Trial Outcomes & Findings for Two Week Cross-Over Study Comparing Two Daily Disposable Contact Lenses (NCT NCT01155323)
NCT ID: NCT01155323
Last Updated: 2018-06-19
Results Overview
This outcome is a weighted combined score calculated from individual comfort-related questions asked on a 1-5 scale: 1 = most negative response to 5 = most positive response.
COMPLETED
NA
118 participants
after 1 week of lens wear
2018-06-19
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Etafilcon A/Omafilcon A
etafilcon A contact lenses will be worn first and omafilcon A contact lenses will be worn second.
|
Omafilcon A/Etafilcon A
omafilcon A contact lenses will be worn first and etafilcon A contact lenses will be worn second.
|
|---|---|---|
|
First Intervention
STARTED
|
60
|
58
|
|
First Intervention
COMPLETED
|
59
|
57
|
|
First Intervention
NOT COMPLETED
|
1
|
1
|
|
Second Intervention
STARTED
|
59
|
57
|
|
Second Intervention
COMPLETED
|
58
|
56
|
|
Second Intervention
NOT COMPLETED
|
1
|
1
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Etafilcon A/Omafilcon A
etafilcon A contact lenses will be worn first and omafilcon A contact lenses will be worn second.
|
Omafilcon A/Etafilcon A
omafilcon A contact lenses will be worn first and etafilcon A contact lenses will be worn second.
|
|---|---|---|
|
First Intervention
exclusion criteria
|
1
|
1
|
|
Second Intervention
Lost to Follow-up
|
1
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Two Week Cross-Over Study Comparing Two Daily Disposable Contact Lenses
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Total Number of Participants
n=113 Participants
This represents all subjects that completed the study minus one additional subject excluded due the discovery after study completion that the subject conflicted with exclusion criteria.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
25.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.4 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
80 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
33 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Singapore
|
113 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: after 1 week of lens wearPopulation: The analysis population represents subjects that completed the study per protocol.
This outcome is a weighted combined score calculated from individual comfort-related questions asked on a 1-5 scale: 1 = most negative response to 5 = most positive response.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etafilcon A
n=113 Participants
soft contact lens replaced daily, worn for one week.
|
Omafilcon A
n=113 Participants
soft contact lens replaced daily, worn for one week.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Subjective Rating of Comfort
|
3.33 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
|
3.32 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: after 1 week of lens wearPopulation: The analysis population represents subjects that completed the study per protocol.
This outcome is a weighted combined score calculated from individual vision-related questions asked on a 1-5 scale: 1 = most negative response to 5 = most positive response.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etafilcon A
n=113 Participants
soft contact lens replaced daily, worn for one week.
|
Omafilcon A
n=113 Participants
soft contact lens replaced daily, worn for one week.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Vision Quality
|
3.53 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
|
3.50 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: after 1 week of lens wearPopulation: The analysis population represents subjects that completed the study per protocol.
This outcome is a weighted combined score calculated from individual lens handling-related questions asked on a 1-5 scale: 1 = most negative response to 5 = most positive response.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etafilcon A
n=113 Participants
soft contact lens replaced daily, worn for one week.
|
Omafilcon A
n=113 Participants
soft contact lens replaced daily, worn for one week.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Subjective Rating of Handling
|
3.48 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
|
3.48 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: after 1 week of lens wearPopulation: The analysis population represents subjects that completed the study per protocol.
Investigator assessment of the corneal staining. Staining is an indication of dryness on areas on the cornea. Here it is measured over 5 regions of the cornea: central, temporal, nasal, inferior, and superior. The staining is graded using the National Eye Institute (NEI)0-3 scale: grade 0 = normal, grade 1 = mild, grade 2 = moderate, grade 3 = severe.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etafilcon A
n=113 Participants
soft contact lens replaced daily, worn for one week.
|
Omafilcon A
n=113 Participants
soft contact lens replaced daily, worn for one week.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Corneal Staining
|
0.07 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.01
|
0.09 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.01
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: after 1 week of lens wearPopulation: The analysis population represents subjects that completed the study per protocol.
This outcome is a weighted combined score calculated from individual quality perception-related questions asked on a 1-5 scale: 1 = most negative response to 5 = most positive response.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etafilcon A
n=113 Participants
soft contact lens replaced daily, worn for one week.
|
Omafilcon A
n=113 Participants
soft contact lens replaced daily, worn for one week.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Subjective Rating of Quality Perceptions
|
3.51 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
|
3.44 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: after 1 week of wearPopulation: The analysis population represents subjects that completed the study per protocol.
This outcome is assessed by the investigator during biomicroscopy examination using the following 0-4 scale: 0 = none, 1 = trace, 2 = mild, 3= moderate, 4 = severe.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etafilcon A
n=113 Participants
soft contact lens replaced daily, worn for one week.
|
Omafilcon A
n=113 Participants
soft contact lens replaced daily, worn for one week.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Limbal Hyperemia
|
0.51 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.02
|
0.48 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.02
|
Adverse Events
Etafilcon A
Omafilcon A
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The results of the study may not be published or publicly presented without prior written approval of the sponsor. If the investigator wishes to publish or present any study findings, investigator shall contact sponsor to discuss publication plan.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER