Comparison of Intravenous Adenosine Infusion With Regadenoson Bolus for Inducing Maximal Coronary Hyperemia
NCT ID: NCT01161121
Last Updated: 2017-06-23
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE1
46 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-07-31
2013-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Regadenoson and Adenosine
NCT01809743
Regadenoson Combined With Symptom-Limited Exercise in Patients Undergoing Myocardial Perfusion Imaging
NCT01021618
Study With Aminophylline to Attenuate of the Side Effects of Regadenoson
NCT01250496
Safety and Accuracy Study of Regadenoson Atropine Combination for Stress Echocardiography in Identification of Coronary Artery Disease
NCT00894179
The Impact of the Routine Aminophylline Administration Following Regadenoson Stress on SPECT Myocardial Perfusion
NCT01655524
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Adenosine then Regadenoson
Adenosine infusion will be compared to Regadenoson for efficacy and safety/side effects. Arterial blood pressure, coronary pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation and coronary flow, FFR, and coronary flow velocity will be assessed. Safety will be assessed by monitoring for any side effects such as chest pain, headache, flushing, nausea, or arrhythmias. Adenosine infusion will be administered at 140 mcg/kg for 2 minutes and once mean coronary flow velocity returns to within 15% of pre-dose value, Regadenoson IV bolus 0.4 mg/5 ml will be administered followed by a 5 cc normal saline flush.
adenosine
Measuring FFR and Coronary Flow Reserve after administration of IV adenosine 140 mcg/kg/min for 2 minutes.
regadenoson
Measuring FFR and Coronary Flow Reserve after administration of IV regadenoson 0.4 mg over 10 seconds.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
adenosine
Measuring FFR and Coronary Flow Reserve after administration of IV adenosine 140 mcg/kg/min for 2 minutes.
regadenoson
Measuring FFR and Coronary Flow Reserve after administration of IV regadenoson 0.4 mg over 10 seconds.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Provided written consent approved by Institutional Review Board and provided Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) authorization
* Have at least one coronary stenosis (greater or equal to 40% but less than 70\& narrowing by visual inspection) and technically accessible coronary artery into which the pressure wire may be introduced.
Exclusion Criteria
* Cardiogenic shock
* Pregnancy
* Total vessel occlusion
* Extremely tortuous coronary arteries
* Second and third degree heart block without pacemaker
* Severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and active bronchospasm
* Less than age 18 years
* Have received theophylline, aminophylline, pentoxifylline or dipyridamole within 12 hours of FFR measurement.
* Has severe 3 vessel disease defined by \>80% luminal narrowing by visual inspection
* Known hypersensitivity to adenosine or regadenoson
* Recent uncontrolled ventricular arrhythmia
* History of greater than Type I atrioventricular block, symptomatic resting bradycardia, sick sinus syndrome (without permanent pacemaker)
* History of heart transplantation
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Florida
OTHER
Astellas Pharma US, Inc.
INDUSTRY
St. Louis University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Michael J. Lim
Director, Division of Cardiology
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Michael J Lim, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
St. Louis University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Florida
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
St. Louis University
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Pijls NH, Van Gelder B, Van der Voort P, Peels K, Bracke FA, Bonnier HJ, el Gamal MI. Fractional flow reserve. A useful index to evaluate the influence of an epicardial coronary stenosis on myocardial blood flow. Circulation. 1995 Dec 1;92(11):3183-93. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.92.11.3183.
Iskandrian AE, Bateman TM, Belardinelli L, Blackburn B, Cerqueira MD, Hendel RC, Lieu H, Mahmarian JJ, Olmsted A, Underwood SR, Vitola J, Wang W; ADVANCE MPI Investigators. Adenosine versus regadenoson comparative evaluation in myocardial perfusion imaging: results of the ADVANCE phase 3 multicenter international trial. J Nucl Cardiol. 2007 Sep-Oct;14(5):645-58. doi: 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2007.06.114.
Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Siebert U, Ikeno F, van' t Veer M, Klauss V, Manoharan G, Engstrom T, Oldroyd KG, Ver Lee PN, MacCarthy PA, Fearon WF; FAME Study Investigators. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med. 2009 Jan 15;360(3):213-24. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0807611.
Lim MJ, Kern MJ. Coronary pathophysiology in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2006 Aug;31(8):493-550. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2006.04.002.
Stolker JM, Lim MJ, Shavelle DM, Morris DL, Angiolillo DJ, Guzman LA, Kennedy KF, Weber E, Zareh M, Neumayr RH, Zenni MM. Pooled comparison of regadenoson versus adenosine for measuring fractional flow reserve and coronary flow in the catheterization laboratory. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2015 Jul-Aug;16(5):266-71. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2015.05.011. Epub 2015 Jun 5.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Rega-9I06
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.