PENTACON Trial: Partial ENdothelial Trepanation in Addition to Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty in keratoCONus
NCT ID: NCT01145937
Last Updated: 2015-12-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
14 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-03-31
2015-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Keratoconus is a progressive, non-inflammatory corneal disease in which irregular refractive properties of the cornea result in loss of visual acuity. Treatment is aimed at improving vision, principally using (rigid) contact lenses. With progression of the disease non-correctable refractive abnormalities and/or corneal scars arise. For these advanced stages of keratoconus, a corneal transplant is the only treatment modality.
New surgical grafting modalities have been developed to create partial thickness grafts, according to the location of corneal pathology. For keratoconus, transplanting only the anterior corneal lamellae lowers long-term graft rejection rates. We utilize a method to enhance the safety of the grafting procedure while better visual outcomes are expected.
Objective:
To investigate the additional value of partial endothelial trepanation (PET) in an anterior lamellar keratoplasty (ALKP) procedure in terms of efficacy and safety in patients with keratoconus.
Study design:
A randomized controlled interventional trial
Study population:
Patients over 18 years old with keratoconus in whom contact lens correction is unsuccessful and who are not suitable for corneal crosslinking.
Intervention:
Patients will be randomly assigned to corneal grafting techniques; partial endothelial trepanation in addition to an anterior lamellar keratoplasty (i.e. the PET group) or a regular ALKP procedure.
Study outcomes:
Risk of per-operative perforation. Secondary, factors contributing to treatment safety and efficacy.
Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness:
There is no extra burden or risk associated with participation in this study. All measurements are part of normal clinical practice. Adequate experience is available with both surgical techniques. Study participation has no effect on donor selection. If partial endothelial trepanation (PET) is associated with lower complication rates and better visual outcomes, this might be beneficial in terms of morbidity.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Keratoconus is a progressive, non-inflammatory corneal disease in which irregular refractive properties of the cornea result in loss of visual acuity. Keratoconus usually arise in adolescence, is bilateral and has an estimated incidence of 1:2000. The aetiology of keratoconus is largely unknown, genetic predispositions are currently under investigation. Treatment is aimed at improving vision, principally using (rigid) contact lenses. With progression of the disease non-correctable refractive abnormalities and/or corneal scars arise. For these advanced stages of keratoconus, a corneal transplant is the only treatment modality.
The first corneal transplant for keratoconus was conducted in 1936 by Ramon Castroviejo in New York's Columbia Presbyterian Medical Centre. Ever since, corneal grafting is subject to many technical developments. For over 70 years, a technique is used in which a circular donor disc is cut with a trephine and sutured in a concordantly prepared recipient, called a perforating keratoplasty (PKP).
With the advent of refractive surgery in the years 1990, equipment appeared to split a cornea in horizontal lamellae. This made partial thickness grafting possible, tailoring grafts according to the nature and location of corneal pathology. For keratoconus, only the anterior part of the cornea needs to be transplanted. The posterior (endothelial) part is particularly involved in graft rejections. The chance of graft rejection decreases significantly when the patient's endothelium is left in place.
For keratoconus, this new treatment modality is called a deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK). The transplanted anterior corneal thickness is maximized, and the patient retains its own endothelium and Descemet membrane, owing to lower graft rejection rates and less secondary cataract formation.
The biggest drawback of a DALK procedure is the risk of inadvertent peroperative corneal perforation; the lamellae is cut to thick necessitating a conversion to a complete thickness graft similar to an regular PKP. To prevent inadvertent perforation, several techniques are described to dissect the stroma from the posterior lying Descemet membrane and corneal endothelium. Failure and perforation are described in 20-36% of cases though, leaving the patient with an inferior end product and leading to poor surgical predictability.
To circumvent this problem we utilize a method in which, in addition to a anterior lamellar keratoplasty (ALKP), a partial endothelial trepanation (PET) is performed. This technique was first performed by Massimo Busin, Villa Serena Hopsital, Forli, Italy. The endothelium en Descemet are paracentrally and circular loosened, but some tissue bridges are left in place. This 'island' is able to mould to the healthy donor curvature. By doing this, the surgeon can retain a safer graft thickness margin leading to a lowered number of preoperative perforations. The addition of PET is believed to make corneal grafting safer and more predictable.
