Study to Assess Brincidofovir Treatment of Serious Diseases or Conditions Caused by Double-stranded DNA Viruses

NCT ID: NCT01143181

Last Updated: 2021-08-12

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

210 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-12-31

Study Completion Date

2012-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This was a multicenter, open-label study of oral brincidofovir (BCV) treatment of serious disease or conditions caused by double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) virus(es). Subjects received either a weight-based or a fixed dose of oral BCV once weekly (QW) or twice weekly (BIW) for up to 3 months until clinical disease was resolved or stabilized and/or viral DNA by polymerase chain reaction testing was negative for 4 consecutive weeks, whichever was longer. Under the first protocol amendment, adults and adolescents (≥13 years) received 200 mg or 300 mg BCV BIW (not to exceed 4 mg/kg total weekly dose) depending on the difficulty of treating their disease (i.e., Group 1 or Group 2, respectively), and pediatric subjects (≤12 years) received 4 mg/kg BCV BIW. Under the second protocol amendment, adults and adolescents (≥13 years), regardless of viral infection/disease, had a maximum weekly dose of 200 mg, i.e., 200 mg QW or 100 mg BIW; not to exceed 4mg/kg total weekly dose. Pediatric subjects (≤12 years), regardless of viral infection/disease, had a maximum weekly dose of 4 mg/kg, i.e., 4 mg/kg QW or 2 mg/kg BIW; not to exceed 200 mg.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This was a multicenter, open-label study of oral brincidofovir (BCV) treatment of serious disease or conditions caused by double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) virus(es).

Subjects with a life-threatening or serious disease or condition caused by infection with any dsDNA virus(es), who met the protocol eligibility criteria and who were approved by the Chimerix Medical Monitor were enrolled in this open-label treatment study. During the course of the study, the viral disease indications were narrowed in Amendment 2 to cytomegalovirus, adenovirus, herpes simplex virus, vaccinia virus, variola virus, or monkeypox virus to focus on indications that were under study in controlled clinical trials of oral BCV and on viral disease with few, if any, options for treatment. However, subjects with other viral disease indications may have been enrolled with the approval of the Chimerix Medical Monitor.

Subjects received either a weight-based or a fixed dose of oral BCV once weekly (QW) or twice weekly (BIW) for up to 3 months until clinical disease was resolved or stabilized and/or viral DNA by polymerase chain reaction testing was negative for 4 consecutive weeks, whichever was longer. Subjects who met criteria for resolution of viral disease may have: 1) discontinued BCV; 2) reduced the dose or dosing frequency of BCV; or 3) continued BCV QW or BIW, depending on the investigator's assessment of the risk of relapse and following discussion with the Chimerix medical monitor.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Double-stranded DNA Virus

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Brincidofovir

Subjects received either a weight-based or a fixed-dose of oral brincidofovir (BCV) once weekly or twice weekly for up to 3 months until clinical disease was resolved or stabilized and/or viral DNA polymerase chain reaction testing was negative for 4 consecutive weeks, whichever was longer.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Brincidofovir

Intervention Type DRUG

Brincidofovir (BCV) was administered orally either once or twice weekly for up to 3 months. Treatment may have been extended for an additional 3 months depending a satisfactory review of safety parameters. Subjects could not receive more than a total of 6 months of treatment with BCV without prior approval.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Brincidofovir

Brincidofovir (BCV) was administered orally either once or twice weekly for up to 3 months. Treatment may have been extended for an additional 3 months depending a satisfactory review of safety parameters. Subjects could not receive more than a total of 6 months of treatment with BCV without prior approval.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

CMX001 BCV

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Had an immediately life-threatening or serious disease or condition caused by infection with a double-stranded DNA virus (including subjects with recurrent viral disease). \[Note: During the course of the study, the viral disease indications were narrow to focus on indications that were under study in controlled clinical trials of brincidofovir (BCV) and on viral diseases that had few, if any, options for treatment, including cytomegalovirus (CMV), adenovirus (AdV), herpes simplex virus (HSV), vaccinia virus (VAVC), variola virus (VARV) or monkeypox viruses(s).\]
2. Had a life expectancy of at least 2 weeks and commitment to continuation of supportive care for at least 4 weeks.
3. Were able to ingest and absorb oral medication (in the judgment of the investigator and based on lack of significant gastrointestinal \[GI\] pathology such as small bowel resection or ileus). \[Note: Use of total parenteral nutrition was not in and of itself exclusionary as long as the reason for use did not disqualify the subject based on this criterion.\]
4. Were willing and able to understand and provide written informed consent. \[Note: For minors or those incapable of providing written informed consent (i.e., incapacitated), consent was provided by a parent or legal guardian or representative who could understand and provide written informed consent.\]
5. Were willing and able, to the best of his or her (or parent/guardian) knowledge, to participate in all required study activities for the duration of the study.
6. If female of reproductive potential, agreed to use 2 acceptable methods of birth control throughout the study with at least 1 being a barrier method.
7. In the judgment of the investigator, subjects for whom no comparable or satisfactory therapeutic alternative was available

