement of coronary flow reserve and fractional flow reserve. The study hypothesis is the assessment of Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) in the catheterization lab can be performed with equivalent accuracy when hyperemia is induced with IV Regadenoson compared with IV Adenosine without compromising patient safety.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Patients with clinical indications to be assessed by fractional flow reserve (FFR) will be included. Following diagnostic angiography in the catheterization lab, the patient will have a guide catheter placed in the artery to be assessed followed by placing a pressure guidewire down the coronary vessel and past the lesion of interest. FFR will be measured in the traditional manner, with intravenous adenosine infusing at 140 mcg/kg/min until maximal steady state hyperemia is reached. At this point, the FFR will be recorded as Pd (distal pressure from the pressure wire in the coronary artery) divided by Pa (proximal pressure from the guide catheter). The adenosine infusion will then be stopped and the patient's hemodynamics allowed to return to baseline. Once baseline state is again achieved, an intravenous bolus of regadenson (0.4 mg) will be given and FFR will be remeasured as the lowest steady state Pd/Pa. Patients will be enrolled at two sites, The University of Florida - where FFR will be measured alone, and Saint Louis University, where coronary flow will be measured simultaneously to evaluate the effect of regadenoson on coronary flow velocity as compared to adenosine. The primary endpoint of the study will be to compare the FFR achieved with adeonsine to that obtained with regadenoson.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Coronary Artery Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Adenosine then Regadenoson

Adenosine infusion will be compared to Regadenoson for efficacy and safety/side effects. Arterial blood pressure, coronary pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation and coronary flow, FFR, and coronary flow velocity will be assessed. Safety will be assessed by monitoring for any side effects such as chest pain, headache, flushing, nausea, or arrhythmias. Adenosine infusion will be administered at 140 mcg/kg for 2 minutes and once mean coronary flow velocity returns to within 15% of pre-dose value, Regadenoson IV bolus 0.4 mg/5 ml will be administered followed by a 5 cc normal saline flush.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

adenosine

Intervention Type DRUG

Measuring FFR and Coronary Flow Reserve after administration of IV adenosine 140 mcg/kg/min for 2 minutes.

regadenoson

Intervention Type DRUG

Measuring FFR and Coronary Flow Reserve after administration of IV regadenoson 0.4 mg over 10 seconds.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

adenosine

Measuring FFR and Coronary Flow Reserve after administration of IV adenosine 140 mcg/kg/min for 2 minutes.

Intervention Type DRUG

regadenoson

Measuring FFR and Coronary Flow Reserve after administration of IV regadenoson 0.4 mg over 10 seconds.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Adenoscan(adenosine) Lexiscan

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* male or female patients greater than 18 years old (If female, pt. must be post-menopausal, surgically sterile, or be non-pregnant as determined by a negative urine or serum beta human chorionic gonadotropin (B-HCG) pregnancy test within 24 hours prior to enrollment.
* Provided written consent approved by Institutional Review Board and provided Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) authorization
* Have at least one coronary stenosis (greater or equal to 40% but less than 70\& narrowing by visual inspection) and technically accessible coronary artery into which the pressure wire may be introduced.

Exclusion Criteria

* ST elevation myocardial infarction
* Cardiogenic shock
* Pregnancy
* Total vessel occlusion
* Extremely tortuous coronary arteries
* Second and third degree heart block without pacemaker
* Severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and active bronchospasm
* Less than age 18 years
* Have received theophylline, aminophylline, pentoxifylline or dipyridamole within 12 hours of FFR measurement.
* Has severe 3 vessel disease defined by \>80% luminal narrowing by visual inspection
* Known hypersensitivity to adenosine or regadenoson
* Recent uncontrolled ventricular arrhythmia
* History of greater than Type I atrioventricular block, symptomatic resting bradycardia, sick sinus syndrome (without permanent pacemaker)
* History of heart transplantation
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Florida

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Astellas Pharma US, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

St. Louis University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Michael J. Lim

Director, Division of Cardiology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Michael J Lim, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

St. Louis University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Florida

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

St. Louis University

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Pijls NH, Van Gelder B, Van der Voort P, Peels K, Bracke FA, Bonnier HJ, el Gamal MI. Fractional flow reserve. A useful index to evaluate the influence of an epicardial coronary stenosis on myocardial blood flow. Circulation. 1995 Dec 1;92(11):3183-93. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.92.11.3183.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 7586302 (View on PubMed)

Iskandrian AE, Bateman TM, Belardinelli L, Blackburn B, Cerqueira MD, Hendel RC, Lieu H, Mahmarian JJ, Olmsted A, Underwood SR, Vitola J, Wang W; ADVANCE MPI Investigators. Adenosine versus regadenoson comparative evaluation in myocardial perfusion imaging: results of the ADVANCE phase 3 multicenter international trial. J Nucl Cardiol. 2007 Sep-Oct;14(5):645-58. doi: 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2007.06.114.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17826318 (View on PubMed)

Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Siebert U, Ikeno F, van' t Veer M, Klauss V, Manoharan G, Engstrom T, Oldroyd KG, Ver Lee PN, MacCarthy PA, Fearon WF; FAME Study Investigators. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med. 2009 Jan 15;360(3):213-24. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0807611.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19144937 (View on PubMed)

Lim MJ, Kern MJ. Coronary pathophysiology in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2006 Aug;31(8):493-550. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2006.04.002.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16920478 (View on PubMed)

Stolker JM, Lim MJ, Shavelle DM, Morris DL, Angiolillo DJ, Guzman LA, Kennedy KF, Weber E, Zareh M, Neumayr RH, Zenni MM. Pooled comparison of regadenoson versus adenosine for measuring fractional flow reserve and coronary flow in the catheterization laboratory. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2015 Jul-Aug;16(5):266-71. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2015.05.011. Epub 2015 Jun 5.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 26242981 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Rega-9I06

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

AB-1002 in Patients With Class III Heart Failure
NCT04179643 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE1