PENTACON Trial: Partial ENdothelial Trepanation in Addition to Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty in keratoCONus

NCT ID: NCT01145937

Last Updated: 2015-12-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

14 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-03-31

Study Completion Date

2015-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Rationale:

Keratoconus is a progressive, non-inflammatory corneal disease in which irregular refractive properties of the cornea result in loss of visual acuity. Treatment is aimed at improving vision, principally using (rigid) contact lenses. With progression of the disease non-correctable refractive abnormalities and/or corneal scars arise. For these advanced stages of keratoconus, a corneal transplant is the only treatment modality.

New surgical grafting modalities have been developed to create partial thickness grafts, according to the location of corneal pathology. For keratoconus, transplanting only the anterior corneal lamellae lowers long-term graft rejection rates. We utilize a method to enhance the safety of the grafting procedure while better visual outcomes are expected.

Objective:

To investigate the additional value of partial endothelial trepanation (PET) in an anterior lamellar keratoplasty (ALKP) procedure in terms of efficacy and safety in patients with keratoconus.

Study design:

A randomized controlled interventional trial

Study population:

Patients over 18 years old with keratoconus in whom contact lens correction is unsuccessful and who are not suitable for corneal crosslinking.

Intervention:

Patients will be randomly assigned to corneal grafting techniques; partial endothelial trepanation in addition to an anterior lamellar keratoplasty (i.e. the PET group) or a regular ALKP procedure.

Study outcomes:

Risk of per-operative perforation. Secondary, factors contributing to treatment safety and efficacy.

Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness:

There is no extra burden or risk associated with participation in this study. All measurements are part of normal clinical practice. Adequate experience is available with both surgical techniques. Study participation has no effect on donor selection. If partial endothelial trepanation (PET) is associated with lower complication rates and better visual outcomes, this might be beneficial in terms of morbidity.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background:

Keratoconus is a progressive, non-inflammatory corneal disease in which irregular refractive properties of the cornea result in loss of visual acuity. Keratoconus usually arise in adolescence, is bilateral and has an estimated incidence of 1:2000. The aetiology of keratoconus is largely unknown, genetic predispositions are currently under investigation. Treatment is aimed at improving vision, principally using (rigid) contact lenses. With progression of the disease non-correctable refractive abnormalities and/or corneal scars arise. For these advanced stages of keratoconus, a corneal transplant is the only treatment modality.

The first corneal transplant for keratoconus was conducted in 1936 by Ramon Castroviejo in New York's Columbia Presbyterian Medical Centre. Ever since, corneal grafting is subject to many technical developments. For over 70 years, a technique is used in which a circular donor disc is cut with a trephine and sutured in a concordantly prepared recipient, called a perforating keratoplasty (PKP).

With the advent of refractive surgery in the years 1990, equipment appeared to split a cornea in horizontal lamellae. This made partial thickness grafting possible, tailoring grafts according to the nature and location of corneal pathology. For keratoconus, only the anterior part of the cornea needs to be transplanted. The posterior (endothelial) part is particularly involved in graft rejections. The chance of graft rejection decreases significantly when the patient's endothelium is left in place.

For keratoconus, this new treatment modality is called a deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK). The transplanted anterior corneal thickness is maximized, and the patient retains its own endothelium and Descemet membrane, owing to lower graft rejection rates and less secondary cataract formation.

The biggest drawback of a DALK procedure is the risk of inadvertent peroperative corneal perforation; the lamellae is cut to thick necessitating a conversion to a complete thickness graft similar to an regular PKP. To prevent inadvertent perforation, several techniques are described to dissect the stroma from the posterior lying Descemet membrane and corneal endothelium. Failure and perforation are described in 20-36% of cases though, leaving the patient with an inferior end product and leading to poor surgical predictability.

To circumvent this problem we utilize a method in which, in addition to a anterior lamellar keratoplasty (ALKP), a partial endothelial trepanation (PET) is performed. This technique was first performed by Massimo Busin, Villa Serena Hopsital, Forli, Italy. The endothelium en Descemet are paracentrally and circular loosened, but some tissue bridges are left in place. This 'island' is able to mould to the healthy donor curvature. By doing this, the surgeon can retain a safer graft thickness margin leading to a lowered number of preoperative perforations. The addition of PET is believed to make corneal grafting safer and more predictable.