Research statement/question To investigate the additional value of partial endothelial trepanation (PET) in a anterior lamellar keratoplasty (ALKP) procedure in terms of efficacy and safety in patients with keratoconus, compared in a randomized clinical trial with a regular ALKP procedure.
Primary outcome is:
• Peroperative corneal perforation;
Secondary study objectives are:
* Best corrected visual acuity one year post op;
* Manifest refraction one year post op;
* Contact lens use (soft/rigid/scleral) or spectacle use;
* Self-rated improvement questionnaire;
* Graft rejection rate;
* Corneal endothelial function one year post op;
* Correlation of DALK outcomes with atopic constitution.
Significance of this research:
The PENTACON trial is designed to answer questions on new treatment modalities for ophthalmic disease, especially keratoconus. Current available research describes various techniques for a lamellar approach of corneal grafting. Most literature concerns retrospective case series, susceptible to several forms of bias. With our prospective randomized approach we aim to supply more clinical relevant information, especially regarding the risk of inadvertent corneal perforation during surgery.
On theoretical grounds we presume that this new technique has even additional value for more progressive keratoconus patients. In early keratoconus visualization during surgery is generally not a big problem. In progressive keratoconus however, scarring occurs and the Descemet membrane underlying the conus behaves differently. We suppose these factors lead to the high corneal perforation rate of 20%. With partial endothelial trepanation larger safety margins can be used and the biggest gain is to be expected in the progressive keratoconus group.
We plan to store the removed patient corneas in the UMCU Biobank. With the enrollment of patients for our PENTACON trial we will gather a significant amount of keratoconus corneas. In the future, we plan to conduct genetic/histopathologic research on these corneas to achieve a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying ophthalmic disease. Currently, all our effort is projected on starting our treatment trial. These etiological questions will be assessed in a later stage.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
PET
Partial endothelial trepanation in addition to anterior lamellar keratoplasty.
The endothelium en Descemet are paracentrally and circular loosened, but some tissue bridges are left in place. This 'island' is able to mould to the healthy donor curvature.
PET
Partial Endothelial Trepanation in addition to an anterior lamellar keratoplasty
DALK
Conventional DALK grafting procedure where the Big Bubble technique is used according to Anwar et al.
DALK
Conventional DALK grafting procedure, with Big Bubble technique according to Anwar et al.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
PET
Partial Endothelial Trepanation in addition to an anterior lamellar keratoplasty
DALK
Conventional DALK grafting procedure, with Big Bubble technique according to Anwar et al.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* keratoconus as defined and classified by
* presence of corneal thinning and protrusion on slit-lamp examination
* topographic criteria according to KISA% index (\>100%)
* mean corneal curvature map
* decreased best corrected visual acuity due to corneal scarring or contact lens intolerance
Exclusion Criteria
* (localized) corneal thickness \< 200 µm
* associated corneal endothelial disease on specular microscopy as defined by:
* \<1500 endothelial cells per mm2
* polymegathism \> 0.3
* pleomorphism \< 0.6 (all are measurements of endothelial dysfunction)
* gross ophthalmic pathology surpassing keratoconus as cause of decreased visual acuity
* keratoconus-like disease (keratoglobus, pellucid marginal degeneration)
* associated corneal anomalies (microcornea, macrocornea, buphthalmos, Peters syndrome, ICE-syndrome etc.)
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Dr. F.P. Fischer-stichting, Utrecht, The Netherlands
UNKNOWN
UMC Utrecht
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
R.P.L. Wisse, MD
Ophthalmologist
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Allegonda Van der Lelij, MD PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
UMC Utrecht
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Amphia Ziekenhuis
Breda, , Netherlands
Westfries Gasthuis
Hoorn, , Netherlands
UMCN St. Radboud
Nijmegen, , Netherlands
Rotterdam Eye Hospital
Rotterdam, , Netherlands
University Medical Center Utrecht
Utrecht, , Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
30756.041.10
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id