Exclusion Criteria

1. Were pregnant or currently nursing.
2. Had hypersensitivity to cidofovir or BCV.
3. Had a long-term prognosis that included a poor likelihood of survival due to irreversible organ failure including, for example, subjects with frank hepatic failure and adults with Grade 4 graft versus host disease of the GI tract.
4. Were eligible for enrollment and able to participate in a clinical trial evaluating BCV. \[Note: Per the FDA guidance, subjects eligible and able to participate in a controlled clinical study evaluating BCV were not eligible for participation in this study. Subjects who did not meet eligibility criteria for a controlled BCV clinical study or who were unable to participate because, for example, of logistical or other issues were eligible to participate in this study. The investigator verified that his/her subjects met this criterion on the Eligibility electronic case report form. A subject simply preferring enrollment in this study over a BCV controlled clinical trial did not qualify for enrollment in this study.\]
5. Had any other condition that would have, in the judgment of the investigator, put the subject at increased risk during participation in the study or interfered with the conduct of the study.
6. Had a serum total bilirubin value \>5 x the upper limit of normal reference range, taking into account the age and/or gender of the subject. \[Note: In order to avoid any unwarranted delay to the start of BCV treatment, compliance with this exclusion criterion may have been determined based on the results of testing performed at a local safety laboratory, rather than waiting for results from the designated central safety laboratory. If relying on local safety laboratory test results, the blood sample must have been collected no more than 7 days prior to the scheduled first dose administration on Day 0, otherwise it was repeated. A subject whose elevated bilirubin was due to the underlying viral disease may still have been enrolled into the study if the participation of the subject was prospectively approved by the Chimerix Medical Monitor.\]

Subjects with acute or chronic renal impairment, pediatric and adolescent subjects, and subjects aged 65 years and older were included in this study. Subjects with hepatic impairment were included unless the investigator judged that the subject had irreversible hepatic compromise.
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Jazz Pharmaceuticals

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Loma Linda University Hospital

Loma Linda, California, United States

Site Status

Children's Hospital of LA

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

UCLA Department of Medicine

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

CHOC Children's

Orange, California, United States

Site Status

Univeristy of San Francisco

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

Lucile Packard Children's Hospital

Stanford, California, United States

Site Status

Children's Hospital of Colorado

Aurora, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Children's National Medical Center

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

University of Chicago

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

University of Iowa

Iowa City, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Childrens Hospital LSU

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

NIH

Bethesda, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Tufts Medical Center

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Brigham and Womens Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

University of Michigan

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

University of Minnesota

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

St. Louis Children's Hospital

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

University of Nebraska Medical Center

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Hackensack University Medical Center

Hackensack, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Mt. Sinai

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Columbia University

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Institute

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Levine Children's Hospital Carolina Medical Center

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Duke University Medical Center

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Cincinnati Childrens Hospital

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Cleveland Clinic

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Nationwide Children's Hospital

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Oregon Health and Science University

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

UPMC

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Childrens Hospital of Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Cook Children's Medical Center

Fort Worth, Texas, United States

Site Status

UT MD Anderson Cancer Center

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Intermountain BMT program LDS Hospital

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

University of Washington-Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Medical College of Wisconsin

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Tippin TK, Morrison ME, Brundage TM, Mommeja-Marin H. Brincidofovir Is Not a Substrate for the Human Organic Anion Transporter 1: A Mechanistic Explanation for the Lack of Nephrotoxicity Observed in Clinical Studies. Ther Drug Monit. 2016 Dec;38(6):777-786. doi: 10.1097/FTD.0000000000000353.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 27851688 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CMX001-350

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.