Research statement/question To investigate the additional value of partial endothelial trepanation (PET) in a anterior lamellar keratoplasty (ALKP) procedure in terms of efficacy and safety in patients with keratoconus, compared in a randomized clinical trial with a regular ALKP procedure.

Primary outcome is:

• Peroperative corneal perforation;

Secondary study objectives are:

* Best corrected visual acuity one year post op;
* Manifest refraction one year post op;
* Contact lens use (soft/rigid/scleral) or spectacle use;
* Self-rated improvement questionnaire;
* Graft rejection rate;
* Corneal endothelial function one year post op;
* Correlation of DALK outcomes with atopic constitution.

Significance of this research:

The PENTACON trial is designed to answer questions on new treatment modalities for ophthalmic disease, especially keratoconus. Current available research describes various techniques for a lamellar approach of corneal grafting. Most literature concerns retrospective case series, susceptible to several forms of bias. With our prospective randomized approach we aim to supply more clinical relevant information, especially regarding the risk of inadvertent corneal perforation during surgery.

On theoretical grounds we presume that this new technique has even additional value for more progressive keratoconus patients. In early keratoconus visualization during surgery is generally not a big problem. In progressive keratoconus however, scarring occurs and the Descemet membrane underlying the conus behaves differently. We suppose these factors lead to the high corneal perforation rate of 20%. With partial endothelial trepanation larger safety margins can be used and the biggest gain is to be expected in the progressive keratoconus group.

We plan to store the removed patient corneas in the UMCU Biobank. With the enrollment of patients for our PENTACON trial we will gather a significant amount of keratoconus corneas. In the future, we plan to conduct genetic/histopathologic research on these corneas to achieve a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying ophthalmic disease. Currently, all our effort is projected on starting our treatment trial. These etiological questions will be assessed in a later stage.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Keratoconus

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

PET

Partial endothelial trepanation in addition to anterior lamellar keratoplasty.

The endothelium en Descemet are paracentrally and circular loosened, but some tissue bridges are left in place. This 'island' is able to mould to the healthy donor curvature.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

PET

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Partial Endothelial Trepanation in addition to an anterior lamellar keratoplasty

DALK

Conventional DALK grafting procedure where the Big Bubble technique is used according to Anwar et al.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

DALK

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Conventional DALK grafting procedure, with Big Bubble technique according to Anwar et al.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

PET

Partial Endothelial Trepanation in addition to an anterior lamellar keratoplasty

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

DALK

Conventional DALK grafting procedure, with Big Bubble technique according to Anwar et al.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Busin ALK

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* age equal or above 18 years
* keratoconus as defined and classified by

* presence of corneal thinning and protrusion on slit-lamp examination
* topographic criteria according to KISA% index (\>100%)
* mean corneal curvature map
* decreased best corrected visual acuity due to corneal scarring or contact lens intolerance

Exclusion Criteria

* prior corneal surgery, cross linking, refractive surgery or other treatment modalities
* (localized) corneal thickness \< 200 µm
* associated corneal endothelial disease on specular microscopy as defined by:

* \<1500 endothelial cells per mm2
* polymegathism \> 0.3
* pleomorphism \< 0.6 (all are measurements of endothelial dysfunction)
* gross ophthalmic pathology surpassing keratoconus as cause of decreased visual acuity
* keratoconus-like disease (keratoglobus, pellucid marginal degeneration)
* associated corneal anomalies (microcornea, macrocornea, buphthalmos, Peters syndrome, ICE-syndrome etc.)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Dr. F.P. Fischer-stichting, Utrecht, The Netherlands

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

UMC Utrecht

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

R.P.L. Wisse, MD

Ophthalmologist

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Allegonda Van der Lelij, MD PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

UMC Utrecht

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Amphia Ziekenhuis

Breda, , Netherlands

Site Status

Westfries Gasthuis

Hoorn, , Netherlands

Site Status

UMCN St. Radboud

Nijmegen, , Netherlands

Site Status

Rotterdam Eye Hospital

Rotterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

University Medical Center Utrecht

Utrecht, , Netherlands

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Netherlands

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

30756.041.10

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id